User Talk:Ktkvtsh

This is Ktkvtsh's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

If I have declined a draft you created or submitted to AfC, and you want to ask me to re-review it, please DO NOT – I feel like it's much fairer when a draft goes back to the pool of fresh eyes for re-review. If you have come to say that you've made changes and want me to take a look, you are more than welcome to. I'd appreciate it if you would please use a hyperlink to link to the page you are mentioning, so that I don't have to search for it.

How Did You Become Part Of The Wikipedia Team?

When You Joined Wikipedia You Weren’t Part Of The Wikipedia Team Yet. But Some How You Joined The Wikipedia Team. How Did You Join The Wikipedia Team? AndrewThe12th (talk) 21:18, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AndrewThe12th Do you mean how did I join Articles for Creation? I applied to become a reviewer. If you mean just in general, I simply created an account, read about Wikipedia policies and how to edit and simply went from there. There are many helpful resources to guide you. I can point you to them if you'd like.

What is your goal here on Wikipedia? Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What Happens If A Draft Gets Declined Too Many Times? AndrewThe12th (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing, it will continue to be reviewed. Eventually, if it hasn't been edited in a certain amount of time it will end up being deleted. But you would get a notice on your talk page before that happens. Ktkvtsh (talk) 01:27, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AndrewThe12th Ktkvtsh (talk) 01:28, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AndrewThe12th well, it could be rejected, though the goal is to get the article to publishing standards. I do have a question, why do you capitalize the first letter of every word? Style choice? Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:06, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leonard Ceeley page not accepted

Hello, I have made substential change to this pages you reviewed and refused. I hope it meets the standarts now. Regards Edmond Furax (talk) 11:22, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Edmond Furax, I see that you have made changes. Another reviewer will take a look. I don't review an article more than once. Ktkvtsh (talk) 14:07, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK I thought so but thanks. I've already been waiting a couple of weeks for a new review ! Edmond Furax (talk) 17:41, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Edmond Furax It could take about 2 months for a second review. There are over 2,000 articles waiting to be reviewed. While you wait, work on a new article or help add a reference to an random unsourced article. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:26, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that’s what I’m doing, mainly in the French Wikipedia 2001:861:324B:2E40:E183:633C:7626:18B4 (talk) 19:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
192	SBS (Australian TV channel) (talk)	Add sources
452	Eurovision Song Contest 2017 (talk)	Add sources
221	Inside (reality show) (talk)	Add sources
342	Eurovision Song Contest 2012 (talk)	Add sources
172	Sliema (talk)	Add sources
28	Mascletà (talk)	Add sources
6	Jeannie Lin (talk)	Cleanup
5	Fortunato Zampaglione (talk)	Cleanup
29	Paola Turci (talk)	Cleanup
136	Anna Oxa (talk)	Expand
7	Roberto Casalino (talk)	Expand
141	2025 Giro d'Italia (talk)	Expand
140	Holodomor denial (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8	Ceremonial Castings (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
58	Nancy Chodorow (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,359	Pterosaur (talk)	Merge
258	Global spread of H5N1 (talk)	Merge
80	Personal information management (talk)	Merge
28	Fred De Palma (talk)	Wikify
16	Prytanée national militaire (talk)	Wikify
6	Stephanie Hilferty (talk)	Wikify
2	Harold Clavite (talk)	Orphan
3	Fiorella Mancini (talk)	Orphan
2	Adeline Fredin (talk)	Orphan
269	E.Leclerc (talk)	Stub
45	Sangiovanni (talk)	Stub
21	La Sad (talk)	Stub
984	Simone Cristicchi (talk)	Stub
25	Izi (rapper) (talk)	Stub
45	Pinguini Tattici Nucleari (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit

Help:Minor edit has a template at the top of the page saying that WP:MINOR is an information page, It is not an encyclopedic article, nor one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. Just letting ya know before you continue policing others for not marking their edits as "minor". Thanks! Some1 (talk) 00:37, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I didn't use the template because I was trying to leave a friendly message for an obviously experienced editor. I thought your edit could have qualified as a minor edit and just thought I'd let you know. Sorry if I offended you in any way. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MINOR also states that It's acceptable to never mark a single edit as "minor" and The use of this feature is optional so you really shouldn't be going around to people's talk pages telling them that their edits should have been listed as a minor edit[1] (emphasis mine). Some1 (talk) 04:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry. Geez. Consider me lashed. Lesson learned. Ktkvtsh (talk) 07:10, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Yamb (game)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I wanted to let you know that I have declined your G11 speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Yamb (game). Although the article has a promotional tone, it does not contain blatant advertising. Especially when articles are in the draftspace, I recommend refraining from nominating articles for G11 speedy deletion unless they contain unambiguous advertising. Editors using the draftspace are much more likely to be new editors who may not fully understand Wikipedia's policies regarding tone--not to mention that learning how to successfully write in a neutral point of view is challenging! As such, I suggest practicing restrain when coming across promotional content in the draftspace as nominating a new editor's first edits for speedy deletion can be very bitey.

My only caveat would be to check the username. For example, many new users will start by creating an autobiography. If that's the case, welcome them with {{welcome-auto}}. If there's a possibility that the user is editing on behalf of a company, welcome them with {{welcome-COI}} and consider reporting to WP:UAA. Otherwise, our goal is to help editors feel welcomed into the community. I hope this makes sense. Let me know if you have any follow-up questions, comments, and/or concerns on the matter. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks for letting me know. Ktkvtsh (talk) 07:11, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are You Active?

I heard your recent editing page got deleted so are you active? AndrewThe12th (talk) 01:06, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AndrewThe12th what page are you speaking of?

Yes I am active atleast weekly, usually daily. Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]