User talk:Conner Stapley
Welcome
[edit]
|
January 2017
[edit]Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 08:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Conner Stapley, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
In situ bioremediaton
[edit]Hi Conner,
When you put your sandbox into article Space, can you please call it In situ bioremediaton? In Wikipedia article titles do not have capital letters unless they are proper nouns. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:27, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Conner (and @Graeme Bartlett: @Rcborden2:). Can I follow this up with a question? What is the rationale for creating a completely new article on In situ bioremediation without first expanding the existing article on bioremediation, please? I can't help wondering whether an initial merging of some content would be more appropriate into that article, followed by expansion into a new, more detailed article if really necessary. Cheers Nick Moyes (talk) 16:31, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
- It is a good idea to improve bioremediation. There is not actually much overlap so a merge would boost that page a lot. My main issue was with the style of name. In situ bioremediation looks to me to be a valid narrowing of the topic for a new article, but Nick Moyes is right, bioremediation should be boosted with content from in situ bioremediation. Perhaps the lede could be copied to yeiled a summary. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:38, 28 April 2017 (UTC)