Talk:Alison King

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Image

Can we please find or create a good, free image of her head that can be used with the biography information? There have been a few images of her uploaded that have all been taken down over disputes about fair use. The article needs an image to show what she looks like. Poeheese (talk) 19:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of information

It feels like the biography information on the right hand side reads more like a CV than most other pages, why does it need agent information or employer history? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.49.56.28 (talk) 16:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'Recently'

I have just removed all instances of the devil-word 'recently' from this article, after stumbling on it by accident. It doesn't take that long before 'recently' becomes old. Try to avoid using 'recently' whenever possible. BenC533 01:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Carla corrie.jpg

The image Image:Carla corrie.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:36, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daughter's name

I've had to remove the name a few times now, so could it stop being added without a source please? It's now been written as Sarah Louise and Daisy, so we need a source before this can be added to the article. Thanks. Sky83 (talk) 16:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re "Face of Boddingtons Beer" was this not Melanie Sykes about 1995 ?

re "Face of Boddingtons Beer" was this not Melanie Sykes about 1995 ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.72.202 (talk) 23:08, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of sock puppetry

This is regarding this large revert. This was mostly a revert of edits made by Poeheese, who has been blocked as a sock per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AnimationWhiz133 (archive). There may have been some good edits that got lost in the mix, but I think most of the changes made by other editors were minor fixes of content added by the sock puppet. Many of the sources added did not appear reliable, or were clearly unreliable tabloids/gossip sites, and the level of detail is entirely inappropriate. There are still some source issues, but adding more tabloids is only making things worse.

If anyone (other than AnimationWhiz133) feels my edit unacceptably damaged the article, please feel free to revert, but please also carefully review the added content to make sure it's WP:DUE and supported by WP:RS. Thanks. Grayfell (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alison King. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]