Hello, Gianluigi02, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to List of terrorist incidents in August 2016. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I noticed your recent edit to German consulate in Mazar-i-Sharif attack does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! 220ofBorg12:49, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Gianluigi02. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
I notice you are doing some edits on the January 2017 article recently, but are not using the proper referencing. Please see the talk page discussion on that article, which includes an easy and short template that you can use for the references. I personally fixed all of them yesterday, and now I see new incidents are being added without the right referencing, so please take a moment to read the talk section, and use the proper tags in the future. Thanks! Skycycle (talk) 00:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am posting this again - you continue to use poor English, poor referencing, and poor attribution while editing the article. Please respond to this, because the next step will be to either up the protection of the article, or request a block for your account. Skycycle (talk) 15:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Marseille melee attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. st170e14:54, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2016 Ouagadougou attacks into Insurgency in the Maghreb (2002–present). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa🍁 (talk) 21:38, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Gianluigi02, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Operation Ghazi have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. sami talk18:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT14:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of terrorist incidents in April 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Borno. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I reverted your edits as the source states: "German prosecutors" said that he had "likely" ties to Islamic terrorism. The same source says though... "Investigators have however not found any indications suggesting that he was a member of jihadist groups like the Islamic State organisation." In other words it is not confirmed or proven yet. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (List of terrorist incidents in September 2017) has been reviewed!
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/January 2017 Baghdad bombings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Ninja5 Empire (Talk)03:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Gianluigi02. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi Gianluigi02, Happy new year! I just looked at the source. It actually says the bombing took place on Sunday - that makes it a December 2017 event. It was just reported on 1 Jan.pseudonymJake Brockmantalk09:48, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Anaxial (talk) 21:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nick Moyes (talk) 13:04, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Anthony Cruz (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.allmusic.com/artist/anthony-cruz-mn0000580016/biography. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 23:18, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Gianluigi02. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia.
I'm sorry, but Anthony Cruz (singer) has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G12. Wikipedia is the world's largest free content encyclopedia. As such, it cannot contain content copyrighted elsewhere. Such content must be completely rewritten and reformatted from scratch. Content published elsewhere copied into Wikipedia must state that it is public domain, licensed under the GFDL, or a creative commons license. Cheers, and happy editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Razer(talk) 16:28, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Alessandro Leogrande) has been reviewed!
Wikipedia editor Glane23 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
You've made a good start - can you add more references? I found several books and many articles about Sgr. Leogrande in a Google search, most of which are in Italian. Perhaps you can find suitable references among those or elsewhere. Good luck and thank you for the article.
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Ten people were injured in a car crash in Wadiya. N
Ten people are injured in a car crash in Wadiya. Y
Use words instead of numbers when the number is in the beginning of the sentence:
30 people have gone missing after Hurricane Aladeen makes landfall in Wadiya. N
Thirty people have gone missing after Hurricane Aladeen makes landfall in Wadiya. Y
Common exceptions:
Describing a past event as the opening sentence will not require present-tenses, but past-tenses.
If the number at the beginning of a sentence is exceedingly high (i.e. over 100), attempt to paraphrase it and include it some where else in the sentence so it can be written as its numerical value.
Hello, Gianluigi02. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanks for creating this article regarding the Indonesian celebrity who was killed in the 2018 Sunda Strait tsunami. Abishe (talk) 09:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Francesco Amendolagine, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Snickers2686 (talk) 16:37, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Enrique Álvarez Conde, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. SSSB (talk) 11:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions18:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for creating Renzo Patria! I edit here too, under the username Eagleash and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Page does not show that he complies with WP:NPOL (no indication of any elected position) or WP:GNG. See those pages for more information
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Eagleash}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Jorge Brovetto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 99.53.112.186 (talk) 15:19, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I've had to revert your good faith edits regarding the disappearance of some of the Kyoto Animation employees because you have been listing unreliable sources or sources that do not mention the disappearance of specific staff members. Please wait until official reports are released to avoid misinformation. Thanks! lullabying (talk) 17:44, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Eisaku Kawanami, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk)06:34, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Copying the entry from ANN does not establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eisaku Kawanami and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eisaku Kawanami, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Gianluigi02!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:44, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently no rush to make articles for any animators that have disappeared, especially when the articles you have created are lacking in citations. lullabying (talk) 15:50, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikiko Watanabe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HurricaneGeek2002 (talk) 11:02, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:07, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Inclusion criteria for List of terrorist incidents in X
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.
But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kingsif}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 The Hague stabbing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WWGB (talk) 00:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Eisaku Kawanami, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
On the first of January 2020 at around 13:00 o'clock, a Bulgarian mathematician, named Hristo Lesov( Христо Лесов in bulgarian), passed away due to an illness. He was a Maths teacher in Kazanlak at PPMG "Nikola Obreshkov". Please, if you can, add him to the list of people that have died in the year 2020. Toonbk201 (talk) 22:13, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Vittorio Fusari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.identitagolose.com/sito/en/6/4598/chef/vittorio.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ミラP02:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Beh,allora..ciao!Vedo che sei ,come me,ateo e politicamente di sinistra.Mi ritengo socialdemocratico, credo fortemente al liberalismo sociale e condivido molte posizoni dei Radicali. VBra02 (talk) 19:27, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
You should stop reverting my proved edit. You can't simply revert my proven edit without proving your point. Repetitive edit-war will cause to a vandalism report. --A11w1ss3nd (talk) 21:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Hi. Please make a note that the old icon template e.g. {{it icon}} has now been deleted and will not work in pages such as Deaths in 2020. The template e.g. {{in lang|it}} should now be used instead. Thanks. Ref(chew)(do)13:35, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You mind telling me why you just straight up invented some inflammatory BS to throw onto the current news window? I checked the article, at no point did it say this, so you clearly weren't just using a version that was updated. 74.90.120.94 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It happens. Just gotta be careful with this kind of thing. This is a contentious topic and there are definitely a lot more people out there who'd react to this kind of thing far more disproportionately than I 74.90.120.94 (talk) 06:28, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 shootings of Oakland police officers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kadzi (talk) 13:14, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!03:41, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am just in process of initiating encyclopedic article Draft:Ex-Muslims. Please do have a look. If topic interests you then do contribute towards expansion of the Draft:Ex-Muslims.
2020 Villejuif stabbing: Neither the cited source nor the article confirm that this is Islamic terrorism. Judging by the text, it seems like the investigation is ongoing.
2020 Streatham stabbing: That the attacker "expressed Islamic extremist views" is not sufficient for inclusion. We need official sources that call it Islamic terrorism.
2020 Romans-sur-Isère knife attack: When a living person has been charged with terrorist crimes but not (yet) been convicted thereof, referring to them as a terrorist is a serious WP:BLPCRIME violation as well as potentially libellous. For much the same reason, we can't include the attack on this list; Wikipedia's editors must not do the court's job of determining whether the suspect is guilty and of what, and deciding on our own that this was terrorism would be doing precisely that.
With regardes to the attack in Colombes: same thing as above, WP:BLPCRIME.
2020 Reading stabbing: Similar WP:BLPCRIME issues as above, except here the suspect has not even been charged with terrorist crimes but strictly murder and attempted murder. Where are we getting "terrorism" (let alone Islamic terrorism) from?
With regards to the attack in Berlin: that somebody "expressed Islamic extremist views" is not sufficient for inclusion. We need official sources that call it Islamic terrorism.
You didn't add any source for the attack in Berlin.
With regards to the attack in Morges: if it is necessary to qualify it as a suspected jihadist attack, it doesn't belong on the list. The cited source also makes it clear that it is not confirmed whether it is a case of terrorism or not.
The only attack with WP:INTEXT attribution (as mandated by MOS:TERRORIST) is the Charlie Hebdo one, but the cited source in that instance does not actually contain this information.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, 2020 Quebec City stabbing, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Quebec City stabbing. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Arif (Indonesian politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Reading stabbings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twin Towers.
An article you recently created, Norma (comic artist), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969TT me15:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Gianluigi02, I have changed the total number of casualties to the number reported by the Washington Post, Rudaw is a regional media from Kurdistan/Kurdish language. Wasshinton Post is more Reliable by far in Wikipedia standards. Also there are no more sources backing that "13 wounded" claim.Mr.User200 (talk) 18:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Gianluigi02, first of all please ping me if you want to read me this. Reuters said that they are referring to a human rights group as already mentioned on the articles talk page. Please do not add further additions without raising consense on the articles talk page, thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Gianluigi02, as noted a couple of hours before please participate the talk page Discussion before adding once again unconfirmed number of deaths. All given sources are WP:RS but these explicitly do NOT confirm the number of deaths. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:11, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Renato Romano requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renato Romano. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕16:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, please do not add "confirmed deads" again like here [4] w/o citing a WP:RS and seeking consensus on the talk page. Please take notice of WP:ADVOCACY, Reuters always do cites witnesses and local media, those are by nature "not confirmed deads". I would also appreciate if you bundle your edits from 8-12 each time to 1 or 2. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Stanislaw Wolski, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969TT me16:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Gianluigi, pardon me for not reading the previous day's events this morning. I kept up until the late night but didn't check this morning. Again, pardon me. I am not discrediting your adding of that. It's highly valuable. It was just me not checking. Best regards. --CoryGlee (talk) 11:13, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Foutouri attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
No, I'm removing the fact that the children were killed by Palestinian rockets. That is not a confirmed fact. The Israelis and the Palestinians accused each other for the childrens' deaths. You belive that the Palestinians killed them. I belive that the Israelis killed them. But we should not add what belive what is true, but facts. Ten children are dead, and we should add it, without any blaming, because we don't who really carried out it. Or at least, I belive a thing and you belive another, but again, we are not here adding what we belive. Gianluigi02 (talk) 20:22, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed your recent edit to 2021 Israel–Palestine crisis does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! AllegedlyHuman (talk) 22:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I’m Israeli
Some of the information isn’t true..
9 deaths and 500+ wounded
And in Gaza 100 of the deaths were actually terrorists
It’s important to mention that Hamas sent 1800 rockets to Israel and 300 lended in Gaza, so Israel didn’t kill innocent children. The IDF tells them to leave they just don’t...
The rockets I’m getting on a daily basis are war crimes.! Israel hasn’t done any war crimes.!
I’m currently sitting in a bomb shelter, in fear. And yes, it’s not Gaza, it’s Israel. Israel is under attack.
And the media is only showing one side and people are stupid enough to believe that. Seagull2000 (talk) 14:46, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There are 31 children confirmed dead and that's a fact. People who are dying in Israel are innocent victims too, like all the dozens of civilians that are dying in Palestine. Gianluigi02 (talk) 18:39, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the majority of the media are showing just the israeli side, like if Israel is right. No, you in Israel are not in the right position. 125+ people are dead in Palestine, and the majority are civilians. 31 children, several women civilians, farmers at their farm, people in cars in streets. Civilians are dying, and I report that. Gianluigi02 (talk) 20:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:05, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:06, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Mohammed Naji (actor), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 22:52, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Mass deletions of relevant detail from Islamic terrorism in Europe
Hi, I wonder if you could help out with these edits? IMO, removing material calling it "excessiv" or "not needed" etecetera is just a variation of WP:IDONTLIKEIT over at the Islamic terrorism in Europe article. What do you think? Imo the detail is relevant to the topic at hand and comes from reliable sources. I re-added the material but was simply ignored by the deletors. A Thousand Words (talk) 14:41, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Villejuif stabbing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
An article you recently created, Zhan Melnykov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969TT me15:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Fedja Rupel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969TT me15:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. In Deaths in 2021, you are repeatedly changing Kazakhstani (the broad demonym covering unconfirmed Kazakh ethnics and those who are not of Kazakh descent but still citizens of the country) to read as though the deceased subject, Yevgeni Pupkov, is a known and confirmed ethnic Kazakh. His article, nor multiple sources, say nothing of the kind. If in doubt he has to be Kazakhstani, to cover the broader mix within the populace. (I've twice asked you to enter a reason in the edit summary box when making that change, and you've not.) Ref(chew)(do)18:15, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Sergio Agnoli, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 21:18, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Daniele Sasson, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969TT me02:40, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This edit didn't provide any sources. The current floods in Hubei are mostly unrelated to the 2021 Henan floods, the latter were caused by rainfalls in the last week of July, the former due to rains this week. They are also 500 km apart. [9]Here you are changing the topic of the entire page. You are free to add this content to 2021 China floods#Hubei or make a new article 2021 Hubei floods. Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 10:26, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stanislaw Wolski, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
If there is contradicting information from various sources, don't remove information from one source unilaterally like you did at 2021 Kabul airport attack. Instead add it alongside. We don't pick and choose who to trust. I'll be reverting you tomorrow if you don't self-revert. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 12:15, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You've also inserted wrong information like the people who were killed were inside the vehicle or the death toll was higher because passersby may have been hit in the aftermath of the strike. That's not even in the sources so I edited it and added what the sources actually mean, as it doesn't count as a revert. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 12:28, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
1. This is in the CNN source: "Nine members of one family -- including six children -- were killed in a US drone strike targeting a vehicle in a residential neighborhood of Kabul". If it is written in this way, it seems like if they were all in the vehicle.
2. Yes, the death toll is suspected to be higher as people near the incident are suspected of being hit too. Gianluigi02 (talk) 12:31, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't mean they were inside the vehicle, besides people can be killed from shrapnel and explosions even if outside. Also where does the source state the people nearby are suspected to be hit? LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 12:35, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not saying that they were necessarly inside the vehicle, but that is what I understood reading the article.
This is from the same CNN source: One man told a journalist working with CNN who visited the compound that "a rocket hit and six people were in there who have been killed. There was a car inside." The journalist was not allowed to enter the compound.Another man said that he heard the sound of a rocket and gained access to the scene from a neighbor's house."First we managed to remove a 3- to 4-year old child. The fire and smoke had engulfed the whole area," he said.He added that "three people were inside the car" and three others were outside the car. The injured, who included children, were taken to the hospital, he said."
Also it states "there might have been up to 20 people killed in the strike." But where does it claim "passer-bys were impacted"? Please don't put up your own interpertration. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 12:40, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
a tip: when you notice incorrect information, do not lecture. I've corrected a lot of wrong informations over the years, but I've never lectured any user. Mistakes and wrong misunderstandings happen to everyone. Change the informations without taking it too long. Gianluigi02 (talk) 12:40, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jens Büchner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Hi, I noticed too late that I misread your edits regarding the 17 October Revolution in Lebanon, I thought it was a call for a future protest on Oct 17 2021. My bad, sorry for reverting them. Fbergo (talk) 15:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My name is Lara Yang, and I am a PhD student in Organizational Behavior at Stanford University. As a part of a research study to better understand work dynamics on Wikipedia, our research team is currently conducting interviews with Wikipedians. Because you are an active editor on Wikipedia, we would love to learn more about your work and hear your perspective on how Wikipedia, and open-source communities in general, function to produce and organize high-quality knowledge. We have done our best to learn about the dynamics of collaboration on Wikipedia from secondary sources, which we are hoping to complement with your invaluable first-hand insights.
The interview will take around 45 minutes and be semi-structured in format. Any identifying information in your responses will be kept strictly confidential, and will not be disclosed in the analysis nor the research paper. If you are interested in participating, please email us via the 'Email this user' tool on my user page and suggest a few time slots in the upcoming weeks that work best for you. We will do our best to accommodate your schedule. Should you have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to let us know. We look forward to hearing from you.
Hi Gianluigi02, thanks for your quick response! We prefer to conduct the interview over Zoom to allow for elaborations of questions and answers, but if you prefer, we can also send you a list of interview questions which you can then respond in writing as well. Let me know what works best for you. Thanks! Wanderingpotato (talk) 02:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Gianluigi02:, I've seen you do this a few times so I'm going to pull you up on it. It's very important that we only record information based on what facts are available. If no date of death is specified within a news piece, then please do not add it into a subject's article. Thanks --Jkaharper (talk) 11:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, 2021 English Channel migrant shipwreck, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at November 2021 English Channel disaster. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mohammed Naji (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zhan Melnykov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fedja Rupel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sergio Agnoli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alibi perfetto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniele Sasson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB (talk) 00:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magomed Tushayev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hi there. Please be aware of MOS:OVERLINK which says to not link "names of subjects with which most readers will be at least somewhat familiar", for example countries like Germany, Italy, etc. I have removed a link at Chris Pfeiffer. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:47, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like you have done a lot of editing on this article and I'm hoping you can check out some recent edits to the page and see what you think. Thanks, in advance, for giving this article a quick review. LizRead!Talk!17:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Ferrer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to 2022 Paris shooting, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. TompaDompa (talk) 14:56, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, Alfredo Cerruti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UtherSRG(talk)01:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 Murcia ramming attack, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hello, Gianluigi02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alfredo Cerruti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Madrid explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Hello, I'm AryKun. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AryKun (talk) 19:31, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi. Please stop throwing in "suspected" and "possible" causes of death which have no apparent reliable sources to back them up. If you have found a reliable source, simply enter the URL into the edit summary so we all know. Thanks. Ref(chew)(do)16:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I'm The Kip. Your recent edit(s) to the page Portal:Current events/2024 February 16 appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The Al-Arabiya article cited doesn't mention anything about settlers, especially given the attack was in Israel proper and not the occupied West Bank. TheKip05:35, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Don't make a habit of deleting Times of Israel sources and calling Israelis "settlers", especially while also totally removing the attackers' nationality. This is starting to look like a pattern, as indicated by the three messages above me. In particular, previously calling Israeli victims of an attack in Israel "settlers" without a source and deleting the ToI source for that attack, and previously deleting the Hamas data center UNRWA entry as "propaganda" or something, despite it being widespread news. This is a contentious topic and we don't need more contentious edits. JM (talk) 19:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
the shooting happened in Ma'ale Adumim, an illegal settlment in the West Bank, which is occupied. You removed those informations. Want to talk about that? Or just of what you care? Gianluigi02 (talk) 20:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I removed irrelevant inforation (that's it's an "illegal settlement", that victims are allegedly "settlers") and restored the original source, which you removed for some reason (the second entry from which you've removed the ToI and replaced it with another, lower-quality source), as well as restored that the attackers were Palestinians, which you removed without removing the fact that the victims were Israelis, in fact you made it more specific, calling them "settlers" (also the second entry you've done that to) and linking to not persons, but settlements.
Neither source, not even the one you added, calls them settlers, but both call the attackers Palestinians. Neither source calls the settlement illegal. That's what matters.
The entry should read, and read when I was done with it, that Israelis were attacked by Palestinians in a terrorist attack, which is the same that we would say in reverse. If there was an entry on an Israeli attack on Palestinians, would you exclude the fact that the attackers are Israeli? When I was done with it, it was the least biased possible blurb. I even compromised and left in your source that you added (which I did previously on another entry as well), as well as your spelling change to the name of the location.
I didn't come here to argue with you, and I don't want to argue with you; I came here to give a dispassionate alert. Which is the fourth you have recieved in ten days.
Copyrighted text added again. Please stop: Wikipedia cannot host copyrighted contents for legal reasons, and you've been warned about this a few times already. Wikishovel (talk) 09:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on 2023 DRC anti-MONUSCO protests requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://m.famousfix.com/topic/2023-drc-anti-monusco-protests. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BilledMammal (talk) 08:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Raúl Padilla López requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://edurank.org/uni/university-of-guadalajara/alumni/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BilledMammal (talk) 08:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Edrissa Marong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://standard.gm/long-distance-runner-edrissa-marong-dies/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BilledMammal (talk) 08:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernesto Wong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
On 7 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Walid Daqqa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Walid Daqqa wrote several works of prison literature, including a children's novel about a boy who uses magical olive oil to visit his imprisoned father? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Walid Daqqa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Walid Daqqa), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021 Ravanusa explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.
Gianluigi02, rather than readding your comment with additional commentary, it would be helpful if you could make mention of what reliable sources are calling this event. We don't make decisions based on our personal opinions, regardless of how valid they are, but based upon what the sources say. I think you already know this – I am simply offering a reminder. – bradv13:44, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for contributing to the article Portal:Current events/2024 August 7. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. The Cradle is a deprecated source. TheKip(contribs)17:06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Gianluigi02, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Samer al-Hajj, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samer al-Hajj.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
The sources are reporting that ISIS claimed responsibility. The fact that a terrorist group has claimed responsibility for an attack or any other action it does not automatically mean that they are actually behind it. Remember that ISIS also claimed responsibility for the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, which turned out to be a false and opportunistic claim. Gianluigi02 (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair points but the attacker has claimed to be a ISIS perp let’s countinue the discussion the the actual talk page of the article John Bois (talk) 08:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The suspect adimitted that he was the perpetrator, not that he is a member of ISIS. And even if he did, it requires further evidence that will be confirmed or refuted over time. Numerous ISIS-inspired lone wolves have carried out attacks in Europe in the past, for which ISIS claimed responsibility. Even in that case it is incorrect to say that ISIS carried out the attacks if it was not aware of their preparation. Lone wolves, although they may refer to an organization or an idea, still operate on their own. And this attack in Germany seems more like the work of a lone wolf. Gianluigi02 (talk) 08:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have more experience on Wikipedia so I’m not going to argue with your points but the way the news is saying it seems more then confirmed it was ISIS not to mention they operate in Syria were the attacker is from but I do see this how this can be speculation but I still would like see opinions from other editors
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
...with the personal commentary and generally non-constructive behavior at the Current Events portal, as illustrated by various notices above. Between the POV terms used often and unreliable sources used on occasion, it's becoming tedious cleaning it all up. TheKip(contribs)06:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gianluigi02 The attack itself happening and killing three people is a fact, but referring to it in Wikivoice as a “military aggression” and “murder” is the type of POV commentary we don’t do here and for which you’ve been warned before. The use of unreliable sources such as The Cradle and live blogs is also problematic. TheKip(contribs)16:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Deaths in 2024, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TheWikipede (talk) 08:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the WP:ARBPIA topic area, editors are only allowed to make a single revert within a 24 hour period.
You have made around a dozen. Please self-revert all that you can to bring yourself back into compliance, and please be more careful in the future. Your reverts include, but aren't limited to:
There also appears to be an element of WP:POVPUSHING here, given how your focus differs significantly from the focus of reliable sources; please also be careful to follow reliable sources in the future when determining which aspects to give the most weight. BilledMammal (talk) 13:41, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I added facts which were removed for no reason. Of course I will re-add them, even a hundred of times, as I'm adding relevant facts to the topic. Gianluigi02 (talk) 13:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
To enforce an arbitration decision, and for edit warring, 1RR violation, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes"). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
Hello, I'm Parsley Man. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of terrorist incidents in July 2016 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Parsley Man (talk) 00:33, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of terrorist incidents in October 2016, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. No sources for these being terrorist attacks, and we would need official sources, not just newspapers Doug Weller talk 16:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to German consulate in Mazar-i-Sharif attack. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! 220 of Borg 12:49, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of terrorist incidents in December 2016. Psychonaut (talk) 20:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Gianluigi02, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Operation Ghazi have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:2019 Sri Lanka Easter bombings#Urgent: Tell Twitter and YouTube to remove these accounts that belong to the perpetrators of the attacks. 2600:1700:BBD0:8050:796A:F7DB:EFDF:F2A6 (talk) 05:35, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2021 Israel–Palestine crisis, you may be blocked from editing. You cannot simply change a sourced detail without an updated reliable source as you did here: [5] or delete details or a source without explanation as you did here: [6] and [7] and [8]. And leave edit summaries to explain your changes. Thank you --Chefallen (talk) 00:58, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (Prodecural notification, I did not open the discussion)-- Asartea Talk | Contribs 12:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics.