Jump to content

User talk:Nelson Ricardo 2500

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Nricardo)

Please remove the above template if you return to editing. Wikipedia:Ignore all rules


File:LocalNUTS3Oeste.png needs authorship information

[edit]
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:LocalNUTS3Oeste.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

  • If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Nelson Ricardo 2500}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
    or use the {{own}} template.
  • If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.
If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:13, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:LocalDistritoLeiria.png needs authorship information

[edit]
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:LocalDistritoLeiria.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

  • If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Nelson Ricardo 2500}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
    or use the {{own}} template.
  • If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.
If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:14, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese translation

[edit]

Hello. I was on Wikipedia:Translators available and notice that you were on the list for Portuguese to English translators and wondered if you could translate Prince Peter of Saxe-Coburg-Kohary? Thank you or obrigado.The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 13:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article ProClarity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Short-lived, non-notable tech business. Essentially promotional.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback deployment

[edit]

Hey Nricardo; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:LocalDistritoLeiria.png missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:41, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:LocalDistritoLeiria.png

[edit]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Horrible reference desk responses

[edit]

I can only assume this [1] is either you trolling, or just being manifestly dumb. Stop doing that. Shadowjams (talk) 06:43, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kwame Jackson for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kwame Jackson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwame Jackson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ApprenticeFan work 09:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Musicals with Nazi characters

[edit]

Category:Musicals with Nazi characters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 17:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Caldas da Rainha may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

[edit]

Your upload of File:Caldas da Rainha Pottery.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caldas da Rainha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valença (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Caldas da Rainha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to St. Catherine and St. Hyacinth
São Gregório (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Coto

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oeste Subregion

[edit]

If not in the Leiria District, what District is Oeste Subregion in? Please add this to the article. Thanks! WilliamKF (talk) 17:16, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tradução

[edit]

Teria como terminar de traduzir essa página? Grato. 189.101.40.134 (talk) 11:49, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 21 June

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The article is a stylistic mess and I merely tried to tidy it up somewhat. But I can't see what you objected to here. The only thing remotely fitting that description is my replacement of "|author=Assembleia da República ([[Assembly of the Republic (Portugal)]])" with "|author=Assembleia da República ([[Assembly of the Republic (Portugal)|Assembly of the Republic]])". I don't see that as being in any way wrong, and it's quite customary to pipe such links. Admittedly it could be piped differently. Regards, -- Ohc ¡digame! 02:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Caldas da Rainha — Nossa Senhora do Pópulo and Caldas da Rainha — Santo Onofre have em dashes in the legislation that defines the names. Other dash edits change the titles of cited sources. Also, I disagree with much of the delinking. —Nelson Ricardo (talk) 02:33, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Municipality is not a word that everyone knows. Readers may be curious to know the difference between a city and a town. Please keep in mind that not everyone reading Wikipedia is a native English speaker. Although some of your delinking may be OK, I did not feel like disentangling the wheat from the chaff that your autoeditor produced. I appreciate your efforts in trying to improve the article, but I believe that it was better before. —Nelson Ricardo (talk) 17:35, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in case you have the time, I'm making a general request hoping that someone can tidy my machine code translation of the Population Matters' article mentioned. (Ultimately I hope to move the article to "População é importante" or whatever might be the best translation of "Population (as a subject) is important"). The article is currently up for deletion so I'm contacting a few potential translators. Please check: W:pt:Population_Matters&action=history to avoid wasting time. If the article is deleted I would still appreciate its development at w:pt:Usuário(a):Gregkaye/Testes. Any help with any population related article would also be appreciated. Many thanks Gregkaye (talk) 06:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC) w:en:User_talk:Gregkaye[reply]

Your GA nomination of Caldas da Rainha

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Caldas da Rainha you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bilorv -- Bilorv (talk) 16:40, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This

[edit]
  • "The advantage of redirects over piped links is that they allow us to determine which pages link to the given topic using Special:WhatLinksHere" - MOS:RDR
  • "Per Link specificity above, do not use a piped link where it is possible to use a redirected term that fits well within the scope of the text." - MOS:NOPIPE
  • "It is generally not good practice to pipe links simply to avoid redirects. The number of links to a redirect page can be a useful gauge"... - WP:NOPIPE

Don't merely say these rules don't support removing pipes, because then your actions can be counted as nothing but disruptive editing (see Wikipedia:Disruptive editing).--ɱ (talk) 05:06, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. Just ignore that the MOS is written by imperfect humans. Redirects are ugly, and I am compelled to click the Article tab to get rid of the redirect message whenever a sloppy writer has linked to a redirect page. Nelson Ricardo (talk) 05:49, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Wikipedia:Redirect#Bypass_redirects_in_navigational_templates Nelson Ricardo (talk) 05:57, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Caldas da Rainha

[edit]

The article Caldas da Rainha you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Caldas da Rainha for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bilorv -- Bilorv (talk) 07:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 09 March 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 March 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 March 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 1 April 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 April 2016

[edit]

Please

[edit]

Is it possible you translate this article? Gratefull. 2804:14C:5BB6:802D:E269:95FF:FE51:FF80 (talk) 16:46, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

[edit]

Traduction - Translate

[edit]

Did you (if you have time) could translate this here for me? Thanks in advance. 201.17.137.122 (talk) 14:33, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Translation from English to Portugese

[edit]

Hi! I would like to request the creation of a Portuguese wiki page based on an english article http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Fabio_Mancini

Is it possible to help me with that? Irene000 (talk) 11:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

[edit]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Nricardo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Nricardo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

[edit]

Please stop undoing edits

[edit]

Longjohnson20 (talk) 01:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

[edit]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Nricardo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

[edit]

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

[edit]

Ways to improve Nick Hendrix

[edit]

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Nricardo, thanks for creating Nick Hendrix!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. WP:BLP: please add more sources. Tabloids are not considered WP:RS.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

[edit]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Nricardo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

[edit]

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

[edit]

Local administrative unit moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Local administrative unit, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Interstellarity T 🌟 13:11, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Interstellarity: 2004 is recently? --Nricardo (talk) 01:30, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

[edit]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Local administrative unit, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

[edit]

Hello, Nricardo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Local administrative unit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 19:26, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo Caldas da Rainha Camara Municipal.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo Caldas da Rainha Camara Municipal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

[edit]

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 May 2020

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 June 2020

[edit]

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

[edit]

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

[edit]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
18 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Reforms of Portuguese orthography (talk) Add sources
1,310 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Westchester County, New York (talk) Add sources
3,021 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B São Paulo (talk) Add sources
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub A8 motorway (Portugal) (talk) Add sources
266 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C ESSEC Business School (talk) Add sources
3,288 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Rio de Janeiro (talk) Add sources
668 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Belo Horizonte (talk) Cleanup
24 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Cricket poetry (talk) Cleanup
104 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Administrative divisions of Portugal (talk) Cleanup
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mount Sinai South Nassau (talk) Expand
36 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start United States Senate Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee (talk) Expand
269 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Heckler & Koch MG5 (talk) Expand
28 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Zé Povinho (talk) Unencyclopaedic
2,237 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Religion in India (talk) Unencyclopaedic
523 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B State school (talk) Unencyclopaedic
892 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C High school (North America) (talk) Merge
152 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Montefiore Medical Center (talk) Merge
81 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Inner suburb (talk) Merge
93 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ana María Polvorosa (talk) Wikify
41 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Nzingha Stewart (talk) Wikify
88 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Florida Democratic Party (talk) Wikify
82 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Accusations of racial bias in Grammy Awards (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Mojtaba Heidarpanah (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Behzad Ghafarizadeh (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Caldas da Rainha — Nossa Senhora do Pópulo, Coto e São Gregório (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Caldas da Rainha — Santo Onofre e Serra do Bouro (talk) Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Nossa Senhora do Pópulo (talk) Stub
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kwaggafontein (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Santa Catarina (Caldas da Rainha) (talk) Stub
29 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Compton–Miller Medal (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:34, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Nricardo! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 06:21, Monday, December 7, 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Nricardo! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 06:21, Monday, December 7, 2020 (UTC)

[edit]

Hi, I came across the discussion thread you started in the Traveller's Pub at Wikivoyage, and I think it's a great initiative! Adding Wikivoyage links to Wikipedia articles definitely is a good way to increase visibility, too, but I have noticed that this is often done inconsistently or improperly. For example, it appears Wikivoyage has the tendency to delete pages of destinations but not remove the links from Wikipedia articles. There is currently no bot that seems to catch this, so there are plenty of dead links to Wikivoyage because the corresponding articles no longer exist. Some examples are Gunib, Shipka, Buynaksk etc. All of those seem to have had Wikivoyage articles at some point in time.

Of course all those dead links make a poor impression, at the very least they indicate a lack of synchronisation/collaboration between Wikivoyage and Wikipedia.

The 3 example articles above are "real" places that can be visited, so if there is not sufficient travel content to fill an article with, could they be redirected rather than deleted? All of the examples have Wikivoyage articles in other languages already, so maybe translation could help as a temporary placeholder rather than deleting articles? Generally if an article exists on a Wiki in other languages, it's better to translate than to delete, because this has the tendency of re-creating pages over and over again but losing the article history every time.

If you are active on Wikivoyage, could you please raise this issue in the Traveller's Pub discussion thread?

Keep up the good work and all the best, ArticCynda (talk) 20:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wes Moss for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wes Moss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wes Moss (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DavidEfraim (talk) 15:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]