Jump to content

User talk:DanielaNES

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, DanielaNES!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thank you for this - http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Armed_Forces_of_the_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo&diff=prev&oldid=1198401046 - edit!!

I have now added a section from Battle of Kinsangani (1997) to the article. Didn't know about that battle article!! Many thanks!! Buckshot06 (talk) 20:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Saint-Sauveur de Villeloin Abbey did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Hello and welcome, Daniel. Just wanted to remind you that it is helpful to others if you take a second to leave an edit summary. Thanks. Eric talk 19:41, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thank you for making Abbey of Saint-Pierre-les-Nonnains! BuySomeApples (talk) 03:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thank you for translating Beaugerais Abbey! You did a really good job :D BuySomeApples (talk) 02:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chapel of Saint-Jean du Liget

[edit]

Hi DanielaNES, I came across the above article on the WP:New Pages Feed. Here are a couple of things I noted.

  • References should be placed after punctuations.
  • See MOS:LAYOUT. See also section appear above references section. Notes comes before Bibliography list.
  • Links that appeared in the body of text should not be repeated in See also section per WP:NOTSEEAGAIN.

Nice article, keep up the good work! Chanaka L (talk) 05:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Chanaka L (talk) 01:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also

[edit]

See also sections are only for links which are not already in the article. Please do not add see also links when the articles in question are already linked from the lead section or body of the article. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 23:21, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, DanielaNES. Thank you for your work on Church of Saint Cecilia in Cos. Ingratis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, DanielaNES. Thanks for creating this article. I have reviewed / accepted it. Thanks in particular for taking the trouble to attribute it correctly as a translation from a Wikipedia in another language. Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 18:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with @Ingratis:. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

March 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Potato production in France, (twice), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Your edit in question is this one. Mathglot (talk) 22:40, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Constitution of the State of Yap, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bill, Nuclear and Article. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your translations from French

[edit]

Hi there, DanielaNES. Since you started editing for OKA at the beginning of the year, I see you have now created 55 translations. I have been looking through your creations, reviewing and assessing where necessary. As you can seen, the results are impressive. Keep up the good work. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 13:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crow-stepped gable (June 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Stepped gable instead.
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Stepped gable. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, DanielaNES! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Adventures of Tintin publication history has been accepted

[edit]
The Adventures of Tintin publication history, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 08:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gontran Boson has been accepted

[edit]
Gontran Boson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 08:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Master of cardinal de Bourbon has been accepted

[edit]
Master of cardinal de Bourbon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 08:45, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Origins of agriculture in West Asia has been accepted

[edit]
Origins of agriculture in West Asia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Joe (talk) 08:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Thanks so much for translating Débuts de l'agriculture au Proche-Orient (now at Origins of agriculture in West Asia), which was sorely missing from the English Wikipedia! – Joe (talk) 08:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of Caraquet has been accepted

[edit]
History of Caraquet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Garsh (talk) 18:37, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pierre Boujut has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pierre Boujut. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:52, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pierre Boujut has been accepted

[edit]
Pierre Boujut, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 20:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chalmazel station (June 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Chalmazel. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 20:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for the wording of this decline message - the issue is not that it's too short, but that the content should be merged into the article at Chalmazel, which is a stub. Please be sure to attribute your translation in the edit history when you do so. Thanks! -- asilvering (talk) 20:04, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of History of Caraquet for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History of Caraquet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Caraquet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 10:34, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Employement for people with autism has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Employement for people with autism. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 00:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles-François Richard has been accepted

[edit]
Charles-François Richard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 21:01, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Origin of the coat of arms has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Origin of the coat of arms. Thanks! Cerebellum (talk) 23:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Peopling of Oceania has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Peopling of Oceania. Thanks! Cerebellum (talk) 00:01, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Origin of the coat of arms has been accepted

[edit]
Origin of the coat of arms, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 00:12, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Russia in the First World War has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Russia in the First World War. Thanks! Cerebellum (talk) 10:53, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parliamentary dissolution (France) has been accepted

[edit]
Parliamentary dissolution (France), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Women in equestrianism (July 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lemonaka was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
More sources needed for leading.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
-Lemonaka 02:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mediterranean episode (July 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Most claims are still unsourced.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Twinkle1990 (talk) 05:39, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Russia in the First World War (July 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:
Please fix the reference errors then resubmit.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cerebellum (talk) 13:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Employement for people with autism (July 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:
Please fix the citation errors and resubmit.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cerebellum (talk) 16:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Federal popular initiative, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:55, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peopling of Oceania has been accepted

[edit]
Peopling of Oceania, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 11:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: French court (July 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:
Could you please add full citation info for Autrand, Coulet, and Marsay?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cerebellum (talk) 13:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chalmazel station (July 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:54, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of possessions of the abbey of Marmoutier de Tours

[edit]

Information icon Hello, DanielaNES. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of possessions of the abbey of Marmoutier de Tours, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Employment for people with autism has been accepted

[edit]
Employment for people with autism, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C F A 💬 04:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Russia in the First World War has been accepted

[edit]
Russia in the First World War, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 10:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mediterranean episode has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mediterranean episode. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 22:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:French court

[edit]

@DanielaNES, this CSM, I have looked into the draft mentioned above and I'm checked it. Only thing that gives me a little concern is that I found some of the red links. If possible kindly fix it in case. Other than that, the draft is ready to publish. I will keep it under review status for you. Once you fixed the links, inform me at the earliest. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:41, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: French court has been accepted

[edit]
French court, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Women in equestrianism has been accepted

[edit]
Women in equestrianism, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 19:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Electricity market in France has been accepted

[edit]
Electricity market in France, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 19:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Imperial Guard Cavalry (First Empire) has been accepted

[edit]
Imperial Guard Cavalry (First Empire), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 00:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Affaire Lip (September 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by OhHaiMark were:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please cite every sentence, change the title to "the Lip affair", and make it so that it won't read like an essay. After that, I'll accept it.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OhHaiMark (talk) 15:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of secularism in France has been accepted

[edit]
History of secularism in France, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Youknow? (talk) 13:26, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Act 115 (September 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 21:07, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mediterranean episode (September 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Unclear sourcing for wiki tables, see comment below.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polish immigration to the Ronchamp coalfields has been accepted

[edit]
Polish immigration to the Ronchamp coalfields, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: History of Aix-les-Bains (October 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
A vast majority of the article is unsourced.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Tavantius (talk) 05:51, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DanielaNES&oldid=1251064722"