User talk:PapaJeckloy/Archive 1

DYK for 2014 PBA Commissioner's Cup Finals

On 12 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2014 PBA Commissioner's Cup Finals, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Talk 'N Text Tropang Texters had not lost a game in the 2014 PBA Commissioner's Cup, but were defeated in three games by the San Mig Super Coffee Mixers in the finals series? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2014 PBA Commissioner's Cup Finals. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving?

Although it's not required, I'd like to ask you to archive your talk page in the future, instead of just blanking it. Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 14:37, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, just wondering, is there a reason why you blank out more recent messages and kept the older one?Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 14:38, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lyca Gairanod

On 13 August 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lyca Gairanod, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that before Lyca Gairanod won The Voice Kids, she helped her mother find recyclable materials to sell to support their family? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lyca Gairanod. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Haiyan

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Typhoon Haiyan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CycloneIsaac -- CycloneIsaac (talk) 01:22, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Haiyan

The article Typhoon Haiyan you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Typhoon Haiyan for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CycloneIsaac -- CycloneIsaac (talk) 02:22, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-edit complete

Hello, PapaJeckloy. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Brod Pete at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome!

Proposed deletion of Jericho Cruz

The article Jericho Cruz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 331dot (talk) 11:14, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Karlos Labajo DYK

I will make the first move on talking with you about our disagreements here. As I've said on the DYK nomination, I undid your revision because I was the one who created the article. I really appreciate that you nominated the article, but please note that you nominated the article, not "created" it. Maybe you're also thinking that both of us "expanded" the article, that's why you're saying that you did more contributions than I did. 1) 5x expanded is not equal to created. 2) If what you're saying is you did more contributions than I did, why don't you look its revision history? You nominated it on August 24 (data: me: 7 edits; you: 6 edits) 3) You also said that it was a stub? Why don't you look at the first edit seen here and compare it now? Not to mention my total edits compared to yours in its statistics? 4) Even if you did contribute more than I did, the fact that you put on your nomination indicated that the article was created not expanded. I'm trying to be nice at you, but you're telling me that I'm selfish and rude? Where did that come from? That happened before on Darren Espanto's nomination before, remember? If you don't also know, you ~~vandalized~~ edited my menu and didn't try to revert it back? What I'm trying to say is don't take the credits of others to yourself. I'm sorry to say this, but the way you credited yourself as a creator was rude. I also told you there to talk on my or that talk page first instead of undoing it every time. Lastly, are you trying to discuss with your own nomination by yourself? I mean, even if I used a peacock term, I believe it's up to anyone (who are not involved in the nomination) to comment on that. Besides removing your name as the "creator", I won't comment there anymore as it would be rude of me to do so. 001Jrm (talk) 08:51, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@001Jrm I know you created it, but there are some instances that even you created it, the major contributor should also be credited like this one, i also have more than cont. when the article is nominated, don't be blind, mine is 6 and yours are 5, It not just your own, You have removed my name there and that is just your belief, also please be civil to other editors. I will not add my name anymore, it's yours now! I really don't care, i just want to help, eat your own credits! You should cry if i will not, you are not the only DYK nominator in WP. -PAPAJECKLOY (hearthrob! kiss me! <3) (talk) 09:02, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you want me to be civil? Why don't you see what you just said..... and then compare my comment? eat your own credits, don't be blind, etc.. Again, give yourself a time to look at its history and statistics? We both know who had more edits/contributions in that page. Even if I was wrong, why didn't you come to me and tell me. Instead, you tried commenting there like you're trying to prove yourself that you're right and I'm wrong.

Again, (even if you won't add your name anymore) I really appreciate your nomination, but please remember to not take someone's credit to your own benefit. If you think I'm selfish because I want it all by myself, then so be it. But why don't you try to be fair as well?

It's just sad that you're a Filipino and we're not in good terms. I really mean it. It's sad. :/ Oh well, I just hope you had a good day, and that your nomination will be approved.

~~PS, you might given me the wrong link for your PBA dyk nomination. Maybe you also added your name in the nomination, but no one contested it... I don't know.. but yeah..~~ I already see it. (thanks for changing the link).. 1) The nomination indicated that it was "created/expanded"... not only "created" 2) Your last revision was not enough for a 1500 character prose that's why the next user expanded it. (which I understood). That just meant that you were the creator and the other was the expander. It's completely a different case with us. 001Jrm (talk) 09:20, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My citizenship has nothing to deal with it, for this to be finished i will add my name and add a expanded statement behind the created by, because i also expanded it before i nominated it, you are very rude, and you are saying that you are sad for me?, i don't care, i just dont deal with selfish, judgemental and perfectionist users, who wants it all by herself, you're just an fooled fangirl, eat what you are saying. --PAPAJECKLOY (hearthrob! kiss me! <3) (talk) 09:29, 25 August 2014 (UTC).[reply]

A rude wikipedian who argue with others for the sake of credits, you really proved that you are selfish, we both contributed majorly to the article but you are just, .... nevermind -PAPAJECKLOY (hearthrob! kiss me! <3) (talk) 09:29, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And also, this case did not happened just one time, there are many instances as i said, any user who has majorly contributed with the other neither even if the creator has more edits or vice versa, like this one. -PAPAJECKLOY (hearthrob! kiss me! <3) (talk) 09:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1) You didn't even give your time to read my comment nor the statistics nor the history.

2)"It's sad"... not "I'm sad for you". Being a Filipino should be a compliment, and you misunderstood it because of your rashness.

3)o.o --> "fooled fangirl"... talking about civility, huh?

4)Try.. again.. TRY reading this information. Don't worry, it's not long

5)Re-read our conversation.

6)You won't add your name anymore? You don't care anymore? I might cry if you add your name again? I'm selfish? Eat my credits? ohhh.. you're so nice that you added your name again.. hmmmmm..

The next time you comment on me that is uncivil, I might report you. But nah... I won't waste my time.

I won't respond to a user who would not try to at least make an effort to see the links and try to be civil in conversation. I won't also explain each word from my comments just now... (try re-reading it and my words might give you the answers) You're telling me that I'm uncivil towards you? Why don't you ask ALL the users and see if I'm really uncivil towards you? Try it. I won't argue with you anymore. It's pointless anyways. Have a great day! 001Jrm (talk) 09:49, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ga nomination of 2014 West Africa Ebola virus outbreak

You may want to withdraw it. The GA criteria states that the article has to be stable, so current events are quick-fails. You should nominate it again when it has past. Cheers, ΤheQ Editor ^Talk? 17:23, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2014 West Africa Ebola virus outbreak

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2014 West Africa Ebola virus outbreak you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 04:01, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2014 West Africa Ebola virus outbreak

The article 2014 West Africa Ebola virus outbreak you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2014 West Africa Ebola virus outbreak for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 04:42, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/List of finalists of The Voice Kids (Philippines season 1) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 12:48, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 11:28, Sunday, November 17, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Congrats... You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Welcome to the teahouse! Hope you enjoy being a host! Mirror Freak 14:08, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Brod Pete

Hello! Your submission of Brod Pete at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PapaJeckloy

PapaJeckloy, this is to let you know that I have submitted a sockpuppet investigation of you with regard to the accounts Gelkia31 and EtitsNgKabayo and their sudden appearances to approve two of your DYK nominations. The latter account was blocked due to its name before the investigation commenced. I regret having to do this, but the evidence and repeated circumstances were compelling. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:40, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]