Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 April 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2018 olympic ice hockey templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after merged into Ice hockey at the 2018 Winter Olympics and transcluded via WP:LST. Delete all templates and corresponding categories. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only two films, WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 15:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Three now, actually. SavageEdit (talk) 13:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This still fails the WP:NENAN "rule of five". --woodensuperman 12:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not rule if you mean policy, but rather a rule of thumb. There are exceptions with certain navboxes. Directors with three films are considered under that exception. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 April 26. plicit 00:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No valid links. – Fayenatic London 07:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:45, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused UK military rank and insignia template. Hasn't been used since creation back in 2019. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a grouping of countries that are or are seeking to join the organization. All of these can be found on the main article of OECD and we already have a template for it, Template:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:45, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Used on two international South American organizations articles, Union of South American Nations, and Mercosur. This should be subst on Demographics of South America since it is the most logical for such information to go. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).