User talk:Ktkvtsh
Main | Talk | To Do | Sandbox | Article Tracking | Draft | Photos | Awards | Useful Stuff | Watchlist |
This is Ktkvtsh's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Question on HYCU page
[edit]Hi @Ktkvtsh - We've been trying to create a Wikipedia page for our brand, HYCU. We understand that the first iteration was rejected because we used an outside agency that didn't adhere to the guidelines. Needless to say, we won’t be using them again. I’m hoping the edits I recently made align with the rules. However, I haven’t received confirmation on whether my edits are under review. Could you confirm if the changes I made to the Draft:HYCU page have been re-entered into review? Any assistance would be greatly appreciated! TyHYCU (talk) 20:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Unfortunately it is promotional. Your username including the company name is grounds for deletion. I do apologize. I'd recommend you don't work on a Wikipedia article for a company you work for. It isn't illegal but is not recommended and, like you may notice, can lead to deletion. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:19, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reconsider the decline
[edit]Dear Ktkvtsh,
I tried submitting an article. ( Draft:Shaking my head) Thank you for reviewing my draft article.
Unfortunately, my article was declined by you for reasons I cannot understand.
It is an acronym from the already existing articles about SMH and therefore uses the exact same abbreviation. But because the abbreviation for shakng my head does not exist on wikipedia, this is a reliable meaning extremely common among the internet users and the subject qualifies for a wikipedia article.
The decision to decline my submission has counter-productive effects because it is hindering the avaliablity of the actual meaning of the acronym. Therefore, I would be thankful for you to revert this decision. I have added some changes and provided info boxes that state that this is a translation and I will resubmit the article as soon as possible.
Thank you in advance and have a nice start into the year 2025. Asmabbas (talk) 09:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Asmabbas I will not be reverting my decline. You can resubmit it for approval and another editor will take a look at it. Ktkvtsh (talk) 14:06, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
January 2025
[edit]Be sure that your links work & go to the correct place :) GoodDay (talk) 22:17, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- @GoodDay which links? I used Twinkle to leave that message on your talk page. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Where "often" is linked. GoodDay (talk) 22:21, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- @GoodDay Okay I see now. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:21, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Where "often" is linked. GoodDay (talk) 22:21, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
MicroPie
[edit]Draft was declined for This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources, however it has the website and the GitHub page with the code. How much more verified can it be when it has the actual code of what the page says it does? What do we need to do? wait for someone else to write something about on a news site? Pretty confused about that, so please help me understand! Thank you! Harrisonerd (talk) 05:51, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Harrisonerd Linking a website on the subject and its GitHub website are not enough to prove notability. Add sources that are talking about it, not itself talking about it. Then resubmit for review.
- Best, Ktkvtsh (talk) 17:41, 26 January 2025 (UTC)