User:TParis/Dashboard
USER PAGE | TALK PAGE | CONTRIBUTIONS | AWARDS | DASHBOARD | RECALL | MOTIVES | POLITICS | RTRC |
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 128.187.116.8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1174 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1174, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:1c2:81:ab70:6408:a1c2:f3af:5447 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- 95.44.81.147 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Micky van de Ven was changed by 95.44.81.147 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942501 on 2025-01-17T23:28:11+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 23:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- BigZaddy223 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Millertime97 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) User continued to add unsourced context on 2025 NASCAR Xfinity Series, which has a hidden note saying not to add it unless there is proper source, it's the user only edits. MysticCipher87(alt-account) (talk) 22:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. TigerShark (talk) 23:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Elliesmith83636 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic High School (Guelph) (diff): vandalism after final warning. Onorem (talk) 23:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- OmartheIdiot77 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Sjö (talk) 12:43, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- ExclusiveEditor (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Usernames that imply that the account has explicit ownership of certain articles, content, or topic areas, or that they have any kind of "power", "command", "control", or "authority" over other editors, or that a different level of accountability and application of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines should be enforced (such as implying that certain policies do not apply to them). QueerEcofeminist🌈 20:00, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. That's a stretch. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Quite a stretch if you factor in that they have nearly 7,000 edits and have been using this name without incident for almost exactly four years. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 21:07, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. That's a stretch. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 20:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Verner Fixings (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See the userpage. Johnj1995 (talk) 23:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content increased by IP users. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 01:31, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:58, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor is disrupting article with POV and modern politics. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 02:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/A-I. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent removal of sourced materials by various South Korean IPs. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: user after being blocked, created new account and now continues to disrupt article. Adrikshit (talk) 11:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:58, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: Mirzapurawadh (talk · contribs) blocked by Girth Summit. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:09, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs persisting in changing the name of the island back to its defunct old name. GraziePrego (talk) 12:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Question: What is the WP:COMMONNAME of the island? Lectonar (talk) 12:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @GraziePrego: Please see above question. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced information BlameRuiner (talk) 14:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: BLP who is getting recent attention for criticizing US support of the Israel-Hamas war during a press conference and being dragged out. There have been multiple IP vandalism attempts [1] [2] [3] in the past 12 hours. 🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- This seems to be primarily coming from one IP who has not vandalized after their most recent warning. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:09, 17 January 2025 (UTC) - Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/AP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism, false claims. It's Berlusconi's private network. gtp (talk) 15:42, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism on this BLP since 05:14, 2 January 2025. Alith Anar 19:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The last couple days on this page look like a vandalism free-for-all. I'm not sure what's happening with this particular article, but counter-vandalism isn't winning. Perhaps a few days of protection until it passes?. Mlkj (talk) 20:27, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:20, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- List of amendments to the Constitution of the United States (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – presidents cannot unilaterally declare constitutional amendments: see recent edits. Will120 (talk) 20:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: add semi protection Filmijhankar (talk) 21:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 21:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 (talk) 22:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs being WP:SNEAKY with credits. Skywatcher68 (talk) 23:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content regarding a transfer which has not been completed yet. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism and name changing, as can be seen in the edit history Surayeproject3 (talk) 23:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Add “by June 30, 2024” to the sentence: The Lancet has estimated 70,000 deaths due to traumatic injuries.[8] Seahumidity (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request that... (the status section for the front page should be labeled as “ceasefire” until the ceasefire ends. This is in accordance with the recently-reached agreement.) . LordOfWalruses (talk) 04:55, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:02, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
9 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed. Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required. Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights - I had it in the past and honestly didn’t realise it was missing until I did a requested move today and the DAB I created had to get manually patrolled. Could I please have this back so as to not add work to others when I’m doing moves related work? Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 13:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting autopatrolled rights because I want to minimize the backlog of new page. As an active member of New Page Patrol, I am also participating in the January Backlog Drive 2024 and I am familiar with the guidelines here on Wikipedia like WP:POLICY, WP:COPYRIGHT, WP:PROOF and WP:GNG. While I have only created 11 articles so far, they include several BLPs and meet Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I understand that the typical requirement is 50 articles, but I hope my demonstrated understanding the guidelines and my contributions on NPP reviewer can be considered as autropatrolled status. Royiswariii Talk! 05:45, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit] |
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
---|
Confirmed[edit] |
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights Some pages have ridiculous permissions, and i would like to be able to edit them to legitimately make wikipedia better IDK how to read (talk) 18:16, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights 32rf (talk) 22:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC) I want to edit pages that I have edited before, but since had the extended conformation lock due to vandalism or something.
|
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I request renewal of the rights to continue supporting the project effectively.tanks Mohammadkazemm (talk) 15:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
I am editing Wikipedia since 10 months and i had created dozens of articles and also participated in deletion discussions and also nominated some articles for AfD and most of them got deleted. Also i exapanded some articles of stub category and my area of interest are Politics, Rajasthan, BLPs, settlement articles, etc. Now i want to work with other editors on New page reviewing and i am requesting for a one month rights, firstly as a trial. TheSlumPanda (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Hey, I would like to apply for the NPR rights. As I have created more than 50 pages and I'm actively involved in reviewing drafts since last week of December 2024, you can check my reviewed articles here and the articles I putted up for deletion can be seen here. My primary focus are the articles related to Women, Politics, India, Poetry, Writers and Indian activists. I do sometime revert bad faith edits. I will contribute to the Wikipedia with NPR rights, same as I have contributed through the AFC Reviewer rights. Thanks and Regards. Taabii (talk) 12:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
As a wikipedia contributor, I have created several wikipedia articles and committed several edits to improve the wikipedia articles. I would love to contribute as a New page reviewer and it will help me to expand my contributions to Wikipedia. Ensconce (talk) 22:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover[edit]
Have participated in handful of RMs in past year, as well as at MRV. I've only come to RMTR once, but otherwise would be useful for disambiguation purposes. As I often create the disambig first, in order to justify a page moving away from ptopic; this often leaves me with having to swap the disambig page with the redirect and visa versa afterwards, when I simply need to perform a swap. I've otherwise closed RMs before, and would probably close more that aren't too controversial, but am often restricted due to the need to overwrite a redirect. CNC (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
I've been requesting occasional, regular and errant page moves at RMTR ever since I either created this account or achieved the extended-confirmed threshold. After 30 months of existence and persistence and in this new year, I'm ready to take the next step and have this right for a start as I can have an impact on this encyclopaedia. Intrisit (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Over time, I have made numerous move proposals on talk pages. Sometimes I don't get a reply from other editors and I bring it to WP:RM/TR. Other times, an administrator notices the proposal and implements it. Some of these could probably have been undiscussed bold moves and not required discussion at all. All of them are impossible without the page mover permission because they would overwrite a redirect. I'd rather save y'all the trouble of reviewing and do them myself. I've made 269 page moves and 22 edits at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. I was granted this permission once before, but it expired. Daask (talk) 21:30, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to have the page mover rights, I know how page movement works and the rules regarding page movements. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC) SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
I have had the flag for a long time until I decided to have it removed recently. It appears that file-mover right doesn't have the required redirect-suppression right, and as such some file renames where I have to suppress the redirect, leave behind a redirect with a CSD tag - which I find odd as it adds to the load of admins. I am aware of the relevant polices and would like to have the flag back. Thanks. Regards, Aafi (talk) 07:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC) Regards, Aafi (talk) 07:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Hello I'm Ampil. The right set to expire 7 days. I've received a award. and I'm a AfC reviewer. ~🌀 Ampil 「💬 / 📝」 04:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Requesting pending changes reviewer rights to assist in recent changes patrol, am very active on the English Wikipedia and have good knowledge of Vandalism policy and other basic content policies. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Well, I'm requesting this right to protect Wikipedia from Vandals. By the way the 1 of the 2 revisions (both not accepted) in Curry was unaccepted without any reason and other maybe due to some misunderstanding by the reviewer of the WP:NOINDICSCRIPT & both were good faith.Although I am look as a newcomer, but this is a clean start account. If there is any other objection, I'll try to be explainable for it. Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback[edit]
Hello everyone. I would like to request rollback rights here. I have a long and controversial history on the English Wikipedia but hope that especially in recent years, I have proved as to other editors, as well to the administrators, a positive change in my editorial behavior. I myself, don't forgive and don't forget my mistakes, but believe that with my experience and knowledge on the Macedonian issue, I will be useful in the fight against vandalism in this complicated question. Even though I'm worried, I remember Matthew 7:7-8: “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened." Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 09:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback rights for the ability to use a tool-assisted diff viewer, either huggle or meta:SWViewer. I have a lot of experience doing recent changes patrolling and fighting vandals and am interested in doing so with the semi-automated tools available. I have read the policy for using rollback and always warn users when reverting their edits. cyberdog958Talk 10:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I've been editing Wikipedia for about a year, with more active contributions over the past 5-6 months. i edited over 1000 edits and made some pages as well. During this time, I've frequently reverted vandalism and unconstructive edits and have become familiar with handling such challenges. While I’m still learning some aspects of Wikipedia policies, I feel that rollback rights would help me revert vandalism and const. edits more efficiently, especially when i have to do repeated cases. I’m committed to using these rights responsibly to maintain the quality of Wikipedia. Much Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 03:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I've been editing for half an year (less than others I know) and have amassed a total of 1600 edits, with about half of those being in mainspace. I have patrolled recent changes for a while, and have been adequately warning users since I learned about Twinkle. Note that the block I have received was a self-block to study for finals. I want rollback permissions in order to use tools such as Huggle effectively. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 20:12, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I am requesting this permission in order to fight vandalism in a faster and more efficient manner, when I encounter it in my work here (with this being one of the worst examples I've seen so far). If granted, I intend to use it responsibly (and just occasionally – when needed), in the same way as I am using other permissions that were granted to me so far. Of course, I am aware that this tool is supposed to be used, basically, just to target vandalism – not at all in content disputes, etc. As for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 16:01, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like the rights to utilise rollback to aid in reverting vandalism more easily. I have seen numerous instances in which someone has added several instances of vandalism on the same page, preventing me from reverting it. I have warned people after their vandalism (if someone else doesn't beat me to it) and have not violated MOS in two years. Drdr150 (talk) 16:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
---|
Template editor[edit] |