User:Biblioworm/Toolbox
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 2600:1016:b11d:2e82:0:6:eb69:e901 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:27, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- 24.237.11.68 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:45, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Jjkthe monster222! (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1174 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1174, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:1700:8a16:490:b95c:fb68:86be:bc72 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:23, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Monsteraalbo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:35, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 71.193.183.233 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:27, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Potentially block evasion of Special:Contributions/2600:100F:B1E8:38BF:0:0:0:0/64 but the edits are the same yet. Izno (talk) 03:35, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- ShyAndroid (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1311 (LTA 1311, details). Note: Please see the comment(s) at the top of filter 1311 before taking any action. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. PhilKnight (talk) 04:33, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 42.113.4.191 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:49, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. PhilKnight (talk) 04:51, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- MikeAllen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Repeatedly has removed content from http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Until_Dawn_(film) for multiple days on end, abusing his rollback rights to do so. http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Until_Dawn_(film)&diff=prev&oldid=1269714333 http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Until_Dawn_(film)&diff=prev&oldid=1269684805 http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Until_Dawn_(film)&diff=prev&oldid=1269684573 http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Until_Dawn_(film)&diff=prev&oldid=1269588498 He has no block history. Given that this has gone on for days, I am asking that you please ban him to stop the vandalism. 2607:FEA8:7221:F600:60E4:6CE4:B415:E562 (talk) 00:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- 75.127.12.179 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Another block evasion by the same disruptive IP. Please see the history of their edits. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Andersholmquestatgmaildotcom (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Barfrestonreupdate (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "barf" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- CoderSchoolMontgomery (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Prosanjitdhar (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Used i instead of l attempting to skip filter: (ltd|pty). Violating string: prosanjltdhar" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 04:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Yo mama so fat she ate The sigma (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Johnj1995 (talk) 16:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Wait until the user edits. Others may disagree, but I don't think this is offensive enough to block without having edited. 331dot (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- I agree that no-edit blocks are for only the worst of the worst, hate speech, blatant profanity, etc. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 23:30, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- TheLongestMan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a offensive username. 🤷🏻🍆📏 JayCubby 22:50, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names if they disagree with your concerns. I understand what you reasonably assume is implied here but I don't think it warrants a no-warning block. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 23:27, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Killyourself12 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Devchar (talk) 14:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ini Vie (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Added link related to https://inivie.com/. Nobody (talk) 06:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: IP-hopping vandal. Previous protection was for a week. I think longer protection would be in order. — Chrisahn (talk) 07:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Since PC was imposed there has been one disruptive edit, and that IP has been blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP-hopping vandal. Other pages affected by this vandal have been protected for a week or so, but the vandal returns with a new IP (VPN) as soon as protection expires. Maybe longer protection would help. — Chrisahn (talk) 07:26, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- No, you silly bot, the request wasn't denied. Someone commented that the latest IP of the vandal has been blocked, and you silly bot thought that meant the page protection request was denied. But of course, blocking an IP is not the same as protecting a page. — Chrisahn (talk) 21:33, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. As with above, the IP responsible for the most recent vandalism has been blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- No, you silly bot, the request wasn't denied. Someone commented that the latest IP of the vandal has been blocked, and you silly bot thought that meant the page protection request was denied. But of course, blocking an IP is not the same as protecting a page. — Chrisahn (talk) 21:33, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection due to recent IP vandalism over the past few days Reconrabbit 12:11, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to have been more serious three days ago. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High IP vandalism changing boxoffice figures without reliable source and changing the title of the existing source. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 15:31, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I know it's getting a lot of attention right now but I do not see much reverting going on. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Plasticwonder (talk) 15:31, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And since it's been nominated for deletion, it would need to be pretty blatant disruption as we usually want to make it possible for editors to do what is necessary to get it kept if they want. Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for clarifying! Plasticwonder (talk) 04:56, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 16:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think we need to shut down every project page that this LTA posts on. At least this one makes it easy to spot the latest IP they're using. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:04, 15 January 2025 (UTC)- Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Financial vandalism. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Should be ECP due to being relevant to WP:ARBPIA. Smallangryplanet (talk) 20:01, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- This isn't vandalism, but a content dispute, and you didn't abide by WP:ONUS: "The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content." — Chrisahn (talk) 21:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Again inflow of ips vandalizing the page (46.112.114.3 and 46.112.92.134, seem to be the same person) Polish kurd (talk) 22:16, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And those IPs could well be the same person, yes—on a dynamic IP assigned by their ISP. The use of different IPs does not always show intent to deceive.
Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oops, I did that a while back. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 22:21, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There were just two edits today and they haven't continued since their level 2 warning. Really, AIV would be better if they keep going.
But, I will leave a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by same editor at varying I.P addresses. Flat Out (talk) 00:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2600:100F:B1E8:38BF:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Izno. for 31 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continued vandalism; see 1, 2. Happily888 (talk) 02:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Those seem to be the only two incidents. Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism 3 weeks after last page protection expired. –twotwofourtysix(talk || edits) 06:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Far too popular with the socks with disruptive mass changes/multiple changes. Zinnober9 (talk) 06:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Add “by June 30, 2024” to the sentence: The Lancet has estimated 70,000 deaths due to traumatic injuries.[8] Seahumidity (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to add more information regarding his legacy. KiddKrazy2 (talk) 21:00, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Edit requests should take the form, for example, of change X to Y. What specific edit would you like to be made? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:25, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC) |
| 10 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed. Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required. Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights - I had it in the past and honestly didn’t realise it was missing until I did a requested move today and the DAB I created had to get manually patrolled. Could I please have this back so as to not add work to others when I’m doing moves related work? Steven Crossin Help resolve disputes! 13:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit] |
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights: Need to add official logo for a school page and edit the name to the more current/appropriate one Dagoofybloke (talk) 13:57, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
@OhNoItsJamie removed my access to EC because i made a quite a few test edits and said if i made 100 constructive edits, i would gain it back, and so im asking for it, if not its fine i guess
I wish to be able to translate articles between the languages I speak, English and Spanish. I have already translated a page, but I want to be able to upload it. FroggyTranslator (talk) 23:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, can i be an Extented Confirmed User? Sr. Blud (talk) 16:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover[edit] |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
Hello, I would like to apply for New page reviewer rights. I am actively involved in reviewing Recent changes and Pending changes. I have also been reviewing Articles for creation since December 2024. Additionally, I have participated in Articles for deletion discussions. My primary areas of interest include politics, politicians, history, sports and topics related to Sri Lanka. I always strive to explain to editors the reasons for reverting their edits or declining their submissions when addressing their queries. I have also contributed by creating articles in the mainspace and participating in the NPPS programme to enhance my knowledge. Thank you. QEnigma talk 19:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
During my one-month trial as a NPR, I reviewed dozens of pages, nominated several for deletion or sending some to draftspace and edited/improved some pages. While I made some mistakes, such as accepting (good) page(s) created by socks that were later deleted, I intend to continue contributing responsibly by carefully reviewing pages, adhering to guidelines. I request renewal of the rights to continue supporting the project effectively. ANUwrites 04:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
I request renewal of the rights to continue supporting the project effectively.tanks Mohammadkazemm (talk) 15:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
Have participated in handful of RMs in past year, as well as at MRV. I've only come to RMTR once, but otherwise would be useful for disambiguation purposes. As I often create the disambig first, in order to justify a page moving away from ptopic; this often leaves me with having to swap the disambig page with the redirect and visa versa afterwards, when I simply need to perform a swap. I've otherwise closed RMs before, and would probably close more that aren't too controversial, but am often restricted due to the need to overwrite a redirect. CNC (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
I've been requesting occasional, regular and errant page moves at RMTR ever since I either created this account or achieved the extended-confirmed threshold. After 30 months of existence and persistence and in this new year, I'm ready to take the next step and have this right for a start as I can have an impact on this encyclopaedia. Intrisit (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting page mover rights because I want to have the ability, which would help in vandalism patrols and other things. Currently, someone moved a page for basically no reason and I'm trying to move it back, otherwise the page will have no former revision history. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:59, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Over time, I have made numerous move proposals on talk pages. Sometimes I don't get a reply from other editors and I bring it to WP:RM/TR. Other times, an administrator notices the proposal and implements it. Some of these could probably have been undiscussed bold moves and not required discussion at all. All of them are impossible without the page mover permission because they would overwrite a redirect. I'd rather save y'all the trouble of reviewing and do them myself. I've made 269 page moves and 22 edits at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. I was granted this permission once before, but it expired. Daask (talk) 21:30, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Hello I'm Ampil. The right set to expire 7 days. I've received a award. and I'm a AfC reviewer. ~🌀 Ampil 「💬 / 📝」 04:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I've been active in the Wikipedia community adding new content and creating articles, but especially fighting vandalism. I have also gained experience in reviewing by looking and reviewing semi-protected and protected pages edit requests. I am now looking for a new challenge, and I think I could help by putting forth my skills for the pending changes reviewer role! Thanks for the consideration.TYPEINFO (talk) 06:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
Hello everyone. I would like to request rollback rights here. I have a long and controversial history on the English Wikipedia but hope that especially in recent years, I have proved as to other editors, as well to the administrators, a positive change in my editorial behavior. I myself, don't forgive and don't forget my mistakes, but believe that with my experience and knowledge on the Macedonian issue, I will be useful in the fight against vandalism in this complicated question. Even though I'm worried, I remember Matthew 7:7-8: “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened." Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 09:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback rights for the ability to use a tool-assisted diff viewer, either huggle or meta:SWViewer. I have a lot of experience doing recent changes patrolling and fighting vandals and am interested in doing so with the semi-automated tools available. I have read the policy for using rollback and always warn users when reverting their edits. cyberdog958Talk 10:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I've been editing Wikipedia for about a year, with more active contributions over the past 5-6 months. i edited over 1000 edits and made some pages as well. During this time, I've frequently reverted vandalism and unconstructive edits and have become familiar with handling such challenges. While I’m still learning some aspects of Wikipedia policies, I feel that rollback rights would help me revert vandalism and const. edits more efficiently, especially when i have to do repeated cases. I’m committed to using these rights responsibly to maintain the quality of Wikipedia. Much Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 03:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I've been editing for half an year (less than others I know) and have amassed a total of 1600 edits, with about half of those being in mainspace. I have patrolled recent changes for a while, and have been adequately warning users since I learned about Twinkle. Note that the block I have received was a self-block to study for finals. I want rollback permissions in order to use tools such as Huggle effectively. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 20:12, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I am requesting this permission in order to fight vandalism in a faster and more efficient manner, when I encounter it in my work here (with this being one of the worst examples I've seen so far). If granted, I intend to use it responsibly (and just occasionally – when needed), in the same way as I am using other permissions that were granted to me so far. Of course, I am aware that this tool is supposed to be used, basically, just to target vandalism – not at all in content disputes, etc. As for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 16:01, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor[edit]
Hello, Recently, I went on vacation, which has given me more time to dedicate to Wikipedia. During this period, I noticed some issues with the Dark mode theme. Inspired by user @Synpath, who took the initiative to propose changes to the Drugbox template, I began working on fixing dark mode compatibility in other templates. Specifically, I have contributed to improving Template:Annotated image 4, Template:Enzymatic reaction, and Template:Biochem reaction subunit. In 2019, I created a Lua module for the Portuguese Wikipedia to assist editors in finding articles without citations. This tool categorizes articles by the month and year the tag was added and allows sorting by pageviews. You can view the module and the associated template. I mention this to demonstrate my ability to work with modules if needed, although I currently do not intend to work on modules. The primary reason for this request is to be able to contribute more actively to the Drugbox and Chembox templates. I have previously participated in discussions to update the Brazilian drug legal status parameter in them (see: Template talk:Infobox drug/Archive 19#Legal status in Brazil - Add subclasses F1, F2 and F3 and Template talk:Chembox/Archive 13#Template-protected edit request on 15 August 2023). I am also contemplating starting a project, potentially under the umbrella of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology, to expand the "legal status" parameter to include additional countries, particularly China and India. This expansion would aim to improve greater understanding of how different countries regulate and culturally perceive various substances. Thanks! -- Arthurfragoso (talk) 17:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Toolbox
|
|---|
|
Wikipedia vandalism information  Low to moderate level of vandalism
3.32 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 02:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC) Links[edit]
Tools[edit] |