User talk:Aleqc

Welcome!

Hi Aleqc! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! JimRenge (talk) 02:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aleqc/sandbox

Welcome, and thank you for contributing to the English Wikipedia. The page that you have created in your sandbox is not in English, it is in Spanish. You may translate it into English, but you may also write this article at the Spanish Wikipedia instead. Thank you. Rusty4321 ^{talk contributions} 23:45, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rusty4321 I know that. But my Google settings are in English so the English version is the default option when logging into Wikipedia. I use this sandbox to create articles in Spanish or French. Aleqc (talk) 23:52, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

== Welcome! ==

Hi Aleqc! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Selfstudier (talk) 21:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify the above some more, per WP:ARBECR, I reverted your last contribution as you are presently limited to filing edit requests only, the initial edit was an edit request, even if not in the standard form, but the subsequent contribution was not. Selfstudier (talk) 21:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So. If I want all the references that state 'Mexico recognises the State of Palestine as a full sovereign state' to be removed. Or clarify that there aren't any official sources or documents that support the Mexican recognition of the State of Palestine. I need to ask for that change in the talk page of the article or the 'Current requests for edits to a protected page' section of the 'Wikipedia:Requests for page protection' page you sent. Right? Aleqc (talk) 23:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but I think someone will anyway do it shortly following our conversation and the references provided there. Selfstudier (talk) 09:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted Aleqc (talk) 17:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chiapas abortion

HI. could you add a ref? thanks. — kwami (talk) 04:30, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. But not in English.

In which part of the article do you want me to put the reference?

https://www.elsoldemexico.com.mx/republica/congreso-de-chiapas-despenaliza-el-aborto-12927024.html Aleqc (talk) 04:35, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

I've moved the refs for individual states from the lead to the table so we can see which goes with which. — kwami (talk) 04:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, got it. I can add all the refs needed. But they won't be in English (retrieved from the Spanish version). Aleqc (talk) 04:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The language doesn't matter. People can always pop it into Google Translate. If the source is long, it's helpful to provide a page number.

I'll go ahead and change the map since we list Chiapas in the table. — kwami (talk) 04:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The map needs to be updated with Zacatecas (reformed 5 days ago), State of Mexico (yesterday) and Chiapas (today). But, the laws haven't been published yet. I add them to the table because the local governments can't veto those laws (it's a Supreme Court order the legislative and executive powers must comply). Aleqc (talk) 05:06, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done.

So all states are required to legalize due to the SC order? — kwami (talk) 05:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since Aguascalientes, the legal strategy has changed (it has been pretty messy, and it has been evolving every year). After the 2021 ruling, the states weren't obligated to modify their legislations immediately. The Supreme Court allowed them to do it whenever they want.

But with the Aguascalientes' case, Supreme Court (and other minor federal courts) started analysing collective amparos. And one of the effects of those amparos is the obligation of modifying the unconstitutional laws before the legislative period finishes. Congress and governors can't appeal or veto the ruling. They can't vote against the decriminalisation (something similar happened a decade earlier with same-sex marriage). That was the case with Aguascalientes, Jalisco, San Luis Potosí, Zacatecas, and Chiapas.

Nayarit, Morelos, and Yucatán will do it soon, before January 1st 2025.

In the case of Michoacán, the State of Mexico and Puebla; the amparos were already filed, but the Congress of those states modified their laws before they were analysed (and lectured about their omission).

In Jalisco, representatives had to vote twice the same day because they voted against in a first round (by a tiny minority). So they had to vote again to approve the decriminalisation.

We will see the next year what will happen with Tabasco, Campeche, Tamaulipas, Durango, Sonora, Nuevo León, and Tlaxcala. I don't know if the colectivas and NGOs filed amparos against the Congresses of those states.

As I said, it has been pretty chaotic since 2021. Aleqc (talk) 05:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. I'll add Nayarit, Morelos, and Yucatán to the lead; you're welcome to add a ref, of course, but the laws will probably be changed before anyone tags it. — kwami (talk) 06:17, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would wait until December. Once the final bill is voted for those 3 states, I'll add the info. Right now, the only stuff we have is a judicial order to harmonize the law before the end of the current legislative period (December 2024). Aleqc (talk) 17:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can word it that way. It's nice to be able to provide some idea of how things may move forward. — kwami (talk) 18:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]