User talk:Rich Farmbrough/Archive/2015 August
Jump-to links |
---|
2024
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2023
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2022
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2021
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2020
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2019
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2018
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2017
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2016
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2015
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2014
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2013
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2012
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2011
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2010
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2009
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2008
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2007
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2006
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
2005
Jan ·
Feb ·
Mar ·
Apr ·
May ·
Jun ·
Jul ·
Aug ·
Sep ·
Oct ·
Nov ·
Dec ·
|
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Reference errors on 31 July
[edit] Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Nature Communications page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Video games journalism
[edit]Hello. In this edit you added this sentence- "Kotaku retroactively disclosed certain relationships between Patricia Hernandez and Anna Anthropy and Christine Love.
" I was wondering if you could elaborate on what 'certain relationships' meant in this context, and if you had a transcript or convenient timestamps for the youtube video you used as a source for it? Thanks in advance. PeterTheFourth (talk) 09:25, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- Not sure its worth that level of detail. However a search shows what the disclosed relationships were:
- The disclosed relationship with Anthropy is: (Update: full disclosure...Anthropy, was housemates with me and a mutual friend in the summer of 2012.)
- For Love (Update: full disclosure...Love and I are friends.)
- Also for Quinn (Update: full disclosure, Quinn and I are friends.)
- One other review is also tagged with "Quinn and I are friends"
- [10] by Phil Owen
- Of course there are a number of other disclosures you can find on Kotaku that might be of interest. Google is your friend.
- As for the timecode, I put a rough timecode in an HTML comment. I don't remember if the interview included more public information about the relationships than the disclosures.
- Interestingly I got a bad certificate on Kotaku.com
kotaku.com uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate is only valid for the following names: f.ssl.fastly.net , *.f.ssl.fastly.net , www-dev.banksimple.com , status-dev.banksimple.com , www.ao-staging.com , *.catchpoint.com , api.nuget.org , urx.com , www.urx.com , *.urx.io , gems.secretcdn.net , developers.urx.com , *.adroll.com , api.staging.purpose.com , fast.appcues.com , *.vimeo-staging.com , format.com , format-staging.com , jalopnik.com , cineworld.catchdigital.com , assets.listia.com , *.therealreal.com , *.discogs.com , *.beatport.com , api.movements.purpose.com , *.dotabuff.com , *.britishcouncil.org , sfdc.fastly.com , *.e3expo.com , dotabuff.com , assets.webflow.com , *.500px.com , nydailynews.com , *.nydailynews.com , *.beacon.fastlydns.net , *.fastly-debug.com , vimeo-staging.com , www.kredo.com , *.trytreehouse.com , *.format-assets.com , projects.fivethirtyeight.com , *.services.disqus.com , *.disq.us , disq.us , vector.mapzen.com , *.new.livestream.com , *.nr-data.net , *.isu.pub , *.sf4u.com , thoughtbot.com , *.thoughtbot.com , donations.movements.purpose.com , staging-donations.purpose.com , www.movingsuppliesdepot.com , cdn1.leadcommerce.com , *.shakr.com , projects.propublica.org , *.cooladata.com , thoughtbot.se , *.businessinsider.com , businessinsider.com , *.adis.ws , www.maestro.io , f-jsv2.harveynichols.com , f-mediav2.harveynichols.com , f-skinv2.harveynichols.com , www.gokudos.com , donations.oxfam.org , *.piriform.com , imgcs.net , static.flocabulary.com , rubytogether.org , www.creativeedge.com , nm.contextweb.com , *.mensjournal.com , *.usmagazine.com , *.rollingstone.com
- All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:19, 1 August 2015 (UTC).
- Cheers! I might look at clarifying the relationships- might the current wording might lead readers into thinking it's more than just friendships. PeterTheFourth (talk) 16:10, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #169
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/Wikidata-logo-en.svg/150px-Wikidata-logo-en.svg.png)
- Discussions
- Open requests for Oversight: Sjoerddebruin
- Enable Flow on Wikidata?
- Other Noteworthy Stuff
- Early version of a reconcile API for Wikidata by Magnus
- PagePile: a new tool by Magnus
- Mix-n-Match got a number of new catalogs and now shows a thin red line in front of a catalog that does not yet have a property on Wikidata
- 1.700 biographical items without gender, but with image. Go go go!
- Interested in art movements? Check out this
- Did you know?
- Development
- Minor fixes to property edit mode
- Some fixes for the cucumber test errors
- Released Wikibase DataModel 4.0
- Released Wikibase DataModel Services 1.0
- Continued work to migrate away from old serializers in Wikibase Lib to those in WikibaseDataModelSerialization.
- Working on scripts for importing entities from another Wikibase instance (e.g. Wikidata), so that development instances can have some sample data.
- Fixed the counting of references
- Changed style of the Entitytermsview inputs
- Entity Selector displays alias in brackets behind label
- Monthly Tasks
- Hack on one of these.
- Help develop the next summary here!
- Contribute to a Showcase item
- Help translate or proofread pages in your own language!
- Add labels, in your own language(s), for the new properties listed above.
Notice
[edit]Hey, Rich. I noticed you attempted here to open a Request for Arbitration Enforcement regarding Mass killings under Communist regimes. We are (or mostly I am) currently trying to do the same thing at the talk page here. I was advised to alert all active users that associated with the subject, so I feel your presence would be appreciated. Bataaf van Oranje (talk) 05:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
AfD notice
[edit]Hi! I'm leaving you this note because you recently particpated in a discussion that resulted in a deletion request which you may be interested in. NickCT (talk) 14:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Don't leave me hanging!
[edit]At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Depression Quest, you wrote "Quiz question What well known piece of GamerGate vernacular might be used to support deletion?" What's the answer? — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 17:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- "Literally who?" I beleive it stems from an attempt to follow up a claimed connection between a person and an organization '... and they said, literally "who?"' It is used to try and distance GamerGate from any interest in Quinn, Wu, etc, who as a result are sometimes referred to collectively as "the Literally Whos". Ain't language fun? All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 17:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC).
When did you join?
[edit]Top of your page currently says: " has been a Wikipedian for about 136 months", but at the bottom says: Joined on:12:33, Tuesday, March 3, 2015 (UTC). Some timezone wirdness perhaps? (I'm at NZST, GMT+12) - hmm, on further checking, looks like a bug in whatever magic is behind Wikipedia:Co-op. Snori (talk)
- Yes the second date is when I joined Wikipedia:Co-op. I believe the template may be Lua controlled, and hence not amenable to subst: and fix. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:58, 3 August 2015 (UTC).
- Well I have sort-of subst: and fixed it. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC).
- Well I have sort-of subst: and fixed it. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC).
Reference errors on 11 August
[edit] Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the H. G. Wells bibliography page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
New sections
[edit]Hey there! This is trivial, and sorry for even bringing this to your attention: On discussion pages, I notice you're apparently editing the last section and then adding your new section within it. This is a problem because from the watchlist it looks like you edited the previous section when really you've created a new one. Instead consider using the "New section" button at the top the page. It will generate an automated edit summary "Section title: New section", making it very clear what's happened. The added bonus is you don't need to bother with the == Section heading ==
markup, there's a convenient text field available to enter the section heading. Finally, you won't run into edit conflicts! Just thought I'd let you know, thanks — MusikAnimal talk 14:08, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I actually have a .js fix for this, but I am not permitted to use it. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 14:10, 5 August 2015 (UTC).
The Signpost: 05 August 2015
[edit]- Op-ed: Je ne suis pas Google
- News and notes: VisualEditor, endowment, science, and news in brief
- WikiProject report: Meet the boilerplate makers
- Traffic report: Mrityorma amritam gamaya...
- Featured content: Maya, Michigan, Medici, Médée, and Moul n'ga
Moving Burma to Myanmar - new 2015 poll
[edit]You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #170
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/Wikidata-logo-en.svg/150px-Wikidata-logo-en.svg.png)
- Discussions
- Successful request for oversight rights: Sjoerddebruin
- Events/Blogs/Press
- Wikimedia UK is organizing a Wikidata training session. You can sign up here.
- Other Noteworthy Stuff
- Talk pages on Wikidata can now be converted to use Flow. You can request migrating your talk page at d:Wikidata:Flow.
- Mix-n-Match got a bunch of new catalogs for you to match up with Wikidata. Currently matching is happening at about 500 items per day. Pretty sweet :)
- @happybirthdayauthors is a new Twitter account posting reading suggestions based on Wikidata data.
- Arbitrary access is rolling out to a large number of wikis over the next two weeks.
- Duplicity can help you match up unlinked Wikipedia articles to a Wikidata item.
- Did you know?
- Development
- Made some small changes to the style of the edit warning and sitelinks so they are easier to notice and understand
- Added error messages for Special:GoToLinkedPage and Special:ItemByTitle so you get a useful message in case no result is found
- The Entity Selector now displays alias in brackets behind label
- The number of entities loaded via the {{#property:…}} parser function and via Lua will be reported in the “Parser profiling data” (which can be found below a page preview or within the Html of a page)
- Prepared for next rounds of arbitrary access rollout
- Investigated growing lag of dispatching of changes to Wikipedia and co. We'll need to investigate further and change things so the lag between an edit on Wikidata and it being send to the Wikipedias and other projects is not too high.
- Added the property ID to Special:ListProperties
- Moved two extensions (Wikidata.org and WikimediaBadges) from Github to Gerrit. More will follow.
- We'd like to drop a database table. Discussion is ongoing.
- Monthly Tasks
- Hack on one of these.
- Help develop the next summary here!
- Contribute to a Showcase item
- Help translate or proofread pages in your own language!
- Add labels, in your own language(s), for the new properties listed above.
Reference errors on 15 August
[edit] Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Judith Berrisford page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Just a thought.
[edit]Consider getting more involved with a sister project like Wiktionary, Wikiquote, or Wikisource, and seeking adminship there. Nothing signifies trust with the tools like already having them and using them wisely elsewhere in Wikimedia. Not that I've been snooping your edits or anything, but you have an edit history on Wiktionary that goes back eleven years, so if you were more active in that community for a few months, you would be a strong candidate. Cheers! bd2412 T 14:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- B... but... Wiktionary is hard! (Having said that there are a couple of projects I have been planning there for some time.) ~~
- Everything is hard until you get yourself accommodated with it. Poke around Wiktionary's Beer Parlour and Requests for Deletion a bit and you'll see the big issues needing attention. bd2412 T 14:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestion! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 14:43, 10 August 2015 (UTC).
- Actually, just to revise it slightly, you have a great history at Wikisource. bd2412 T 14:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 14:49, 10 August 2015 (UTC).
- Actually, just to revise it slightly, you have a great history at Wikisource. bd2412 T 14:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestion! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 14:43, 10 August 2015 (UTC).
- Everything is hard until you get yourself accommodated with it. Poke around Wiktionary's Beer Parlour and Requests for Deletion a bit and you'll see the big issues needing attention. bd2412 T 14:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of S. P. A. M.
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on S. P. A. M. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Samuel Tarling (talk) 18:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- If evidence that the speedy system is broken were needed this is it. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 18:41, 10 August 2015 (UTC).
- A redirect deleted as G3 and A1 in under a minute? One of the poorest decisions I've seen in a while. I've restored the history if only so that everyone can see what a bizarre deletion it was. Jenks24 (talk) 19:07, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. It's just stuff that happens under the current system. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC).
- Conversely, given the 'spammy' name and lack of
#REDIRECT
in the original Old revision of S. P. A. M., nor a categorisation{{R from …}}
or anything similar to suggest it might have been intentional, it is perhaps a reflection of the efficiency of WP's mechanisms. On a slightly wider issue of WP:V, I haven't been able to turn up any obvious references to the initials S.P.A.M. being a pen-name of Jonathan Swift—it's isn't in the WP:LEAD of the article either—and the only mention I have found so far is the recent uncited addition[11] to the spam disambiguation page. For the time-being at least, I have tagged[12][13][14][15] the redirects with{{Redirect from pen name}}
. —Sladen (talk) 19:20, 10 August 2015 (UTC)- I know you have, but thanks for telling me anyway. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:22, 10 August 2015 (UTC).
- My Google-fu has failed on this occasion, please could you assist myself and others by sharing whatever WP:RSes you had found which lead to the creation of the redirects. —Sladen (talk) 19:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- I don't believe redirects require RS, however for your delectation I refer you to Joseph F. Clarke (1977). Pseudonyms. BCA. p. 144.. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:43, 10 August 2015 (UTC).
- Thank you. I've added this to Talk:Jonathan Swift#S.P.A.M. so that it is kept somewhere safe and can be introduced into the relevant places. Would you be willing to expand the
{{cite}}
on that Talk page with a short quotation of the relevant paragraph for the benefit of those without a paper copy? —Sladen (talk) 19:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)- Swift was the ultimate anonymiser and pseudonymiser. While people like Addison and Steele, and Pope may have been prolific, Dean Swift takes the biscuit. He even wrote a pangyric against himself, and a response to it. He used "Cadenus" an anagram of the Latin for "dean". Isaac Bickerstaff, Abel Roper, T. H. Philomath, Martinus Scriblerus (Martin==Swift) the which he shared with other worthies, Student of Astrology, Simon Wagstaff, Esq. and many many more. One might indeed be hard put to find a name Swift didn't use, relying, perhaps on some variation of The Engine to generate them. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC).
- Brilliant, thank, could you check that the extent of the quote has been transferred correctly (or ideally make any corrections required directly): Talk:Jonathan Swift#S.P.A.M. —Sladen (talk) 20:46, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry that wasn't a quote, just me talking. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC).
- Thank you for removing the incorrect citation[16]. Would you be able to assist by providing (a quote from) the direct original cite? —Sladen (talk) 20:52, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry that wasn't a quote, just me talking. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC).
- Brilliant, thank, could you check that the extent of the quote has been transferred correctly (or ideally make any corrections required directly): Talk:Jonathan Swift#S.P.A.M. —Sladen (talk) 20:46, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Swift was the ultimate anonymiser and pseudonymiser. While people like Addison and Steele, and Pope may have been prolific, Dean Swift takes the biscuit. He even wrote a pangyric against himself, and a response to it. He used "Cadenus" an anagram of the Latin for "dean". Isaac Bickerstaff, Abel Roper, T. H. Philomath, Martinus Scriblerus (Martin==Swift) the which he shared with other worthies, Student of Astrology, Simon Wagstaff, Esq. and many many more. One might indeed be hard put to find a name Swift didn't use, relying, perhaps on some variation of The Engine to generate them. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC).
- Thank you. I've added this to Talk:Jonathan Swift#S.P.A.M. so that it is kept somewhere safe and can be introduced into the relevant places. Would you be willing to expand the
- I don't believe redirects require RS, however for your delectation I refer you to Joseph F. Clarke (1977). Pseudonyms. BCA. p. 144.. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:43, 10 August 2015 (UTC).
- My Google-fu has failed on this occasion, please could you assist myself and others by sharing whatever WP:RSes you had found which lead to the creation of the redirects. —Sladen (talk) 19:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- I know you have, but thanks for telling me anyway. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:22, 10 August 2015 (UTC).
- Conversely, given the 'spammy' name and lack of
- Thanks. It's just stuff that happens under the current system. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC).
- A redirect deleted as G3 and A1 in under a minute? One of the poorest decisions I've seen in a while. I've restored the history if only so that everyone can see what a bizarre deletion it was. Jenks24 (talk) 19:07, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks dude
[edit]Not sure what I was doing wrong but showing the cost was the problem? Thanks anyway. Luka.J350
- No problem. I think that combined with the focus on Amazon.
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 00:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC).
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for the email tip about the edit filter / Alrasheed socks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- You're welcome. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC).
Use of "paywall" sources
[edit]Hello Rich, several days ago, I removed three "paywall" sources from Fox & Friends. The very first sentence contains the word "conservative" with four sources - two behind a paywall and one not supporting the claim. I replaced them with one New York Times source which succinctly supported the statement. That edit has been undone by an editor who says "Don't remove academic resources simply because they're behind a paywall or in print. Especially when you replace them with online opinion journalism." I don't want to get into an edit war with anyone, but it seems counter-productive to insist on using paywall sources that cannot be seen by non-subscribers (or print-only sources) when credible, current online sources (like NYT) are available. Can you please take a look and give me your opinion on the matter? Thanks SchoolMarm101 (talk) 01:37, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'll take a look. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC).
- Here's my take on it:
- The ref that doesn't mention conservatism, is not useful.
- Refs in print only or behind paywalls should only be replaced by equal or better quality non-paywalled or on-line sources.
- In general four references would be too many. However there have been considerable disputes over these type of statements, I would be happy leaving four refs here.
- Any paywalled items should be tagged with
{{Subscription needed}}
Done
- All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:33, 13 August 2015 (UTC).
- Here's my take on it:
The Signpost: 12 August 2015
[edit]- News and notes: Superprotect, one year later; a contentious RfA
- In the media: Paid editing; traffic drop; Nicki Minaj
- Wikimanía report: Wikimanía 2015, part 2, a community event
- Traffic report: Fighting from top to bottom
- Featured content: Fused lizards, giant mice, and Scottish demons
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
- Blog: The Hunt for Tirpitz
Nomination for deletion of Template:Stable version
[edit]Template:Stable version has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
I would like to award you this for reaching 1,000,000 edits--and still contributing! Thank you. Rubbish computer 18:42, 15 August 2015 (UTC) |
Opinions on Edit Warring
[edit]Hi Rich, hope you are well. I would really value your Opinion on User:WereSpielChequers/Edit Warring, especially if you could use your IT powers to come up with some stats as to how many people get blocked for edit warring and how often that loses us editors. ϢereSpielChequers 16:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- I wasn't that good this morning which is why I didn't attend Oxford. I'll take a look. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 16:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC).
- Thanks, my excuse was that the trains were in a mess. ϢereSpielChequers 16:36, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- So things were less than equal? You were missed, but half a dozen still turned up, including two first-timers. We gossiped about you extensively. --RexxS (talk) 23:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yes things were slightly less than equal. Good to hear that you had a fascinating topic of conversation. I progressed with fixing my election fire though, discovering that standard switch sizes aren't standard. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC).
- Yes things were slightly less than equal. Good to hear that you had a fascinating topic of conversation. I progressed with fixing my election fire though, discovering that standard switch sizes aren't standard. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC).
- So things were less than equal? You were missed, but half a dozen still turned up, including two first-timers. We gossiped about you extensively. --RexxS (talk) 23:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, my excuse was that the trains were in a mess. ϢereSpielChequers 16:36, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #171
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/Wikidata-logo-en.svg/150px-Wikidata-logo-en.svg.png)
- Discussions
- Events/Blogs/Press
- cooperation between free content projects
- A case is made to concentrate our quality efforts on the differences between Wikidata and other sources
- Ongoing: Several team members are attending the Chaos Communication Camp.
- Upcoming: SmartDataConference
- A Comparative Survey of DBpedia, Freebase, OpenCyc, Wikidata, and YAGO
- Other Noteworthy Stuff
- Wikidata needs your vote! It only takes a minute.
- WikiProject Sum of all Paintings reached the milestone of 100.000 paintings. Congrats!
- Arbitrary access is now available on another ~250 Wikipedias].
- See d:Wikidata talk:Arbitrary access#Use cases: testing modules and templates for two general use cases for arbitrary access on Wikipedia's regression testing of Wikidata-related modules and templates and testing infoboxes with Wikidata content.
- List of articles on English Wikipedia without a Wikidata item (also works for other projects)
- You have a bunch of names etc. and want to find Wikidata items with those labels/aliases? Try relabel!
- SourcererBot is adding lots of references to existing statements on several thousand items.
- Mix-n-Match has new catalogs including the National Library of Australia.
- Deaths at Wikipedia are a series of reports comparing items at Wikidata with death-by-year-categories of Wikipedia. For the years since 2000, only about 15% of items at Wikidata lack d:Property:P570 (date of death).
- 93% of items about people have a gender set now.
- Want to make both Wikidata and Inventaire better? You can help by finding those books' authors.
- Did you know?
- Development
- Rolled out arbitrary access to about 250 Wikipedias including German, French and Japanese. More to come in a few days.
- Worked more on quantities. Looks like we'll have it on a demo system for you to try a first version within the next two weeks.
- Bene* is joining us for a month as an intern. Welcome!
- References are now hidden while loading the page, speeding up page load time
- First commit to the ArticlePlaceholder extension
- Expensive parser functions now count each entity only once
- Released a new version of the DataModelServices component and started using it
- Started working on phasing out the wb_entity_per_page table. It will be kept around and updated for some time to allow tool owners to migrate.
- The Wikibase code base now fullfills all of MediaWiki’s PHPCS coding standards
- Added property IDs to Special:ListProperties
- Did a lot of bug triage on Phabricator
- Monthly Tasks
- Hack on one of these.
- Help develop the next summary here!
- Contribute to a Showcase item
- Help translate or proofread pages in your own language!
- Add labels, in your own language(s), for the new properties listed above.
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/40px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Vesvolod Chaplin, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://adam.curry.com/art/1389371286_ER23bhJJ.html.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Edit filter question
[edit]You said that Special:AbuseLog/12869359 was just the filter working properly: are you sure? I can't imagine a filter that's supposed to do this, and I've already performed the edit that it prevented this other user from performing. Nyttend (talk) 13:05, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- The problem is the user's name, as the warning message states. They are now blocked on that basis as well. I'm not sure if they were simply unable to spell "fascinator", or were indulging in a little trolling. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 13:11, 19 August 2015 (UTC).
The Signpost: 19 August 2015
[edit]- Travelogue: Seeing is believing
- Traffic report: Straight Outta Connecticut
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Cheers :)
[edit]Thanks for your nice comment on my talk page. Really appreciate you keeping an eye on my stuff as I am still quite new to Wikipedia and so learning the ropes as I go! BestWakelessGrub (talk) 19:03, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Wackypedia listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/30px-Information.svg.png)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wackypedia. Since you had some involvement with the Wackypedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 02:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Category:Commons category template with no category set nominated for deletion
[edit]Hi Rich. FYI, Category:Commons category template with no category set, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. The deletion discussion is here. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 10:24, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Gensis
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Gensis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
- disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -©2015 Compassionate727(Talk)(Contributions) 16:51, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Wikidata weekly summary #172
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/Wikidata-logo-en.svg/150px-Wikidata-logo-en.svg.png)
- Events/Blogs/Press
- Other Noteworthy Stuff
- Wikidata made it into the top 10 of the Land der Ideen competition \o/ This means we're part of the final public voting starting on 9th of September. Thanks everyone who voted and spread the word.
- Flow is being tested on selected talk pages.
- New tool: Get new Wikidata items (now or before a given timestamp) as HTML or PagePile
- New tool: Find Wikidata items without an image around a location, then find free images on Flickr taken nearby.
- EventZoom.net extended with OpenStreetMap support, increasing the options for visualizing historical events from Wikidata.
- Did you know?
- Development
- Soon the edit summary for edits through the API will also contain the automatic edit summary that you are used to for edits done through the website. The summary given by the API user will be appended to the automatic summary. (phabricator:T97247)
- Addressed performance issues in usage tracking updates and had to delay the latest round of rollouts because of it
- Fixed a bug where suggestions would show up twice in item and property selectors (phabricator:T109697)
- Improved performance of the mw.wikibase.sitelink Lua method
- More work done on Unit Selector widget
- Started working on the ArticlePlaceholder extension
- Made final changes so we can redirect mobile users to the mobile version by default
- Evaluated the remaining steps to get the extension deployed that lets you do checks against 3rd party databases. Not much left it seems and we'll tackle that in one of the next sprints. Getting the new features deployed for the constraints checks will still take a bit longer.
- More work on making the edit summaries in the watchlist on Wikipedia and co more meaningful
- Monthly Tasks
- Hack on one of these.
- Help develop the next summary here!
- Contribute to a Showcase item
- Help translate or proofread pages in your own language!
- Add labels, in your own language(s), for the new properties listed above.
Gertz v. Robert Welch
[edit]Not surprising, as you put it. Back when I wrote it (a long time ago, but in this galaxy ) I was depending entirely on the SCOTUS opinion as a source; it was things like this that taught me that you're better off reading the whole published case history where and when you can.
I'll be interested to see how you improve it. Daniel Case (talk) 23:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- SCOTUS opinions (and indeed UK Supreme Court opinions) make good and informative reading. But I'm sure you are right that they are often insufficient for full coverage. Notably the rulings sometimes have unintended consequences, in which case the weight given in the ruling is distorted for the purposes of the article.
- I won't do a lot more, since I only have the Googlebooks view of Gertz's book, but I have yet to read the entire judgement. I will bring out the change in emphasis on the crime and communism libels, which is an interesting sidelight - Gertz avoided the implied "obstruction of justice" libel in his first case, as it Nuccio was appealing the murder charge, and the three civil cases were pending. However the SCOTUS justices drew Wayne (Geertz's representative) on the point in the SC verbal arguments. In this it seems they erred - Gertz says "One assumes that each justice has read all of the briefs. One hopes that he .. has gone through the whole record." The hope, at least, seems to have been a little optimistic.
- I will also have to put something about the Seventh Circuit case when I get a better idea of what happened.
- All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC).
- Powell was sort of infamous for only reading the briefs before oral argument (But at least he read them all the way through). Brennan used to read the trial record and all the evidence as well (See his dissent from the per curiam opinion (believed to have been written by Powell) in Snepp v. United States for an excellent demonstration of the benefits of being that thorough). Daniel Case (talk) 14:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Elliptio congaraea for deletion
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elliptio congaraea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliptio congaraea until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakesyl (talk • contribs) 01:02, 3 September 2015
Invitation to WikiProject TAFI
[edit]![]() |
Hello, Rich Farmbrough. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement, a project dedicated to significantly improving articles with collaborative editing in a week's time.
Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Article nomination board. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. Thanks for your consideration. North America1000 09:17, 27 August 2015 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 26 August 2015
[edit]- In focus: An increase in active Wikipedia editors
- In the media: Russia temporarily blocks Wikipedia
- News and notes: Re-imagining grants
- Featured content: Out to stud, please call later
- Arbitration report: Reinforcing Arbitration
- Recent research: OpenSym 2015 report
Contested PROD and AfD
[edit]Hello, Rich. Your PROD of the article 2147483659 (number) has been removed, without explanation, so I have taken it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2147483659 (number). The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't PROD it, that was the redoubtable User:David Eppstein. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 14:02, 28 August 2015 (UTC).
- Yes, I see you are right. Silly me. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:59, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Redirects
[edit]I just wanted to let you know I redirected a number of redirects you created from Great Britain and Ireland to Ireland–United Kingdom relations per Talk:Great Britain and Ireland#"Ireland and the United Kingdom". I'm going to assume you disagree that Ireland–United Kingdom relations is the primary topic of those phrases, however that is the consensus. Having different versions of very similar phrases redirecting to different pages should be avoided. I recommend you open a discussion to redirect all of the phrases if you wish. I've already explained my reasoning for redirecting to that article.
Regards,
Rob984 (talk) 09:34, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- They are redirects, a long as they go somewhere reasonable, that's fine by me. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 14:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC).
As mentioned in my last edit, the article the way it is formatted with {{commons category}}, is part of an on-going so please do not revert the edit that changes the {{commons category}} until the discussion is finished. Thank you. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- That's fine. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 14:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC).
Wikidata weekly summary #173
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/Wikidata-logo-en.svg/150px-Wikidata-logo-en.svg.png)
- Discussions
- New request for comments: Merging relationship properties
- Events/Blogs/Press
- Other Noteworthy Stuff
- New page: Wikidata:OpenStreetMap to facilitate cooperation with our colleagues at OpenStreetMap
- Inventaire now shows links to ProjectGutenberg ebooks based on Wikidata data (example)
- First version of units is ready for testing
- Did you know?
- Newest properties: ResearchGate ID, GitHub username, African Plant Database, LinkedIn personal profile, Project Gutenberg ebook ID, Category for pictures taken with camera, work period end, work period start, NASA biographical ID, Dictionary of Ulster Biography ID, United States Armed Forces service number, Colour Index International constitution ID, Avibase ID
- Newest WikiProjects: Reasoning
- Newest gadgets: List of missing pairs queries, DuplicateReferences
- Newest External tools: Commons:Database reports/Cameras
- Development
- Lucie posted a sneak-peek of her work on the article placeholder extension
- Optimized Wikidata for viewing on mobile devices. You will be redirected to m.wikidata.org automatically when using a mobile device soon the same way it already happens on Wikipedia. (Editing will only be possible via the special pages!)
- Started working on a page to track how much Wikidata's data is used on each Wikimedia project
- API breaking change coming soon
- API custom summary will no longer override the autocomment (phabricator:T97247)
- Paging and sorting has been added to Special:ListProperties and it now also shows the IDs of the properties
- Worked more on making the edit summaries on the client more meaningful and readable
- Introduced a limit of 250 different entities that can be used on a page in the client via arbitrary access. The limit does not apply to convenience functions in lua, such as
mw.wikibase.label
which use a TermLookup instead of loading a full entity to get labels. (phabricator:T93885) - Properties are now linked in the diff view (phabricator:T105411)
- Ricordisamoa made several improvements to special pages (eg phabricator:T68744, phabricator:T48248, phabricator:T86647)
- Fixed a bug that made aliases too prominent in entity selectors (phabricator:T110021)
- Fixed a bug that made entries show up twice in the entity selector (phabricator:T109697)
- Started working on a special page to list all pages on a wiki with a certain badge
- Fixed remaining blockers for first rollout of unit support
- Bene worked on a new feature for DuckDuckGo to show instant results from Wikidata on their site
- Monthly Tasks
- Hack on one of these.
- Help develop the next summary here!
- Contribute to a Showcase item
- Help translate or proofread pages in your own language!
- Add labels, in your own language(s), for the new properties listed above.