Jump to content

User:TParis/Dashboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 15
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 35
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 54
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 8
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 2
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 72
Requested RD1 redactions 2
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 4
Candidates for speedy deletion 50
Open sockpuppet investigations 45
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]

Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 4
Hoaxes 0
Vandalism 0
User requested 5
Empty articles 1
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 2
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 5
Other candidates 41
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 18 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – 2 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content increased by IP users. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 01:31, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:58, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor is disrupting article with POV and modern politics. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 02:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/A-I. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent removal of sourced materials by various South Korean IPs. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 10:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: user after being blocked, created new account and now continues to disrupt article. Adrikshit (talk) 11:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:58, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Mirzapurawadh (talk · contribs) blocked by Girth Summit. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:09, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs persisting in changing the name of the island back to its defunct old name. GraziePrego (talk) 12:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Question: What is the WP:COMMONNAME of the island? Lectonar (talk) 12:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
@GraziePrego: Please see above question. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced information BlameRuiner (talk) 14:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: BLP who is getting recent attention for criticizing US support of the Israel-Hamas war during a press conference and being dragged out. There have been multiple IP vandalism attempts [1] [2] [3] in the past 12 hours. 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This seems to be primarily coming from one IP who has not vandalized after their most recent warning. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
19:09, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged as enforcement for WP:CT/AP. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism, false claims. It's Berlusconi's private network. gtp (talk) 15:42, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 16:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism on this BLP since 05:14, 2 January 2025. Alith Anar 19:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: The last couple days on this page look like a vandalism free-for-all. I'm not sure what's happening with this particular article, but counter-vandalism isn't winning. Perhaps a few days of protection until it passes?. Mlkj (talk) 20:27, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:20, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:34, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – presidents cannot unilaterally declare constitutional amendments: see recent edits. Will120 (talk) 20:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: add semi protection Filmijhankar (talk) 21:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 21:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 22:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Already protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 (talk) 22:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs being WP:SNEAKY with credits. Skywatcher68 (talk) 23:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content regarding a transfer which has not been completed yet. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and name changing, as can be seen in the edit history Surayeproject3 (talk) 23:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Add “by June 30, 2024” to the sentence: The Lancet has estimated 70,000 deaths due to traumatic injuries.[8] Seahumidity (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

I would like to request that... (the status section for the front page should be labeled as “ceasefire” until the ceasefire ends. This is in accordance with the recently-reached agreement.) . LordOfWalruses (talk) 04:55, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

2 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Message box (request) 2025-01-07 21:25 Cascade-protected from Main Page (log) Modified by KrakatoaKatie on 2016-11-16: "restore"
Portal:Current events (request) 2025-01-17 19:00 Fully protected (log) Modified by Nihonjoe on 2017-06-02: "per prev: there is very little need for this to be edited, nothing that couldn't wait for an {{editprotected}} request and there's a fair bit of vandalism/test edits in the history"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:02, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
9 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox Chinese (request) 2024-12-29 20:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2025-01-06 03:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox song (request) 2025-01-12 12:26 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Module:IPA/data (request) 2025-01-12 14:40 Template-protected (log) Protected by Favonian on 2023-09-16: "High-risk template or module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Module:Infobox military conflict (request) 2025-01-12 21:19 Template-protected (log) Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-10-08: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Infobox military conflict/styles.css (request) 2025-01-12 21:19 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2019-07-02: "High-risk template or module (more info)"
Template:Db-meta (request) 2025-01-15 03:05 Template-protected (log) Modified by NeilN on 2015-11-18: "per request"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist (request) 2025-01-15 19:22 Template-protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Blacklist: Modified by AmandaNP on 2016-02-12: "we are going to try letting template editors edit"
Wikipedia:WikiProject/Popular pages config.json (request) 2025-01-17 19:02 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2024-09-28: "protect at TE level"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]

I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm concerned that many of the articles on lifeboat stations don't meet GNG. After looking at a random sampling of them, most of them cite the Lifeboat Enthusiasts Society (of which Martin states they are a member of on their talk page), which appears to be an WP:SPS, and The Lifeboat, a publication of the RNLI, which is not an independent source. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
@Voorts I would have thought the same thing when I first encountered these articles, but there are several independent published sources on these lifesaving stations. Whenever I've done a BEFORE search on one, I always find GNG-qualifying sourcing. This came up in an AfD for one of Ojsyork's creations last year (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bamburgh Castle Lifeboat Station), which resulted in a "keep". Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed.

Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required.

Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)

(Non-administrator comment) You are currently not adding to the "workload of new page patrollers", in fact, your creations need to be watched closely. Not when I specifically told you here that the pieces you presented to inquire about Bobo Ajudua are thrash and nonsensical and told you to focus elsewhere instead of on an article that has been deleted several times. Yet, you went ahead to create it, and now, it has been deleted again? via AfD. And this? Your creations need to be watched and that is what the NPP is for. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights - I had it in the past and honestly didn’t realise it was missing until I did a requested move today and the DAB I created had to get manually patrolled. Could I please have this back so as to not add work to others when I’m doing moves related work? Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 13:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done charlotte 👸♥ 17:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

I am requesting autopatrolled rights because I want to minimize the backlog of new page. As an active member of New Page Patrol, I am also participating in the January Backlog Drive 2024 and I am familiar with the guidelines here on Wikipedia like WP:POLICY, WP:COPYRIGHT, WP:PROOF and WP:GNG. While I have only created 11 articles so far, they include several BLPs and meet Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I understand that the typical requirement is 50 articles, but I hope my demonstrated understanding the guidelines and my contributions on NPP reviewer can be considered as autropatrolled status. Royiswariii Talk! 05:45, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has created roughly 17 articles. MusikBot talk 05:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi Royiswariii! The instructions at the top of this page state Applicants will not be granted this right if they have not created at least 25 new articles on the English Wikipedia, excluding redirects and disambiguation pages. You have created fewer than 17 (at least one of them was not an actual creation). Even if you had created 25, articles like Kristian PH (I don't think I would've accepted that as an A7, but it was a BLP sourced entirely to YouTube) within the past six months is a dealbreaker. Luckily, autopatrolled does literally nothing to help you create articles. It exists solely to help reduce the NPP backlog, and nothing else.  Not done. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 06:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
330+ article creations with zero deletions. Have run into this editor's creations in New Page Review and do not have to do repairs; infoboxes, categories, wikilinks, short descriptions, talk pages, etc. are all in place. This editor does not need to be in the new pages feed. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

[edit]
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

[edit]

Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights Some pages have ridiculous permissions, and i would like to be able to edit them to legitimately make wikipedia better IDK how to read (talk) 18:16, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done The community, along with the Arbitration Committee have decided that certain areas, in particular contentious topics should be protected in this manner. It's not a matter of your intent but rather your level of expererience in editing the encyclopedia. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 19:04, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights 32rf (talk) 22:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC) I want to edit pages that I have edited before, but since had the extended conformation lock due to vandalism or something.

 Not done No convincing reason to grant this early given. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]

I request renewal of the rights to continue supporting the project effectively.tanks Mohammadkazemm (talk) 15:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 72 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 15:30, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
 Not done. Sorry, but you do not currently meet guidelines for granting. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
tanks.i want only spend more time and help Mohammadkazemm (talk) 21:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

I am editing Wikipedia since 10 months and i had created dozens of articles and also participated in deletion discussions and also nominated some articles for AfD and most of them got deleted. Also i exapanded some articles of stub category and my area of interest are Politics, Rajasthan, BLPs, settlement articles, etc. Now i want to work with other editors on New page reviewing and i am requesting for a one month rights, firstly as a trial. TheSlumPanda (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Hey, I would like to apply for the NPR rights. As I have created more than 50 pages and I'm actively involved in reviewing drafts since last week of December 2024, you can check my reviewed articles here and the articles I putted up for deletion can be seen here. My primary focus are the articles related to Women, Politics, India, Poetry, Writers and Indian activists. I do sometime revert bad faith edits. I will contribute to the Wikipedia with NPR rights, same as I have contributed through the AFC Reviewer rights. Thanks and Regards. Taabii (talk) 12:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

As a wikipedia contributor, I have created several wikipedia articles and committed several edits to improve the wikipedia articles. I would love to contribute as a New page reviewer and it will help me to expand my contributions to Wikipedia. Ensconce (talk) 22:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). MusikBot talk 22:10, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]

Have participated in handful of RMs in past year, as well as at MRV. I've only come to RMTR once, but otherwise would be useful for disambiguation purposes. As I often create the disambig first, in order to justify a page moving away from ptopic; this often leaves me with having to swap the disambig page with the redirect and visa versa afterwards, when I simply need to perform a swap. I've otherwise closed RMs before, and would probably close more that aren't too controversial, but am often restricted due to the need to overwrite a redirect. CNC (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Leaning towards no, mainly on account of a lack of demonstrated need, but willing to be overruled or persuaded otherwise. Primefac (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
As an example; I'd be able to close this RM if there is no consensus, as I did the previous that lacked consensus, but I wouldn't be able to if there was consensus. The one I closed had sat in the backlog for almost two months. CNC (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
@CommunityNotesContributor: Feel free to close some more RMs even if you'd need to request assistance at WP:RM/TR to implement some of them. See WP:RMNAC. And in other instances where you would use this permission to make a swap or move a page without leaving a redirect, just ask at WP:RM/TR for now. I basically agree with Primefac, so I'll mark as  Not done. I'd consider granting this when you've made more like 10 technical requests. SilverLocust 💬 06:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
@SilverLocust: Understood, thanks for explaining. I hadn't really considered using RMTR to implement an RM closure, but in future I won't shy away from such closures that require it. On a side note, the word "several" would be well placed at WP:PMCRITERIA to describe "Participation in requested moves and move reviews," , as I read this as simply plural/multiple; and with approval otherwise being at the discretion of an admin, it wouldn't change much. It could help to reduce backlogged requests such as mine in future. CNC (talk) 11:11, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

I've been requesting occasional, regular and errant page moves at RMTR ever since I either created this account or achieved the extended-confirmed threshold. After 30 months of existence and persistence and in this new year, I'm ready to take the next step and have this right for a start as I can have an impact on this encyclopaedia. Intrisit (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Your three most recent RMTR requests were all contested. I think that disqualifies you from this permission for a long while. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Over time, I have made numerous move proposals on talk pages. Sometimes I don't get a reply from other editors and I bring it to WP:RM/TR. Other times, an administrator notices the proposal and implements it. Some of these could probably have been undiscussed bold moves and not required discussion at all. All of them are impossible without the page mover permission because they would overwrite a redirect. I'd rather save y'all the trouble of reviewing and do them myself.

I've made 269 page moves and 22 edits at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. I was granted this permission once before, but it expired. Daask (talk) 21:30, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 20:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

I would like to have the page mover rights, I know how page movement works and the rules regarding page movements. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC) SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 152 days. MusikBot talk 18:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi SparklingBlueMoon. For these requests you should both have a demonstrated need for the right and meet the guidelines for granting. You haven't given a reason that you would need this, and you haven't previously gone to WP:RM/TR to request technical help with a move, so I don't see the first. As to the guidelines for granting, you don't quite meet the 6 months criterion, and I don't think you have enough experience with the moving process (2 RM comments, 0 RM/TR requests, 46 distinct moves – usually without edit summaries explaining the moves or noting relevant guidelines for the move). For now, if you are unable to perform some move, please just make a technical request at WP:RM/TR or open a requested move discussion.  Not done.
I'd also recommend not to move articles to draft space immediately after they have been created or while someone is still actively been recently working on them. As explained at WP:NPPHOUR and WP:DRAFTNO, you should give the creator time to work on it. Newly created articles are configured not to appear in search results until they have been reviewed, so there isn't a rush to move incomplete articles to draft space, and working on new articles in the main article space is permitted. SilverLocust 💬 05:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

I have had the flag for a long time until I decided to have it removed recently. It appears that file-mover right doesn't have the required redirect-suppression right, and as such some file renames where I have to suppress the redirect, leave behind a redirect with a CSD tag - which I find odd as it adds to the load of admins. I am aware of the relevant polices and would like to have the flag back. Thanks. Regards, Aafi (talk) 07:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC) Regards, Aafi (talk) 07:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([5]). MusikBot talk 07:20, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
 Done. SilverLocust 💬 07:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

Note: The bot becoming silly, and marking as already done.

Hello I'm Ampil. The right set to expire 7 days. I've received a award. and I'm a AfC reviewer. ~🌀 Ampil 💬 / 📝 04:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

{{already done}} (automated response): This user already has the "reviewer" user right. MusikBot talk 05:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
@Ampil I know you noted in your original post, but just in case: this is not already done! Ampil is asking for the permission, which they currently hold, to not expire. Zanahary 20:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Zanahary, Thanks. I've removing the pin message. Because the bot had not been becoming silly. My PCR right makes without expiry. ~🌀 Ampil 💬 / 📝 11:45, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
 Done charlotte 👸♥ 21:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 92 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 20:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ali Beary Given your recent WP:CUTPASTE move, I'd like to see a little more time for you to demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies and procedures before granting additional permissions. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
22:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
@Ahecht, ah, apologies. I didn't realize a "request moves" page existed, and I do not have move or merge permissions. I was simply undoing something that wasn't correct... hence why I requested move perms earlier so I could fix it. Ali Beary (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Requesting pending changes reviewer rights to assist in recent changes patrol, am very active on the English Wikipedia and have good knowledge of Vandalism policy and other basic content policies. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Well, I'm requesting this right to protect Wikipedia from Vandals. By the way the 1 of the 2 revisions (both not accepted) in Curry was unaccepted without any reason and other maybe due to some misunderstanding by the reviewer of the WP:NOINDICSCRIPT & both were good faith.Although I am look as a newcomer, but this is a clean start account. If there is any other objection, I'll try to be explainable for it. Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 9 days and has 54 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 16:10, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]

Hello everyone. I would like to request rollback rights here. I have a long and controversial history on the English Wikipedia but hope that especially in recent years, I have proved as to other editors, as well to the administrators, a positive change in my editorial behavior. I myself, don't forgive and don't forget my mistakes, but believe that with my experience and knowledge on the Macedonian issue, I will be useful in the fight against vandalism in this complicated question. Even though I'm worried, I remember Matthew 7:7-8: “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened." Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 09:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello Jingiby. You had rollback declined a few years ago (June 20, 2018), per this link. At that time, reviewers mentioned your prior blocks on enwiki and an indef block on the Macedonian Wikipedia. The admin who declined your rollback was User:Swarm. Have there been any new developments since 2018 that you would like to bring to our attention here? EdJohnston (talk) 23:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
I haven't been blocked on the Macedonian Wikipedia for years, but in general, the attitude towards Bulgarian editors on historical topics there is a quite special. Jingiby (talk) 06:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
By the way, during the last 15 years I am busy to deal with such IPs' activity. Jingiby (talk) 12:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Regarding my mistakes of the past, those of 10 years ago, I will strive to avoid them and not repeat them again. There are no ideal people, but I am neither a paid agent of the Bulgarian authorities, nor are there specially trained propagandists hiding behind my nickname, as some IPs are trying to present me. I am an ordinary person. Jingiby (talk) 19:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Third user comment: I coincide with this user often, everytime I check their contributions they're filled with reverts of IPs and warning messages. I checked and they were unblocked from Macedonian Wikipedia in 2019, plus their claim probably has at least some truth, it's a small Balkan Wikipedia after all. It's also been 6 years and a half since their last request; it had been one year here since they were unblocked at that time, and now it's almost eight, no small amount. I'd recommend a trial period on this user. They'd probably do well. Super Ψ Dro 23:12, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi, User:Super Dromaeosaurus, and thanks for your comment. Jingiby (talk) 04:16, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Third user comment: I am not really sure how exactly rollback works, but regarding Jingiby, with whom I happened to interact a few times in the past, I'd say that they are indeed a pretty hardworking and dedicated editor in Balkan-related history articles. They have been doing an immense work with reverting IPs and vandals for years and WP would certainly be in a much worse place right now, if it weren't for them. If this rollback feature is going to help with their editing, I believe they deserve it, in my humble opinion. Piccco (talk) 21:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi, User:Piccco, thank you. Jingiby (talk) 04:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

I am requesting rollback rights for the ability to use a tool-assisted diff viewer, either huggle or meta:SWViewer. I have a lot of experience doing recent changes patrolling and fighting vandals and am interested in doing so with the semi-automated tools available. I have read the policy for using rollback and always warn users when reverting their edits. cyberdog958Talk 10:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I've been editing Wikipedia for about a year, with more active contributions over the past 5-6 months. i edited over 1000 edits and made some pages as well. During this time, I've frequently reverted vandalism and unconstructive edits and have become familiar with handling such challenges.

While I’m still learning some aspects of Wikipedia policies, I feel that rollback rights would help me revert vandalism and const. edits more efficiently, especially when i have to do repeated cases. I’m committed to using these rights responsibly to maintain the quality of Wikipedia.

Much Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 03:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I've been editing for half an year (less than others I know) and have amassed a total of 1600 edits, with about half of those being in mainspace. I have patrolled recent changes for a while, and have been adequately warning users since I learned about Twinkle. Note that the block I have received was a self-block to study for finals. I want rollback permissions in order to use tools such as Huggle effectively. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 20:12, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I am requesting this permission in order to fight vandalism in a faster and more efficient manner, when I encounter it in my work here (with this being one of the worst examples I've seen so far). If granted, I intend to use it responsibly (and just occasionally – when needed), in the same way as I am using other permissions that were granted to me so far. Of course, I am aware that this tool is supposed to be used, basically, just to target vandalism – not at all in content disputes, etc. As for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 16:01, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

 DoneTheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 16:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

I would like the rights to utilise rollback to aid in reverting vandalism more easily. I have seen numerous instances in which someone has added several instances of vandalism on the same page, preventing me from reverting it. I have warned people after their vandalism (if someone else doesn't beat me to it) and have not violated MOS in two years. Drdr150 (talk) 16:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 197 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 19:00, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
I just wanted to leave a note that the user has today been auto reported on AIV for tripping edit filter 1311 (http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Special%3AAbuseLog&wpSearchUser=Drdr150). Another admin User:Daniel Case looked at the report and believed it to be a false positive. I have just been looking at the contributions too, and also looked like a false positive to me, but then I noted this request, and thought that I should at least mention it here. TigerShark (talk) 21:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
What I was saying was that while I believed it to be a false pos, I was not familiar enough with what I was reviewing to say so with the highest degree of confidence. Daniel Case (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor

[edit]