Talk:The Dreamscape

The Dreamscape has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 21, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Dreamscape/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Albacore (talk · contribs) 14:46, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article shortly. Albacore (talk) 14:46, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lead and infobox look good. No DAB links but a dead link. Files look OK. References are all properly formatted.

Olivia receives an email from someone who claims to be John Scott, listing an address for her to visit. Is Scott someone important here, or is he just some random guy? If he is important, can you explain who he is?

Can you link "hallucinogen"?

Why do you use "Young" to describe Mark but everywhere else you use first names? Same with Morales.

as well as other recent fringe cases what do you mean "fringe cases"?

This placed it in third place in its timeslot. Can you find out what was second?

place among viewers aged 18-49 18–49.

I feel like the SFScope quote is far too long and should be cut down for copyright reasons. I also feel like the length and amount of IGN quotes should be reduced for the same reasons.

I will look over the article again when these are responded to. Albacore (talk) 15:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have addressed all of your concerns. Thanks for reviewing! Ruby 2010/2013 20:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pass. Albacore (talk) 22:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Dreamscape. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090703192017/http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/26/tuesday-ratings-brooke-burke-wins-dancing-with-the-stars/8843 to http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/26/tuesday-ratings-brooke-burke-wins-dancing-with-the-stars/8843

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Dreamscape. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]