User talk:119.74.238.54

August 2023

Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Tertiary education fees in Australia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AgisdeSparte (talk) 14:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear AgisdeSparte

I have made numerous changes to improve the outdated higher education in Australia related articles. After improving Tertiary education in Australia, I also improved the outdated Tertiary education fees in Australia to condense it to the encyclopedic style, bring the updated to the current status, also added useful links in the external links which have been reference in other articles via wikilinks and enchoring.

It seems you might have received some edit-filter triggered automated alert that a large chunk of text has been removed or condensed. If you thoroughly review the edits I made to this article, you will find there's a merit to my edit. The article already had a hatnote tag, which states the article is outdated, that is what I had tried to fix.

Perhaps you did not have much time as you might be busy and you reverted my edits under the presumption that it migha some vandal making troubles. Please review thoroughly and you will find my edits are very useful.

Just in case, if you still want to retain the original History Section, then at least please restore my edits done to the external link section.

Though I prefer you retain all my edits including the edits I made to the History Section, because presently it's difficult to see what is in the past and what is in the current situation, as my edits to history section had condensed the section and clearly differentiate the past with the present situation, and thus my edits to the history section made article more useful to the readers. Hence, I request you to restore all the edits. Thank you.

119.74.238.54 (talk) 15:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@119.74.238.54 Undone the revert. Have a nice one ! AgisdeSparte (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AgisdeSparte, wow, excellent. Huge thanks to you. 🥰🥰🙏🙏

119.74.238.54 (talk) 06:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Depsang Bulge does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 09:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Rani ki Vav, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See MOS:SEEALSO for more The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurugram Heliport Hub (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:Too Soon at the moment

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gurugram Heliport Hub and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Maliner (talk) 10:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 119.74.238.54! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Maliner (talk) 10:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gurugram Heliport Hub

Hello, 119.74.238.54. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gurugram Heliport Hub, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.