User talk:Yaqub al-Mansur
Welcome!
[edit]
Getting StartedTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Tips- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, TheWikiToby (talk) 18:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:بوكوس per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/بوكوس. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Yaqub al-Mansur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Admins,
- I am writing to request an unblock for my account, User:Yaqub al-Mansur. I have been blocked indefinitely based on the suspicion of being a sockpuppet of User:بوكوس. I understand the importance of maintaining Wikipedia's integrity and I would like to clarify the situation.
- I have reviewed the evidence presented in the sockpuppet investigation and believe there may have been a misunderstanding. Here’s why:
- 1. Account History: My account has been primarily focused on contributing to articles related to the Almohad history, a subject I am passionate about. My edits and contributions have been concentrated on enhancing and expanding content within this area of interest.
- I would like to clarify that I have no association with User:بوكوس, and my activities on Wikipedia have been independent and in good faith. My work has been driven by a genuine interest in the historical topic and a desire to improve the quality of related articles.
- 2. Reason for Multiple Accounts: I created this account due to an issue with my previous account, User:Alexandre the terrible. Specifically, I had forgotten the password for that account and did not have an email address associated with it to facilitate a password reset. Consequently, I was unable to regain access to it and needed to create a new account to continue contributing to Wikipedia.
- I assure you that this new account is intended solely for genuine contributions and is not being used to evade any blocks or bans.
- 3. Evidence of Good Faith: I would like to highlight my commitment to Wikipedia's guidelines and my contributions to the project:
- Adherence to Wikipedia Standards: I have consistently avoided vandalizing pages and have focused on contributing valuable content to Wikipedia. My edits are always made with the intention of improving the accuracy and quality of the information presented.
- Creation of Quality Pages: I have created several pages that are backed by authentic and reliable sources such as Almohad campaign against Castille (1196-1197). I ensure that the content I add is well-researched, factual, and free from unnecessary embellishment.
- Constructive Contributions: My contributions have been aimed at enhancing Wikipedia’s overall quality and adhering to its content guidelines. I have taken care to provide accurate references and maintain the integrity of the articles I work on.
- 4. Request for Review: I respectfully request a review of the block decision. I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia’s guidelines and am eager to contribute constructively to the project.
- Thank you for your attention to this matter. I am happy to provide any further information if needed and look forward to resolving this issue.
- Sincerely,
- User:Yaqub al-Mansur
Decline reason:
I used the checkuser tool and the result was you are a match to Mrpf plus (talk · contribs). In this context, I am declining your unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 15:49, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.