User talk:Example/Archives/2014/May
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Example. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your GA nomination of Eskimo (film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eskimo (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Clevelander96 -- Clevelander96 (talk) 01:00, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Peter Ostrum
The article Peter Ostrum you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Peter Ostrum for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 11:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Poem- The god almighty
Hello Example. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Poem- The god almighty".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Poem- The god almighty}}
, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 07:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Eskimo (film)
The article Eskimo (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eskimo (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Clevelander96 -- Clevelander96 (talk) 20:21, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Keeper of the Flame (film)
The article Keeper of the Flame (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Keeper of the Flame (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Soham -- Soham (talk) 00:21, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Martin Miller (actor, born 1899)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Martin Miller (actor, born 1899) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Martin Miller (actor, born 1899)
The article Martin Miller (actor, born 1899) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Martin Miller (actor, born 1899) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 19:01, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Paul Williams (character)
The article Paul Williams (character) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Paul Williams (character) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 13:01, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Earth structure
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Earth structure you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rosiestep -- Rosiestep (talk) 02:20, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Dutch brick
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dutch brick you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 03:41, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1992 Cape Mendocino earthquakes
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1992 Cape Mendocino earthquakes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 11:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Dutch brick
The article Dutch brick you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dutch brick for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 01:21, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Testing of Template:Alert
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the September 11 attacks, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.AGK [•] 13:29, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Neurolixis was accepted
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Fiddle Faddle 12:19, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Your GA nomination of Dejan (magnate)
The article Dejan (magnate) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dejan (magnate) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Madalibi -- Madalibi (talk) 16:01, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Debian you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jamesx12345 -- Jamesx12345 (talk) 21:40, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 21)
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/sandbox.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Example,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JustBerry (talk) 22:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
|
Your GA nomination of Earth structure
The article Earth structure you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Earth structure for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rosiestep -- Rosiestep (talk) 19:21, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Earth structure
The article Earth structure you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Earth structure for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rosiestep -- Rosiestep (talk) 14:01, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Zhuangzi (book)
The article Zhuangzi (book) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Zhuangzi (book) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanhe -- Zanhe (talk) 13:41, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Althorp you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SchroCat -- SchroCat (talk) 14:00, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1992 Cape Mendocino earthquakes
The article 1992 Cape Mendocino earthquakes you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1992 Cape Mendocino earthquakes for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 15:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)