Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women

WT:WOMEN

This page has been mentioned by a media organization:

Olivia Cleal (October 11, 2023). "What a Wikipedia page can do for women in STEM". womensagenda.com.au. Retrieved October 13, 2023. It's part of a worldwide movement to boost the number of Wikipedia pages that are written on women in every field. According to WikiProject Women, just 19.66 per cent of English language Wikipedia pages profile women.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 8 sections are present.

Lorraine Twohill

Hi! Alana here, representing Google and attempting to submit some requests related to the company here on Wikipedia. I am familiar enough with Wikipedia's conflict of interest rules to know that I should let others review my suggestions and not edit pages on my own. Over at Talk:Lorraine Twohill, I've submitted a request to update the "Early life" section for Lorraine Twohill using Template:Edit COI. Twice now, I've been told to make the proposed changes, even though I've said I would prefer not to edit the page myself. Are any editors here willing to take a look and update her biography for me? GoogleAB (talk) 19:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for R v R

R v R has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Anggun

Anggun has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Solitary confinement of women in the United States

Could some member or members of this WikiProject take a look at Solitary confinement of women in the United States? It kind of reads more like an essay or academic paper than encyclopedic article from the very first sentence. It's also been recently expanded quite a bit recently by a student editor participating in a WP:WEP course and the newly added content might need some assessing from some Wikipedians more experienced in dealing with this kind of subject. The discussions on the article's talk page seem a bit contentious despite mostly being a couple years old. Anyway, I'm asking about it here because this is one of WikiProjects whose banner is found on the article's talk page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:18, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Margaret Chin

Margaret Chin has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2024

Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325

Online events:

New: Women who died in 2024 | Religion

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

Women in Religion have a monthly virtual edit-a-thon and the next session is
December 2nd 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. CST. For Zoom meeting details, contact Dzingle1 or
RosPost. Women in Red members are welcome to join the Zoom Meeting here

Tip of the month:

Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:43, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Good article reassessment for Live Show

Live Show has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:14, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on date format

Hi! I have recently opened up a discussion on the date format of the article for Kalpana Chawla. You can find it on the Talk page. Would like to see people's perspectives on it. Thank you! Spookyaki (talk) 22:36, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]