Jump to content

Wikipedia:Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive/Removed

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

/Archive1:until 12 June 2006
/Archive2:until 8 January 2007
/Archive3:until 23 April 2007

Arts

[edit]
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated September 26, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by October 3, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. S.dedalus 05:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. zenohockey 04:18, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This article practically doesn’t exist!!! Nearly every other art form has huge pages devoted to twentieth century practices. The body of this article consists of just 12 words! It has apparently been like this for over a year! If any article ever needed help it’s this one.--S.dedalus 05:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated February 5, 2008; needs at least 4 votes by February 12, 2008 Overdue
Support
  1. Solumeiras (talk) 18:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. HarrisonB - Talk 07:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

Biography

[edit]
[edit]
31 votes, Nominated March 6, 2007; needs at least 32 votes by May 1, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. bibliomaniac15 01:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Blood Red Sandman Open Up Your Heart - Receive My EviLove 07:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lord Metroid 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 19:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Kidsheaven 19:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Anas Talk? 13:30, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 21:08, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Duran 21:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. LordHarris 00:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oberiko 18:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. DavidYork71 05:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. semper fictilis 18:48, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Think outside the box 11:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Dweller 11:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Emperor Walter Humala · ( talk? · help! ) 18:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Dalf | Talk 22:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Twerbrou 10:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. mirageinred 14:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bossi (talk ;; contribs) 00:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ixistant 15:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Flubeca 19:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Proabivouac 09:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. —Dave101→talk→contributions • 21:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Timrollpickering 12:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Kaiser matias 20:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Daniel5127 | Talk 03:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. BobbyCat 21:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Darrenhusted 16:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Oneworld25 19:46, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Scorpion0422 22:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Sportsjam3 04:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • A very influential man in history. I ask you to set aside whatever beliefs you have for this man and think solely about improving the article to the standard it should be at. bibliomaniac15 01:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Among the most globally influential and recognizable historical figures of modern times. Oberiko 18:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Great Statesman of mid-20th century EuropeDavidYork71 04:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It took a united world to defeat Germany, twice, in the last century.58.163.142.123 03:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also worth noting that according the wikicharts tool it was the 17th most viewed article in January, 21st in Feb. and 17th again in march.
Agreed as per nom. Daniel5127 | Talk 03:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
4 votes, Nominated April 18, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by May 2, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Kaiser matias 05:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ck lostsword|queta!|Suggestions? 21:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 10:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. bibliomaniac15 22:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Decided as one of Wikipedia's 200 core biographies, the man who is credited with surgical sterilisation, something that has affected most of our lives, and is only ranked as Start-class. Surely there is more that can be said. Kaiser matias 05:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated May 2, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by May 9, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Aminz 04:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jeltz talk 19:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sportsjam3 04:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • I think this is an important article. -Aminz 04:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Indeed, this article is in a poor shape and about an important topic too.
  • So important, but can definitely use some work.

Jeltz talk 19:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
2 votes, Nominated May 10, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by May 17, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. S.dedalus 05:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 01:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Elliott Carter is a really important classical modernist composer who is often considered America’s greatest composer in academic circles. The page is really bad and neglected (It was even nominated for deletion!) Other important modern composers have great pages, for instance Messiaen, so why is this page so stunted? S.dedalus 05:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
7 votes, Nominated May 6, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by May 20, 2007 Overdue}
Support
  1. YankeeDoodle14 04:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Clay 06:37, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Caponer 15:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Astrowob 14:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 22:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User:Thomas.macmillan 11:11, 15 May 2007
  7. Ehjort 21:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • For one of the most influental people in western history, his article is remarkably short. It should be expanded and given a more non POV than it has now. YankeeDoodle14 04:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Well, I wouldn't call this remarkably short, but definitely remarkably undercited. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 22:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated May 29, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by June 5, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Matt.kaner 23:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • (Takemitsu was the most eminent Japanese composer of the 20th century, and I've been working really hard to get this article up to scratch. Nevertheless it's a slow process for one person and if anyone is able to help, I think it would make a great featured article. Despite what you may think there is plenty of academic reference material available on him - look on JSTOR for example if you can, it's just a case of putting it all together into one coherent article.) Matt.kaner 23:58, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
5 votes, Nominated July 20, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by August 3, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. John Carter 19:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Totnesmartin 20:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Universe=atomTalk•Contributions 10:11, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. BorgQueen 13:02, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sportsjam3 04:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • One of the most important and most widely worshipped gods in the world today. His article as it currently exists is only a B class article. Article could use a lot of work, particularly regarding quotations, phrasing, and maybe NPOV. John Carter 19:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
6 votes, Nominated August 13, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by August 27, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Pascal.Tesson 05:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. →Lwalt ♦ talk 11:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. BrothaTimothy 02:30, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. InnocuousPseudonym 04:19, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. MaJic 16:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Melancholyblues 11:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. User:Supershow Showmanship is the key 22:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

  • The article could easily be improved to GA quality and perhaps even FA quality. There's a very decent start with a number of solid references. There's still plenty to do: an extensive copyedit, an "in popular culture" section that needs to be cleaned up, a more thorough discussion of his legacy, etc. In any case, it's the kind of article where editors with various skills and interests could find something worthwhile to do. The article falls in the scope of a number of projects so it should be easy to gather a good number of competent editors to help out. Of course, James Brown is a key figure in popular music and I just think it would be really nice to have the article featured by the first year of his death (December 25th). Pascal.Tesson 05:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by →Lwalt ♦ talk

GA-Class quality? Didn't realized the quality of the article has slipped that far. The JB article was rated as B-Class, then A-Class quality earlier this year (also noted on the article's talk page) for the Biography and Georgia portals (this article is also rated as "top-importance" for the Georgia Portal). Also, the article was featured on the Music Portal during February 2007. Here's the content of the article at the last edit on February 1 and the last edit on February 28. Since I don't where to find the archives for past featured articles on portals, I don't know which version of the article appeared on the Music Portal during February 2007, especially since the article was also vandalized frequently at that time.

After I spent some time editing the article, I stepped back to take another look at what needs to be done for the article's improvement. Here are my comments for what I think is still needed to improve the article: '→Lwalt ♦ talk

comments moved to the James Brown talk page to avoid clogging the ACID page.Pascal.Tesson 17:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
4 votes, Nominated August 27, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by September 10, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat  22:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. -FlubecaTalk 00:15, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Jaranda wat's sup 00:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Showmanship is the key 16:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated September 10, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by September 17, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. John Carter 17:07, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • One of the more important tennis players in recent history, and certainly one of the most popular. Biographical content of existing article is frankly minimal. Article could be better with just a bit of work, and honestly should be better, given the importance of the subject. --John Carter 17:07, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated October 6, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by October 13, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  04:39, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. CJ 10:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Alexander Doria 12:26, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated October 29, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 5, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Universe=atomTalk•Contributions 18:14, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Indianstar 05:37, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • The WORLD'S RICHEST PERSON definitely deserves a better article than the one in its present state. --Universe=atomTalk•Contributions 18:14, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • His own article notes that he's the 14th richest person in the world. Certainly deserving of a better article (and definitely a better photo) but I don't know that you should indicate him as the "world's richest person" in light of that. I won't support this as there are many other articles that require more attention that are far mroe important to an English encyclopedia. --lincalinca 10:48, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • The world's richest person can pay someone to improve his article if he wants to. If he wants to, he can certainly leave a message here. Reasonable Rates!! :) I agree that there probably are more important articles for wikipedia in general. Having said that, he might be a good nominee for the India or Biography collaboration. John Carter 17:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated December 25, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by January 1, 2008 Overdue
Support
  1. Sasha l (talk) 02:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sharkface217 20:28, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Treehouse372 (talk) 20:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated March 16, 2009; needs at least 4 votes by March 23, 2009 Overdue
Support
  1. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 22:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. BaconSquishy (talk) 23:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ritzbitz00 (talk) 18:47, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated March 14, 2009; needs at least 4 votes by March 21, 2009 Overdue
Support
  1. Secret account 22:19, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

Business and Economics

[edit]
[edit]
21 votes, Nominated March 20, 2007; needs at least 24 votes by May 1, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. JACOPLANE • 2007-03-20 23:38
  2. A Link to the Past (talk) 23:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. bibliomaniac15 23:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Emperor Walter Humala · ( talk? · help! ) 18:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hero1701 18:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Kevinwong913 01:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ixistant 20:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Greeves (talk • contribs) 22:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bossi (talk ;; contribs) 00:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 14:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Themcman1 16:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Lord Metroid 22:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Bifgis 02:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Darrenhusted 16:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Astrowob 14:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Scorpion 19:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Imaginationac (Talk | Edits) 02:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Pendo 4 02:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
  19. Digiwrld1 23:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Bifgis 03:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Wikada - TALK CONT ISU 00:42, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Sportsjam3 04:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

Culture

[edit]
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated April 21, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by April 28, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Nydas(Talk) 09:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. SpLoT // 05:15, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Daniel11 00:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
5 votes, Nominated April 16, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by April 30, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. ZayZayEM 02:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Kaiser matias 09:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Zleitzen(talk) 05:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Darrenhusted 18:07, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. M&NCenarius 00:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This is an important anthropological term; but this article is an absolute mess of tabloid, trivia and vanity. I really thing a good, or even featured article could come from this subject if editors worked together on it.ZayZayEM
[edit]
6 votes, Nominated April 17, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by May 1, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Scorpion 15:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Gran2 15:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Alex 23:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Twerbrou 14:48, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. LordHarris 15:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ĞavinŤing 14:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
6 votes, Nominated May 12, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by May 26, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Kzrulzuall Talk• Contribs 01:22, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 22:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sportsjam3 15:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lεmσηflαsh(t)/(c) 22:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Punkmorten 13:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Dictouray 16:58, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated May 25, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by June 1, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. •Felix• T 19:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Dictouray 16:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated May 26, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by June 2, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Daskill 23:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Wl219 08:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated May 28, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by June 4, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Richy 11:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

Millions of people around the world go to nightclubs, and have done so for decades, and yet the article is not very good. Needs a lot of work, especially the History Section. There are also no references.

[edit]
16 votes, Nominated May 3, 2007; needs at least 20 votes by June 7, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Shrub of power 19:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. bibliomaniac15 00:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. YankeeDoodle14 04:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Clay 06:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. kc12286 02:19, 7 May 2007 (UTC)kc12286[reply]
  6. Scalene•UserPage•Talk•Contributions•Biography•Є• 08:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. GDonato (talk) 10:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. yoyo
  9. Wl219 12:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. S.dedalus 23:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mrmoocow 23:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Fbv65e
  13. Sportsjam3 17:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. del / ☑t / ☛c || 22:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Oneworld25 05:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. 02:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Alston
Comments
  • This is a very important book in terms of literature and social and historical context, but it needs some serious work doing - it contains several lists and very few citations. Would like to do some work, but am very pushed for time at present. Shrub of power 19:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
14 votes, Nominated June 18, 2007; needs at least 16 votes by July 16, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Nydas(Talk) 19:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ♠TomasBat 20:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. SpLoT // 13:26, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. -Flubeca (t) 23:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Bifgis 03:41, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Sportsjam3 15:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Psychless 22:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. (lemonflash)talk 00:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. M&NCenarius 06:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Jeltz talk 13:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Yarnalgo talk to me 17:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Dark Falls talk 23:44, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Hydrogen Iodide 22:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Mcattell 01:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Every article about any fictional thing is likely to link here, but for such a fundamental article, it's pretty basic. With no pictures, few sources, no history of fiction and a weak overview, there's lots of work to do here.Nydas(Talk) 19:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
11 votes, Nominated June 23, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by July 14, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. (lemonflash)talk 01:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. -Flubeca (t) 23:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sportsjam3 15:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Psychless 22:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hydrogen Iodide 22:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ScarianTalk 19:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. LordHarris 20:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. -- R'son-W (speak to me/breathe) 21:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Daskill 00:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Universe=atomTalk•Contributions 12:37, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. igordebraga ≠ 15:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated August 20, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by August 27, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. S.dedalus 21:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. mirageinred 04:07, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hydrogen Iodide 17:52, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Another one of those pervasive terms that is seen frequently in the news these days, and is quite controversial. This article needs lots of work and has been tag for cleanup since February! The article also possible has some POV problems. Thanks for your help! --S.dedalus 21:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated November 14, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 21, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. As nominator --EncycloPetey 04:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated November 25, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by December 2, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. T (Formerly Known as FireSpike) 03:36, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Clamster 22:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
9 votes, Nominated November 23, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by December 14, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. As nominator Juliancolton (talk) 21:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. M&NCenarius (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Master Redyva (talk) 19:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 03:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. JPG-GR (talk) 05:43, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. SameDayService 00:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Auroranorth (talk · contribs)
  8. Acs4b T C U 18:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN 19:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments


History

[edit]
[edit]
10 votes, Nominated April 21, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by May 12, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. bibliomaniac15 20:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —ÅñôñÿMôús Dîššíd3nt 22:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC) This article can make it to Feautured, and it should![reply]
  3. Bifgis 03:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ♠TomasBat (@)(Contribs)(Sign!) 10:17, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sir Reginald Aylmer Ranfurly Plunkett-Ernle-Erle-Drax 01:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Astrowob 14:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Jeltz talk 22:43, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. —Zan orath 08:48, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Madris 03:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Sportsjam3 04:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
12 votes, Nominated April 15, 2007; needs at least 16 votes by May 13, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Ezeu 18:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. LordHarris 14:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Dweller 16:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Darrenhusted 16:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Kaiser matias 09:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Zleitzen(talk) 05:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. CitiCat 12:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  8. BigrTex 14:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. BanyanTree 03:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Timrollpickering 09:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. njan 20:05, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Scorpion0422 04:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • A figure of historical importance, for many reasons. Potential to be a very interesting article. Edited by relatively few people, needs help to reach GA status. Also, consider the scarcity of Africa related articles with GA status. --Ezeu 18:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
5 votes, Nominated April 12, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by April 26, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Somebody Else's ProblemCatDog(aka Alethiophile) 20:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Lord Metroid 21:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Twerbrou 12:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Darrenhusted 16:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Jeltz talk 22:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This article is extremely controversial and needs to be fixed. The current group that's editing the article is polarized either pro- or anti-Falun Gong, so the article is pretty much locked into its current configuration as any major edit will start an edit war. It's an important issue that affects a lot of people. We need to fix this. Somebody Else's ProblemCatDog(aka Alethiophile) 20:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ohh dear, I never seen so many templates on one page before! Lord Metroid 21:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated April 20, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by April 27, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Seraphimblade Talk to me 11:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. LordHarris 15:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Jersey Devil 06:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • April 20, the anniversary of the Ludlow Massacre, seems a good day to nominate this article. This was an important event to organized labor, and should not be forgotten. Needs expansion in terms of description and aftereffects. Seraphimblade Talk to me 11:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated April 23, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by April 30, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Jersey Devil 05:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Oneworld25 19:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Article is on the treaty which officially formed the Axis Powers of Germany, Italy and Imperial Japan in the onset of the Second World War. Yet the article has only one link in its external link section. Very little references. An article of this importance needs serious work and should be heavily cited.--Jersey Devil 05:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated May 21, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by May 28, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. BlueLotas 23:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
6 votes, Nominated May 23, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by June 6, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. jwillburtalk 00:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. •Felix• T 14:11, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Dalf | Talk 05:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Bifgis 20:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. M&NCenarius 08:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ♠Tom@sBat 13:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No I didn't, but it still doesn't look any better. So its best to try again. Alphablast 12:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
10 votes, Nominated June 12, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by July 3, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. ♠Tom@sBat 22:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ZeWrestler Talk 23:43, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Monkeyblue 13:48, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Defy 15:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Twerbrou 18:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Bifgis 03:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. -Flubeca (t) 16:57, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Sportsjam3 15:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Psychless 22:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. (lemonflash)talk 00:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
6 votes, Nominated June 19, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by July 3, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Fxer 16:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ♠TomasBat 20:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Bifgis 03:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Sportsjam3 15:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. BigrTex 14:52, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Jeltz talk 13:45, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Fascinating piece of history, the mystery surrounding who made them and when, and assorted crackpot websites that attribute them to Atlantis etc. The web needs a credible article on the topic, so the people who said the Pyramids were upside-down UFO landing pads don't have the loudest voice :) Fxer 16:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated November 6, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 13, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. As nom. Hemlock Martinis 00:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 05:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Zginder 03:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated April 4, 2009; needs at least 4 votes by April 11, 2009 Overdue
Support
  1. Smallman12q (talk) 15:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • The current article is lacking in sources and needs to be updated given the recent usage of the term. This month, a number of news articles have been written regarding the interpretation for the new world order.It should also be noted that the article recieves roughly 1.5k views a day(given the recent usage though, the article has recieved 3k hits a dayview count.--Smallman12q (talk) 15:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poltics and Government

[edit]
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated April 19, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by April 26, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Zanimum 19:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ThePointblank 13:21, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • The extensive recent press coverage of this article's edit war, twice on CBC Radio Charlottetown, once on CBC TV Charlottetown, on CBC.ca PEI and CBC.ca Manitoba, in the National Post, Montreal Gazette, PEI Guardian, on Canada.com. -- Zanimum 19:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • The media circus surrounding the article and the intentions of the various editors is enough. As I said on the article's talk page, we as a collective whole as editors and contributors have to demonstrate we can produce articles that are excellent sources of information, that are reliable, non-biased, and ones as a whole, the community can be proud of, and we can use the media attention to show we can produce such article. ThePointblank 13:21, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated May 11, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by May 18, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Cat chi? 10:50, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Crushti 19:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ehjort 21:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • The series of protest are among the largest in Turkish history as well as human history. Mind you, this article is about a current event that has been going on for the past month. There have already been 4 rallies and a 5th one is scheduled for this weekend, another is scheduled for 19 May. It is very overwhelming for a single person to try to maintain this article and I would welcome any assistance. When the rallies come to an end, I hope to have a near feature article. It will be very hard to write about the protests once they conclude. It would loose the historic perspective too. -- Cat chi? 10:50, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
10 votes, Nominated May 8, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by May 29, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Wl219 06:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Mike Serfas 22:46, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. CJ 17:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 22:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. bibliomaniac15 00:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Caponer 16:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Sportsjam3 17:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Flubeca t 16:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Oneworld25 05:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Dalf | Talk 05:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
15 votes, Nominated June 10, 2007; needs at least 16 votes by July 8, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Monkeyblue 04:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Universe=atom•Talk•Contributions• 09:07, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. ♠Tom@sBat 22:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Nemilar 04:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Brisvegas 05:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. -Flubeca (t) 23:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. ॐ Metta Bubble puff 12:58, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. goodleh 19:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
  9. Psychless 22:40, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Sportsjam3 00:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Crocodile Punter 07:09, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Martinship 09:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Think outside the box 11:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Andersmusician VOTE 04:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. LordHarris 20:03, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This article is central to many democracies and to the whole Freedom Concept series. I would like to nominate Freedom of speech by country too but I think Freedom of speech is more important/should come first. Thanks, Monkeyblue 04:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • It should indeed be an FA. It is because of it that Wikipedia exists. Universe=atom•Talk•Contributions• 09:07, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think this article, of all those listed here, could benefit most from the attention of many editors. It has broad appeal and worldwide importance, is a fundamental concept that can surely draw on better illustrations, and needs intensive copyediting to collapse the lists into subsections and paragraphs. Also, to do: wordwide view, additional references. Surely, something for everybody! --Martinship 09:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
3 votes, Nominated November 23, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 30, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Clamster 04:42, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 03:00, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Master Redyva (talk) 15:42, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
8 votes, Nominated November 23, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by December 14, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Marlith T/C 17:41, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Master Redyva (talk) 19:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Eurozone AA (talk) 17:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 03:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Kukini hablame aqui 06:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. SameDayService 23:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Daniel 5127 05:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Kaiser matias (talk) 08:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated January 19, 2008; needs at least 4 votes by January 26, 2008 Overdue
Support
  1. As nom. --Sharkface217 18:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Decent, but should be great. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDENplay it cool. 19:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Avala (talk) 11:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've been trying to get this article to FA for some time now. It's pretty decent in it's current state, but has the potential to be so much more. I think it would be a perfect project for those who enjoy contributing to ACID. --Sharkface217 18:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Science

[edit]
[edit]
11 votes, Nominated April 3, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by April 24, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Thedreamdied 01:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC) i'm the nominator.[reply]
  2. Tekaphor 07:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Good idea.[reply]
  3. AvB ÷ talk 10:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. bibliomaniac15 00:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Guido den Broeder 01:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Citicat 02:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. JFW | T@lk 21:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Renwick 01:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Feyandstrange 03:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. SadanYagci 03:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Sportsjam3 04:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • The article about ME/CFS is unbelievably poor. This disease, whatever your personal opinion on it, is known to affect 4 million Americans and around 1 in 1000 people in Western populations. However, the article is unbelievably long, full of useless and biased information and as a resource is pretty poor. There are also continuing and unresolved arguments over lots of the information, and information about research and upcoming clinical trials, for instance, is mentioned either sparingly or not at all. This article may not interest you personally, but it is important that it is thoroughly improved to make it useful to the public. Please vote! Thedreamdied 01:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Last time I looked (admittedly years ago) the US estimate was 800,000 patients so I think I detect definition/dx criteria creep (not suggesting Thedreamdied is responsible for that; increasingly inclusive diagnostic criteria is seen as a big problem in ME/CFS advocacy). AvB ÷ talk 10:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was going on the CDC estimate in their recent cfs public information drive, which said 4 million. Thedreamdied 13:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The CDC have different estimates in different publications. 800,000 sounds about right for the Fukuda definition. More accurate diagnosing should (more quickly) eliminate other diseases than ME from the CFS population and thereby reduce this number. I agree that the article is presently a total mess, it is more a collection of 'my two cents' bits than a proper lemma.--Guido den Broeder 01:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article is presently filled with poorly verified information added by people with an agenda. We need to be crystal clear on what can be included and what is out. I suggest small case series that have never been cited by a systematic review are not suitable.
In general I agree however I think that leaves out some very promising recent research such as this small study http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=search&DB=pubmed Renwick 01:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

JFW | T@lk 21:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You think so? It seems to me that they're all the same thing with different names - hence 'CFS/ME' in the US. Thedreamdied 00:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Having separate articles for ME and PVFS could confuse things even more, a ME or PVFS diagnosis isn't based on diagnostic tests that distinguish them from CFS, but perhaps the difference between chronic fatigue and CFS needs to be further highlighted. - Tekaphor 06:26, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
They're not quite the same, although they target the same patients. ME is a disease, CFS a syndrome. In practice this means that all ME-patients have CFS, while the diagnosis of CFS is (or should be) a temporary thing until it is established that the patient has ME, or not. Furthermore, some aspects of ME are typically not included in CFS criteria, and there is a long history of ME research from before CFS was even invented. Diagnosing ME is also quite different from diagnosing CFS.--Guido den Broeder 09:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Tekaphor. To me, ME and CFS are broadly different words for the same thing, and thats how they are intended. Chronic Fatigue by itself is a totally different thing, its a symptom and not a disease. Thedreamdied 15:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think that its FAR too large - it should be divided up into other articles if necessary, similar to the Multiple Sclerosis article. There also needs to be a much better lead, and the endless 'sniping' where one POV is followed by another is ridiculous. The article should be written from the POV that CFS is real, then there should be a clear section suggesting that some people/doctors believe it isnt. The etiology section is also appalling - the only serious etiologys are "its all in the head", "it doesnt exist at all", gene/immune problems, and persistent low grade viral infections. All the other rubbish is unsourced and really unneccessary. Thedreamdied 15:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of the stuff in the etiology section may be useful but should be moved to a section called differential diagnosis/diseases with similar symptoms or something (which I think a lot of medical articles on rare/ hard to diagnose diseases should add). Celiac disease and arnold chiari malformation may cause similar symptoms but are definitely not the same thing as CFS/ME, they have their own articles and they do not need a lot of elaboration on the CFS/ME page. Also treatments should be listed in a single section not spead out in the etiology section- treatments for diseases such as celiac disease, allergies, etc. are already mentioned on their respective pages and shouldn't be on the CFS page at all. This section also lists tests such as testing for herpes virus/epstein barr virus, these should be moved to the testing/diagnosis section. Renwick 01:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is also enough immunology information to warrant its own subsection. - Tekaphor 03:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re-Renwick, i do see why it the etiology stuff should be kept, but maybe a seperate article on 'Chronic Fatigue' could have them, and then keep CFS/ME as a seperate page relating only to seriously proposed etiologies. Thedreamdied 13:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps the relevant information can be "strained" out and the rest deleted. - Tekaphor 15:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any additions of information, removals of bad information, and anything else that could help a person understand the illness is greatly needed. Also, editing, fact checking, etc... SadanYagci 03:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
7 votes, Nominated May 11, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by May 25, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. →EdGl 22:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Mrmoocow
  3. RttM 17:29, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. M&NCenarius 17:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 22:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Jeltz talk 21:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Bifgis 20:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated May 17, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by May 24, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Lεmσηflαsh(t)/(c) 22:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Sportsjam3 17:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
5 votes, Nominated May 25, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by June 8, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. SunStar Net talk 18:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Dictouray 17:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Belazzur 08:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. M&NCenarius 08:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Universe=atom•Talk•Contributions• 16:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This is an article that is in decent shape so far, and is of personal interest to me for two reasons:

1. I studied this in my GCSE geography.
2. It was also the subject of ITV's Police, Camera, Action! in the 1996 episode The Man Who Shot OJ Programme 2, about the Los Angeles News Service.
Any help would be appreciated if you can: I would like this to be the Featured Article one day. If you want to help me or have any questions, leave a note on my talk page SunStar Net talk 18:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
2 votes, Nominated June 14, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by June 21, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. ZeWrestler Talk 23:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hydrogen Iodide 01:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
17 votes, Nominated June 7, 2007; needs at least 20 votes by July 12, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Dekimasuよ! 02:06, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Milton 02:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. M&NCenarius 04:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. danielfolsom 06:44, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Robert K S 12:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Nemilar 04:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Flubeca (t) 23:21, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. goodleh 20:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Think outside the box 13:41, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Sportsjam3 15:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. BsayUSD [Talk] [contribs] 18:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Yarnalgo talk to me 17:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Beagel 15:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Annandale 17:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Hydrogen Iodide 22:15, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Psychless 22:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Mcattell 21:43, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
I notice that someone has already done the page move from "Energy (physics)". Hence, there is no longer a need for this article to be nominated for improvement. --PeR 16:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is still a need for improvement, and particularly, the attention of experts. The lead requires a lot of hammering out yet to make it concise and clear for the uninitiated reading without sacrificing correctness for simplicity. Robert K S 17:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  1. 132.216.228.230 13:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC) moved anon vote --BsayUSD [Talk] [contribs] 20:28, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
19 votes, Nominated July 7, 2007; needs at least 20 votes by August 11, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. ♠TomasBat 16:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. LordHarris 20:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mcattell 21:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. M&NCenarius 02:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Lemonflashtalk 22:28, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Spamsara 05:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. SpLoT // 13:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Hydrogen Iodide 05:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. igordebraga ≠ 01:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Safe-Keeper 04:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Universe=atomTalk•Contributions 09:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Espresso Addict 16:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Iotha 01:05, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. WS 23:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Sportsjam3 04:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Timrollpickering 22:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Shruti14 ( talk • contribs ) 15:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Seaaron 16:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
4 votes, Nominated August 13, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by August 27, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. John Carter 20:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ♠TomasBat 21:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hydrogen Iodide 05:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Freiberg, Let's talk!, contribs 01:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Only a Start-class article. Say what you want to about smoking, but it is an extremely important subject and it deserves a better article than it currently has. John Carter 20:54, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • The start-class label was a bit outdated so I upgraded to B-class, since it's 44 k without template, table or list-cruft. It has noticeable info gaps in sociology, medicine, physiology, public health effects and modern history, but has a far superior overall coverage when compared to, for example, tobacco smoking. Peter Isotalo 11:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
8 votes, Nominated August 6, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by August 27, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. 82.71.48.158 19:30, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Seaaron 16:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Boy1jhn 20:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Shrewpelt 19:49, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hydrogen Iodide 05:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Baridiah 22:01, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Jeltz talk 11:54, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Freiberg, Let's talk!, contribs 01:34, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Short article (six paragraphs and a listy section). Important environmental, freshwater/marine biology, fishery topic. Lots of people live in river deltas. I'm guessing around 500 million worldwide (for instance, about 60 million in Vietnam and between 115 and 143 million in the Ganges delta), sometimes to ill effect. 82.71.48.158 19:30, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • This seems like an important environmental article. I'm surprised it's so short for such a large topic. Shrewpelt 19:49, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
22 votes, Nominated July 31, 2007; needs at least 24 votes by September 11, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ♠TomasBat 14:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Iotha 08:51, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. BigrTex 15:40, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Cloachland 13:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Hydrogen Iodide 22:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Alvin6226 talk 21:14, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Boy1jhn 20:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Freiberg, Let's talk!, contribs 20:02, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Universe=atomTalk•Contributions 15:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Think outside the box 11:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Zginder 12:58, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Separa 20:01, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. User:Supershow Showmanship is the key 22:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. RJH (talk) 17:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. --Avala 19:40, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. AZ t 21:43, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. EamonnPKeane 20:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 13:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Kukini hablame aqui 16:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Marlith T/C 03:00, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. M&NCenarius 21:22, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
7 votes, Nominated October 13, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by October 27, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. EncycloPetey 17:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. BorgQueen 17:32, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hardyplants 19:17, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Aelwyn 12:26, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 23:28, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Wilchett 22:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Dekimasuよ! 15:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments


[edit]
3 votes, Nominated November 2, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 9, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. BorgQueen 05:45, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. EncycloPetey 12:44, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 05:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated November 14, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 21, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. As nominator --Juliancolton 00:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Zginder (talk) 02:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. M&NCenarius (talk) 07:22, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
10 votes, Nominated November 9, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by November 30, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Per nom. Mgiganteus1 11:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 02:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Totnesmartin 11:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC) This gets a few lines and some fake wrestler gets an FA. Unbelievable.[reply]
  4. ♠TomasBat 14:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Think outside the box 15:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. M&NCenarius 18:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. ffm 00:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Master Redyva (talk) 20:40, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. WeBuriedOurSecretsInTheGarden (talk) 15:33, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Twerbrou (talk) 13:53, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated March 28, 2009; needs at least 4 votes by April 4, 2009 Overdue
Support
  1. Bryan Hopping T 05:59, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Marlith (Talk)  18:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

Technology

[edit]
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated April 17, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by April 24, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. BenB4 07:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Dalf | Talk 21:25, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
6 votes, Nominated May 10, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by May 24, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Madris 02:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. SpLoT // 09:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sportsjam3 15:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. YankeeDoodle14 19:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Punkmorten 13:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oneworld25 05:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • I feel that such an important component in biology, human development, and geology needs a more in depth article on its biological role and especially its use in human historyMadris 02:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • It gave its name to a whole age, so is historically crucial and should be better than B-class.
  • If this isn't in Wikipedia, then the whole periodic table should be thrown out if that's what taking this article out means. Iron is such an important part of human construction. I cannot believe this could be gone.
[edit]
5 votes, Nominated April 14, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by April 28, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. CloudNine 11:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ZayZayEM 10:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Thedreamdied 13:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Jeltz talk 18:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Derwig 20:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • The article name might need improving (Tool or technology?), but this is an important subject to cover. Species, apart from humans, can utilise simple tools. Information on this is spread throughout Wikipedia though, and there's no article to summarise this. CloudNine 11:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • It might help to have a proper link to an article first. All I see is a redlink. Kaiser matias 23:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tool also covers this subject. -- Beland 22:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
13 votes, Nominated May 8, 2007; needs at least 16 votes by June 5, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Gutworth 02:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 03:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Jeltz talk 22:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. bibliomaniac15 22:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Guy Fuchsia 14:22, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User:Madris Madris 03:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mrmoocow 23:49, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. - Flubeca t 19:09, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Lεmσηflαsh(t)/(c) 22:44, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Lenoxus " * " 15:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. ZeWrestler Talk 14:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. •Felix• T 17:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Sportsjam3 04:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated June 14, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by June 21, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. ZeWrestler Talk 23:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ♠TomasBat 00:38, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated September 3, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by September 10, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Showmanship is the key 16:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Think outside the box 14:47, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
The paragraphs tend to drag and its kind of nauseating throughout the article. Needs an enhanced Table of contents. That's really all.
[edit]
12 votes, Nominated August 17, 2007; needs at least 16 votes by September 14, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Kotare 07:05, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. themcman1 talk 15:31, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Freiberg, Let's talk!, contribs 20:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ♠TomasBat 20:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. ZeWrestler Talk 12:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Jeltz talk 11:52, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Hydrogen Iodide 17:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Duran 20:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Doradus 04:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Aerobird Target locked - Fox One! 13:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Lapsed Pacifist 21:51, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Marlith T/C 03:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This article is desperately in need of attention; A military invention which has shaped the course of history ever since, this article doesn't have even one inline citation and could do with major expansions with regards to the history of use of this weapon.
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated October 3, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by October 10, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Bonus Onus 03:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bifgis 20:53, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. RC 04:52, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Popular Mechanics has been a very influential magazine in the coverage of science and technology for over 100 years. Certainly throughout its history it has had cultural significance as a leading American technology publication. The current article is very short (barely two paragraphs) and says nothing of the magazine's history, significant issues or coverage, or recent events concerning the magazine. Compare with the article for Wired, which I would consider to be a relatively good article about a magazine. --Bonus Onus 03:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated May 16, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by May 23, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. - Flubeca t 19:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated October 31, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 7, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. BorgQueen 00:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Zginder 13:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Duran 20:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated October 31, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 7, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. BorgQueen 03:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ZeWrestler Talk 03:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. RayBeckerman 22:02, 4 November 2007
Comments
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated October 31, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 7, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. --Indianstar 05:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Wragge 21:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. DancingPenguin 23:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This is very important subject in view of continuous increase in Global oil price. Article has lot of scope for improvement in terms of style, presentation and neutrality. This will be one of the most referred article in near future when Oil price touches $100/Barrel. It is essential to improve quality of this article at the earliest --Indianstar 05:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's a mass of interesting information (and 100 cited sources) in this article, but the organization and presentation could be improved quite easily. --Wragge 21:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated November 1, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 8, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. BorgQueen 20:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 05:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
5 votes, Nominated June 30, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by July 14, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Beagel 15:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Martinship 09:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. ♠TomasBat 21:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hydrogen Iodide 22:16, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Philbentley 16:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated March 16, 2009; needs at least 4 votes by March 23, 2009 Overdue
Support
  1. Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Secret account 15:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. mav (talk) 01:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated April 4, 2009; needs at least 4 votes by April 11, 2009 Overdue
Support
  1. — Rod talk 16:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • (This article is about a proposed tidal energy scheme with over 150 years of history. It involves; environment, transport, ecology, economics - something for everyone! However it is a mass of cleanup tags (Articles needing additional references (Mar 2008, Nov 2008), Articles that may contain original research (Mar 2008, Nov 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2007, Jul 2008, Aug 2008), Wikipedia articles in need of updating), with accusations of original research, bias etc from those who have strong feelings on the proposal. I think it is an important topic which needs lots of help from "impartial" editors to improve its quality.) --— Rod talk 16:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geography

[edit]
[edit]
9 votes, Nominated April 12, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by May 3, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. — Jack · talk · 17:35, Thursday, 12 April 2007
  2. Eureka! bibliomaniac15 21:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. — Pious7TalkContribs 21:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. M&NCenarius 19:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. LordHarris 14:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Astrowob 17:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Coemgenus 13:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Diez2 16:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. 210physicq (c) 00:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • To say this state is the third largest, most populous, largest economic power in the US, the article ain't up to scratch. International powerhouse in terms of music, film and electronics — Jack · talk · 17:35, Thursday, 12 April 2007
[edit]
4 votes, Nominated April 20, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by May 4, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Felixboy 14:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Astrowob 17:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. LordHarris 15:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. M&NCenarius 00:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
14 votes, Nominated May 7, 2007; needs at least 16 votes by June 4, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Adam78 10:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Wl219 13:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Astrowob 14:56, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Dami 19:42, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. – Alensha talk 19:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 01:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mrmoocow 23:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. as extremely interesting. Punkmorten 13:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. - Flubeca t 21:14, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. gren グレン 11:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Dalf | Talk 04:59, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Bifgis 20:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Kurykh 03:04, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Universe=atom•Talk•Contributions• 17:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • It could be a really useful article to review the major geopolitical changes of the 20th-21st centuries. There are blanks in the knowledge of all of us (for example, it was a surprise to me that a country named Eritrea exists – because it wasn't until 1993 that it was created and it was just missing from my atlas) and it would be interesting to see how the worldscape differed from the present one just a couple of decades ago and how it changed over time to reach its today's state. There are useful articles available as resources in its "See also" section. Adam78 10:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Seems interesting. Wl219 13:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very good article idea. Astrowob 14:56, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is really cool. I'd definitely love to help. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 01:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I remember, say two years ago, seeing some incredibly successful article collaborations which I rarely see today. I think it was because there was lots of information available both online or already on Wikipedia. Although this isn't the greatest topic, I think it's a great one for collaboration because it doesn't require specialty sources. gren グレン 11:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • A really cool topic. :) Universe=atom•Talk•Contributions• 17:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
14 votes, Nominated April 19, 2007; needs at least 16 votes by May 17, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Twerbrou 14:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Kaiser matias 21:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Dalf | Talk 03:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Astrowob 17:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Coemgenus 13:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ~ BigrTex 14:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. M&NCenarius 00:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. bibliomaniac15 00:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Flubeca 19:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Caponer 15:25, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --ISOLA'd ELBA 23:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Felix 12:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Mrmoocow 23:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 22:32, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Page of an important country, which has a lot of spelling and grammatical problems, and the history part (that's the furthest I got) goes over huge times of history in one giant leap. Why where they together with Lithuania and why was that bond dissolved, for instance. Twerbrou 14:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
6 votes, Nominated May 2, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by May 16, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. ↔NMajdan•talk 15:06, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Okiefromokla 22:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. BigrTex 14:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. PatricknoddyTALK (reply here)|HISTORY 11:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Astrowob 14:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 22:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated May 18, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by May 25, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Punkmorten 13:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated May 26, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by June 2, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Alphablast 20:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated May 19, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by May 26, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Punkmorten 18:15, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. •Felix• T 18:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Dictouray 21:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
I've never seen a capital city article in condition this bad! •Felix• T 18:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated May 25, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by June 1, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Billy227, Review my account!! talk contribs sndbx usbx 01:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
5 votes, Nominated July 5, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by July 19, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Nathanww 22:50, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --VovanA 11:33, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hektor 08:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Dojarca 11:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Universe=atomTalk•Contributions 12:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
6 votes, Nominated September 14, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by September 28, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. JoshuaArgent 04:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 17:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. ZeWrestler Talk 17:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ♠TomasBat 20:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Phgao 07:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Dfrg.msc 09:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated November 23, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 30, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Master Redyva (talk) 19:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Marlith T/C 01:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  1. 216.64.117.227 (talk) 15:31, 24 November 2007 (UTC) (Sure, I'll vote).[reply]
Vote not counted because IP's can not vote. Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 00:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3.SameDayService 23:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Miscellaneous

[edit]
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated April 18, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by April 25, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Salix alba (talk) 23:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. SpLoT // 11:19, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. bibliomaniac15 04:33, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments


[edit]
4 votes, Nominated May 7, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by May 21, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Guy Fuchsia 23:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. SpLoT // 09:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mrmoocow 23:50, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 22:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • It's absurd how underdeveloped this article is, considering how well-known the topic is. I imagine anyone with even the slightest understanding of casinos could easily find something to add or reference. Guy Fuchsia 23:53, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
12 votes, Nominated April 5, 2007; needs at least 16 votes by May 3, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. bibliomaniac15 01:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Dalf | Talk 22:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. M&NCenarius 22:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. KZTalk• Contribs 07:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Themcman1 15:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Flubeca 15:43, 7 April 2007 (UTC) I saw a documentary on pandas. It's a subject needing FA status[reply]
  7. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 06:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Darrenhusted 16:32, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Kaiser matias 09:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Astrowob 14:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Brisvegas 02:29, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. —ÅñôñÿMôús Dîššíd3nt 03:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
5 votes, Nominated April 28, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by May 12, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Ilse@ 13:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Stlemur 16:35, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Daniel11 22:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Felixboy 20:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Jeltz talk 22:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
4 votes, Nominated May 16, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by May 30, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Ixistant 00:09, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Punkmorten 13:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ehjort 21:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Sportsjam3 04:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated May 17, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by May 24, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. ***Clamster 23:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Mrmoocow 00:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Book series by Lemony Snicket with thirteen books and a handful of spin-off books. The article is plagued by speculation and unsourced statements. Hopefully, it can be brought up to par with Harry Potter, a similar type of series. This page and other closely related pages are primarily edited by users who have read and are fans of the books. Some input from those less familar with the series would be very helpful. ***Clamster 23:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just a note here again, I've started a to-do list with some suggestions of improving the article. Anyway, I support. Mrmoocow 00:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
6 votes, Nominated May 18, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by June 1, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. ***Clamster 20:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jeltz talk 21:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. - Flubeca t 21:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Lεmσηflαsh(t)/(c) 00:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Brisvegas 11:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. SpLoT // 14:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
6 votes, Nominated May 22, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by June 5, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Telcourbanio 13:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Dalf | Talk 05:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Richy 11:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Doppelganger 17:17, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. SpLoT // 14:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ♠Tom@sBat 21:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • It is a well known notable drink, and basically the article has seemed to have been left to rot with hardly any refs, and needing heavy cleanup and a number of other improvements. It is having a peer review, (which is being blatantly ignored), and generally a task force of users is needed to get it to GA. Telcourbanio Care for a talk? 13:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
4 votes, Nominated June 16, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by June 30, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. BlueLotas 19:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ♠TomasBat 22:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sportsjam3 15:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. BigrTex 14:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
I agree, we could surely work on it. ♠TomasBat 22:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated June 29, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by July 6, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. LordRobert 05:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This collection of Charlie Chaplin's finest silent era films has been overlooked for a long time. I created the article yesterday and due to an astounding amount of information available, was able to write a lot on it. As it is Chaplin's best, it deserves the best article it can have.

LordRobert 05:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
8 votes, Nominated June 15, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by July 6, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Spamsara 14:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Derwig 16:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. (lemonflash)talk 00:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Weenie beenie 11:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Twerbrou 18:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ♠TomasBat 20:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. SpLoT // 13:24, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Sportsjam3 15:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated June 28, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by July 5, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Yarnalgo talk to me 17:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Robert Beck 14:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sportsjam3 04:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • It is a recent issue that brought national attention to the team and the players, not to mention partly ruining some of the players lives. It deserves a good article as it will soon be part of history. Yarnalgo talk to me 17:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
4 votes, Nominated July 2, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by July 16, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. BorgQueen 23:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Nydas(Talk) 10:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. ♠TomasBat 22:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hydrogen Iodide 22:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • One of the most important topics in social, economic, and legal perspectives. In its current awful condition, the article badly needs some group effort. --BorgQueen 23:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
19 votes, Nominated July 11, 2007; needs at least 20 votes by August 15, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. SriMesh | talk 04:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. fishhead2100talk contributions 11:53, July 10 2007
  3. Ultraflame 15:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Shanemcd 22:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Victor D PARLE 03:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Delzen 05:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Freechild (BoomCha) 03:19, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Dbiel (Talk) 09:00, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Bearian 20:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Hawker Typhoon 03:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Universe=atomTalk•Contributions 09:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Brandon Christopher 04:27, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Patrick 21:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Sportsjam3 04:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Marlith T/C 01:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Timrollpickering 22:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Qmwne235 14:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Dl2000 03:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Michalkun 08:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated August 21, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by August 28, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Shrewpelt 13:18, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Freiberg, Let's talk!, contribs 14:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Clamster 23:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated September 14, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by September 21, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Zginder 01:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 17:10, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. ♠TomasBat 20:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
4 votes, Nominated September 13, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by September 27, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. AJUK Talk!! 12:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 23:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Think outside the box 11:49, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Phgao 07:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
4 votes, Nominated September 13, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by September 27, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. --TheTallOne 19:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Avala 19:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 23:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ♠TomasBat 20:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This article has huge potential, with many areas the article can expand to. I feel that the article could be something similar to Toilets in Japan with the randomness, yet interesting feel to it Some attention is needed, with a cleanup in the references section and further expansion in the lead and each of the licenses available. --TheTallOne 19:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
5 votes, Nominated September 14, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by September 28, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. ♠TomasBat 20:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 20:26, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. ZeWrestler Talk 04:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. JQF • Talk • Contribs 02:11, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. JACOPLANE • 2007-09-24 10:03
Comments
  • A notable topic (the board's little logo images are commonly seen on videogame boxes); article is not in a very bad condition, but could certainly do with some more work. ♠TomasBat 20:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
4 votes, Nominated September 14, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by September 28, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. ♠TomasBat 23:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 01:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Think outside the box 12:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. zenohockey 04:18, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • An article in not a very good shape in proportion to its high level of notability; plus, sort of short and a bit too much of a plain list. Would certainly need more work; deserves to be an FA. ♠TomasBat 23:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
6 votes, Nominated September 15, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by September 29, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. ♠TomasBat 18:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 07:29, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Rob C. alias Alarob 07:38, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Marlith T/C 01:59, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Think outside the box 11:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ZeWrestler Talk 16:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • "One of the oldest and most famous riddles still in use in the English language." (sentence extracted from article) ♠TomasBat 18:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've been watching this article for some time and have revised some essay-like passages without simply hacking them out. The article borders on WP:OR and some help with finding reliable secondary material would do much to help get this bird to the other side. -- Rob C. alias Alarob 01:39, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated September 20, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by September 27, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. RC 04:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 07:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated September 21, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by September 28, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Katsam 07:09, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Freiberg, Let's talk!, contribs 23:32, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This could be a really great article. But it's a topic which people feel obsessive about and so a) it gets bogged down in weird details sometimes and b) it attracts a lot of new/inexperienced/one-topic editors (including me). I think that with the attention of some old hand Wikipedians it could reach Featured Article status.Katsam 07:09, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated September 21, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by September 28, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Kaldari 19:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. John Carter 18:27, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • This Core Biography article is in sad shape. Sun Tzu wrote The Art of War and his writing is still considered influential today. His Wikipedia article, however, is barely more than a stub. --Kaldari 19:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Actually, I agree. However, as per the article itself, the subject is one about whom very little, if anything, seems to be known. I don't know how to improve an article when there is apparently very little information on the subject available. Do you have any ideas? Alternately, if the article is, as is, basically complete, there does exist ample precedent that it could be nominated for possibly even FA despite its brevity. Maybe something like that might be the way to go. John Carter 19:46, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
7 votes, Nominated September 8, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by September 22, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Narco 23:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ♠TomasBat 01:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 02:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Kaldari 20:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Phgao 07:29, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Zginder 12:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Think outside the box 12:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated October 24, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by October 31, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Zginder 12:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. BorgQueen 14:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 16:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated November 1, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 8, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. BorgQueen 09:38, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bronayur 00:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated November 1, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 8, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. BorgQueen 09:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Amphis 10:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Funper 16:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated November 1, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 8, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. BorgQueen 17:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. ZeWrestler Talk 05:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 05:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated November 1, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 8, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. BorgQueen 19:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
3 votes, Nominated November 3, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by November 10, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. John Carter 19:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Blueboar 19:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC) (already an involved editor, but happy to collaborate).[reply]
  3. ALR 14:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC) (again, already involved but interested to see if anyone can come up with anything innovative)[reply]
Comments
  • An article with a very good amount of information from one side of the discussion available. Unfortunately, this has a tendency to make the article one-sided and very POV. A historically significant article that would definitely benefit from the input of neutral, objective outsiders. --John Carter 19:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
5 votes, Nominated November 25, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by December 9, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. WeBuriedOurSecretsInTheGarden (talk) 15:30, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bobbacon (talk) 23:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Hydrogen Iodide (HI!) 03:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. SameDayService 00:03, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Daniel 5127 05:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
2 votes, Nominated December 14, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by December 21, 2007 Overdue
Support
  1. Chris! ct 21:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Trance addict 03:01, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Postlebury (talk) 01:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
5 votes, Nominated December 21, 2007; needs at least 8 votes by January 4, 2008 Overdue
Support
  1. — Jack · talk · 12:50, Friday, 21 December 2007
  2. Postlebury (talk) 01:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sharkface217 20:29, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Treehouse372 (talk) 20:26, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Dumelow (talk) 12:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • Second largest tourist attraction in Scotland, and has accomplished many milestones in conservation — Jack · talk · 12:50, Friday, 21 December 2007
  • Wow i can't believe this hasn't been brought up before...
[edit]
10 votes, Nominated December 23, 2007; needs at least 12 votes by January 13, 2008 Overdue
Support
  1. DurovaCharge! 09:04, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. PKM (talk) 18:09, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sharkface217 20:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Treehouse372 (talk) 20:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. SRauz (talk) 22:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Kakofonous (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Nydas(Talk) 12:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  8. 4u1e (talk) 15:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  9. NuclearWinner (talk) 22:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Mattyness (talk) 22:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
11 votes, Nominated January 24, 2008; needs at least 12 votes by February 14, 2008 Overdue
Support
  1. Samsara (talk • contribs) 07:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. JPG-GR (talk) 21:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Cheers. Trance addict 20:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. MightyWarrior (talk) 00:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Drance I know 7 19:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neurogeek (talk) 01:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7. 4u1e (talk) 20:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Sharkface217 03:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tenbergen (talk) 00:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  10. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  11. jwandersTalk 07:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments


[edit]
2 votes, Nominated February 1, 2008; needs at least 4 votes by February 8, 2008 Overdue
Support
  1. ZeWrestler Talk 16:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. MightyWarrior (talk) 10:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
6 votes, Nominated February 1, 2008; needs at least 8 votes by February 15, 2008 Overdue
Support
  1. HarrisonB - Talk 07:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. OSX (talk • contributions) 08:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Solumeiras (talk) 18:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Sharkface217 03:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. James086Talk | Email 08:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[edit]
1 vote, Nominated March 16, 2009; needs at least 4 votes by March 23, 2009 Overdue
Support
  1. 86.159.78.45 (talk) 18:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Article_Collaboration_and_Improvement_Drive/Removed&oldid=1147993875"