User talk:Doniago

Welcome to my Talk page. Please note the following-

I may not respond to any un-civil comments left here; in fact, I may summarily delete them. If you don't trust yourself to speak civilly, please feel free to chill out for a bit and come back here when you feel you can speak to me civilly.
You may wish to consider whether a discussion would be more productive at a specific article's Talk page, where other editors will more easily be able to view the conversation and offer feedback.
Before starting a thread to discuss any removals of unsourced material from articles, please review WP:V and WP:BURDEN. I will expect any discussions to take those policies into consideration. Also, please note that I have already been the subject of an ANI discussion regarding my removal of uncited material; I will expect any discussions of such here to go beyond what was raised during that discussion.
Please be aware that just because something is handled a certain way elsewhere on Wikipedia does not mean it is okay for it to be repeated; it is possible the matter was handled improperly at the location being used as a precedent. For more information, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.

Thank you for your consideration and civility!

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80
81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100
101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110
111, 112, 113, 114, 115

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

DRN Case Status

Case		Created		Last volunteer edit		Last modified
Title	Status	User	Time	User	Time	User	Time
Wesean Student Federation	On hold	EmeraldRange (t)	34 days, 21 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	1 days, 6 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	1 days, 6 hours
Charyapada	New	Ixudi (t)	24 days, 19 hours	Steven Crossin (t)	24 days, 16 hours	CharlesWain (t)	23 days, 20 hours
Malcolm Sargent	Resolved	CurryTime7-24 (t)	24 days, 12 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	2 days, 15 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	2 days, 15 hours
Taylor Lorenz	On hold	Delectopierre (t)	22 days, 10 hours	Steven Crossin (t)	8 days, 14 hours	Delectopierre (t)	8 days, 7 hours
Aristides de Sousa Mendes	On hold	Benji1207 (t)	13 days, 19 hours	None	n/a	Joséángel006 (t)	8 days, 19 hours
The Simpsons season 36	New	Lado85 (t)	13 days,	Robert McClenon (t)	4 hours	U-Mos (t)	3 hours
Sean Combs	New	162 etc. (t)	7 days, 6 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	4 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	4 hours
Amdo	Closed	Vacosea (t)	2 days, 14 hours	Kovcszaln6 (t)	1 days, 20 hours	Kovcszaln6 (t)	1 days, 20 hours
Elysian Valley, Los Angeles	New	2603:8000:DCF0:95D0:D5C0:7CB3:844E:FF60 (t)	2 days, 13 hours	None	n/a	Phatblackmama (t)	2 days, 11 hours
Mikheil Kavelashvili	New	Malev oleg (t)	2 days, 5 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	4 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	4 hours
Gulf of_Mexico	Closed	Lincoln2020 (t)	1 days, 22 hours	Kovcszaln6 (t)	1 days, 19 hours	Kovcszaln6 (t)	1 days, 19 hours
Bahmani–Vijayanagar War (1443)	New	Example (t)	Unknown	None	n/a	Asilvering (t)	14 hours
Ricky Rich	New	Surayeproject3 (t)	1 days, 21 hours	None	n/a	Surayeproject3 (t)	1 days, 21 hours

If you would like a regularly-updated copy of this status box on your user page or talk page, put {{DRN case status}} on your page. Click on that link for more options.

New message from Sjones23

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Princess Mononoke § Casting details. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:33, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
354	Romulan (talk)	Add sources
119	Pink Floyd pigs (talk)	Add sources
72	Kahless (talk)	Add sources
104	Mr. Potter (talk)	Add sources
89	Butt-Ugly Martians (talk)	Add sources
2,234	Men in Black (1997 film) (talk)	Add sources
7	The Dark-Thirty (talk)	Cleanup
86	Run Rudolph Run (talk)	Cleanup
10	The Butterjunk Effect (talk)	Cleanup
24	Star Trek (IDW Publishing) (talk)	Expand
131	Always Watching: A Marble Hornets Story (talk)	Expand
641	Scotty (Star Trek) (talk)	Expand
304	Guinan (Star Trek) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
281	Wonderland Gang (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,484	Broadcast syndication (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8	Burbage Parish Council, Leicestershire (talk)	Merge
370	Mutualism (biology) (talk)	Merge
17	Goel (talk)	Merge
18	The Road to Memphis (novel) (talk)	Wikify
6	Meneguar (talk)	Wikify
9	Clay Graham (talk)	Wikify
3	Ben Cami (talk)	Orphan
4	Air pollution in Bhiwadi (talk)	Orphan
3	Chloroeremomycin (talk)	Orphan
18	Tower of the Firstborn (talk)	Stub
26	Marassa Jumeaux (talk)	Stub
50	Baron Criminel (talk)	Stub
10	Yaaron Ka Yaar (talk)	Stub
5	Texas State Highway 198 (talk)	Stub
10	Mombu (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Verifiability/SPS RfC on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hoaxes

See Category:1975 hoaxes and its parents. Hoaxes and scandals are subcategories of "controversies". Dimadick (talk) 15:54, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please post new threads at the bottom of Talk pages. That's the standard in almost all cases.

I have doubts about whether hoaxes and scandals are equivalent to controversies, but I don't care enough to make a fuss about it at this time. DonIago (talk) 16:57, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Where No Don Has Gone Before"

Voice of Creation here, and fellow Trekkie. I have checked the summary guide, and after much gnashing of teeth, rage-fueled slapping, and swearing to unleash the wrath of Singh upon you, I recognized that your reversions were correct. The only thing I would ask is that the end of the summary for "Where No Man Has Gone Before" mention the moment between Spock and Kirk where he mentions how he feels. The interpretation that such a mention is too dramatic for readers is bizarre; it caps off the episode proper. At least, that is what my overly emotional mind tells me. GenesisMaster (talk) 11:06, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, as long as the summary stays at 400 words maximum, I'm not going to get overly conccerned about it one way or another. Hell, I probably wouldn't care if it was slightly over 400 words, but there's an unfortunate propensity among editors, especially ones less familiar with the P&G, to just keeping adding 'one more thing' until the plot summary is vastly out of proportion relative to the recommended and attainable word count.

Cheers though, and thanks for reaching out! I'm definitely a Trekkie...and yet, from my time on the TrekBBS, I've come to realize that I'm only about half the Trekkie that many, many other people are! Happy editing! DonIago (talk) 04:17, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
407	Magnificat (talk)	Add sources
198	Comanche Moon (miniseries) (talk)	Add sources
537	Lonesome Dove series (talk)	Add sources
453	ReBoot (talk)	Add sources
532	Folsom State Prison (talk)	Add sources
122	Comanche Moon (talk)	Add sources
232	Galactica 1980 (talk)	Cleanup
4	Syrian Unity Party (talk)	Cleanup
172	Physical comedy (talk)	Cleanup
85	Magnolia (soundtrack) (talk)	Expand
1,853	Star Trek (2009 film) (talk)	Expand
6,618	The Count of Monte Cristo (talk)	Expand
84	Battlestar Galactica (fictional spacecraft) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
222	The Passage (Cronin novel) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
113	William Adama (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
540	USS Enterprise (NCC-1701) (talk)	Merge
13	Interpersonal communication relationship dissolution (talk)	Merge
34	Transit hotel (talk)	Merge
1,162	The Sadness (talk)	Wikify
145	Ballistic Missile Early Warning System (talk)	Wikify
350	Chill Wills (talk)	Wikify
7	Manny Gammage's Texas Hatters Inc. (talk)	Orphan
2	Anna Kontek (talk)	Orphan
3	AD-PUT (talk)	Orphan
21	Geronimo (1939 film) (talk)	Stub
11	Pandemia (talk)	Stub
16	Monte Cristo (1922 film) (talk)	Stub
52	Save Me (Aimee Mann song) (talk)	Stub
204	Gabriel Casseus (talk)	Stub
27	The Count of Monte Cristo (1943 film) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:33, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Counting

Side note about this: If you enable "Show discussion activity" in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion then it will show the number of comments and the number of editors in each ==Level 2== section. WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:25, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Iiiii don't have a "Show discussion activity" option, and when I searched the Preferences I didn't see that one's available. Thanks for the tip; I'd be happy to implement it if I could find it! DonIago (talk) 03:28, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:GEOLINK on articles

I left messages on User_talk:Wamalotpark pages for MOS:GEOLINK for Chicago, Illinois vs Chicago, Illinois they've left messages on mine, and on Talk:United_Center they said they didn't care, and were leaving the pages alone, as to if we couldn't come to an agreement you were to leave the pages as is. Then come to find out they changed it again. I am just looking to get a third party opinion on it. Not trying to get anyone banned, or into an edit war. Just trying to get some help on this, thanks. Brotherbenz (talk) 18:10, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I've now said there, if you want a third-party opinion, I think you need to start by providing a clear description of what the disagreement actually is. You can't just summarize it as you have above, but you need to verbalize what the root issue is. If this is about edit-warring, then there are processes for how to address that. DonIago (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just posted on the talk page of the UC Brotherbenz (talk) 18:30, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

automated tooling

your automated tooling is a waste of my time. Bart Terpstra (talk) 18:02, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If being informed when you violate policies and guidelines is a waste of your time, editing Wikipedia may not be a good fit for you. DonIago (talk) 20:24, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Logan's Run, The Circuit

"Why is this relevant? It's not mentioned anywhere else in the article."

Sir, it is relevant because it is part of the plot of the film, plus I narrowed it down to a simple brief description:

That evening, via a device called The Circuit, he meets Jessica 6, a young woman also wearing an ankh pendant.

The current sentence in this section of the plot is this before my edits were needlessly reverted:

That evening, he meets Jessica 6, a young woman also wearing an ankh pendant.

It is only SIX additonal words and it adds a brief detail to the plot description that actually happened in the film.

I don't want to get into a tiresome editing war on the Logan's Run article but I think the addition fits fine. Thank you. Eric Carpenter (talk) 16:11, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you felt the need to space out your comment as you did, but okay.

I don't see where in your comment you establish why it's specifically important to mention The Circuit, versus just saying he meets Jessica. There's no mention of The Circuit anywhere else in the article, so it doesn't exactly seem to be an important plot device. You may want to read WP:FILMPLOT; we typically try not to add plot details just for the sake of including them.

You are welcome to raise the question at the article's Talk page if you feel strongly that this merits inclusion. That would allow other editors to weigh in as well. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 16:38, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Nature Boy" reversal.

Thanks. I guess I'm not as conversant as I should be in editing via the app - couldn't figure out how to insert the required citation. Timhogs (talk) 22:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Happy to help out if I can! Please note that for "In popular culture"-style items, generally a secondary source is needed, as discussed at WP:IPCV. Happy editing! DonIago (talk) 03:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
137	Streets of Laredo (miniseries) (talk)	Add sources
1,286	The Fox and the Hound (talk)	Add sources
246	Logan's Run (talk)	Add sources
48	Turbo Dogs (talk)	Add sources
148	Anandavally (talk)	Add sources
453	I'm Gonna Git You Sucka (talk)	Add sources
233	Disneyland Park (Paris) (talk)	Cleanup
558	Supersonic transport (talk)	Cleanup
639	Container ship (talk)	Cleanup
72	NHK Educational TV (talk)	Expand
245	Catalog merchant (talk)	Expand
4,118	The Lost World: Jurassic Park (talk)	Expand
876	Forbidden Planet (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
208	Main Street, USA (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
840	Big-box store (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
12	Mandera Prison (talk)	Merge
309	Freedom of movement (talk)	Merge
6	2008 Twenty20 Cup (talk)	Merge
39	History of the Atlanta Falcons (talk)	Wikify
257	Superboy (TV series) (talk)	Wikify
624	Supergirl (1984 film) (talk)	Wikify
10	Irving Force (talk)	Orphan
2	Chester Hougen (talk)	Orphan
2	Beauval Communal Cemetery (talk)	Orphan
16	Dragonlance Adventures (talk)	Stub
53	Popeye Doyle (film) (talk)	Stub
59	The French Connection (book) (talk)	Stub
15	Brendle's (talk)	Stub
6	The Atlas of the Land (talk)	Stub
12	Hollow World Campaign Set (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:40, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]