User talk:Pharaoh of the Wizards/Archive

This is a subpage of Pharaoh of the Wizards's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Thank you very much for your kind welcome, o Pharaoh! Lrstallings (talk) 23:20, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto! Titomuerte (talk) 00:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For this revert on my user talk. Keep up the good work Tiderolls 01:16, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Thanks for the revert on my page, I must be doing something right! G~~ain~~Line ♠ _♥ 02:15, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which failed with 21 support, 39 oppose, and 11 neutral.
This is highly belated, but I wanted to thank you for the support in the RfA discussion. I do apologize for taking so long to reply to you, after the failure I laid back for a while. I just dove into another article and am working more diligently on WP.

Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 06:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One good turn...

...deserves another! :) $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 18:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where My Beasts Are Bedded

I will not be on a boat with you, BUT IN HELL!! Why do you torment me little yellow bird? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.9.19.185 (talk) 15:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User Keverding

Keverding has been posting a string of links, all to the same site. The activity looked to me exactly like spamming, so I deleted the links, and posted warnings on User talk:Keverding. Keverding then restored one of the links, and you posted a final warning, which is exactly what I would have done. However, Keverding has now posted a query on my talk page, which has prompted me to look more closely at the links, and I have decided they are perfectly good links, not spam at all, and I have restored them. I just thought I would let you know, since I have gone against what both you and I had been saying, which might look odd if you noticed it. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:24, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

My name is Wim Reijnen. I am the owner of the Thailand Tigers. I made changes to the head coach of my team, at Asean Basketball League and Thailand Tigers wikis and was prevented to do so. The new head coach is Mawinphorn "Joe" Soonpornthont. Pls allow me to make these changes. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wimsterbkk (talk • contribs) 03:02, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Amrita Tulika.

Why did you think this is a test page? --Dweller (talk) 21:29, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry my error actually wanted to mark it as Biography did not find anything in Google search or in Yahoo search Anyway Thanks for pointing it out.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:10, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

...very much for your quick revert of vandalism on my page. $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 06:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Vandalism revert on my talk page

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. --Jatkins ^{(talk - contribs)} 09:18, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Hi!! Thank You! See you soon! :) --Quaveren (talk) 19:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Regarding your post.[1] Durova³⁸⁶ 05:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hello pharaoh of wizards. i'm really pleased to see someone to help me here. i'm a student n really intrested to be a editor or wikipedia. ur any help will be certainly useful for me.

also a friend ... thmx a lot
--gursimar singh mohar 08:02, 24 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simar mohar (talk • contribs)

Hi

Hi. Beat you to the next vandalism! Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) 02:34, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zoklet.net does not need a wiki page. I highly recommend the page be removed completely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcrjtn (talk • contribs) 04:01, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hello Pharaoh of the Wizards. I greatly appreciate your message that you left me on my talk page. Thank you very much and I am really happy that we will get along. Oh, also, Merry Christmas (I know it has passed, but I hope you had a pleasant one) and a Happy New Year!--Seurope (talk) 12:09, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RFCN

Hi there. This note is to let you know I've closed the RFCN you started prematurely, as a key step was not done. We must wait for the editor to either respond to the username concerns, or continue to edit elsewhere (thereby signifying they have chosen not to address the issue). This particular user has not edited since your notification, so there is no need to escalate the issue into a RFC. As disruptive usernames only cause problems when they are used, they are no longer an issue when they are no longer used. You may find all this in the instructions at the top of WP:RFCN. Anyway, thanks for your contributions and happy editing! -kotra (talk) 19:58, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for message,did feel the username Going3killu was offensive and I understand I should waited till the user edited after my notification.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:01, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dude.

Your guiding wisdom helped me. I was in a bad place. I shall redeem myself, by God's will! 76.26.237.192 (talk) 23:47, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

could you please help me redeem myself as well...? I am to in a BAD place. k. thanks.

Question

Why am I continuing to be assaulted via wikipedia? I gave a link to the correct information. The posts on my talk are offensive to me as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpo90 (talk • contribs) 23:55, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Pharaoh of the Wizards's Day!

User:Pharaoh of the Wizards has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Pharaoh of the Wizards's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Pharaoh of the Wizards!

Peace,
Rlevse
00:13, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:13, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much.I am really honoured to get it from a distingushed Wikipedian like you.Wish you a Happy New Year. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Human rights in the People's Republic of China

But there aren't any human rights there. The government controls the media. Furthermore, all criminals are convicted before their trial even begins, and the actual trial is a mere formality. In addition, the Chinese government executes people for crimes that would be misdemeanors in any other country. --75.50.52.102 (talk) 16:56, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you that the human rights in China.But you should not Remove content like that ,Please improve the article with references the poor human rights record is also being highlighted there.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the warm welcome

You seem an expert on wikipedia so I ask for advice. I have written a musical analysis It is located at: 'Girlfriend (Avril Lavigne) - Discussion-' I hope it has not breached any copyright. What do you think? Otherwise delete everything.

--Bomben Stefano (talk) 19:03, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Im new to Wikipedia and am VERY excited and interested in contributing to the community! I've created a page on a musician and would love feedback! thank! OSAT 1229 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Osatmusic (talk • contribs) 22:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

Enjoy 2010! --201.51.64.17 (talk) 00:22, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vir Singh

You recently deemed my editing of page "Vir Singh" nonconstructive. I had just succeeded in turning it into a disambiguation page, which I believe is fully warranted, and moved the original "Vir Singh" to "Vir Singh (author)". Please respond. Virsingh (talk) 00:48, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elmbrook School District

Please take another look at the text I reverted here; it's the reason the page was protected last month. Thank you, 76.248.149.51 (talk) 01:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please check edit summaries before reverting

Before reverting content removal, such as in Elmbrook School District, please take a look at the edit summary to avoid mistakes. Thanks. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 01:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing it out.will be more vigilant from now. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. 99% are vandalism deletes. It's that 1% that sometimes trips us up. (I've caught myself a few times too.) And thanks for reverting the IP's talk page too. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 01:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, much appreciated. I know you do excellent work here. 76.248.149.51 (talk) 01:22, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hi Pharaoh of the Wizards, thank you for the quick vandalism reversion on my user page. Cheers :-) -- Marek.69 ^talk 08:39, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vevo edit

Hello

This is my first time ever writing a comment on Wikipedia, so please excuse me if I post it in the wrong section.

You recently wrote to me about the edit I made on Vevo. I admit that I wrote what I did on purpose, knowing that it would cause some commotion. But since it was the first time for me to edit a page on Wikipedia like this, I wanted to see how long it would take before the page was re-edited.

Anyhow, I would like to mention the dissatisfaction of many Youtube users about Vevo. Is it OK what is written in the article as long as there's a source included? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.221.141.167 (talk) 02:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

excuse me, but my last post on 'rock and roll' was correct. it was the guy before me that had it wrong. i saw the mistake and immediately corrected the error. i am sorry he had it wrong...man bad mistake on his part. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.112.206.70 (talk) 23:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you, oh Pharoah, for the revert on my talk page. Though the comment was amusing: "croc-powered fatoacracy" - now that's a new one! Geoff ^{Who, me?} 02:41, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am STILL seriously confused about how Wiki has everything formatted using HTML, and it screws me up when I try to do something... Sometimes I think I'm doing one thing, but when I check it again I'm doing another. Can I have some help that does not include the explanations given by wiki? Some of them are still confusing.

Pyro Vampiress (talk) 06:00, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For your speedy help on Injoos and Tony Fish. MuffledThud (talk) 11:39, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot!

for reverting my userpage. Jovianeye (talk) 05:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I appreciate your help. I didn't realize how important it was to sign and explain for each edit. I'll be sure to do so from now on. Thanks!

--Willrobinsoniii (talk) 04:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i am sorry

i am sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iordanis 777 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my talk page! -- Matthew Glennon (^T/_C\^D) 14:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ping

I have sent you an e-mail. --Tenmei (talk) 00:56, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - Generation Z page

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on the Generation Z page. Your contributions are much appreciated. --CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 02:21, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Wow, you're fast! Thanks for reverting the edits on my talk page before I could even see them! I've done the same for you (silly vandal...) Until we meet again, friend! Cheers, Mononomic (talk) 02:35, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed! That particular kid I've blocked about 20 times in the last week or so. WP:RBI. Cheers! Antandrus (talk) 02:36, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Geronimo Page

Hey there! I think you misunderstood me. I didn't vandalized that page. I only wanted to contribute something to that article. If you're reffering in the images, Some of it are my own shots but some of them came from my friend. We own that pictures and didn't violate any of it. Hoping for your reply. --Rars07 (talk) 01:31, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pharaoh, Rars' removal of that image in no way warranted a level-4 warning, as you applied here. I am removing it; clearly the edits this user is making are in good faith, even if they do not always display the greatest Wiki-savviness. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 16:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your removal anyway because he had already been given level 3 warning and clearly the user was violating WP:COPYRIGHT and his edits clearly mirrored vandalism and were unhelpful.Anyway I was Planning reply to the user when I see the user has been Indef Blocked Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:01, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AWB

Hi, believe it or not I've never used AWB in my life. It never worked when I tried to start using it.... Most of the articles started in the past were done with simple cut and paste at a breakneck speed. I no longer mass generate articles as I focus more on quality these days but providing you have a reliable source and some info I don't see why you shouldn't use AWB to create articles. Ask User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 13:10, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, AWB's a good way to make a large number of similar articles at once. The best thing to do is to open it up, load up the template, and then work on creating. If you're familiar with making a template for copy-and-paste using the {{subst:PAGENAME}} template, then you should be fine. Let me know if you have any other questions and I can try and help you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle question.

Hey, I'm new at this (Huggle), it seems that you know this way better than I do, so I would like to ask you want the List Builder's function is? Thanks. Connormah (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why accuse me of vandalism!

There was absolutely no reason to accuse me of vandalism on the vb.net page

Me.Dispose was perfectly valid!

I could accuse you of vandalism for taking it out! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tombrown16 (talk • contribs) 22:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message.Edits are clearly without consensus anyway removed the warning removed as per WP:AGF as given you a welcome.Please edit as per WP:CON as another editor has also pointed out.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:55, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

I have replied in detail to you. However, you could at the very least, protect the Jiddu Krishnamurti article from frequent uploads by user 65.88.88.126 (New York Libraray). This user deletes valid edits with reverts to his own version claiming it is "the proper version of the article"! He has been warned throughout this episode and has only retaliated throughout. If the user cannot be blocked, at least some protection needs to be provided to other users against this practice. Thanks for your time. Bo.talks (talk) 03:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I hereby award you this barnstar for all the vandalism you have reverted, thank you and keep up the good work. South Bay (talk) 06:32, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Sara flower

Hello Pharaoh of the Wizards. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sara flower, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: well known opera and concert singer is an assertion of importance. Thank you. Ϣere SpielChequers 11:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you the version I marked merely said Sara Flower was born in 1820.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:20, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point, but you did tag it within one minute of its creation, also once the capitalisation was resolved it fixed a redlink, though I accept that without moving it "what links here" wouldn't have helped. May I suggest with good faith Newbies it can pay to cut a cut them a little slack? In this case the editor continued writing, but it must have been a somewhat disconcerting welcome. Ϣere SpielChequers 13:18, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to second WereSpielChequers' remarks. This is actually a valuable article, with a lot of potential for expansion. If you're new-page patrolling, start at the end and work up. Please do not delete an article literally one minute after it's started (See the instructions here.) A lot of new editors, start their articles gradually, or hit the save button by mistake while they're still drafting. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 15:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I agree actually did not realise you Sara Flower was being refered too when it was merely said she was born in 1820.I will start the end and work up.Thank you for your suggestion.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Pharoah, alternatively you could try out the fairly new one hour option at special:Newpages - that should give enough time for people to get a few edits into an article, without leaving the bad stuff hanging round all day. Ϣere SpielChequers 18:06, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign new postings

Just so you know what's going on:

I have more than adequately addressed your concerns.
I do not understand your edit - it doesn't seem to make sense to me.
Further, it changes the intent of what you originally said, and makes my original response no longer relevant.
Hence, please respond sequentially, and please sign new postings to keep the chronology.

With thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Regarding your edit, thanks for the reply. Obviously, we are both coming at this from different angles which do not have much (if any) common ground. I see little point in trying to make you aware of my POV, (for reasons similar to the fact that I don't see much relevance in your POV, so I assume you don't see much relevance in mine). OK. Fair enough. We have different PsOV. - (Not what you would call "an unusual situation".) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:24, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply.I fully respect your right to your opinion.Cheers.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, regarding these edits, the world didn't end, so the situation can't have been disasterous ...

Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 14:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deen Chatterjee

When the creator of a page has removed all content, the proper response is to tag it with {{db-author}}, NOT to revert the edit and issue warnings. 98.248.32.44 (talk) 01:12, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

thanks for the welcome. Impliedwarranty (talk) 23:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of vandalism

Please stop adding in vandalism to this page . This section has been removed numerous times. This section is puffery and salacious. Why do you continue to vandalize this page. Warning 1. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmb2010 (talk • contribs) 00:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message.It is not vandalism if it is attributed to reliable sources, which is what it is. Please read our info on what vandalism actually is. Please do not continue to remove sourced information from the page.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:42, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you reaaly dont have a life do you? what kind of loser sits on a pc all day monitoring people. i see u have pathetic little award aswell. get a life u sad bastard. you lonley freak. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Respectme11 (talk • contribs) 13:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i apologize if i offended you ic ant help it sometimes. can u help me with using wikipedia efficiently i just done know how,sorry again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Respectme11 (talk • contribs) 13:06, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Watch it

Be careful now with your reverting. This revert you made to Michael Green was an edit which an IP was clearly trying to improve the article. In Biographies of British people the date comes in before the month, not the other way round. Minima c94 (talk) 11:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing it out actually gave the IP a Welcome.Thought we had a common format for all anyway thanks for pointing it out.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:13, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Pharaoh of the Wizards! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Gayathri Girish - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:54, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Image Upload and Copyright requirement

Thank you for posting to my new USER Site and first article Robert Fritz. I requested a photo from the subject (Robert Fritz) to add to the article I posted. I was provided a .jpg but then realized there were copyright guidelines to follow.

The owner of the image is Robert Fritz. I sent the page from Wiki on selecting the copyright tag.

I was requested to list the copyright as follows:

The copyright holder of this file has irrevocably released all rights to it, allowing it to be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, used, modified, built upon, or otherwise exploited in any way by anyone for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial, with or without attribution of the author, as if in the public domain. However, as a courtesy, a link back to http://www.robertfritz.com would be appreciated.

What is the next step? I'm unclear about how to upload the file or this copyright notice linking it to the image. Your help is appreciated. ProjectCREATE (talk) 05:45, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiout

First Annual Wikiout. In order to give our vandalism, new page and spam patrollers a well deserved day off, it is suggested that all edit patrollers take a 1 day vacation from editing Wikipedia, on Thursday, April 1, 2010. _{(No, this is NOT an April Fools Joke)} Go out, enjoy the spring weather, and give your wrist a break from using that mouse! Please pass this message along to other patrollers by adding {{subst:User:Wuhwuzdat/Wikiout}} ~~~~ to their talk pages

WuhWuzDat 23:30, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

really?

ok i do not know who you are,i put down a fact how the hell is that vandalism? what ever —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.244.138.249 (talk) 17:13, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Participation at my RfA

Thank you for taking the time to weigh in on my RfA. It was successful, in that the community's wish not to grant me the tools at this time was honored. I'm taking all the comments as constructive feedback and hope to become more valuable to the project as a result; I've also discovered several new areas in which to work. Because debating the merits of a candidate can be taxing on the heart and brain, I offer this kitten as a low-allergen, low-stress token of my appreciation. --otherl left 14:33, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Apologies for the previous warning, we reverted at the same time and Huggle gave you the warning in error :) --5 albert square (talk) 21:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem I understand.Thanks for your message.Cheers Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

173.162.177.53

Hello,

One of our students brought this page to my attention.

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User_talk:173.162.177.53

Can you please advise best practices regarding student access to Wikipedia. Obviously we are all sharing one (static) IP address, and the actions of one user affect everyone.

Blocking our school IP from editing might not be a bad idea. Is there any way to find out who did the vandalism?

thanks -

Luke Jaeger | Technology Coordinator Pioneer Valley Performing Arts Charter Public School www.pvpa.org

ljaeger at pvpa dot org —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.162.177.53 (talk) 18:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Best way to avoid it is to create separate accounts for each Student using Wikipedia.It is really impossible to find out who vandalised otherwise.School blocks do not affect Users with account.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your RfA Support

Pharaoh of the Wizards/Archive - Thank for your participation and support in my recent successful RfA. Your confidence and trust in me is much appreciated. As a new admin I will try hard to keep from wading in too deep over the tops of my waders, nor shall I let the Buffalo intimidate me.--Mike Cline (talk) 08:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AWB

Why thanks for the barnstar *blush* :-) It's much appreciated.

There is a way to mass-create pages with AWB. I'm afraid I'm a little busy at the moment, because I've been out of the office for three days due to snow. But I'll write something up and e-mail it to you tonight, once I get home; will that work? --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure and it's my pleasure. I'll send you something tonight, then. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]