Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 July 30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 30

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Energy Western Australia. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WA Government Energy Corporations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, deprecated template. Miracle Pen (talk) 14:36, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:54, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Graphics reply (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Isn't this template outdated?? The graphics lab has split into three workshops and each workshop has its own template like this. Roshan (talk) 12:18, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 15:23, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NPB franchise and postseason (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. DH85868993 (talk) 11:18, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv (talk) 15:24, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sent off 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Sent off|2}}. Only used in 1 article. DH85868993 (talk) 10:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Easy as that. -Koppapa (talk) 10:57, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. But can someone fix {{Sent off|2}} because it messes article alignment as discussed on the talk page. I created this template since it appears no one is fixing the main Sent off template. One95 (talk) 15:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
{{Sent off|2}} looks OK to me on Win7/IE9. What OS/browser are you using? DH85868993 (talk) 01:46, 31 July 2012 (UTC) I misunderstood the problem. {{Sent off|2}} is now fixed. DH85868993 (talk) 13:41, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:29, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FurtherInformationLink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Purpose unclear (to me). DH85868993 (talk) 10:11, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:29, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Starbox astrometry experimental (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Starbox astrometry experimental 2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Starbox astrometry experimental asymmetric (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 07:21, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:29, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Union Station style (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Doesn't seem to be part of a series, i.e. there are no other "Union Station xxx" templates. DH85868993 (talk) 07:15, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment this is part of a series, but not "Union Station" templates. It is part of a series of formatting templates for railstations and railways. Which in turn is part of a series of table formatting templates. -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 05:38, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I realised it was a railway formatting template, but in my experience usually where there's a "xxx style" template, there's also a "xxx color" and/or "xxx lines" and/or "xxx stations" template. That's what I meant by "not part of a series". (I concede that I could have been clearer). DH85868993 (talk) 09:12, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Lega/Liga templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:09, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lega Emilia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Lega Friuli-VG (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Lega Liguria (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Lega Lombarda (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Lega Piemont (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Lega Romagna (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Lega Sud Tirolo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Lega Toscana (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Lega Trentino (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Lega Trieste (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Lega Umbria (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Liga Veneta (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. The content of each template is already embedded in the related article, e.g. the content of {{Lega Romagna}} already exists in Lega Nord Romagna. DH85868993 (talk) 06:20, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Actress filmography templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Joan Crawford, Bette Davis, Greta Garbo, and Lana Turner (they are pure filmography templates). Keep Katharine Hepburn (now that it has been cut down to a standard person template). Feel free to recreate the other four if there are enough articles to fill a non-filmography template. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:02, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Joan Crawford (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Bette Davis (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Greta Garbo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Katharine Hepburn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Lana Turner (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previous consensus has been for actors NOT to have navigation templates for this, due to template clutter. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:19, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because it has her entire filmography on it and if it stays that way it is entirely appropriate for it to be included in this nomination. If you will look at version of the navbox that Frietjes has linked to you will see a version that is acceptable. MarnetteD | Talk 15:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Condense ~ Couldn't we do the same for Bette Davis as we did for Katharine Hepburn? Let her have a template for 'film and television credits', 'awards and nominations', etc.? Don't see why Hepburn gets to have a template like such, yet not Davis (or any other major award nominees like Laurence Olivier and Spencer Tracy, et al).--Cinemaniac86Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire 12:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Change to Keep condensed forms of any created if a template can remove all individual acting roles and link to a single filmography article or section and still remain a useful template, it should be kept.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:34, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I've been meaning to come and comment here. I created the Hepburn template (I didn't know actor ones were discouraged), and although I know that doesn't give my vote more weight, I'd ideally like to see it deleted at this point. I don't fully agree with the established consensus, but a majority do so the template isn't going to survive in its full form. The "compressed" version dorsn't have much use in my opinion, it even looks a bit silly. The only articles that are really worth linking to are the filmography and awards ones, but then it would be too small. I'm not writing this with any bitterness; I genuinely would prefer all or nothing. Consensus is against actor templates so lets keep it simple and not have them in any form. --Lobo (talk) 22:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.