Jump to content

User talk:HouseBlaster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to my talk page!
Note: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave me a message here, I will respond to it here as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. Unless you request otherwise, I will ping you so that you know I have responded. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there.

Thank you!

post move cleanup

[edit]

Hey, I'm happy to chase you on some of the post move cleanup (at least for those articles that I have on my watchlist where it's easy to spot) on the renames, but just wanted to check with you if you have a list of the ones you're planning to move in case there are some that I don't cleanup (mainly updating the lead, default sort and the linked templates is the important part since the bots won't fix those)? Raladic (talk) 23:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have a list I am working from; I am just doing them as I come across them. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 23:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, I'll just try to chase and do what I can when I spot it and we'll see where we end up at. Hopefully the rest of the editing community also helps since it looks like various editors have started independently of each other to help with it :) Raladic (talk) 23:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like a plan :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 23:46, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, do you have an opinion of whether we should move the various Templates that have LGBT in the template name itself (like Template:LGBT or Template:LGBT sidebar) to LGBTQ and will redirects for those still works so we don't have to update the transclusions for those in all the articles that currently transclude the then potentially outdated name? Or is there a bot that could update outdated transclusions? Raladic (talk) 23:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Template redirects definitely work. For instance, {{t}} is a redirect to {{template link}}, which I have used to write this message. I think that making template moves is a good idea, though a lower-priority item than article/category/portal moves (which are visible to readers). Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 00:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok good to know :)
But yes, I agree, the visible text stuff is more important, so that's why so far I've only updated the visible text in those templates I've encountered in my post move cleanup and left the template itself at the existing part. Raladic (talk) 00:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reporter

[edit]

Hello I am a reporter hoping to speak with you about Wikipedia editing -- could you please contact me on my Twitter @margimurphy? Thanks! Margimurphy (talk) 02:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-38

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Executive20000 (01:29, 17 September 2024)

[edit]

Hello. I saw you were assigned to me as a mentor. Quick question: How can I make a photo ID of an image work while editing so that the image actually appears on the article instead of just the ID on the article itself. --Executive20000 (talk) 01:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not entirely sure what you mean, Executive20000. Definitely not your fault that you don't magically know our jargon :)

Would you be able to give me an example of a photo ID? I think that would help me understand how to help you best. Thanks, HouseBlaster (he/they) 01:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For example, I was trying to add a photo to an article and when I saved my changes, the entire link of the photo including “.jpg” at the end appeared instead of the photo itself. Executive20000 (talk) 01:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. I think I get what you are talking about, Executive20000. To include an image, we have a tutorial. So, to include a file title "Example file 123.png", you would write [[File:Example file 123.png|thumb|alt=<A short description of what the image displays. This is used for blind people with screen readers so we can ensure Wikipedia is as accessible as possible> | <A caption which is displayed for everyone below the image>]] (replacing the bolded parts as needed). Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 01:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciate it very much.
Kudos, Stephen Sarsalari aka Executive20000 (talk) 01:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Jdog175 (01:01, 18 September 2024)

[edit]

Hello, how do I create an article? --Jdog175 (talk) 01:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! Creating a new article from scratch is extremely challenging, and new editors are strongly recommended to spend a few months learning how Wikipedia works, by making improvements to some of our existing seven million articles before trying it. When you do decide to have a go at a new article, you are highly encouraged to read WP:Your first article. If you haven't already also check out WP:TUTORIAL; it's a lot of fun! Happy editing! HouseBlaster (he/they) 01:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Shariffa mutua on Kenya Power and Lighting Company (12:20, 18 September 2024)

[edit]

Hello how can i get the token reallocation form --Shariffa mutua (talk) 12:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shariffa mutua: Unfortunately, I am only able to answer questions about editing Wikipedia. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:JessZoiti/sandbox

[edit]

Information icon Hello, HouseBlaster. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:JessZoiti/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A fresh new Cfd?

[edit]

Hey there. Am I allowed to withdraw and the restart a few Cfd? I'm referring to the mess that is the baseball category where I'm being accused of having an agenda and making the Cfd in bad faith and so on. The main purpose of it, in my mind, has been lost entirely and I think a fresh one will let me clarify any misunderstanding there may have been. Asking for an opinion basically. Omnis Scientia (talk) 22:05, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Omnis Scientia! If nobody else has opined in favor of a nomination you made, you can use XFD closer to close the nomination as speedy keep. I am not going to advise for or against it; you might consider whether the act of making a fresh nomination is going to raise or lower the temperature. Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 23:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not one to step out of the usual system of how things work and usually only withdraw if I realize the nomination I made was by mistake. So I'm a bit hesistant to do so. I think I will let this one go on and hope that a consensus is reached. If this closes as "no consensus" then I'll think about opening a new one. Omnis Scientia (talk) 23:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Works for me :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 23:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Thomasgallatin (18:08, 19 September 2024)

[edit]

Hey! Can you take a look at my recent edits and let me know your thoughts? --Thomasgallatin (talk) 18:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thomasgallatin, and welcome to Wikipedia! They all look fabulous. If I had to offer one way to improve, in this edit you swapped a primary source for a better primary source. That is an improvement, but not the biggest improvement we can make. On Wikipedia, we actually prefer secondary sources to primary sources. In this case, if you can find a news article from a reliable source (here is a list of sources and their reliability: As you would imagine, green is best), that would be even better. But you are taking great care to cite your sources when updating articles, and that is the most important thing on Wikipedia – especially when dealing with information about living people. If you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to ask. I am more than happy to help you! Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:French Communist Party on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural question for CfD closes where redirects are kept

[edit]

Hello, I need advice and I think you're probably the best person to provide it. I want to close the two CfD discussions about LGBT categories which you posted at CR as a consensus to rename and retain redirects. If it weren't for the redirects, I would just post a request on WT:CFDW, but I'm assuming the bot will automatically delete the redirects, and I don't see a way to specify that it shouldn't. Is there? Otherwise, I'll need to manually move the categories and then, I guess, use AWB to semiautomatically change the category on all articles, which would be quite tedious. Or just recreate the redirects afterwards, which I guess would be okay, although it feels sloppy. Compassionate727 (T·C) 12:52, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Compassionate727! To tell the bot to automatically leave a redirect, you add (case-sensitive) REDIRECT after the * but before the old category name. I usually paste the list into your selection of word processor and find and replace *[ with * REDIRECT [. And thank you for volunteering to close the discussion! Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 14:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Do you know if a bot will automatically remove the CfD templates from the categories? Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:14, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The bot will automatically remove the CfD templates from the categories :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 17:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Dylanthepickleman (16:23, 23 September 2024)

[edit]

Say hello and ask a question. E.g. How do I create a citation? --Dylanthepickleman (talk) 16:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dylanthepickleman: Hi! Do you actually what to know how to create a citation, or did you just copy and paste the sample text? Best, HouseBlaster (he/they) 16:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
um... 72.74.45.196 (talk) 21:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-39

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Julian Assange on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for moving templates to better names. I think you are doing good work. I have one minor request: After you move a template, can you please click Edit and then Publish? In case you are unfamiliar, this is called a null edit, and it helps avoid having the template and its subpages show up in various error reports, including Wikipedia:Database reports/Uncategorized templates. It's a small thing, but it will help your fellow gnomes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can do that. Thanks, Jonesey95, for all the work you do :) HouseBlaster (he/they) 19:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

[edit]

RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review

[edit]

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin September Issue 2

[edit]


MediaWiki message delivery 17:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closures not processed

[edit]

Just a note that your closures on the CfD log page of 19 September have not been processed yet. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Marcocapelle! HouseBlaster (he/they) 18:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT categories not redirected

[edit]

Regrettably, many of the categories speedily renamed from the speedy nominations at [9] were not coded with *REDIRECT, so no redirects were left at the old names. The intersection categories by date and media are probably not worth recreating as redirects, and we don't need the template-generated ones for stubs nor the container categories e.g. "LGBT by continent", but I recommend that you do recreate the others e.g. LGBT for each country. – Fayenatic London 11:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will do that. Thank you, Fayenatic london! HouseBlaster (he/they) 18:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]