User talk:FMSky

This is FMSky's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8: 10.5 days

Orphaned non-free image File:Paul Steed (video game artist).webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paul Steed (video game artist).webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

You gave no reason or indication on why you reverted those edits. It is the same person and I updated a pic from last year. Meep Meep 14:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which edit are you talking about? --FMSky (talk) 15:17, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Willard in NPRmageddon Podcast

Hi FMSky, I noticed you've contributed edits to the Fred Willard Wikipedia entry, and I was wondering if you'd be able to add that he was a cast member of the podcast NPRmageddon in 2023. Here’s a citation you can use: https://laist.com/news/los-angeles-activities/why-the-creators-of-nprmageddons-dystopian-lost-angeles-see-reporters-as-heroic?utm_source=chatgpt.com Thank you for considering this addition! Lungthief4444 (talk) 21:44, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Elfman

Not sure why you deleted a very serious section about allegations of sexual harassment against a musician by alleging that it is "political." I could see a less careful editor accusing you of being paid to erase it or something similar. I especially dislike your failure to add alternate sources that could have been sufficient. wizzito | say hello! 10:00, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, the Rolling Stone sources in that article are under their "music" section and not their "politics" section. It wasn't very careful of you to remove that section. wizzito | say hello! 10:02, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:ROLLINGSTONEPOLITICS "there is unanimous consensus among editors that Rolling Stone is generally unreliable for politically and societally sensitive issues reported since 2011" --FMSky (talk) 15:03, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a COI with Elfman? This kind of behavior is what gets normies on Twitter to think you are erasing it on behalf of him. wizzito | say hello! 05:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't even know who this person is. I edit random articles all the time and saw the problematic rolling stone refFMSky (talk) 11:19, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]