User talk:Fileman67

Welcome!

Hello, Fileman67, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 04:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caractacus Pott

The article is at Caractacus Pott because that was the name in the original book. It was changed to Potts for the film. Also the image you uploaded is not a free one and can't be used. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 04:13, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:ST4 Joyce.png

Thanks for uploading File:ST4 Joyce.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It will be a smaller.

Fileman67 (talk) 12:02, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Middle-earth edits

Hi, thanks for your interest in this WikiProject. However, this is an encyclopedia, not a fansite, there are plenty of those.

So, please avoid adding trivia, such as to infoboxes. We don't use fan art in the lead section. Please do not remove formatting, it's there fir readability. Please also do not remove warning notices from the text, that is disruptive, as is repeating an edit after an editor - not me in that case - reverted your edit and asked you to discuss it first. That was editwarring, which is forbidden. In short, most of your additions have been reverted as unhelpful or inappropriate. If you want to help then you will need to adapt your approach. Chiswick Chap (talk) 03:42, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hobbit. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please could you stop this disruptive and dishonest editing. Adding an image, contrary to what has been explained to you in repeated edit comments, reversion by two different editors, and a note on your talk page, is directly disruptive and uncollegiate. I'd be really grateful if you could stop this kind of thing. You've also ignored the fact that the image is in Copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations extremely seriously. All of these are matters for which you can be blocked from editing. Best stop now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:22, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I won't be blocked from editing. But Thanks. Fileman67 (talk) 17:58, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Celine Dion (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freddie Washington. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at James Pankow, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Think Twice (Celine Dion song). Binksternet (talk) 00:31, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't block the page. I still need to edit. Fileman67 (talk) 01:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to cite sources that actually support your edits. You cited AllMusic for track-by-track credits but they don't supply that. Binksternet (talk) 01:33, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, the problem is that you are making decisions yourself about who played what. Wikipedia has a hard policy against that. See WP:No original research. You must have published WP:Reliable sources that you are reading, and then you summarize them for Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 01:35, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BlueNoise. I noticed that you recently removed content from Eye in the Sky (album) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BlueNoise (talk) 03:56, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at HouseBroken. — YoungForever^(talk) 22:42, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:43, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radio Ga Ga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Taylor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How neat. Not to get rid of this. Fileman67 (talk) 12:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files listed for discussion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 October 20 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:55, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files listed for discussion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 October 26 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:03, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Armand Assante. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 12:14, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Shanice-620x400.jpg

The page File:Shanice-620x400.jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://raynbowaffair.com/international-recording-artist-shanice-to-be-honored-with-the-woman-of-soul-award-at-the-lgbt-music-festival/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 20:24, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jean-Paul Goude, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montreuil.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reach for the Light moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Reach for the Light, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:49, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Balto OST.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Balto OST.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:52, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reach for the Light (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Note that Discogs.com is generally not a reliable source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reach for the Light and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:12, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fileman67! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:12, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was redirected it, right? Fileman67 (talk) 19:15, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it to draft space as it is not ready for mainspace whatsoever. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:16, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Valerie (Steve Winwood song). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 20:35, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bud Cort, you may be blocked from editing. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 23:15, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reach for the Light (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NSONG - Discogs is not an acceptable or reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reach for the Light and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:30, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dr. Dolittle (1998 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Possum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New talk page message

Hi there. I've left a message for you at Talk:Big_Mouth_(TV_series)#Requested_move_19_November_2022. Did you see it? — Manti core 21:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw it. Fileman67 (talk) 23:24, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Have a Dream (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bass.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom! '90

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Freedom! '90, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. I looked for sources for credits, and so far, have only found them for Michael's work on the song, but I'll keep looking. If you know of sources yourself, feel free to add them.

Also, a minor point, but only the first word and proper nouns are capitalized in headings, per WP:SECTIONHEAD.

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 14:53, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think I like the best. Fileman67 (talk) 15:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Where the Wild Things Are: Motion Picture Soundtrack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Lawrence.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Somewhere Out There (An American Tail song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I have had to deal with a vandal adding an uncited Personnel section for a long time. This is a club you do not want to join. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 10:56, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TriStar Pictures.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TriStar Pictures.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:LorraineGary2011.jpg

The page File:LorraineGary2011.jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0308882/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Raspberry Beret, you may be blocked from editing without further warnings. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 01:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.
Please review WP:PERSONNEL - FlightTime (open channel) 01:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Raspberry Beret. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Caractacus Potts.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Caractacus Potts.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paul Shenar.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paul Shenar.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Let's Talk About Love, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Thompson and John Pierce.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Misled (Celine Dion song), you may be blocked from editing. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:24, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Makes Me Wonder. That's it. This is your final warning. When adding Credits sections to articles, cite your source(s). If I catch you adding another uncited Credits section, I'm reporting you to WP:ANI. It's time for this to stop. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:22, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Village People Cruisin personnel

Hi, just an FYI... Jacques Morali credited the other Village People as "background vocalists" to a) make them appear as a real group and b) to placate the boys. Alex is the only other Village Person singing backgrounds, along with the usual bunch from the original album and Macho Man. Hotcop2 (talk) 16:48, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 19:59, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to ignore the column of warnings above. If, on your return to editing, to carry on making edits like this, without adding sources or leaving an informative edit summary, your next block will very likely be indefinite. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 20:08, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Robbie Buchanan (songwriter) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Robbie Buchanan (songwriter). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and no content and not citations. Please don't replace all that copyrighted content. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Big Mouth (season 1)

I have removed a huge amount of unreferenced information. You simply must add citations. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HouseBroken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neil Goldman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Why do you keep adding uncited credits? All it'll do is end up getting you blocked. Again. Please stop adding uncited information. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 02:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Wind of Change (Scorpions song), you may be blocked from editing. There's just no stopping you, is there? ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:23, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use of multiple accounts

I have blocked your other account, Profile78, per the discussion at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fileman67. While you may not be aware of this, Wikipedia's policy on using multiple accounts forbids using undisclosed alternative accounts to edit the same articles. Moreover, because both of these accounts have received warnings and/or blocks for disruptive editing, splitting your contributions between two accounts can be construed as evading scrutiny. You are free to continue editing from this account, but please do not create further undisclosed alts. Thank you, Spicy (talk) 12:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Profile78, you're out of here. Fileman67 (talk) 13:03, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Wind of Change (Scorpions song). Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 12:36, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Reach for the Light

Hello, Fileman67. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Reach for the Light, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Robbie Buchanan (songwriter)

Hello, Fileman67. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robbie Buchanan (songwriter), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robbie Buchanan (songwriter)

Hello, Fileman67. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robbie Buchanan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]