User talk:Amayorov
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 21:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think this relates to my adding Benny Morris as a "See Also" to Ilan Pappé's page. Benny Morris's is a protected page, and I didn't edit it directly. Both Morris and Pappé belong to a group called "New Historians" – I thought it'd be useful to link the two. I hope it's all right. Amayorov (talk) 21:14, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Your edits were of a good quality, so nothing wrong there. However unfortunately Wikipedia has strict rules about who can and can't edit topics involved in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Specifically, "you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days" to edit any content which is to do with the Israeli-Palestinian topic area. You may however make Wikipedia:Edit requests. Let me know if you have any questions about this. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 21:24, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sukhoi Shkval, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hawker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 21:31, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! That was a mistake, and I will correct it. Amayorov (talk) 21:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
[edit] There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- And I have responded to your accusations there. Instead of engaging constructively, pointing out what exactly you disagree, you've resorted to edit-warring, seeming for ideological purposes.
- If you ever choose to discuss my work itself, I will also be happy. But so far, our interactions have been wholly unproductive. Amayorov (talk) 19:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Amayorov. Thank you.
Disambiguation link notification for July 12
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peretz (Russian TV channel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pepper.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: College marriage (university) (July 12)
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:College marriage (university) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, Amayorov!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:34, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
|
July 2024
[edit] Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Reagan peace plan. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Diannaa! Thanks for pointing out the issue! I see that you've put an inline attribution at the end of each copied paragraph (instead of a single attribution at the start) and added a Template:Source-attribution. I will make sure to comply with WP:FREECOPY now on. Are the changes you've made sufficient, or are there any additional edits required for that particular article? Amayorov (talk) 20:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- This particular one is okay now. The reason I prefer to put the citation after the content is that it makes it clearer which text was copied, and/or exactly which sentences or paragraphs the citation supports. — Diannaa (talk) 20:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Makes sense! Amayorov (talk) 20:51, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- This particular one is okay now. The reason I prefer to put the citation after the content is that it makes it clearer which text was copied, and/or exactly which sentences or paragraphs the citation supports. — Diannaa (talk) 20:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Start a discussion with Amayorov
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Amayorov. What you say here will be public for others to see.