User talk:Arbeiten8

April 2024

Hello, I'm InfiniteNexus. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Expend4bles have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unplugged (smartphone) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Unplugged (smartphone), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 00:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Arbeiten8!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Butlerblog. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Language of Jesus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ButlerBlog (talk) 12:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noting specifically what you added, I don't disagree with the premise of what you added, but it is entirely unsourced and as such, it is original research. Don't add statements of that magnitude without a cited source. ButlerBlog (talk) 12:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Jesus" is the anglicized Greek version of the Hebrew name "Joshua." It is explained in the main Jesus article. You can consult Wiktionary. --Arbeiten8 (talk) 19:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter. It needs to be cited. Read WP:WHYCITE. It likewise doesn't matter what is in other articles. Wikipedia cannot be used to source itself (WP:NOTSOURCE). If you don't understand, ask. This is a primary content guideline so understanding how/when to cite material is important. ButlerBlog (talk) 21:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did I stop you from contributing and improving the article? Arbeiten8 (talk) 21:52, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about God of the New Testament

Hello, Arbeiten8

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Godsy and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect God of the New Testament, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11 § God of the New Testament.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Godsy}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 05:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"God of the Old Testament" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect God of the Old Testament has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12 § God of the Old Testament until a consensus is reached. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 01:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of infant monarchs moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of infant monarchs. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 07:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

Hi. I noticed you answered an edit request to remove the old name of the subject of the article. Per MOS:NB, if the subject is known by their old name professionally prior to the name change, as is the case in this article, the name should be listed in the article as a former name. You changing it without any discussion goes against the letter of the guideline and such change should be made through consensus on the talk page first. I reverted the edit and would just caution making any such change again without discussing in and achieving consensus for the change first. cyberdog958^Talk 03:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. Steele wasn't notable at all until this documentary came out. In fact, we didn't have an article on her until the documentary premiered. Arbeiten8 (talk) 03:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, multiple of the references used in the article refer to the subject by their former name, so the former name should be listed or else it wouldn't even make any sense to the uninformed reader. If anything of their career is mentioned to prior the name change, and if any reference refer to the subject with their former name, it should be kept in the article once per the guideline. cyberdog958^Talk 03:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The references are made with male names for Vivian Wilson (publicly done by her father, New York Post, and many others), Rachel Levine, and others. Don't harm people emotionally. Arbeiten8 (talk) 03:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is inappropriate to resort to personal attacks. Reach consensus on the talk page before making the change on a contentious topic and there should be no problem. cyberdog958^Talk 03:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you be patient? Can you stop badgering me with your constant retorts on my talk page? Please wait to see if others will chime in on the relevant talk page.Arbeiten8 (talk) 03:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Me responding to your statements on your talk page do not constitute badgering me with my constant retorts. cyberdog958^Talk 03:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just 1 question. Can you wait like me? This will allow others to comment. Arbeiten8 (talk) 03:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And again, if consensus is reached to remove the name on the talk page, that is one thing. But the change should not be made unilaterally without discussion. cyberdog958^Talk 03:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Crovetti (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDB may not be used as a reference

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas Crovetti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arbeiten8! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]