User talk:Jogurney
The article Denys Lyashko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article about former footballer which fails WP:SPORTBASIC.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Guillaume Quellier
[edit]
Hello, Jogurney. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guillaume Quellier, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Jogurney!
[edit]
Jogurney,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 18:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 18:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:USM El Harrach.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:USM El Harrach.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Chorrillo FC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Chorrillo FC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Fausto Klinger (footballer, born 1976)
[edit]Have we stopped notifying article creators about AFDs then? GiantSnowman 19:06, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hello GiantSnowman. I'm sorry - I don't think I've ever notified an article creator about an AfD (although I think most of the articles I nominate are created by retired users). I'll look into the process for notifying, and be more careful about that in the future. All the best. Jogurney (talk) 20:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- It's standard but not mandated - just courtesy! Thanks, GiantSnowman 21:57, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Ian Lake
[edit]Hi there. Did you get a chance to search for SIGCOV for Ian Lake (footballer)? Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 15:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Robby.is.on. I couldn't find anything other than match previews and match reports after checking Malaysian and Trinidadian sources. Nothing that would be significant coverage. Jogurney (talk) 15:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- That's a pity. Thanks for looking. Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 15:51, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Local/routine
[edit]Given this, this, and now this, I'm wondering if we need to add more explicit guidance to NSPORT about local/routine coverage, since clearly NOTNEWS and the language already in NSPORT are being ignored... JoelleJay (talk) 16:49, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ugh, and this. JoelleJay (talk) 16:56, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi JoelleJay. I think more clear guidance at NSPORT about what constitutes SIGCOV would be very helpful. I've been participating in AfDs for a long time, but I still feel like I'm learning and I know a lot of participants in athlete biography AfDs seem to struggle with what counts as well (as we are seeing in those linked AfDs). Most of us weren't concerned about the GNG when the SNG's presumption of notability was valid, but now we all need to know. Jogurney (talk) 22:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- That's a very good point; before the RfC the only people really doing source analyses for notability were the delete !voters at AfDs for criteria-meeting athletes, who had to go above and beyond to demonstrate GNG wasn't met. Now that the sport-specific guidelines are no longer presumptive, many of the editors who used to !vote strictly based on SSGs are just using those deprecated criteria to define what is SIGCOV (as epitomized by the rapid evolution of KKL's !vote rationales from late February till now) even though it should be the other way around. Not to mention the various criteria the sports projects developed were always supposed to be calibrated to GNG, and yet a) these criteria were often wildly out of line with the larger community's idea of SIGCOV, and b) a lot of the athletes excluded by SSG criteria whom project members would summarily !vote to delete pre-RfC had received exactly the type of routine coverage now being cited as counting toward GNG or NBASIC by those same members. I think this is why it's so important to get input from people outside the sports projects, to ground our guidelines in concordance with broader community consensus. Ideally, the SSGs would serve only as exclusionary guidance on what doesn't count as SIGCOV, e.g. sports coverage would be contextualized through the lens of NOTNEWS/GNG/etc. by editors familiar with the topic to clarify what is routine and explain how to identify non-independent/secondary material (many non-sports editors don't realize that transactional reports, interviews, and profiles by affiliated bodies aren't compliant with P&Gs; see the Amanda Dennis discussion for example). JoelleJay (talk) 00:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- I think there's a lot of confusion right now, and everybody would benefit from a discussion there. For example, I understand that blogposts generally cannot be used, but there is the case of pt:Milton Neves who has a blog hosted by UOL, Que fim levou? - A biblioteca do futebol brasileiro. He is a prominent football journalist, and I understand that his blogposts can be used because they represent journalism similar to something published in a newspaper. There is much to explore. Jogurney (talk) 13:17, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- That's a very good point; before the RfC the only people really doing source analyses for notability were the delete !voters at AfDs for criteria-meeting athletes, who had to go above and beyond to demonstrate GNG wasn't met. Now that the sport-specific guidelines are no longer presumptive, many of the editors who used to !vote strictly based on SSGs are just using those deprecated criteria to define what is SIGCOV (as epitomized by the rapid evolution of KKL's !vote rationales from late February till now) even though it should be the other way around. Not to mention the various criteria the sports projects developed were always supposed to be calibrated to GNG, and yet a) these criteria were often wildly out of line with the larger community's idea of SIGCOV, and b) a lot of the athletes excluded by SSG criteria whom project members would summarily !vote to delete pre-RfC had received exactly the type of routine coverage now being cited as counting toward GNG or NBASIC by those same members. I think this is why it's so important to get input from people outside the sports projects, to ground our guidelines in concordance with broader community consensus. Ideally, the SSGs would serve only as exclusionary guidance on what doesn't count as SIGCOV, e.g. sports coverage would be contextualized through the lens of NOTNEWS/GNG/etc. by editors familiar with the topic to clarify what is routine and explain how to identify non-independent/secondary material (many non-sports editors don't realize that transactional reports, interviews, and profiles by affiliated bodies aren't compliant with P&Gs; see the Amanda Dennis discussion for example). JoelleJay (talk) 00:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi JoelleJay. I think more clear guidance at NSPORT about what constitutes SIGCOV would be very helpful. I've been participating in AfDs for a long time, but I still feel like I'm learning and I know a lot of participants in athlete biography AfDs seem to struggle with what counts as well (as we are seeing in those linked AfDs). Most of us weren't concerned about the GNG when the SNG's presumption of notability was valid, but now we all need to know. Jogurney (talk) 22:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
The Sakama AfD?
[edit]I feel like I'm genuinely missing something here... Is there some source everyone else is seeing that I'm not? A single sentence in one local source announcing a trial with Tahiti for him and another player, 1.5 sentences in a match preview from PNG, scattered namedrops in match recaps...when have these ever been considered close to SIGCOV? You and I have agreed in almost every AfD (and I guess technically do in this one too), so I would really like to understand where you're coming from! JoelleJay (talk) 17:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- I went with !weak delete because I received a lot of hits when I searched Sakama on the VDP website, many of which are in Bislama. I didn't have an easy way to machine translate Bislama to English, but bislama.org has a passable translator which I've now used on several of the hits. It's clear to me now that the VDP articles are routine coverage (match previews and match reports primarily). I'll update at the AfD now. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 18:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for reconsidering! I've been using a combination of Google Translate for Krio (fairly similar to Bislama) and en.glosbe.com, which has a bunch of Bislama-English translations of what seems to be a large corpus of religious texts. It doesn't directly translate words/phrases but rather searches for instances where they are used, so you can sort of figure out what specific phrases mean in particular contexts. Plus there are a lot of cognates with English that become much more apparent if you sound out the Bislama. I've actually had quite a lot of fun trying to translate some of this material... JoelleJay (talk) 19:33, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Grzegorz Podstawek for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grzegorz Podstawek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Ktkvtsh (talk) 14:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:US Raon l'Etape.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:US Raon l'Etape.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Elana Torun.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Elana Torun.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Real Estelí (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic redirect points to an article with a hatnote to the only other use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Unofficial Tottenham Hotspur taskforce/project
[edit]Hello, myself and another user had the idea to try to get a taskforce/project going so Spurs fans can all focus on similar articles or just keep tabs on what other editors are working on.
I made the project on a userpage here and welcome you to add whatever is of interest to you, and we can always add more pages as we need to.
COYS! Christiangamer7 (talk) 02:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Radomsko.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Radomsko.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Smigly Wilno.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Smigly Wilno.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Junak Drohobycz.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Junak Drohobycz.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tarant Wojcin.gif
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Tarant Wojcin.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ahli Bahrain.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Ahli Bahrain.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Jacek Falkowski for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacek Falkowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.