Jump to content

User talk:76.82.51.127

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome!

[edit]

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!  Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 01:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2021 California gubernatorial recall election—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawn (talk) 14:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2021 California gubernatorial recall election. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 2021 California gubernatorial recall election was changed by 76.82.51.127 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882816 on 2021-05-05T14:58:39+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:58, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DanCherek. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Huntington Beach, California, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DanCherek (talk) 21:51, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Huntington Beach, California. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 00:39, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:40, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John McAfee, you may be blocked from editing. Susmuffin Talk 19:53, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Epstein didn't kill himself, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|1 Year of Service to the Encyclopedia 01:25, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm KNHaw. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Climate Pledge Arena have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. KNHaw (talk) 03:47, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm GhostRiver. Your recent edit to the page Tony DeAngelo appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — GhostRiver 21:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to The Walten Files. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ----Rdp060707|talk 05:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

[edit]

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Paycom, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 04:11, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 17:51, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2021

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.82.51.127 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "GBAlph4". The reason given for GBAlph4's block is: "Violations of the biographies of living persons policy".</nowiki>

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am a completely different person, and I would like to be seperated from "GBAlph4"

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
76.82.51.127 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "GBAlph4". The reason given for GBAlph4's block is: "Violations of the biographies of living persons policy".


Decline reason: WP:ACC will allow you to register an account. We will not consider unblock requests for this block, unless that request is made by an account. Yamla (talk) 15:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You said it would expire, but it hasn't.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
76.82.51.127 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "GBAlph4". The reason given for GBAlph4's block is: "Violations of the biographies of living persons policy".


Decline reason: what part of "no" have you been unable to understand? Less brusquely ... the block on GBAlph4 was indefinite, so it might well be quite some time until the autoblock expires. If you are "a completely different person", try editing from some other computer, preferably on a different IP range, and maybe even setting up an account per the instructions you have been given in response to one of your other requests (And frankly, given all the warnings above from previous use of this IP, I really think you'd be better off doing that).

Lastly I will point out, once again, that this request template is meant to be used by registered users in good standing who have not yet become automatically IP-block exempt and find themselves caught behind an autoblock resulting from the misbehavior of someone else who unfortunately shares the same IP.

If you continue making requests like these that we cannot fulfill, for all the reasons already explained, I will strongly recommend to the next reviewing admin that your access to this page be revoked as you are wasting our time. And yours, too. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm InfiniteNexus. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, YouTube Rewind, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 14:38, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Team Seas (October 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 20:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 76.82.51.127! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 20:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Song 2, you may be blocked from editing. Robvanvee 20:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Erica Cerra. A source for this has already been requested – do not just add content back without meeting the WP:BURDEN request. --IJBall (contribstalk) 19:19, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

New message from Bagumba

[edit]
Hello, 76.82.51.127. You have new messages at Bagumba's talk page.
Message added 22:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Bagumba (talk) 22:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sporting Kansas City. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:59, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Montreal Trudeau Airport

[edit]

Hello, I need help editing it. I added Air Nunavut and Iqaluit, but the format is off. Can anyone help please?

Talk page message

[edit]
Hello, 76.82.51.127. You have new messages at Suonii180's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Suonii180 (talk) 17:09, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm DL6443. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to AnnaLynne McCord have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DL6443 (Talk/Contribs) 03:42, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Rob Manfred, you may be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:57, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to International reactions to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Sea Cow (talk) 21:41, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Aeroflot, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 11:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hail to the Redskins, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 04:41, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]