Jump to content

User talk:Qzekrom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Qzekrom! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 23:24, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Voltaire

[edit]

I was not in favor of such a big section myself, but there was huge debate after some editor had completely copied the text from French Wikipedia and used Google translator. It was not even neutral but after some days(when I was on break), some other users would attempt to make it neutral or at least look real, free of original research. Whenever you place these tags[1] you should also post on the talk page. Bladesmulti (talk) 16:08, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, French Wikipedia. Of course. I thought they had put undue weight on attacking Islam. Qzekrom (talk) 00:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Soybean

[edit]

For those of us without comedic tastes, the folks at Uselesspedia have an article about me. MyOwnBadSelf | Consult the Fossil 11:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! (Almost read that as "Uncyclopedia.") Qzekrom (talk) 14:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is Uncyclopedia. MyOwnBadSelf | Consult the Fossil 07:50, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah but you wrote Uselesspedia and I read that as Uncyclopedia. Anyway, I'm not as active on Uncyc as I used to. Qzekrom (talk) 15:13, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Haha! Tricked you... into thinking that I exist! MyOwnBadSelf | Consult the Fossil 05:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Qzekrom. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Credinka moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Credinka, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 19:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Qzekrom. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

re: ECS move

[edit]

Can you please undo the name change you made to Entity–component–system ? As the comment on the talk page under the heading 'Someone renamed the page' explains - it's incorrect and your analogy to MVC is misplaced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andybak (talk • contribs) 00:05, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Andybak: Thanks, I've moved it back. Please leave messages on my talk page here instead of on subpages; I didn't notice your message until just now. Qzekrom (talk) 00:07, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion Pages

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia.I would like to give you a kind reminder that Wikipedia's discussion pages are not meant to be used as forums. This means that contributions to discussion pages should only be reserved for items that are:

  • Directly discussing the improvement of the article.
  • Challenging an incorrect statement.
  • Contributing something meaningful and substantial to an active discussion.

Thanks, --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  17:55, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually going to propose that the information I posted on Talk:Dave Farrell be added to the article. I should have clarified. Qzekrom (talk) 18:51, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IP blocked

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qzekrom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 108.168.227.220. I am using the Internet from a Greyhound bus and apparently this is the bus Wi-Fi's public IP address. Qzekrom (talk) 7:49 pm, Today (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

This is procedural decline; the reason for the block was because of public wifi on a bus which the editor is (obviously) no longer on. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

:@GeneralizationsAreBad: This is indeed a webhost. The ISP of that IP is SoftLayer, which offers cloud computing. I'm not sure why on earth a Greyhound bus would have that IP, but this rangeblock shouldn't be lifted. We can certainly provide short-term IPBE if needed. ~ Rob13Talk 01:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GeneralizationsAreBad - I'd second that this appears to be a webhost. As BU Rob13 mentions, I'm not sure why on earth it would be used on a bus - other than possibly hosting a content filter. I noticed that this request has been open for 10 days now. Are you still looking into this block? Qzekrom - Are you still running into this block? SQLQuery me! 23:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@SQL: I probably won't need to worry about this until the next time I board a bus. Qzekrom 💬 theythem 01:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Special Barnstar
Thank you for your reply to my question in the Teahouse! (my query about pronouns in the service awards). I'm hopeful that the templates will continue to improve to address this! <3 SunnyBoi (talk) 11:57, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Qzekrom! You created a thread called NPOV in the social sciences at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hey Qzekrom

[edit]

Hello, Qzekrom! Fellow genderfluid-type person here with a bit of info for you.

I wanted to let you know that we don't hold for "lack of consensus" at WP:ANRFC. We also don't strictly count votes as well per WP:!VOTE. The purpose of WP:ANRFC is to find individuals who are willing to measure the arguments on both sides. This way they can (1) determine if there is a possibility for consensus and (2) summarize what that consensus is.

This makes us a wee bit different from WP:XfD. We are able to choose: whether a discussion should be closed by us at all, if it should be closed as no consensus, or in rare cases seek to get it reactive for further discussion. With this in mind, I highly recommend striking this. When it comes to uses of {{on hold}}, we normally limit it to instances when the discussion is still active or there is a technical problem in getting it done.

WP:ANRFC can be tough sometimes because we really haven't written most of this stuff down at the moment. If you ever want to co-close something with me or have any questions, ping me or write on my talk page. I'm always here for you! :D –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 19:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MJL: Thanks for the pointers! From what I see, it's an expired RfC that is unlikely to reach agreement, so I suppose it should be closed anyway. I like to "show my work" when I make decisions, and I used the !vote tally to determine that there was no consensus. I would not use !votes to show that there is consensus. I'll change it to "Comment". Qzekrom 💬 theythem 21:10, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's the least I could do, and that all makes sense. Thank you for fixing it! As I said, if there's anything I can ever do for you, please let me know. I'm always happy to help~! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 21:40, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Hamilton

[edit]

Hey! Thanks for making that correction for me. And your comment was epic! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1010:B023:1B3E:3CF4:E2C8:F18C:29DA (talk) 07:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See note to you

[edit]

On [2]

AfDs

[edit]

Hi, please follow the rules at WP:FOOLS for AfDs. Thanks, ansh666 17:58, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CS+Social Good (April 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 07:28, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Qzekrom! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 07:28, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

[edit]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Glen Weyl

[edit]

Hello, Qzekrom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Glen Weyl".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 09:38, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Emoji

[edit]

Hi, I noticed Template:Emoji/testcases showing up in Category:Templates with missing files and your addition of Module:Emoji looks like an improvement. I previewed Template:Emoji/Gallery wit the update and it shows no issues. So I was just wondering if there was a reason why you didn't proceed and update the root template? Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 14:33, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KylieTastic: Aw man, this is from way back. I guess I felt bad for letting others implement all the coding parts.
Concretely, though, one problem is that it still doesn't have an "auto mode." For example, I'd like to be able to pass in either an emoji name or a hex code - so either {{#invoke:Emoji | auto | smiley}} or {{#invoke:Emoji | auto | 1f603}}, so it doesn't break all the current usages. Qzekrom (she/her • talk) 17:29, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Update: I added two named parameters to the template, name and hex, and a sub-template Template:Emoji/auto that handles those parameters, as well as the unnamed parameter 1 for backward compatibility. 🙂 Qzekrom (she/her • talk) 17:54, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good work. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 14:35, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ayuda Efectiva (December 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:41, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Nomadicghumakkad: Thanks for reviewing my submission! What do you suggest as to improving the article? Qzekrom (she/her • talk) 17:13, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Importance, tractability, and neglectedness

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Qzekrom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Importance, tractability, and neglectedness, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sinergia Animal

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Qzekrom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sinergia Animal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sinergia Animal

[edit]

Hello, Qzekrom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sinergia Animal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:34, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ayuda Efectiva

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Qzekrom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ayuda Efectiva, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ayuda Efectiva

[edit]

Hello, Qzekrom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ayuda Efectiva".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Supply-side progressivism

[edit]

On 29 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Supply-side progressivism, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that supply-side progressivism is a response to rising costs of housing, healthcare, and other essential goods in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Supply-side progressivism. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Supply-side progressivism), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 04:39, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zoning in Japan

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Qzekrom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zoning in Japan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zoning in Japan

[edit]

Hello, Qzekrom. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Zoning in Japan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sample ratio mismatch

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Qzekrom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sample ratio mismatch, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gather (metaverse platform)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Qzekrom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gather (metaverse platform), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sample ratio mismatch has been accepted

[edit]
Sample ratio mismatch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 02:17, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gather (metaverse platform) (May 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SWinxy was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The reason I'm declining is that the quantity of sources is low. TechCrunch and FastCompany are both reliable and good, but those are only three sources. More like those, please! (As an aside, it bills itself as "building the Metaverse", which is like... come on.)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
SWinxy (talk) 05:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gather (collaboration software) (July 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
These interview-based pieces are not independent.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 09:08, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FWD.us page updates review request

[edit]

Hi there @Qzekrom! I just made some changes to the FWD.us page, after disclosing that I am employed by the organization. Can you please review my edits for neutrality, sourcing, and relevance to the community. Thanks. Emilylevett (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Userboxgroup

[edit]

Template:Userboxgroup has been nominated for merging with Template:Ubx-section. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 10:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gather (collaboration software)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Qzekrom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gather (collaboration software), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New message from ExclusiveEditor

[edit]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § ‎AI for WP guidelines/ policies. ExclusiveEditor Notify Me! 14:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Two-tower model

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Qzekrom. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Two-tower model, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Qzekrom&oldid=1258282090"