User talk:Thatsoddd

Info

Until my block is reviewed. I’ll be logged out but that doesn’t mean I will use another account. I’ll just take a break from Wikipedia until my block is reviewed. I have notifications on for my email as well. As of November 14, 2023 though I am logging out.

If you an admin sees this. Please check my block and review it. Once again I’ll come back by the end of the month but of course right now there’s no need to use this account.

September 2023

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cupid (Fifty Fifty song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 00:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Jena Rose

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jena Rose, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:50, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wasted Summers (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NSONG. AppleMusic is not a reliable independent source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wasted Summers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thatsoddd! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wasted Summers (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NSONG - needs more than just an infobox. Also need to ensure that sources are cited correctly - see WP:REFB.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wasted Summers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:16, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Wasted Summers has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wasted Summers. Thanks! dxneo (talk) 14:23, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept the article. I had already added those citations prior before you mentioned them. Check the ‘reception’ and ‘charts’. Feel free to let me know if any citations are unreliable. If there are no unreliable sources please accept the article. Thatsoddd (talk) 15:15, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to you everywhere but here so sorry about that. I didn’t realize you could reply. Those things have been cited since before you said that. I haas added it in the charts and also the ‘reception’ part of the article. Accepting it would be great. Thatsoddd (talk) 15:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Thatsoddd!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, S0091 (talk) 18:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I’m currently working on a draft for an article. Please check it out and tell me what you think.https://en.m.wiki.x.io/wiki/Draft:Wasted_Summers I appreciate it.Thatsoddd (talk) 23:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Girls Like Me Don’t Cry moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Girls Like Me Don’t Cry. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not talking about that one. That one is currently in the works. I just started working on it today. I’m talking about my draft for the song Wasted Summers. Which I linked above. I’m currently still working on Girls Like Me Don’t Cry. Thatsoddd (talk) 12:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wasted Summers (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need multiple sources that have written in-depth about the song. At least one of those sources needs to be a publication other than Billboard. Also, some of the cited sources do not mention the song or repeat the same information in other cited sources so redundant. Note that ranking on a qualified chart is only indicator the song can meet WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wasted Summers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 14:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

other accounts

So this is your third account so far? Valereee (talk) 16:32, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I abandoned all the others. This is the only account I’m using currently. With the exception of one which I stated my reason for using in my bio. I no longer use that account either way. Thatsoddd (talk) 16:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey my article is ready for main space.

Just added references and more to my article on Girls Like Me Don’t Cry. Thatsoddd (talk) 18:50, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023 unreliable sources at BLPs

Please don't add sources like this one to any article, much less one about a living person. An online people search tool is not in any way a valid citation for anything. Valereee (talk) 10:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted that. I must’ve forgot it on one of the pages sorry. I kinda forgot about that considering the fact, she hasn’t tweeted anything and also the Instagram pictures won’t work for some reason so it’s either I wait till next year and hope she tweets something on her birthday or a news article posts something about her and includes her birthday. Since neither is probably gonna happen. I’m choosing to just forget about it until then. Thank you so much for your help on tea house bye. Thatsoddd (talk) 14:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Her birthday does also come up when she’s searched via google anyway. Thatsoddd (talk) 15:09, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:Thuy Girls Like Me Don't Cry sped up.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Thuy Girls Like Me Don't Cry sped up.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 08:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Girls like me dont cry sped up.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Girls like me dont cry sped up.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Girls like me dont cry.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Girls like me dont cry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thuy girls like me dont cry sped up.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thuy girls like me dont cry sped up.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COPYVIO issues: Do not copy text from websites without attribution

Hello. Regarding your creation of Love Lee, you copy-pasted text from various sources you cited throughout the article without putting it into your own words (paraphrasing or rewording it) or indicating that what you copied was a quote. This is a significant problem on Wikipedia and you need to stop doing it immediately going forward. It is a copyright violation to do this (per WP:COPYVIO) and repeated instances of it can get your account blocked. I am sure you can see why copying text from a publication when copyright law exists is a problem. You need to paraphrase, put things in your own words, and explicitly mark with quotation marks (" ") parts of text that are direct quotes—like when a critic offers an opinion of a work. You should additionally not be copying PR text from sources describing songs or albums. We word things neutrally on Wikipedia (WP:NEUTRAL) and text copied directly from sources describing songs as "catchy" and "clever", aside from the aforementioned copyright issues and unless it is indicated as a quote, is not appropriate. Thank you. Ss112 04:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that now but I had no clue about that before so thanks. Thatsoddd (talk) 14:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

other accounts again?

Thatsoddd, you've been using the Jjjjfghh2 account again. Is there a reason you're alternating between accounts, sometimes at the same article? Valereee (talk) 15:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That account only has about 15 edits, it’s not something I use on a regular basis. I did state on my page that I do have an account which I sometimes use. Although as stated before, it’s not an account I use often. On Wikipedia, I try to use only ONE account. Thatsoddd (talk) 20:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is the purpose of the alt account which may be in violation of WP:SOCK? Also, why "try" to use one account when you really could just use one account? S0091 (talk) 20:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay fine then I’ll use only this account. Thatsoddd (talk) 20:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, you agree to only use this account? S0091 (talk) 21:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the option and blocked all undisclosed accounts including Jjjjfghh, Uglydoodoo, Wewillbetheree and Jjjjfghh2 some of which have been used on overlapping articles. Thatsoddd, stick to this one account moving forward please.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly some of those i don’t remember making. I will stick to just this account though. Thank you for all your help! Thatsoddd (talk) 21:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move articles to unnecessary and incorrectly disambiguated pages

Thatsoddd, there was no reason to move Love Lee to Love Lee(AKMU song). There is nothing else of the name Love Lee on Wikipedia, therefore there is no need for the incorrect disamibguation per WP:NCMDAB (it is incorrect as you didn't add a space between the last letter of the title and the parenthesised disambiguation, and even if you had spaced it, it is not necessary). Ss112 04:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. Without that it won’t come up on Google search so it is necessary. Thatsoddd (talk) 04:55, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are here can you move it please. Thatsoddd (talk) 04:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please move the page to Love Lee (AKMU song) with the space so it can be easier to find through google. Without this it’s basically impossible to find. Thatsoddd (talk) 04:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Supreme Leather Varsity Jacker Spring Summer 2015.png

A tag has been placed on File:Supreme Leather Varsity Jacker Spring Summer 2015.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eteethan (talk) 01:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Valereee (talk) 10:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thatsoddd, it's starting to feel as if aren't ever going to understand that this and this look extremely much like WP:sockpuppetry, but it seems pretty clear that you're playing some game of logging in and out and back in to make edits. Which very much makes me wonder what exactly you're here for. Valereee (talk) 10:58, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you ever coming back. It’s been a few days. I’m starting to feel like I’ll never get unbanned. I have respected you and I have even said kind things about you to other editors and I’m not trying to use this as a way of getting you to unblock me, im just being honest. I would never try to harm the website. I made only constructive edits with my IP address and I mean this is gonna get ignored anyway. Im here to make articles under my niche and explore different topics too. I am here to build an encyclopedia. Thatsoddd (talk) 02:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thatsoddd (talk) 13:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thatsoddd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I couldn’t get into my account at the time. Presumably because I’m going from device to device. Things get frustrating as I don’t wanna have to log in every single time. To add to that I didn’t see anything that says publishing through another account on Wikimedia commons is a bannable offense and I know I shouldn’t have have done this but my intentions were not to cause harm to the platform. I also did message you immediately when this happened but I deleted. It can be found in the history though. Once again I’m so sorry that this happened. I should’ve just logged in if I wanted to post or edit something. Thatsoddd (talk) 15:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't buy it. Yamla (talk) 15:46, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're going from device to device over the period of a six minutes twice, sometimes, and while editing the same page? You're saying you actually find it easier to switch devices, navigate to the page you were working on using a different device six minutes ago than it is to log in? My devices keep me logged in, you aren't being offered that ability? Valereee (talk) 15:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At the end of the day I admit it was dishonest and gaming but it was far from intentional behavior. My intention was simply to edit the page but due to consistent use of WP without logging in I definitely looked like a sockpuppet but I simply just never logged in. Also no, I can’t log in on two devices at the same time. I should’ve simply not have edited the website while logged out. This won’t happen again. I will be more cautious about things like this. I know I most likely won’t get unbanned but I am asking for at least a shortening of the ban put in place. Thatsoddd (talk) 15:40, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You removed from this discussion the complaint about removing a deletion tag literally while we were having this discussion. I'm afraid I'm with Yamla here. Maybe go edit Simple Wikipedia constructively for a few months, then come back here with a good track record and request again. Valereee (talk) 15:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thatsoddd (talk) 10:21, 11 November 2023 (UTC):[reply]

Unblock.

..My intention was not to cause damage or harm to the website. The reason placed "not here to build an encyclopedia" I assume refers to the 'gaming the system' part. Everything I did was primarily due to me being unaware of certain guidelines despite being reminded by the admins due to this I continued to break the rule and after reading the rules again, I recognized the problem and immediately addressed it. I messaged one of the admins through my talk page. After a day, I deleted my message. There was never any vandalism done to the website when using an ip address or another account. I am once again asking for my ban to be shortened or simply removed as of January 16, 2024 because I swear I will not use an ip address again to edit again. I understand why it was placed, I should've known better but I will not let this happen again.}} Thatsoddd (talk) 10:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue further to make my point clear. The ip address that was used was used by accident to edit articles. It was not however meant to harm the platform. I specifically forgot to log in. I did log in too by the way but then it logged me out AGAIN. I am asking for a removal of this ban. I assure it won’t happen again. Despite all this, I was ONLY editing that specific thing as it was a copy edit which ended up in me continuing to edit it. It’s not in my niche so of course I didn’t realize logging out and editing would cause a problem. Thatsoddd (talk) 18:18, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AKMU Love Lee Promotional Poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AKMU Love Lee Promotional Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea what I was doing and I was uninformed on most rules which I should’ve known. I’m asking my block request be reviewed by an administrator. Thank you.Thatsoddd (talk) 21:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia unblock request as of December.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thatsoddd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I am now more educated on certain rules such as the sockpuppetry rule and a lot more. I believe that I am ready to get my account back. I broke the rules as I never read them. Now that I have a better understanding. I'm willing to change and to adapt as a Wikipedia editor, I will no longer use any other account to edit articles nor deleted templates and add citations that may be false Thatsoddd (talk) 19:18, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your request because you have continued to evade your block by editing while logged out, according to multiple independent checkusers who have examined Wikipedia's technical logs, even as this appeal was pending. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Valereee: If this individual has not evaded their block over the past several months, would you object to an unblock under a one-account restriction? — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{Checkuser needed}} to see if the user has evaded their block following the decline by Yamla above. As noted in the quick SPI request, I'd summarily decline this if there is evidence of block evasion (and this user should not be stale). — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Red-tailed hawk: they have evaded their block using IPs as recently as yesterday. Spicy (talk) 10:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, RTH. Obviously this is probably moot, but the issues with this user kind of went beyond the multiple accounts thing. Their contributions at Jenna Rose while discussion was happening at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_417#Can_Instagram_be_used_as_a_WP:ABOUTSELF_if_it_is_the_person’s_Instagram_account?, for instance. The multiple accounts thing was concerning because they were contributing to conversations using two different accounts after multiple requests not to do so, but the CIR and IDHT was what got us there in the first place. Valereee (talk) 13:29, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair. I had read most of the comments above to indicate problems relating to sockpuppetry, which is why I framed the question as such. In any case, it's a moot point if they're continuing to evade their block. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will say I didn’t know a lot. — User:Thatsoddd 00:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thatsoddd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had no idea what I was doing and I was uninformed on most rules which I should’ve known. I also didn’t realize I couldn’t edit with an IP either while blocked. Also keep in mind I didn’t know that I wasn’t allowed to do that.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, I am are unable to unblock you at this time. I recommend waiting at least six months before you again request unblocking. (You should not evade your block by editing the English language Wikipedia from a different account or while not logged in during this time. It would reset the six month timer.) It would work in your favor for you to constructively edit a different Wikipedia or Wikimedia project during this time, for at least six months and at least 500 edits. You will then need to concisely and clearly tell how your editing merited a block, what you would do different, and what constructive edits you would make. A list of Wikimedia projects can be found at META:List_of_Wikipedias . Before again requesting unblocking, please read the Guide to Appealing Blocks. Please read and heed any other advice you have received in unblock declines or discussions. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 8:41 am, Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:08, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thatsoddd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My intention was not to cause damage or harm to the website. The reason placed "not here to build an encyclopedia" I assume refers to the 'gaming the system' part. Everything I did was primarily due to me being unaware of certain guidelines despite being reminded by the admins due to this I continued to break the rule and after reading the rules again, I recognized the problem and immediately addressed it. I messaged one of the admins through my talk page. After a day, I deleted my message. There was never any vandalism done to the website when using an ip address or another account. I am once again asking for my ban to be shortened or simply removed as of November 11, 2023 because I swear I will not use an ip address again to edit again. I understand why it was placed, I should've known better but I will not let this happen again.

Decline reason:

Spicy found block evasion on January 8, 2024, User does not evince understanding of the problems and how to not repeat them. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thatsoddd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will continue further to make my point clear. The ip address that was used was used by accident to edit articles at first . It was not however meant to harm the platform. I specifically forgot to log in. I did log in too by the way but then it logged me out AGAIN. Soon after I was banned and didn’t see any issue with using my IP adresss. I am asking for a removal of this ban. I assure it won’t happen again. I didn’t realize logging out and editing would cause a problem.

Decline reason:

Your account was blocked, so you evaded your block by editing without logging in by accident? I don't even know what that is supposed to mean. When your account is blocked, you are not permitted to edit at all. In six months time, you can request unblock per the standard offer. Girth Summit _(blether) 17:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Created user:Everybodyyy two hours after the above unblock request was denied. CU blocked on 8 March 2024. Meters (talk) 22:50, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thatsoddd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1.The account has been blocked because of sockpuppetry which I knowingly engaged in. My other accounts were not active when this account was used and this account was not made to circumvent a block.It wasn't until after I made this account through a different IP address I realised this was sockpuppetry but I continued to use this account and that was my fault. I should have stopped using the account immediately and waited for my block on my other accounts to be removed.

2. The IP addresses are different because I made this account on a different IP address but it was not created to disrupt or abuse the platform. It was created because I didn't see how making an account on a different IP address would be a problem however I realised quickly that it is in fact sockpuppetry and take full responsibility in knowingly engaging in that.

3. This account has not made disruptive edits and the talk page is quite clean and is free of complaints. It never was created to bypass any restriction. My account was blocked on the other IP address and has yet to be unblocked and I didn't want to wait 3 months to get unblocked when I have clearly improved and am willing to understand the rules of Wikipedia. I won't do it again because I now understand Wikipedia takes sockpuppetry very seriously. I understand that many of my articles and edits will be removed and already have been.

4. I believe I should be unblocked because I am not a distriptuve editor nor did I engage in sockpuppetry to disrupt or abuse the platform. I am aware that I knowingly engaged in sockpuppetry but it will not happen again. If unblocked I will ONLY use this account from now on and I will NOT use another account or IP adresss to circumvent any block again. Lastly, I understand that I engaged in sock-puppetry and I will not do it again.

Decline reason:

The only possible pathway forward here is the standard offer; the six months period starts now. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User: 331dot Six months?? That would mean I’d get unblocked around September 12 of this year?? It’s March 12, 2024. There has to be a way to shorten this from six whole months. — Thatsoddd (talk) 10:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Love Lee(album)

Hello, Thatsoddd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Love Lee(album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:It Girl

Hello, Thatsoddd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:It Girl, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Love Lee(album)

Hello, Thatsoddd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Love Lee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:It Girl

Hello, Thatsoddd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "It Girl".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Girls Like Me Don't Cry Thuy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Girls Like Me Don't Cry Thuy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]