User talk:Mohrflies

Disambiguation Request

I think you should consider making a disambiguation page for this bio:

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Matt_Weiss

It is evident that you are passionate and knowledgeable about professional soccer and semi-professional soccer. And, I can see through your history that you have made a tremendous contribution to Wikipedia.

But, don’t you think that since we have a current NFL football coach and a former semi-pro US / NAIA soccer player with the same name, we should at least put up a disambiguation page?

I think it is fair to expect that the NFL football coach will have more hits in the future. 65.119.126.3 (talk) 19:18, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link in article 'Samuel Ekeme'

Hi. The article 'Samuel Ekeme' has a dead link that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?

Dead: http://www.howesportsdata.com/howesportsdata/stats/soccer/misl/misl04.txt

You added this in January 2009.
The bot tested this link on 23 March, 25 March, 27 March, 31 March and today, but it never worked.
The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

This link is marked with {{Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots |deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 01:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Central Florida Kraze players

Category:Central Florida Kraze players, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:28, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NPSL I and NPSL II

instead of using these could use National Professional Soccer League (1984–2001) for 2 (NPSL II) and National Professional Soccer League (1967) for 1. by the way some of your NPSL for the 84-01 actually link back to the 1967 page .

Mike Gailey

Mo Suri

Rusty Troy

Scott Gaither

Alvin James

Doug Neely ‎ Pat Occhiuto ‎ Otto Orf ‎ Angelo Panzetta ‎ Randy Prescott ‎ Manuel Abaunza ‎ Eloy Salgado ‎ Gino Schiraldi ‎ Jim Schwab ‎ Brad Smith (soccer) ‎ Nate Houser ‎

Smith03 (talk) 15:37, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1959 National 'Open' Cup

I would have to disagree with the article move. There is a reason why I used National Challenge Cup(NCC) and not U.S. Open Cup(USOC). The tournament naming has been a long debate among researchers. I have talked about it here on wikipedia as well. Yes, there are articles the say USOC but there are also upwards of twenty some other variations as well. They depend on who is writing the story, the city, etc. Trust me, I have done the research, I have seen thousands of articles on this tournament. There needs to be consistency when dealing with the history. It would be best not to flip flop the names from one year to the next to accommodate every variation in print. Libro0 (talk) 07:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: NC v OC I can talk for days on this so I will try to keep it brief. I had decided to use NCC for the historical period since it was official and verifiable through the 80's. I felt this was the best solution to reduce confusion, remain consistent, and retain the historical integrity of the tournament's heritage. From the 90's to now I decided to use USOC, again to maintain consistency and reduce confusion for the modern era. Despite what the hardware says for the 90's pre MLS editions I opted for USOC to bridge the gap prior to the tournament being given Lamar Hunt's name. To answer some of your questions: it does not appear the USFA was all too critical of 'official' names. So far there has been no evidence to indicate there ever was an official name change until the 1999 Lamar Hunt edition. I would use the phrase 'evolved into' when describing how USOC came about though keep in mind it was still one of many variations. While most of the reasons remain theory because one can only speculate as to the interaction between a committee member and a sportswriter. Unless you get lucky and the committee member was the actual soccer columnist as was the case in a Connecticut paper back in the 20's where we were treated to the inside scoop. Most of the members of the organization are not historians and kept few records if any at all combined with the change off to USASA in the 80's and back again in the 90's their focus is more on conducting the tournament than chronicling it. For decades it wasn't much of a money maker for the teams or the organizers. Libro0 (talk) 18:32, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

I have no idea on how to reach you and I clicked here. I see that you have done a great deal with soccer biographies. I live in Ukraine and there is an American who just became Head Coach of Kherson Krystal in the professional 2nd Division of Ukrainian Football. He is a Head Coach of a professional soccer team in Europe. I know that he coached in the USL with "A" League Team the Bay Area Seals and USISL Team the Boston Storm (3rd Division). It might be worthwhile to make a page about him. I would do it but don't know how. He also coached the U-23 National Team of St Lucia. One of a few Americans who have coached another countries National Team. Natasha4581 (talk) 20:31, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is a American Soccer (Football) Coach coaching professional soccer in Ukarine. He has been named Head Coach of Krystal Kherson of the Ukraine Professional 2nd Division. It has been all over the news here and on many web sites. It is big news here as we are a really big football country with our Premiership ranked 7th by UEFA among domestic leagues (53 Countries/Leagues) in all of Europe. I live here in Ukraine and have read about him and live in Nikolaev which is next to Kherson. He is the first American to coach in Ukraine and as I understand he is the 3rd American born coach to be head coach of a European professional soccer team. He has a UEFA "A" License and a USSF "A" License. His name is Dennis Lukens and as I understand the other American born coaches to actually be a Head Coach of a professional European team are Brett Goulet and Gregg Berhalter. I went online and found some links about his coaching background. I have learned that he was Head Coach of the St Lucia U-23 National Team (2006-2008)http://www.uslfans.com/news/2006/news,2006,0139.shtml and lead them through CONCACAF Olympic Qualification in 2008 and is one of the few American born coaches to be Head Coach of another countries National Team. He was Head Coach of the Bay Area Seals of the USL "A" League http://www.soccertimes.com/directory/usisl/a-league/seals.htm ( Professional 1st Division) in 2000 and Head Coach/Player for Boston Storm http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Boston_Stormof the USISL (Professional 3rd Division) in 1993 and 1994. He was also Director of Soccer Operations and Assistant Coach http://www.ussoccerreview.com/publications/MISL.php for the California Cougars of the Major Indoor Soccer League back in 2005.

Here is a link in Russian annoucning him as Head Coach of Krystal Kherson. You can use Google translator to read it in English http://ukrfootball.in.ua/second-league-a/7644-khersonskyi-fk-krystal-ocholyv-amerykanets. Please let me know if this is of interest to you and I will get you more information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natasha4581 (talk • contribs) 21:18, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Everson stats

Hi, would you mind providing a link for the stats you recently added to Ben Everson? Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 21:47, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scott Bolkan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Bolkan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Bolkan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mikemor92 (talk) 02:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Winston Marshall

The article Winston Marshall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mikemor92 (talk) 01:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jovan Bubonja

The article Jovan Bubonja has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mikemor92 (talk) 21:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1992 United States Interregional Soccer League may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:58, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to clear one thing up with you....

I've looked at the articles you created and there's a few of them where you listed PDL teams under the youth section in the infobox. That's not where they go because even though PDL teams aren't fully pro, they're not youth teams either. – Michael (talk) 00:15, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Darren Tilley may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| birth_place = [[Keynsham]], [[Somerset]], England]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:44, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Soccerdatabase.eu

This website violates copyright, so please do not include links to it in the future as you have done at Guillermo McFarlane and Narciso Zazueta. Regards, Giant Snowman 13:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

United States men's national soccer team record

Hello, in addition to the history of the United States men's national soccer team since 1916. If you could you add the record of goals scored by opponent or received..--Sebastián Alfaro 16 (talk) 00:23, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ignacio Báez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ignacio Báez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ignacio Báez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Soccerdatabase.eu

We should never use websites which are known to violate copyright, that is basic stuff! Giant Snowman 08:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peter Horvath (soccer)

The article Peter Horvath (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mikemor92 (talk) 02:37, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steve Allison

The article Steve Allison has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mikemor92 (talk) 19:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peter Horvath (soccer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Horvath (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Horvath (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mikemor92 (talk) 19:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pat Baker

The article Pat Baker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mikemor92 (talk) 20:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pat Baker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pat Baker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Baker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mikemor92 (talk) 23:59, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gregg Blasingame

The article Gregg Blasingame has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Indoor soccer is not fully pro, so this article fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Plus there's no significant coverage which means this article also fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mikemor92 (talk) 01:34, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gregg Blasingame for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gregg Blasingame is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregg Blasingame until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mikemor92 (talk) 02:34, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Professional sports

For starters, a league can call itself professional without it actually being the case. The best example of this is that roughly half the player in the Championat de France Amateur are in fact professionals. While, I've seen no evidence of that, I've seen no hard evidence the other way either.

Second, while obviously a necessary criterion, it is not sufficient for a league to be professional for it be included in the list of fully professional leagues. Unqualified, the word professional, for FPL purposes, is somewhat ambiguous. The English fifth division, the German fourth division, and the aforementioned CFA are all leagues you could reasonably describe as professional, but since all of them have amateur elements as well, none of them belong on the list. What is a necessary, is a source that specifically refers to the league as fully pro. The preferred type of source, however, is one that specifically speaks to the state of professionalism in the league in question. Usually this takes the form of player registration regulations, as many FPL's have professionalism requirements for clubs and players to even be permitted to play in the league. Other types of sources are usually articles that look at football clubs from a business point of view.

The reason for this is that WP:NSPORT, the guideline that the list was created to support, was designed specifically with the notion of semi-professionalism as it exits in the English league structure in mind. As a result, we place particular emphasis on the fact that a list must be fully professional to included. I hope this helps clarify things. Cheers. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:15, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help Needed in Proof for MISL being FULLY Pro.

Hello there, I noticed you have a good knowledge of the beautiful game. I have been arguing under my username talk that the first article I wrote on the soccer player james georgeff is instantly up for deletion. He was drafted to Dynamo, played several touranment games etc, no league games, then played in Portuguese 2nd div, then German 4th div. The page was up for deletion (still is) on grounds of not meeting pro criteria. I then made the point that this player was the first college athlete, Austrlian, to be drafted to the MLS. Also, was the first australian to be drafted as 1st overall pick in teh 2008 MISL draft. Now, the next form of suppression is, no, that MISL is not and was not a fully pro league, so esentially being the number 1 draft pick is not a notable event. Could you please if possible have a look on the james georgeff page and offer your expertise on the profesional nature of the MISL and the notoriety of being drafted as the first ever australian, and especially first ever australian as the number 1 draft overall in the MISL...?

Thank you! (Samej1902 (talk) 00:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aaron Lewis (soccer)

The article Aaron Lewis (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Michael (talk) 04:21, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Centennial F.C.

The article Centennial F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Centennial F.C. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Centennial F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centennial F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 10:56, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Austin Aztex squad

Template:Austin Aztex squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mikemor92 (talk) 03:27, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey: Use of Chronicling America on Wikipedia

My name is Donald Taylor and I'm the Wikipedian-in-Residence with the University of Maryland Libraries, Historic Maryland Newspapers Project. The Historic Maryland Newspapers Project is a part of the National Digital Newspaper Program, a joint program of the Library of Congress and the National Endowment for the Humanities. We are digitizing historic state newspapers for inclusion in the Library of Congress's Chronicling America online digital collection of America’s historical newspapers.

We are conducting a survey of Wikipedia contributors who have cited Chronicling America as a reference in their edits to Wikipedia. It is the objective of our study to identify ways that Chronicling America might be made a better resource for people editing Wikipedia. We recently used Linkypedia to identify contributors who have used Chronicling America. As an editor who has made use of Chronicling America, we hope that you will take our survey.

If you are interested in taking our survey, you can do so at this website.

More information about the survey is provided before you begin answering survey questions. Participation in the survey is strictly voluntary. It should take you less than thirty minutes to complete. You must be at least 18 years old to participate. If you have any questions about this survey, you can contact Donald Taylor, Wikipedian-in-Residence for the Historic Maryland Newspapers Project, at dwtii@umd.edu, or Elizabeth Caringola, Historic Maryland Newspapers Project Librarian, at ecaringo@umd.edu.

If you decide to take this survey, please do so within the week, by Friday, 8 August 2014.

Thank you for your contribution to our study.

-- Taylordw (talk) 13:55, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dale Weiler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dale Weiler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dale Weiler (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Becky Sayles (talk) 20:27, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lone Star Soccer Alliance seasons

Template:Lone Star Soccer Alliance seasons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tavix | Talk 09:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ian Clarke (soccer)

The article Ian Clarke (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro ^{~Come at me~} 16:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Dear Mohrflies, Thank you so much for all of your excellent research and writing on all of the American soccer players! I am very impressed, and grateful that you took the time to create and update profiles of players, especially those who were around before the internet. You have done them all a great service. SweetJane930 (talk) 08:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rob Ryerson

The article Rob Ryerson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article sources do not provide any evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aust331 (talk) 06:39, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rich Ryerson

The article Rich Ryerson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

References include only a passing mention in the LA Times. Article does not meet notability requirements

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aust331 (talk) 06:43, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rich Ryerson

The article Rich Ryerson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not seem to meet WP:GNG. If you remove this tag, you must explain how the article meets notability guidelines. Alternatively, it'll get taken to AfD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aust331 (talk) 05:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Davie Kemp

The article Davie Kemp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTDIR. Unsourced stub biography.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy (Help!) 11:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jim Leahy

The article Jim Leahy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks significant coverage in independent secondary sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:24, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gregory Walters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gregory Walters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Walters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 21.colinthompson (talk) 06:24, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rochester Rhinos squad

Template:Rochester Rhinos squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Joeykai (talk) 12:43, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeremy Tolleson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeremy Tolleson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Tolleson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:47, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philadelphia Fever players has been nominated for renaming

Category:Philadelphia Fever players has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 01:31, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marvin Oliver for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marvin Oliver is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvin Oliver until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arunjithp (talk) 10:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Johnny Stark (soccer)

The article Johnny Stark (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about semi-pro indoor soccer player which fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 18:01, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tate Parrish for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tate Parrish, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tate Parrish until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kearny Arlington for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kearny Arlington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kearny Arlington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TartarTorte 03:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ricardo Blanchard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ricardo Blanchard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Blanchard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:33, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:United States Interregional Soccer League seasons

A tag has been placed on Category:United States Interregional Soccer League seasons indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sioux City Breeze players has been nominated for deletion

Category:Sioux City Breeze players has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American Indoor Soccer Association has been nominated for merging

Category:American Indoor Soccer Association has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. S.A. Julio (talk) 02:15, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American Indoor Soccer Association coaches has been nominated for merging

Category:American Indoor Soccer Association coaches has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. S.A. Julio (talk) 02:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Professional Arena Soccer League has been nominated for merging

Category:Professional Arena Soccer League has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. S.A. Julio (talk) 02:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Professional Arena Soccer League coaches has been nominated for merging

Category:Professional Arena Soccer League coaches has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. S.A. Julio (talk) 02:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Professional Arena Soccer League players has been nominated for merging

Category:Professional Arena Soccer League players has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. S.A. Julio (talk) 02:32, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Premier Soccer Alliance has been nominated for merging

Category:Premier Soccer Alliance has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. S.A. Julio (talk) 02:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Premier Soccer Alliance coaches has been nominated for merging

Category:Premier Soccer Alliance coaches has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. S.A. Julio (talk) 02:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Montreal CPR players has been nominated for discussion

Category:Montreal CPR players has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Geregen2 (talk) 14:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Montreal Maroons (soccer) players has been nominated for discussion

Category:Montreal Maroons (soccer) players has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Geregen2 (talk) 16:13, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vancouver Spartans players has been nominated for discussion

Category:Vancouver Spartans players has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Geregen2 (talk) 15:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bill Eppy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bill Eppy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Eppy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 15:11, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joe Robbie Cup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Robbie Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Robbie Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:German-American Soccer League players has been nominated for merging

Category:German-American Soccer League players has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shotgun pete (talk) 16:03, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page creation

Hello. How did you find information on Slobodan Djordjevic? I am his daughter. DanicaBartolf (talk) 02:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eddy Roberts

The article Eddy Roberts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly sourced stub. Source provided only mentions the subject once without providing any further information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Helmut Michel

The article Helmut Michel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:SPORTSCRIT, Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 07:30, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Helmut Michel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Helmut Michel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helmut Michel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

C 679 13:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Gregorian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Gregorian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Gregorian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 21:48, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henry Margenson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henry Margenson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Margenson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 19:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]