User talk:Oignonne

Welcome!

Hi Oignonne! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Citius Mag (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Citius Mag and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. This article has been updated and resubmitted, with I believe an offending source (Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Sportskeeda) now removed. Oignonne (talk) 11:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oignonne! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SWAP Running (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While individual members appear notable the entity is not. It cannot inherit notability from the team members

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SWAP Running and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, understood and agreed. Draft has been substantially amended to focus on the notable individual. Oignonne (talk) 13:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Oignonne, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you are interested in runners and have improved several of their biographies. I hope you will soon feel inspired to create biographies yourself. If so, you should find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. If you would like others to see your interest in the project, you can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Citius Mag has been accepted

Citius Mag, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Habst (talk) 20:25, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating this article, and sorry it took so long to get approved! I made some edits, one important thing is to focus the lede on how other notable entities (like the Times) describe the subject rather than relying only on self-published sources.

Once you feel comfortable writing articles, you are free to create them directly and bypass the AfC process, feel free to ping me if you want a second look. Thanks! --Habst (talk) 12:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2024

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320

Online events:

New: Women in STEM | Geofocus: Islands I-P | Women in archaeology

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

October is Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article Edit-a-thon

Tip of the month:

Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:David Roche (runner) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Roche (runner). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:36, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Roche (runner) has been accepted

David Roche (runner), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.