User talk:JhowieNitnek

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Grand Jojo

On 4 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Grand Jojo, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 07:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/File:European_Union_Members.svg

Hello there! Sorry to bother you, I wanted to ask. Could you update this file (EU map) with Ukraine and Moldova as candidates?

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cinema of Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brussels Film Festival. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article name change

There is an ongoing discussion on the article's talk page. Please do not make these changes without generating consensus and joining the discussion on the talk page. Especially with such an edit as large as the name of an article.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jo Jc Jo^{Talk💬Edits📝} 17:48, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm sorry I didn't intend on engaging in a edit war. I'm not a expert in Wikipedia editing and in general only make small chances. Jhowie_Nitnek (talk) 17:52, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brusselians for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brusselians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brusselians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvqr (talk) 13:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:MigratieMuseumMigration

Hello, JhowieNitnek. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MigratieMuseumMigration, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:08, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:MigratieMuseumMigration

Hello, JhowieNitnek. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MigratieMuseumMigration".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:30, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz I found a red link for this in Migration museum, found some new sources, requested sight of the deleted version, added new content and sources, and it's now back in mainspace at MigratieMuseumMigration. Thanks for your work on starting this, @JhowieNitnek, between us we have created a solid little stub with a nice infobox (all your work) and some good sources. Thanks. PamD 13:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've now expanded the infobox by adding the logo! PamD 13:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But I can't find a photo of the museum anywhere. If you could take one, or find a copyright-free one, it would fill a gap in the list at Migration museum and enhance the article. There's a perfect Commons category: Category:Museums in Molenbeek-Saint-Jean. PamD 13:33, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bombardment of Brussels

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bombardment of Brussels requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 09:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Armorial of Brussels moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Armorial of Brussels. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. – Hilst [talk] 15:15, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Armorial of Brussels (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Armorial of Brussels and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JhowieNitnek! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ratnahastin (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of Brussels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free inquiry. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 21:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Span tags

Hi JhowieNitnek and thank you for your recent additions to Timeline of Brussels! I agree with all of them and I allowed myself to make some more fixes to the page. I did notice, however, that you restored "span tags", such as in the links to Manneken Pis and to Brussels placenames, and you have been using similar tags in several other articles, too. Please note that those tags are outdated, and translating runs of text, when necessary, is generally done through the {{Lang}} templates. You will find more details in WP:SPAN. In this case, though originally a Dutch (Flemish) word, Manneken Pis is now used in all languages, so no translation tag is required here. Moreover, as you may know, Brussels placenames in Wikipedia articles must follow the long-established local naming conventions, without the need for tags or italics for linkable articles (unless specifically required), so those markups are redundant, hence why I removed them again. If you have any questions, do let me know! Jason Lagos (talk) 18:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As a side note, you may also wish to familiarise yourself with WP:NOPIPE, which is why I restored the links to Prince Charles Alexander of Lorraine and Joseph II, Holy Roman Emperor to their original forms. Cheers! Jason Lagos (talk) 18:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jason Lagos,

Thank you for all the great tips! I am currently adding more stuff. While I am doing that I am also applying your feedback on my edits. Thank you for the help.

Cheerio! Jhowie_Nitnek (talk) 19:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning Jhowie. You are very welcome. One more tip for good practice: be careful about overlinking (see MOS:OVERLINK). Basically, terms should be linked maximum one time per major section (i.e. heading), so for instance, no need to repeat the link to Palace of the Nation ten times in the timeline. ;-) Jason Lagos (talk) 08:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jason Lagos,

I will keep it in mind thank you. Still trying to learn the ropes of Wikipedia. I have more knowledge of Wikidata which is completely different. Jhowie_Nitnek (talk) 09:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries – I made the fixes now. Thanks as well for connecting Brussels Salon to Wikidata. Jason Lagos (talk) 13:27, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Timeline of Brussels

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Timeline of Brussels, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1370 in Brussels has been nominated for merging

Category:1370 in Brussels has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Austrian Brussels has been nominated for merging

Category:Austrian Brussels has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:35, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Reginar Brussels has been nominated for deletion

Category:Reginar Brussels has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. House Blaster (talk · he/they) 02:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1370s in Brussels

A tag has been placed on Category:1370s in Brussels indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1510s in Brussels

A tag has been placed on Category:1510s in Brussels indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Hey Jhowie, just a few extra comments and suggestions about some of your recent edits:

The Timeline of Brussels is getting pretty long (over 11,000 words) and might need a bit of trimming to keep it within WP:SIZERULE. Like I said before, I think most of your additions to this article are really good, so thanks again, but it is also important to keep in mind the article's original purpose, and not turn it into a repository for everything Brussels-related. The rule of thumb should be that if an event would not be featured in a regular encyclopedia listing the key events in the city's history, it probably does not belong in this Wikipedia list either. Some examples of entries that should probably get deleted or combined are the ones with just red links, minor or trivial events, etc.
The Saint Verhaegen article has become a bit less readable after you added that table with the themes and medals. Tables may be appropriate in some Wikipedia articles, but should generally be avoided if the information can be easily or adequately described by text (see MOS:TABLES and MOS:NO-TABLES). Plus, this table is completely unsourced and has also caused unbalance to the article, so it should probably be deleted completely or split into a separate article (with proper sources) to maintain WP:PROPORTION.
Finally, make sure you pay attention as well to the language and date format tags at the top of the articles you edit; they indicate the standard to follow (e.g. use British English, use dmy dates). That table you added uses the wrong spelling and date format compared to the rest of the article, so you will want to fix that, too (see MOS:RETAIN).

Sorry if all this may sound a bit nitpicky, but I think it might be helpful once again. Cheers! Jason Lagos (talk) 14:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Jason Lagos,

Thanks for the feedback! For the timeline, splitting the article like they did with the Timeline of London might be a good idea. Regarding the Saint Verhaegen article, I copied it from the French and Dutch versions; I agree it might be better to include it in a different article as you suggested. As for the language, I aim to use British spelling, but I occasionally slip into American spelling or get corrected by autocorrect.

Hope this helps! Jhowie_Nitnek (talk) 14:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again Jhowie and thanks for your very quick reply!

About the timeline, I strongly believe trimming should be used as the first option, and then splitting as the second if the article is still too long. London is a way bigger city with a longer history than Brussels, so that explains the choice of splitting. For Brussels, I can see plenty of your additions, especially some of the recent stuff (like the opening of all the new radio stations, tram lines, etc.) that is not noteworthy enough and could be easily deleted.
For Saint Verhaegen, it is great that we agree. Though, if unsourced material (especially in table form) also appears at the French and Dutch Wikipedia, that does not mean it has been "accepted", so it is probably best practice not to translate it in the future. For the split article, I did something similar with List of houses of the Grand-Place, so you could use that as a reference.
As for the language and date format, ok I understand. It should still be fixed though. ;-) Jason Lagos (talk) 12:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I will split the timeline since it is really becoming too long now. This is just a head's up in case you are planning to work on the article, to avoid doing so in the next few minutes, in order to avoid any loss of data. Jason Lagos (talk) 18:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jason Lagos, thank you for the heads up Jhowie_Nitnek (talk) 18:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome! It is fully done, so you are free to edit the pages again at your will. Jason Lagos (talk) 19:10, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I created Wikidata entries for al the new pages and connected them to the relevant pages. Jhowie_Nitnek (talk) 19:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moby Train moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Moby Train. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:21, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ana de Jesús, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blessed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi JhowieNitnek. Thank you for your work on J. Petermann fondeur Bruxelles. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

please mention J Petermann in the target page with a good reference

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:13, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824 could you explain further I don't know what you mean with target page Jhowie_Nitnek (talk) 15:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. See, this is now a redirect to the target Fonderie Nationale des Bronzes. "J. Petermann fondeur Bruxelles" seems to be an old/alternative name for the foundry. If you can mention that (with a ref) it would be nice. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 16:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]