Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors

To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.

• Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
• Offer a correction if possible.
• References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
• Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 16:46 on 22 July 2024) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
• Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
• Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems because this is not a talk page. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
• No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
• Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
• Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.

Administrators: Clear all reports

Errors in the summary of the featured article

Please do not remove this invisible timestamp. See WT:ERRORS and WP:SUBSCRIBE. - Dank (push to talk) 01:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Errors in "Did you know ..."

Current DYK

• ... that Zali Steggall, an independent member of the Parliament of Australia, is the country's most successful skier?

The "most successful" claim is not cited in the target article. It seems dubious because she only won one Olympic medal and it was just a bronze. Per Australia at the Winter Olympics, other skiers have won multiple medals including golds: Alisa Camplin, Lydia Lassila, Michael Milton (skier)... Andrew🐉(talk) 07:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

 Fixed – My apologies (I was involved in that); it's now referenced. Schwede66 07:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@Schwede66: That didn't really fix the issue IMHO, as the names mentioned by Andrew above seem to have had an objectively better career than Steggall, e.g. Camplin has a better record in the Olympics and the same record in the world championships. Whichever way you cook it, bring the "most successful" is a subjective thing that probably doesn't meet DYK's "definite fact" criterion and would certainly need to be very widely attested. I've amended the hook to say simply that she won an Olympic medal, which maybe is still an interesting achievement for a politician and maybe hooky enough... If not then we might just have to consider pulling and replacing.  — Amakuru (talk) 09:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

I admit that I did not check Andrew's individual articles. All I did was provide a reference for the hook fact. BTW, you will recall that I very much support putting a stop to "first" and other superlative hooks unless we have a rock-solid source, but there's unfortunately no consensus for it. Schwede66 09:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

And now that I have looked at those other bios, I wonder what the Sport Australia Hall of Fame people are on about. By which definition could you possibly arrive at the conclusion that Steggall is the "most successful international skier"? Schwede66 09:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Indeed! It's rather bizarre. Re first/most of the hooks, I think we already have an unofficial convention that they need fairly rigorous sourcing. If I come across these in my sets I usually do a fairly thorough check and flag it if I think the sourcing isn't very strong.  — Amakuru (talk) 09:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Sure. But you'd think that a Sports hall of fame has a good handle on their athletes. Schwede66 09:38, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

"... is an Olympic skiing medallist"? That's sufficiently hooky for a member of Parliament, especially an Australian. Black Kite (talk) 10:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Agreed. I’ve implemented that. Schwede66 11:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Errors in the summary of the featured list

Friday's FL

(July 26)

Monday's FL

(July 22, today)

Errors in the summary of the featured picture

Notice to administrators: When fixing POTD errors, please update the corresponding regular version (i.e. without "protected" in the page title) in addition to the Main Page version linked below.

Any other Main Page errors

Please report any such problems or suggestions for improvement at the General discussion section of Talk:Main Page.