User:Excirial/Dashboard
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
| Userpage | Talk | Awards | Dashboard | Programs | Sandbox | Sketchbook | Blocknote |
|
Reports[edit]
User-reported[edit]
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 3 items Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 7 items Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 105 items Requested RD1 redactions – 5 items
Usernames for administrator attention
User-reported[edit]
Requests for page protection
Current requests for increase in protection level[edit]Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Persistent Unreferenced edits. Hotwiki (talk) 00:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term insertion of citogenesis birthdates by a sockpuppet. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term insertion of citogenesis death dates by a sockpuppet. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long term changing of birth date by a sockpuppet. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent trade. Sushidude21! (talk) 00:58, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥ 论 01:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥ 论 03:08, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥ 论 03:08, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥ 论 03:08, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA article. GnocchiFan (talk) 04:06, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. - Ratnahastin (talk) 05:08, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:TOOSOON via trade. Sushidude21! (talk) 05:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – WP:RSBREAKING - poorly sourced unconfirmed reports of sports transaction. DaHuzyBru (talk) 06:34, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism 67.81.10.115 (talk) 06:48, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit war/content dispute involving multiple IPs. JavaHurricane 08:09, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 09:21, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 10:29, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Consistent attempts to remove sourced DOB by the subject, IP editors, and new accounts. Flatthew (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. IP vandal adding false information purporting to spread the "truth". 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 11:29, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Reason: Persistent addition of an unreferenced date for a series that haven't begun airing as of this writing. Hotwiki (talk) 12:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – All but one IP edits since last February have been either vandalism or non-constructive edits. Nobody (talk) 12:22, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 12:27, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Falls under the provisions of WP:ARBPIA and should be ECP, thanks!. Smallangryplanet (talk) 12:27, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Also falls under the provisions of WP:ARBPIA and should be ECP, thanks!. Smallangryplanet (talk) 12:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC) Current requests for reduction in protection level[edit]Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here. Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... this page has been spammed for 5 years ago and protected in 2020 . 2001:44C8:4446:6855:B0EE:C038:4F25:5742 (talk) 11:31, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page[edit]Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
"prompting Israeli forces to fight back and apply the Hannibal Directive against its own citizens.[78][79][80] The clash resulted in the deaths of 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals, including 815 civilians.[81][82] After" CORRECTION: ". The attack resulted in the deaths of 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals, including 815 civilians.[81][82] There were accusations that Israel applied the Hannibal Directive against its own soldiers.[78][79][80] After" Reason: Accuracy. The corrected form is what the provided sources support. The sources (and the directive) refer to soldiers, not civilians. Further, while sources for accusations are valid, the sources clearly frame this as a potential accusation rather than an establishment of fact, which the article's current phrasing misrepresents. Itamarro (talk) 15:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC) Handled requests[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive. Protected edit requests
Requests for permission - rollback
WP:RFPERM (rollback)Rollback[edit]
I am requesting rollback rights because I spend most of my time on Wikipedia reverting vandalism, and I would like to help fight vandals more effectively. I have made some mistakes, but I mostly have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies, and I try to always WP:AGF. Rollback will also allow me to use tools like AntiVandal. Thank you. Protobowladdict (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request rollback permission to help combat vandalism, particularly in Nepal-related articles, which I frequently come across while patrolling recent changes. Having rollback rights would allow me to efficiently revert obvious and disruptive edits, improving the quality of affected pages. I always assume good faith and am careful when reviewing edits. If I am uncertain whether an edit is vandalism, I do not revert it. I am also familiar with Wikipedia’s warning templates and know when it is appropriate to report persistent vandals to WP:AIV. I believe rollback will be a valuable tool in my efforts to maintain Wikipedia’s integrity, and I will use it responsibly. Thank you for your time and consideration. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:49, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting this right to revert vandalism from the all the articles on Wikipedia, especially India related articles. I'm also patrolling recent changes from when I started i.e. almost a month.Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 05:53, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
I have been actively combating vandalism on Wikipedia for some time, especially Taiwan related articles. I regularly monitor recent changes and undo obvious vandalism while ensuring that good-faith edits are not mistakenly removed. Having rollback rights would allow me to revert vandalism more efficiently, especially on high-traffic pages. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s policies on vandalism, edit warring, and proper rollback usage, and I will use the tool responsibly to help maintain the integrity of the encyclopedia. Heeheemalu (talk) 12:57, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to request rollback rights as I have been patrolling on Wikipedia for a while, finding vandals, and I would like to have the ability to use rollback to revert their edits more effectively (as I have had a couple where I had to undo lots of small edits and it took up lots of my time). Thanks, ScrabbleTiles (talk) 16:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting rollback to help me revert vandalism better. I've been using Twinkle for a while now, but in a few cases the proper rollback toll would have been more useful. I think I only revert blatant vandalism, as I prefer accuracy over volume. Mainly, it would be another tool in the kit. LightlySeared (talk) 10:04, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
I do not foresee using the Rollback function very much, but it would be useful, from time to time, for undoing vandalism or seriously botched edits. I've been on the English Wikipedia since 2013. It'd be more convenient, at least, than copy pasting the entirety of an old version of an article—something I've done in the past. I hope you will consider my request. Thank you. Indefatigable2 talk 18:31, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
I am kindly requesting rollback permissions for myself, in order to revert vandalism using the Huggle tool. Dell Latitude E6400 (talk) 16:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC) Requests for permission - account creator There are no outstanding requests for account creator.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
