User talk:Kuzinakka

Welcome!

Hello, Kuzinakka, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! MartinPoulter (talk) 19:11, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Technical University of Munich—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Jalen Folf (talk) 07:06, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on draft

Hi and thanks for showing me your draft article on the Museum of Care. You've assembled a large number of references and clearly put in a lot of work. I've made some structural changes and fixed some minor errors, and it just needs a bit more work before it's ready. Some advice:

external links should not go in the body text of the article. There should just be a very small number of them, under the "External links" heading at the end.
Be very careful will consistent spelling: Carnival rather than Carnaval and so on.
We normally introduce people by full name at first mention, then just by their surname in the rest of the article. So "David Graeber" when he is first mentioned, but "Graeber" after that, not "David".
It's very important to have at least some citation for every paragraph, ideally a reference published independently of the organisation the article is about. If a detail isn't covered in third-party sources, it might be too much detail for the Wikipedia article. It's often the case that when an initiative is new, there isn't much to say about it on Wikipedia but as it gets more noticed and gets more coverage, the article can expand.

So I think you're nearly ready to submit this as a draft. Nice work, but keep going! MartinPoulter (talk) 21:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I edited your draft as if it were an article I found on the encyclopedia de novo, but my edit summaries were comments for you. It's almost ready, there's a few tedious tasks for you to do and one paragraph that needs serious overhaul. In general, only basic facts can be sourced to the primary topic itself, not claims that can be in anyway contentious. Like an author saying they wrote a book is OK, but not an author saying their own book was a bestseller -- that would need independent sourcing. And also be careful of how you present info, you're writing about the Museum of Care and that only, not about other things like hashtags and carnivals and other projects that are affiliated with it, especially if they're not notable and not covered by independent sources, the more "also" things you mention and then either source to that thing itself or the MoC itself (an abbreviation that is used once in the lede and then not again), the poorer the article looks. Good luck! JesseRafe (talk) 14:16, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MartinPoutler, thanks again for your helpful comments! I am back to the wikipedia after a summer break and I reformulated a few things in the beginning and finished the copy-editing and formatting. Overall, I feel like I am ready to submit the article. What do you think? Also, in terms of formalities, what are my next steps to get the article published? Thanks and best, Kuzinakka (talk) 09:07, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Museum of Care (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Museum of Care and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kuzinakka! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 15:50, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Museum of Care

Hello, Kuzinakka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Museum of Care, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Museum of Care

Hello, Kuzinakka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Museum of Care".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:53, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]