User talk:Beckbucket

Hello, Beckbucket, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Yuchitown (talk) 00:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Joseph White (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Paul W were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sourcing is heavily dependent upon publisher sources (not independent), routine mentions, and an interview with the author is used repeatedly (care is needed here, see WP:Interviews: "The general rule is that any statements made by interviewees about themselves, their activities, or anything they are connected to is considered to have come from a primary source and is also non-independent material." Adding any significant coverage in reliable, independent sources will help demonstrate notability; this may come in time - otherwise it may simply be WP:Toosoon.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Joseph White and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Paul W (talk) 21:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Beckbucket! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Paul W (talk) 21:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While the page on its author is currently awaiting AFC re-evaluation, the information on his debut novel Hell Followed with Us (draft) sounds promising enough for a separate article (along with follow-up The Spirit Bares Its Teeth (draft) once/if I get to it). See you as I set up the basics in a few days; you may be in trusted hands in case you're reading this several weeks or months from now. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 10:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good! I'll check back next week- I have a ton of info about the books that I cut from the author draft that would work well in a separate article. Beckbucket (talk) 18:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two tips

Hi and welcome! I just wanted to let you know about two minor issues I've noticed in your edits. First, section headings in articles should use sentence case, not title case. Second, when you cite a book as a source, please include the page number(s). Hope that helps! Schazjmd (talk) 20:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know! Correcting those now :) Beckbucket (talk) 20:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sasha LaPointe (author) (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A quick WP:Before shows that better, more reliable sources exist for this subject. Please work those in to the draft. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 21:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sasha LaPointe (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 21:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Joseph White (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You may want to create about his books, which appears to be notable. There are interviews that aren't sources per WP:RS, and book reviews, which are independent of the books itself, and nothing about the author.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Joseph White and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sasha LaPointe (author)

Hello, Beckbucket. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sasha LaPointe (author), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hell Followed with Us has been accepted

Hell Followed with Us, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 12:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sasha LaPointe (author) has been accepted

Sasha LaPointe (author), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 12:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Sasha LaPointe (no need for the disambiguator, "author", since we don't have an article on any other Sasha LaPointe). -- asilvering (talk) 12:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'm really sorry your drafts were declined improperly. They were perfectly acceptable, so I resubmitted and accepted them. A general rule of thumb here is that if an author has multiple books that themselves would be notable under WP:NBOOK, then the author should have an article. Keep it up! And thanks for editing wikipedia. -- asilvering (talk) 12:45, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Joseph White has been accepted

Andrew Joseph White, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 12:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Women in Red

Hello Beckbucket! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to women. I would like to invite you to WikiProject Women in Red, a WikiProject focused on creating entries for women's biographies and related topics and assisting contributors who run into difficulties. If you wish to participate, you can sign up under "New registrations", or feel free to ask for assistance on our talk page any time. Thanks again for your contributions! asilvering (talk) 12:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]