Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 September 20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with only two blue links. Not useful for navigation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with only one blue link. Not useful for navigation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It actually has 2 Pнp13333332 tαlk\edıts 19:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2017. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. plicit 14:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Replaced with {{Bendigo V/Line rail service}}. Gonnym (talk) 08:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 15:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. plicit 14:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Replaced with Template:Ballarat V/Line rail service. Gonnym (talk) 08:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. The Ballarat template was edited full of inaccuracies for the Ararat service, and the Swan Hill template is not replaced by the Ballarat template, Swan Hill services do not run on the Ballarat line at all! On the Bendigo article, the Swan Hill template was lazily replaced with a template for the physical Piagnil railway line, *not* representative of the Swan Hill passenger service whatsoever. I've fixed these templates back to how they always were until these random, senseless edits happened to them. Oppose, oppose, oppose. Граймс (talk) 08:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 15:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Ararat services do travel between Melbourne and Ararat via Ballarat and thus can somewhat be seen as an extension of the Ballarat service, but the Swan Hill service travels between Melbourne and Swan Hill via Bendigo, and should be seen as an extension of the Bendigo service NOT the Ballarat service. However, all of these services are operated and branded separately to each other by the operator V/Line. Because the Swan Hill train goes via Bendigo and not via Ballarat as incorrectly stated per nom, the Swan Hill template shouldn't be considered for deletion in this nom. Fork99 (talk) 21:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    In addition, it may be confusing to use the Bendigo or Ballarat templates to add on services that travel further afield (i.e. Swan Hill, Ararat) as the stopping patterns of stations can differ between these services. Fork99 (talk) 21:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep: Not because of my comments above, but because V/Line's other lines, including the Template:Geelong V/Line rail service and Template:Seymour V/Line rail service and their associated templates with "longer-distance extensions" of said lines haven't been nominated (i.e. Warrnambool, Shepparton, Albury), as for consistency's sake, these templates should be similar to each other in scope. These templates seem to be transcluded in their respective main articles now. Fork99 (talk) 22:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contains only 2 English WP links, one of which is up for deletion. LibStar (talk) 15:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now only has 1 English entry. LibStar (talk) 06:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 15:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add the single link to Template:Foreign relations of Honduras and use that template. Gonnym (talk) 20:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We don't link embassies in foreign relations templates. LibStar (talk) 05:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:24, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use roster template with no documentation, categories, or template parameters. Subst into article and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:58, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:55, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only contains 1 English WP link. Pointless for a nav box to have one entry. LibStar (talk) 09:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add the link to Template:Foreign relations of Guatemala and use that template. Could also merge Template:Diplomatic missions in Guatemala while doing it. Gonnym (talk) 20:40, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We don't put diplomatic missions in foreign relations templates. LibStar (talk) 04:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Curlie is dead. The static pages such as "About" or "Privacy policy" still work, but any of the dynamic content, i.e. the directory itself is no longer working. Websites such as isitdownrightnow.com report it down long term.

Per WP:ELNO #16 we should avoid links to "Sites that are not reliably functional or not likely to continue being functional." That's Curlie.

Also the database has long been overtaken by spammers and ceased to be of use.

Deleting the template is preferred to removing it from multiple articles manually. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it was rare that Curlie contents were useful anyway, it was mostly just local business spam. Canterbury Tail talk 12:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the meantime, could we please get an admin or template editor to blank the template? There's no value in sending readers to a non-existent website. Also, pinging Jmg38, who has been removing these manually. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, the website works for me here and all contents seem accessible? ~ nicolas (talk) 11:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly one week after first finding (well, first documenting) the unreliability issue. Only proves the sad notion that the template needs to carry the warning "if you get a '504 Gateway Time-out' message, just wait a few days and try again". Jmg38 (talk) 14:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nav box which contains no English blue links. LibStar (talk) 06:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing to navigate to. Gonnym (talk) 20:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nav box with only 1 English entry LibStar (talk) 05:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing to navigate to. Gonnym (talk) 20:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nav box with only 1 English entry. LibStar (talk) 05:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing to navigate to. Gonnym (talk) 20:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:2012 ICC World Twenty20. plicit 14:24, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:2012 World Twenty20 Stadiums with Template:2012 ICC World Twenty20.
Just 3 links; should be merged with the main navbox Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 04:47, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not even sure what process this could be for on Wikipedia. The only place on Wikipedia we do straight-up votes is at WP:ARBCOM, and speaking as a (trainee) clerk I had never even heard of this template. Delete them. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Leftovers from a dead process. Gonnym (talk) 20:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only has 2 English WP entries, 1 of which is up for deletion. Pointless having a nav box for 1-2 entries. LibStar (talk) 00:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Add links to Template:Foreign relations of Liberia and use that template. Gonnym (talk) 20:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, it isn't. FR templates are about relations between nations linked in the navbox. Embassies and diplomatic missions are separate FR topics. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with WikiCleanerMan LibStar (talk) 04:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.