Wikipedia:Requests for comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: ()
Biographies
[edit]| Which image should be used in the Infobox? There has been consistent edit warring and changes to the infobox image since October. [1] A discussion was had on which - or if any - image should be used to depict Yasuke (link to discussion topic) where no consensus was reached. Two of the images (the Sumō Yūrakuzu Byōbu and Rinpa Suzuri-bako) are discussed as possible depictions by sources and discussed on the page already. For more information on the sources, Rotary Engine compiled the current mentions in their comment (here). Another option proposed using a modern artwork depiction by Anthony Azekwoh. Another option was to use no image in the infobox at all. Relm (talk) 09:52, 7 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Is it appropriate to include the statement "In general, a Muslim Mappila is a descendant of Hindu lower-caste natives who converted to Islam"--Imperial[AFCND] 14:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Should we list the upcoming Mayhem album as number 7 or number 8 in Gaga's album numbering scheme, should we refrain from mentioning the number, or should we tell the reader how both numbers have been supported? In any case, should we add an explicit note about the contradictions in the numbering labels given by the media?
Please answer 7, 8, refrain or both, with the optional add note. Binksternet (talk) 06:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Should Kash Patel be called a conspiracy theorist in the first sentence? Wikieditor662 (talk) 23:04, 5 February 2025 (UTC) |
We're a week out and this hasn't been decided yet. What should the first sentence of the article read?
|
Wikipedia talk:Verifiability/SPS RfC
| This RfC is to determine the consensus about (1) whether the current explanation of "self-published" in WP:SPS generally serves us well, perhaps with small improvements, or if it should be revised in some significant way, and (2) how editors interpret "self-published," in order to help us revise the explanation if needed. |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
These are some of the most read newspaper of the country and I wanted to preemtively ask about the general reliability of the sources.on cases of economical, national and political reporting. This does not cover press releases, syndicated news or editorials. Usage for general information regarding local news is to be gauged here. The sources to rate for are:
|
| Should the first sentence of the lead be rewritten to read as follows:
James Earl Carter Jr. (October 1, 1924 – December 29, 2024) was |
| Should the first sentence of this article be changed to include Uğur Şahin's Turkish ethnicity/background, rather than simply calling him "German"? Tserton (talk) 22:20, 19 January 2025 (UTC) |
Economy, trade, and companies
[edit]Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Is Benzinga [2]:
|
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
These are some of the most read newspaper of the country and I wanted to preemtively ask about the general reliability of the sources.on cases of economical, national and political reporting. This does not cover press releases, syndicated news or editorials. Usage for general information regarding local news is to be gauged here. The sources to rate for are:
|
Can the blog Bloody Elbow be used on ONE Championship as the main source for the Controversies and Finance sections?
|
History and geography
[edit]Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
| Should we delete order numberings from infoboxes of office holders? See previous related discussions: |
Considering the prevailing guidance at MOS:INFOBOX, WP:RESULT and the documentation at Template: Infobox military conflict should the result in the infobox be:
Where Outcome and negotiation is the section in the article (equivalent to an Aftermath section) where the result of the war is discussed. Cinderella157 (talk) 08:42, 8 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Which image should be used in the Infobox? There has been consistent edit warring and changes to the infobox image since October. [3] A discussion was had on which - or if any - image should be used to depict Yasuke (link to discussion topic) where no consensus was reached. Two of the images (the Sumō Yūrakuzu Byōbu and Rinpa Suzuri-bako) are discussed as possible depictions by sources and discussed on the page already. For more information on the sources, Rotary Engine compiled the current mentions in their comment (here). Another option proposed using a modern artwork depiction by Anthony Azekwoh. Another option was to use no image in the infobox at all. Relm (talk) 09:52, 7 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Is it appropriate to include the statement "In general, a Muslim Mappila is a descendant of Hindu lower-caste natives who converted to Islam"--Imperial[AFCND] 14:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Russian invasion of Ukraine
| The 2023 RFC on this topic can be found here.
Belarus is presently listed in the infobox under Russia and North Korea in a section headed |
Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War
| Do the lead and § Hindu victims section of this article: |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
These are some of the most read newspaper of the country and I wanted to preemtively ask about the general reliability of the sources.on cases of economical, national and political reporting. This does not cover press releases, syndicated news or editorials. Usage for general information regarding local news is to be gauged here. The sources to rate for are:
|
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
What is the reliability of Tornado Talk?
The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:46, 25 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Should the first sentence of the lead be rewritten to read as follows:
James Earl Carter Jr. (October 1, 1924 – December 29, 2024) was |
| Should we include Elon Musk's gesture?
Yes or no? Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 05:40, 22 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Gulf of America should be in the LEAD section?
I am requesting that all other discussions about the Gulf of America be closed and have a formal RfC to resolve this issue. Consensus has shown AGAINST changing the entire title to the Gulf of America. But there is still debate on whether or not it should be included in the article, particularly in the LEAD section. Rc2barrington (talk) 03:48, 22 January 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Polish–Ottoman War (1620–1621)
| Problem: One side thinks that only the source which directly mentions the result of the war is valid, while other side thinks that all sources used for Battle of Khotyn (1621) are viable because it was the battle that determined the final outcome.
Therefore, what should the result be:
This is my first RFC so sorry if I set it up wrong. Setergh (talk) 19:45, 20 January 2025 (UTC) |
There has been previous discussions regarding whether the Israel–Hamas war & the Israeli invasion of Lebanon (2024–present) should be included in this article. The main question regarding this is whether or not this article covers only sovereign states (which Hamas & Hezbollah are not), or whether it covers non-sovereign states/political entities/paramilitaries. The lead of the article is vague in this distinction, but does specifically call out national government. So, should both events be included or excluded?
The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 18:46, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Constantine XI Palaiologos
| Should we use the fresco as it was in the source, or the version slightly cropped and colour adjusted by User:Tintero21? 💖平沢唯を愛してる💖 (talk) 01:43, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
.jpg){kind=link}
Language and linguistics
[edit]Maths, science, and technology
[edit]| How should the Glacier article describe the relationship between rocks and glaciers? Lordgilman (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather
| How should articles deal with damage estimates for weather events? Departure– (talk) 14:46, 5 February 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard
| Is the Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine a WP:FRINGE organization? Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 21:52, 2 February 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
What is the reliability of Tornado Talk?
The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:46, 25 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Should the first sentence of this article be changed to include Uğur Şahin's Turkish ethnicity/background, rather than simply calling him "German"? Tserton (talk) 22:20, 19 January 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Coefficient of relationship
| Should this article contain a table of degrees of relationship with calculated coefficients of relationship, such as the one at Coefficient_of_relationship#Human_relationships? - MrOllie (talk) 03:34, 19 January 2025 (UTC) |
| I am requesting input from other editors regarding the level of detail in the description of the dilation and evacuation procedure in this article. My recent edits to expand this section, which included additional detail and references, were reverted. The current description in the article is as follows:
"Uterine contents are removed using a cannula to apply aspiration, followed by forceps to remove fetal parts." I proposed revising this section to provide more specific details, including the instruments used and the other procedural steps. You can review my proposed changes in this edit: http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Dilation_and_evacuation&oldid=1270115407 I ask editors the following:
I appreciate feedback from the community to help resolve this dispute. Thank you. DocZach (talk) 00:55, 18 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Should the following sentences be removed from the Lead of Polyvagal Theory?
There is consensus among experts that the assumptions of the polyvagal theory are untenable.[1] Ian Oelsner (talk) 16:59, 14 June 2024 (UTC) |
Art, architecture, literature, and media
[edit]| Should we list the upcoming Mayhem album as number 7 or number 8 in Gaga's album numbering scheme, should we refrain from mentioning the number, or should we tell the reader how both numbers have been supported? In any case, should we add an explicit note about the contradictions in the numbering labels given by the media?
Please answer 7, 8, refrain or both, with the optional add note. Binksternet (talk) 06:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film
Per the above thread, regarding the {{Rotten Tomatoes prose}} and {{Metacritic film prose}} templates, what is the best way to handle them?
|
| Should the first sentence of the third lead paragraph read:
Fox News has been characterized by many as a propaganda organization. Here is a previous discussion. Also see: Fox News#Political alignment in the body. soibangla (talk) 06:03, 5 February 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
| Should the Encyclopaedia Metallum (also known as Metal Archives) be deprecated? Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:09, 4 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Per the discussion above, it appears that there is an impasse on which sources should be used for the tour dates section. So, it comes to this question: Which is more reliable and should be preferred? Do we use the books (The Jacksons: Legacy and Michael Jackson FAQ) or the newspapers that claim that shows were on different days. Or should there be a compromise in which both the book(s) and newspapers be used, but in the form of efns that state that the shows were on different days "according to some sources". Please indicate your preference ("Books" or "Newspapers" or "Compromise") with your reasoning. HorrorLover555 (talk) 02:57, 2 February 2025 (UTC) |
| this article contains the following quote “ Over the years that followed he added COVID conspiracies, MAGA support, open discrimination against LGBTQ+ people, lizard and paedophile conspiracies, alt-right propaganda, getting in bed with white supremacists and who knows what else by the time you read this introduction.” I believe that this is good enough to include in the overview section about what sinfest is about. We’ve been having a great deal of difficulty sourcing actual quotes about what it’s about, so this was hard to get. Another user believes since it’s a quote from a quote of an unreliable source, that it’s unusable, but I believe that since a reliable source quoted the unreliable source as fully accurate and true, at least in this case, it’s a good quote. Is the quote usable? Le Blue Dude (talk) 00:59, 30 January 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
These are some of the most read newspaper of the country and I wanted to preemtively ask about the general reliability of the sources.on cases of economical, national and political reporting. This does not cover press releases, syndicated news or editorials. Usage for general information regarding local news is to be gauged here. The sources to rate for are:
|
| Hello! I'm requesting for your consensus on whether infoboxes for songs and albums should be customized with background colors that reflect the primary colors of the associated album or single cover. I proposed this because to enhance visual appeal and strengthen the connection between the article design and the featured music branding.
Should we allow the customization of infobox background colors to reflect the color of the album or single cover? Choices:
|
Talk:Dragon Age: The Veilguard
| Should the "Lead" and "Reception" sections be restored to the version that was established at the dispute resolution noticeboard (DRN)? (I'll copy over the exact prose after opening the RfC per WP:RFCOPEN #3 to avoid statement truncation). Sariel Xilo (talk) 03:24, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Which of the following best describes the reliability of Jacobin (magazine)?
|
Politics, government, and law
[edit]Should the current lead image (as seen to the right) remain? _crop.jpg) |
Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
| Should we delete order numberings from infoboxes of office holders? See previous related discussions: |
Considering the prevailing guidance at MOS:INFOBOX, WP:RESULT and the documentation at Template: Infobox military conflict should the result in the infobox be:
Where Outcome and negotiation is the section in the article (equivalent to an Aftermath section) where the result of the war is discussed. Cinderella157 (talk) 08:42, 8 February 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:2028 United States presidential election
| Should the potential candidates sections be removed in the article? elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 05:03, 8 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Should Kash Patel be called a conspiracy theorist in the first sentence? Wikieditor662 (talk) 23:04, 5 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Should the first sentence of the third lead paragraph read:
Fox News has been characterized by many as a propaganda organization. Here is a previous discussion. Also see: Fox News#Political alignment in the body. soibangla (talk) 06:03, 5 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Since the previous discussions above didn't come to a clear consensus. Should the infobox say "centre to centre-left" or just "centre-left"? -- FMSky (talk) 21:05, 4 February 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Republican Party (United States)
| Should center-right be removed from the infobox in the political position section? EarthDude (talk) 04:45, 4 February 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Killing of Trayvon Martin
| Should this article, Killing of Trayvon Martin, be included in the category, Anti-black racism in Florida? Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/him] 13:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
| Are Erin Reed’s reposted blog pieces reliable and non-SPS if republished by a reputable source such as The Advocate or LA/Wa Blade? Bluethricecreamman (talk) 03:01, 30 January 2025 (UTC) |
| this article contains the following quote “ Over the years that followed he added COVID conspiracies, MAGA support, open discrimination against LGBTQ+ people, lizard and paedophile conspiracies, alt-right propaganda, getting in bed with white supremacists and who knows what else by the time you read this introduction.” I believe that this is good enough to include in the overview section about what sinfest is about. We’ve been having a great deal of difficulty sourcing actual quotes about what it’s about, so this was hard to get. Another user believes since it’s a quote from a quote of an unreliable source, that it’s unusable, but I believe that since a reliable source quoted the unreliable source as fully accurate and true, at least in this case, it’s a good quote. Is the quote usable? Le Blue Dude (talk) 00:59, 30 January 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Russian invasion of Ukraine
| The 2023 RFC on this topic can be found here.
Belarus is presently listed in the infobox under Russia and North Korea in a section headed |
Generally speaking, when can views (by experts and "expert activists", such as human rights orgs) be included in the article, and not just in the list? Please vote for the minimal standard you consider due.
I believe to have mentioned all significant views, but !voters can and should elaborate on destinctions I may have missed. FortunateSons (talk) 08:51, 28 January 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War
| Do the lead and § Hindu victims section of this article: |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
These are some of the most read newspaper of the country and I wanted to preemtively ask about the general reliability of the sources.on cases of economical, national and political reporting. This does not cover press releases, syndicated news or editorials. Usage for general information regarding local news is to be gauged here. The sources to rate for are:
|
| This article's first paragraph currently says "Jackson's legacy is controversial. He has been praised as an advocate for working Americans and preserving the union of states, and criticized for his racist policies, particularly towards Native Americans." Should it say this? Should public opinion be on the first paragraph? DisneyGuy744 (talk) 03:07, 26 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Should the first sentence of the lead be rewritten to read as follows:
James Earl Carter Jr. (October 1, 1924 – December 29, 2024) was |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
| The EurAsian Times (used to have its own article but it was apparently PRODed) is cited in several hundreds of articles, mostly pertaining to Russian military hardware and South Asian issues, but not exclusively. It was mentioned a few times on this noticeboard but only on a surface level.
In light of all this, how would you rate the EurAsian Times?
Thank you. Choucas Bleu 🐦⬛ 22:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Should we include Elon Musk's gesture?
Yes or no? Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 05:40, 22 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Gulf of America should be in the LEAD section?
I am requesting that all other discussions about the Gulf of America be closed and have a formal RfC to resolve this issue. Consensus has shown AGAINST changing the entire title to the Gulf of America. But there is still debate on whether or not it should be included in the article, particularly in the LEAD section. Rc2barrington (talk) 03:48, 22 January 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:2028 United States presidential election
Which is correct?
|
Talk:Department of Government Efficiency
| This request for comments concerns the following question: In the first sentence of the article, does the term "Department of Government Efficiency" require a definite article before it, i.e. "the Department of Government Efficiency"?
The sentence in question: Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), officially the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization, is a temporary organization under the United States DOGE Service. Proposed change: The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), officially the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization, is a temporary organization under the United States DOGE Service. |
Talk:Russian invasion of Ukraine
| The last RfCs on the topic were over two years ago:[6] [7] [8]
Question: Should countries be added as supporters of Ukraine to the infobox? Option A: No. Option B: Yes, add United States, United Kingdom, EU and NATO. Option C: Yes, add United States, United Kingdom and individual countries as merited. Option D: Something else. (please explain in the comments) TurboSuperA+ (talk) 13:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Which of the following best describes the reliability of Jacobin (magazine)?
|
How should Ritter's sexual offences be described in the lead section?
Where in the lead should this sentence be placed?
|
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
| Should infoboxes on parliamentary elections which will be held in the future continue to contain information on current political party makeup? Or should the infoboxes be removed/heavily trimmed down until the election has occurred? Chessrat (talk, contributions) 03:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC) |
Religion and philosophy
[edit]| Is it appropriate to include the statement "In general, a Muslim Mappila is a descendant of Hindu lower-caste natives who converted to Islam"--Imperial[AFCND] 14:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC) |
Society, sports, and culture
[edit]| Should the current lead image (as seen to the right) remain? |
Considering the prevailing guidance at MOS:INFOBOX, WP:RESULT and the documentation at Template: Infobox military conflict should the result in the infobox be:
Where Outcome and negotiation is the section in the article (equivalent to an Aftermath section) where the result of the war is discussed. Cinderella157 (talk) 08:42, 8 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Is it appropriate to include the statement "In general, a Muslim Mappila is a descendant of Hindu lower-caste natives who converted to Islam"--Imperial[AFCND] 14:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Should we list the upcoming Mayhem album as number 7 or number 8 in Gaga's album numbering scheme, should we refrain from mentioning the number, or should we tell the reader how both numbers have been supported? In any case, should we add an explicit note about the contradictions in the numbering labels given by the media?
Please answer 7, 8, refrain or both, with the optional add note. Binksternet (talk) 06:34, 6 February 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Killing of Trayvon Martin
| Should this article, Killing of Trayvon Martin, be included in the category, Anti-black racism in Florida? Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/him] 13:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
These are some of the most read newspaper of the country and I wanted to preemtively ask about the general reliability of the sources.on cases of economical, national and political reporting. This does not cover press releases, syndicated news or editorials. Usage for general information regarding local news is to be gauged here. The sources to rate for are:
|
| Should the first sentence of this article be changed to include Uğur Şahin's Turkish ethnicity/background, rather than simply calling him "German"? Tserton (talk) 22:20, 19 January 2025 (UTC) |
Can the blog Bloody Elbow be used on ONE Championship as the main source for the Controversies and Finance sections?
|
Wikipedia style and naming
[edit]Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism
| Should we drop the prefix "Roman Catholic" (or "Catholic") from the diocese and archdiocese pages where no disambiguation is needed? 11:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography
MOS:JOBTITLES currently reads:
Should we simplify MOS:JOBTITLES by removing exceptions #2 and/or #3? Surtsicna (talk) 22:52, 29 January 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia policies and guidelines
[edit]| There is currently no rule regarding "[author] ([year])" citing within a sentence. Should there be? 15:53, 7 February 2025 (UTC) |
| this article contains the following quote “ Over the years that followed he added COVID conspiracies, MAGA support, open discrimination against LGBTQ+ people, lizard and paedophile conspiracies, alt-right propaganda, getting in bed with white supremacists and who knows what else by the time you read this introduction.” I believe that this is good enough to include in the overview section about what sinfest is about. We’ve been having a great deal of difficulty sourcing actual quotes about what it’s about, so this was hard to get. Another user believes since it’s a quote from a quote of an unreliable source, that it’s unusable, but I believe that since a reliable source quoted the unreliable source as fully accurate and true, at least in this case, it’s a good quote. Is the quote usable? Le Blue Dude (talk) 00:59, 30 January 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:Verifiability/SPS RfC
| This RfC is to determine the consensus about (1) whether the current explanation of "self-published" in WP:SPS generally serves us well, perhaps with small improvements, or if it should be revised in some significant way, and (2) how editors interpret "self-published," in order to help us revise the explanation if needed. |
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
Should WP:ATD-R be amended as follows:
|
There is no point in syntaxhighlighting a word code.
The meaning of 'distinct' is "different from one another." -- Cedar101 (talk) 01:40, 22 January 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:Changing username
| In this discussion on Meta-Wiki last month, some renamers suggested closing the English Wikipedia usurpation request page and directing users to Meta instead. As far as I know, English Wikipedia is the only wiki with its own usurpation page, while all other wikis process such requests on Meta. While requests on Meta are typically handled within hours, those on English Wikipedia often face delays due to a lack of attention from renamers. Given this, should all future usurpation requests be directed to Meta instead? – DreamRimmer (talk) 03:40, 14 January 2025 (UTC) |
WikiProjects and collaborations
[edit]
Wikipedia technical issues and templates
[edit]| Hello! I'm requesting for your consensus on whether infoboxes for songs and albums should be customized with background colors that reflect the primary colors of the associated album or single cover. I proposed this because to enhance visual appeal and strengthen the connection between the article design and the featured music branding.
Should we allow the customization of infobox background colors to reflect the color of the album or single cover? Choices:
|
Wikipedia proposals
[edit]Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
| The EurAsian Times (used to have its own article but it was apparently PRODed) is cited in several hundreds of articles, mostly pertaining to Russian military hardware and South Asian issues, but not exclusively. It was mentioned a few times on this noticeboard but only on a surface level.
In light of all this, how would you rate the EurAsian Times?
Thank you. Choucas Bleu 🐦⬛ 22:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Which of the following best describes the reliability of Jacobin (magazine)?
|
Unsorted
[edit]
User names
[edit]
|
Navigation: Archives • Instructions for closing administrators • |
This page is for bringing attention to usernames which may be in violation of Wikipedia's username policy. Before listing a username here, consider if it should be more appropriately reported elsewhere, or if it needs to be reported at all:
- Report blatantly inappropriate usernames, such as usernames that are obscene or inflammatory, to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention.
- For other cases involving vandalism, personal attacks or other urgent issues, try Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; blatant vandalism can also be reported at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, which is sometimes a better option.
Do NOT post here if:
- the user in question has made no recent edits.
- you wish to have the block of a user reviewed. Instead, discuss the block with the blocking administrator (see also Wikipedia:Blocking policy § Unblocking).
Before adding a name here you MUST ensure that the user in question:
- has been warned about their username (with e.g. {{subst:uw-username}}) and has been allowed time to address the concern on their user talk page.
- has disagreed with the concern, refused to change their username and/or continued to edit without replying to the warning.
- is not already blocked.
If, after having followed all the steps above, you still believe the username violates Wikipedia's username policy, you may list it here with an explanation of which part of the username policy you think has been violated. After posting, please alert the user of the discussion (with e.g. {{subst:UsernameDiscussion}}). You may also invite others who have expressed concern about the username to comment on the discussion by use of this template.
Add new requests below, using the syntax {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}}.
Tools: Special:ListUsers, Special:BlockList
Reports
[edit]Please remember that this is not a vote, rather, it is a place where editors can come when they are unsure what to do with a username, and to get outside opinions (hence it's named "requests for comment"). There are no set time limits to the period of discussion.
- Place your report below this line. Please put new reports on the top of the list.
Aurangzebra
[edit]
- ^ Grossman, Paul (2023). "Fundamental challenges and likely refutations of the five basic premises of the polyvagal theory". Biological Psychology. 180. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108589. PMID 37230290.