Draft:Kevin Marino

Submission rejected on 14 December 2024 by Anuwrites (talk).

This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Rejected by Anuwrites 18 days ago. Last edited by Favonian 16 days ago.

Submission declined on 29 November 2024 by Ktkvtsh (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Ktkvtsh 32 days ago.

Submission declined on 8 August 2024 by Dan arndt (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Dan arndt 4 months ago.

Submission declined on 7 August 2024 by Dan arndt (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Declined by Dan arndt 4 months ago.

Submission declined on 31 July 2024 by Drmies (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Drmies 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 28 July 2024 by KylieTastic (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Declined by KylieTastic 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 27 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by SafariScribe 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 25 July 2024 by KylieTastic (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by KylieTastic 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 17 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by SafariScribe 5 months ago.

Comment: We should stop here now with this submission as no progress to the article are made from all comments from reviewers, the article look so poor too. If you kindly wish to go on editing and submit it again, you are always welcome to request it's installation. ANU^writes 00:50, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Comment: No improvement - just wasting everyone time KylieTastic (talk) 17:14, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Comment: This was not improved at all, from the point of view of notability. A lack of sources proving notability was cited as a reason for declining, and I agree, and no new sources were added. Drmies (talk) 22:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Kevin Marino was former President and 2024 Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s campaign manager’s attorney. he was also the attorney of Samuel Miele^[1]^[2], a paid operative for expelled Republican party Representative George Santos during both his 2020 and 2022 Congressional campaigns. Samuel Miele was indicted in for wire fraud and aggravated identity theft relation to impersonating former Speaker of the House of Representatives Kevin McCarthy's chief of staff whose name is Dan Meyer to a wealthy donor.^[3]

References

^ "Trump's former campaign manager Bill Stepien bows out of testifying for the January 6 committee's public hearing because his wife went into labor". 13 June 2022.
^ "Ex-fundraiser for George Santos pleads guilty to wire fraud". 14 November 2023.
^ "Feds indict paid fundraiser for Rep. George Santos for allegedly impersonating Speaker McCarthy aide". CNBC. 16 August 2023.

[1] "Trump's former campaign manager Bill Stepien bows out of testifying for the January 6 committee's public hearing because his wife went into labor". 13 June 2022.

[2] "Ex-fundraiser for George Santos pleads guilty to wire fraud". 14 November 2023.

[3] "Feds indict paid fundraiser for Rep. George Santos for allegedly impersonating Speaker McCarthy aide". CNBC. 16 August 2023.

[1]

[2]

[3]