User talk:Sntshkumar750

Basuki Bihari Northhttps://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DZ34y64gbidI&ved=2ahUKEwjl2-yzq7XqAhWL4XMBHT4WDo8QjjgwCnoECAkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2ZqZkwcaeozxoqF0Uj1xFP

Basuki Bihari is a gram panchayat of Madhwapur block in Madhubani district of Bihar.It is situated at Madhubani district of the state of Bihar, India.

Sntshkumar750, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sntshkumar750! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Basuki Bihari (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Basuki Bihari North and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Basuki Bihari North, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:24, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Basuki Bihari North (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CptViraj were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Basuki Bihari North and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Basuki Bihari North, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CptViraj (📧) 08:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is a village in Madhubani district of Bihar. Sntshkumar750 (talk) 20:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Kopar Khairane, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_wwFen-nt7V_LSv7Z4lZfa7Z78RhELY-/view?usp=drivesdk== Basuki Bihari North ==

Basuki Bihari North is a large panchayat in Madhubani district of Bihar state of India. Sntshkumar750 (talk) 20:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is located 2.5 km south from Indo-Nepal international border at Madhwapur. Sntshkumar750 (talk) 20:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pipraun moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pipraun, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pipraun (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pipraun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pipraun, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 10:34, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Basuki Bihari

Hello, Sntshkumar750. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Basuki Bihari".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pipraun

Hello, Sntshkumar750. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pipraun".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:22, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Basuki Bihari North

Hello, Sntshkumar750. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Basuki Bihari North".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Journey to Quantum Mechanics moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, A Journey to Quantum Mechanics, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mithila University

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mithila University requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://ugcnetpaper1.com/education-in-ancient-india/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ... discospinster _talk 18:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm DEFCON5. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Anugrah Narayan College, Patna have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. defcon5 (talk) 09:25, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ferroelectric Research Laboratory Patna

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ferroelectric Research Laboratory Patna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ancpatna.ac.in/departments/physics/research_lab.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanCherek (talk) 15:21, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ferroelectric Research Laboratory Patna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ferroelectric Research Laboratory Patna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferroelectric Research Laboratory Patna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DanCherek (talk) 16:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mithila University

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mithila University requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Signed,The4lines |||| ^{(You Asked?) (What I've Done.)} 17:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mithila University moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mithila University, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:34, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You will have to support the article better than with a single (possibly unreliable) source, cited only once (and then, incorrectly), if you want this to have any chance of remaining published. Meanwhile I've moved the article to the draft space. Best, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=jCQaAAAAIAAJ&q=%22Mithila+University%22+-wikipedia&dq=%22Mithila+University%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=1&printsec=frontcover&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj4priuwcLxAhVSIaYKHQgDDys4FBDoATABegQIAhAC Sntshkumar750 (talk) 18:57, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://anvpublication.org/Journals/HTMLPaper.aspx?Journal=International+Journal+of+Advances+in+Social+Sciences%3BPID%3D2017-5-4-9 Sntshkumar750 (talk) 19:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here some leblebi for you

	Leblebi
	Those are the most boring things to eat but I think it is a great way to show appreciation. Keep up the good work. V. E. (talk) 18:49, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sntshkumar750 (talk) 19:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mithila University (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mithila University and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mithila University, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:41, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sntshkumar750 (talk) 15:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Even providing reference, article is declined two times. This article is the subject of ancient educational institution in the Indian subcontinent. The exact article yet not published in the wikipedia. Wikipedia is the labrary of knowledge and this article is a knowledge of ancient educational institution. I want to ask the users of Wikipedia, why this article is not to be published.

AfC notification: Draft:Mithila University has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mithila University. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:24, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mithila University (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AntanO was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mithila University and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mithila University, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Antan O 17:51, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basuki Bihari North moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Basuki Bihari North, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 20:16, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Basuki Bihari North (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Basuki Bihari North and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Basuki Bihari North, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Basuki Bihari North (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AntanO was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Basuki Bihari North and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Basuki Bihari North, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Antan O 10:33, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Madhwapur. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:29, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sri Laxmi Janta High School, Madhwapur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sri Laxmi Janta High School, Madhwapur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Laxmi Janta High School, Madhwapur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ram Niranjan Janta Inter College, Rampur - Madhwapur moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ram Niranjan Janta Inter College, Rampur - Madhwapur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 08:38, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of तमसोमा ज्योतिर्गमय

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on तमसोमा ज्योतिर्गमय requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Waddles 🗩 🖉 17:43, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of तमसोमा ज्योतिर्गमय

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on तमसोमा ज्योतिर्गमय requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Waddles 🗩 🖉 19:46, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Primary School Babhnipatti, Basuki Bihari

The article Primary School Babhnipatti, Basuki Bihari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

primary schools are not considered notable at WP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 10:47, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Durga Puja Samiti, Bihari

Hello Sntshkumar750,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Durga Puja Samiti, Bihari for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Public Committee

A tag has been placed on Category:Public Committee indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:09, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Sntshkumar750

Thank you for creating Peerapur.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

https://censusindia.gov.in/pca/SearchDetails.aspx?Id=266637 would be a good ref

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of First Fundamental Law of Physics

The article First Fundamental Law of Physics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Could not find a Speedy category for this, but this is not a law of physics and appears to be related to discussions of principles of philosophy as related to science. Has nothing to do with physics, and without sourcing has no merit for an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesG5 (talk) 16:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of First Fundamental Law of Physics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article First Fundamental Law of Physics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Fundamental Law of Physics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JamesG5 (talk) 02:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ram Niranjan Janta Inter College, Rampur - Madhwapur (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ram Niranjan Janta Inter College, Rampur - Madhwapur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ram Niranjan Janta Inter College, Rampur - Madhwapur, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 20:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited First Fundamental Law of Physics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fundamental. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Primary School Babhnipatti, Basuki Bihari moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Primary School Babhnipatti, Basuki Bihari, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 21:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gautam Ashram

added a link pointing to Mithila

Yajnavalkya Ashram

added a link pointing to Mithila

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:A Journey to Quantum Mechanics

Hello, Sntshkumar750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:A Journey to Quantum Mechanics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:What is Quantum Mechanics

Hello, Sntshkumar750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:What is Quantum Mechanics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sntshkumar750

A tag has been placed on User:Sntshkumar750 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 15:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikieditors

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikieditors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:04, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Phulhar

Hello, Sntshkumar750,

Thank you for creating Phulhar.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

If this place is referenced in many Hindu texts of ancient India, then give the sources. At this point in time, this article does not meet Wikipedia notability

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Gandiveshwar Sthan

Hello, Sntshkumar750,

Thank you for creating Gandiveshwar Sthan.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article is far too short and lacks sufficient content to meet General notability WP:GNG. Please you do one thing, examine the other articles here Category:Places in the Mahabharata and work to bring this article up to the standard given in those articles. Kindly do the needful.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 00:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:A Journey to Quantum Mechanics

Hello, Sntshkumar750. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "A Journey to Quantum Mechanics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:What is Quantum Mechanics

Hello, Sntshkumar750. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "What is Quantum Mechanics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Utkramit High School, Bihari moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Utkramit High School, Bihari, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:31, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Utkramit Middle School, Bihari

The article Utkramit Middle School, Bihari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable primary school. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:34, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mithila Rajya Nirman Sena moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mithila Rajya Nirman Sena, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DFXYME (talk) 12:53, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mithila University

Hello, Sntshkumar750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mithila University, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mithila Rajya Nirman Sena (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ts12rAc was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mithila Rajya Nirman Sena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mithila Rajya Nirman Sena, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 17:04, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mithila University

Hello, Sntshkumar750. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mithila University".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ram Niranjan Janta Inter College, Rampur - Madhwapur

Hello, Sntshkumar750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ram Niranjan Janta Inter College, Rampur - Madhwapur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Primary School Babhnipatti, Basuki Bihari

Hello, Sntshkumar750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Primary School Babhnipatti, Basuki Bihari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ram Niranjan Janta Inter College, Rampur - Madhwapur

Hello, Sntshkumar750. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ram Niranjan Janta Inter College".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Primary School Babhnipatti, Basuki Bihari

Hello, Sntshkumar750. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Primary School Babhnipatti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:53, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Utkramit High School, Bihari

Hello, Sntshkumar750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Utkramit High School, Bihari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pushpam Priya Choudhary for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pushpam Priya Choudhary, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pushpam Priya Choudhary (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Utkramit High School, Bihari

Hello, Sntshkumar750. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Utkramit High School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:08, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Sntshkumar750

Thank you for creating Pancheshwar Nath Mahadev Mandir.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please add coordinates

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 00:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mithila Rajya Nirman Sena

Hello, Sntshkumar750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mithila Rajya Nirman Sena, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Mithila Rohu Machh. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Your reason for removing the tag “ The topic is notable since it is the identity of the Mithila region.” is not valid. That is not how Wikipedia defines notability. See WP:ORG for more (the standard covers products as well as organizations). — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:07, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mithila Vijay Stambha

Hello, Sntshkumar750,

Thank you for creating Mithila Vijay Stambha.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for contributing. This article needs some expansion to give context - where is the monument located, for example - and wikilinks to help readers explore further. Notability for Wikipedia also requires substantial coverage in multiple reliable independent sources (one reference is not enough).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 10:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mithila Vijay Stambha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mithila Vijay Stambha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul W (talk) 10:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article is notable because it related to history of the battle between the King Narendra Sing of Mithila and King Alivardi Khan. It is recorded in reliable books, Journal and News. The reliable citations have been added in the references lists. Sntshkumar750 (talk) 12:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mithila Vijay Stambha (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ts12rAc was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mithila Vijay Stambha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 12:43, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Mithila State Movement. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. 0 Arjayay (talk) 09:25, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Sntshkumar750. Thank you for creating Shiva Simha Singh. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:30, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mithila Rajya Nirman Sena (November 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement since previous decline. Sources are either trivial mentions or what they say about themselves which is not independent so cannot be used to establish notability. Also, the group is covered in the Mithila State Movement article which seems sufficient given the sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mithila Rajya Nirman Sena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mithila Vijay Stambha

Hello, Sntshkumar750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mithila Vijay Stambha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Laxman Jha

Hello, Sntshkumar750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Laxman Jha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mithila Vijay Stambha

Hello, Sntshkumar750. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mithila Vijay Stambha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Satoshar Sthan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Satoshar Sthan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:34, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Laxman Jha

Hello, Sntshkumar750. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Laxman Jha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ashtavakra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mithila Rajya Nirman Sena

Hello, Sntshkumar750. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mithila Rajya Nirman Sena".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:14, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mansa Devi Mandir, Haripur moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mansa Devi Mandir, Haripur. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DreamRimmer (talk) 04:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Satoshar Sthan

Hello, Sntshkumar750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Satoshar Sthan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Sntshkumar750. Thank you for your work on Swami Bodhayan Mandir. User:Sohom Datta, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Looks good, I would avoid WP:REFBOMBing the lede and instead adding more citations for th later sections

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Sohom Datta}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sohom (talk) 09:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Saharghat, Madhubani

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Saharghat, Madhubani, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:21, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mansa Devi Mandir, Haripur

Hello, Sntshkumar750. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mansa Devi Mandir, Haripur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Yajnavalkya 95 Years Cycle

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Yajnavalkya 95 Years Cycle, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:13, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lunar occultation of Venus

The article Lunar occultation of Venus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Enough information is included in Occultation article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dharmadhwaja Janaka

Hello, Sntshkumar750,

Thank you for creating Dharmadhwaja Janaka.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for creating this article and please link this article to releated to article but I've marked you're article as reviewed.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aviram7}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 04:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Janadeva Janaka

Hello, Sntshkumar750,

Thank you for creating Janadeva Janaka.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Primary sources should not be cited on Wikipedia.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ratnahastin}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ratnahastin (talk) 05:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you, for crating clean articles. cheers!

Dcotos (talk) 13:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shandilya Samhita moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shandilya Samhita. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Please cite reliable secondary sources. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 04:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Thank you for creating Ekadash Rudra Mahadev Mandir. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 03:42, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Sntshkumar750. Thank you for your work on Shringi Rishi Ashram, Singiya. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:15, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yajnavalkya's theory of heliocentrism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yajnavalkya's theory of heliocentrism, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yajnavalkya's theory of heliocentrism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isibhasiyaim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Licchavi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mayank Vahia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mayank Vahia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. --- ᗩvírαm7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 13:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shandilya Samhita has been accepted

Shandilya Samhita, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

--- ᗩvírαm7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 09:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your contribution to the Indian Heritage and Sanatan Dharma related Wikipedia pages. Waonderer (talk) 22:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Sntshkumar750. Thank you for your work on Jalabhisheka. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hi, Sntshkumar750 Nice work! but the article is orphan, please link. cheers!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 09:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Sntshkumar750. Thank you for your work on Thumhani River. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start! please add geographic coordinates of Thumhani River, because i couldn't find the river through search. cheers

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Durga Puja, Bihari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Durga Puja, Bihari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Durga Puja, Bihari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Sntshkumar750. Thank you for your work on Ubhay Bharati. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start! However, her name is mentioned as "Ubhaya Bharati" in most of the references.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 16:44, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Sntshkumar750. Thank you for your work on Artabhaga. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 17:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]