User talk:Yaara dildaara

Welcome

Hello, Yaara dildaara! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:14, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Reliable sources

Hello! Blogs are not considered as reliable sources as basically anyone can create a blog and claim anything. I can write a blog and say that i knew Dara Singh and all information written in your blog is wrong. Someone else can come up with a third version of story claiming to be right. Hence blogs are not reliable sources. For more information on what sources are reliable and what are not, read the Wikipedia:Reliable sources policy. If you have any doubt, you can ask me on my talk page or you can put a {{helpme}} tag with your doubt and someone will for sure come to solve it. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:20, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I note that subsequent to AnimeshKulkarni's you continued to add references to blogs and other unreliable sources to the Dara Singh article. Please stop doing this; we cannot accept such links for the reasons already set out. You are only creating work for your fellow editors who must now remove these references and the information which depends on them. —Psychonaut (talk) 12:47, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think, instead of adding information on Dara Singh's page, article about Dara Singh Dulchipuria should be created seperately.Kooljeet (talk) 18:29, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Who is this "Dara Singh Dulchipuria"? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 05:06, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Yaara dildaara, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Moswento ^talky 20:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Instead of using <ref>Citation</ref>, use <ref name="name">Citation</ref> for the first reference, and use <ref name="name" /> for any additional copies of that reference. You can replace name with an original name. For more information see this page.

—Hue Sat Lum 22:37, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tata Nano

Thanks for your WP:BOLD edits to Tata Nano. I deleted them because I don't think they comply with WP:lead. I hope you're not unhappy, and I encourage you to continue editing the article. Fleetham (talk) 23:37, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

*Hello Yaara dildaara:* Welcome to the English version of Wikipedia
Thanks to you for your active participation in this project. We hope that you will stay to contribute more and that you will continue to find the collaboration process enjoyable.
Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that began in 2001 and is free for anyone to use and edit under certain guidelines and principles that all users should understand and adhere to. These principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information.
	The five pillars of Wikipedia. The fundamental principles of the project.	Help. How to get help.
	Tutorial. This tutorial is a basic guide to editing.	Your user pages and your sandbox. How to experiment and edit in your user space.
	Mentoring program. Request help in your first steps of editing.	How to start a page. Help on creating your first article.
	Things to avoid. How to avoid common errors and mistakes.	Style Guide. How to write in an acceptable style.
	Main policies of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.	Frequently asked questions. Some common questions and their answers.
	Help Desk. Here you can ask other editors for assistance	Quick reference. A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.

This is your Talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss things with them. At the end of your messages you should always enter your signature by signing with four ~~~~ or by pressing the button in the editor shown here in the picture. By the way, it is not necessary to sign edits that you make in the articles themselves as those messages will be deleted. My name is DBigXray. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, post `{{helpme\|your question}}` on your talk page (this page), someone will quickly come up and attend to your query. And also, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist. Good Luck Editing!

DBig Xray 20:17, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding reference on Wikipedia articles

Hello Yaara dildaara! Please do not forget to add references from reliable sources for the content you add to Wikipedia. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Adding a well formatted references is very easy to do.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
Then click on "templates",
Choose the most appropriate template and fill as many details as you can,

This will add a well formatted reference that would be helpful in case the website link (web URL) becomes inactive (dead/link rot) after some time. You can read more about it on Help:Edit toolbar or see this video File:RefTools.ogv. thanks and regards --DBig Xray 20:17, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

to use this message place {{subst:User:DBigXray/ref}} on User_talk

DBig Xray 20:17, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Be Careful with templates

Please be careful while editing WP:Templates. your recent edits at Template:History of India created error on various articles where it was used.
Please do not add references inside the template.
If in doubt you can ask me or other editors at WP:HELPDESK

cheers --DBig Xray 20:25, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sub: Template:History of India

hi, you just reverted all the work i was doing on this, citing it was causing trouble. please elaborate on those for me or someone else to fix it, else let me continue with my alterations. Yaara dildaara (talk)Yaara dildaara —Preceding undated comment added 21:15, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, that i had to revert your edits, as your edits had created Cite error on numerous articles wherever this template was used. Also on closer look Your edits were non constructive as they deviated from the primary topic area for which this template was. This template was only created for very notable historical events/periods. please read more about WP:Templates, regards--DBig Xray 21:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Armstrong

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Neil Armstrong. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. szyslak (t) 22:32, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if I have any advice for this situation, it would be to discuss the issue, and listen to those who might have a different view on this topic than yours rather than merely insisting they listen to you. You've stopped edit warring, and that's a start. Remember not to do it again. szyslak (t) 00:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also many legitimate instaNCES OF wikilinks were removed as "ovrlink". Some names and stuff like Kosygin need to be wikilinked so users can find abotu him. Hes not exactly a common name.Lihaas (talk) 02:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i defend my deletion. Reasons:-

WP:UNDERLINK see "if words... are needed to aid understanding of the article" Note: not understanding standalone terms but understanding the article
WP:OVERLINK see "...relevant to the topic of the article" Note: not relevant to terms by themselves but relevant to the context of the article
WP:SPECIFICLINK see "Always link to the article... appropriate to the context from which you link"
WP:NOTLINK see "content-relevant links to an article"

Yaara dildaara (talk) 04:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then per BRD [lease discuss on talk so others can contribute. You may be in the side of consensus on some, but there are some issuesLihaas (talk) 04:24, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Leads don't have quotes formatted like that, above the lead text. They are usually embedded within the lead text somewhere. Furthermore, WP:LEADCITE doesn't say anything along the lines of direct quotations needing to be in the lead. You need to have a consensus to add in content, even if the content is factual, and unfortunately, you did not.

I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 00:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Operation Flood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to NDDB

Verghese Kurien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to NDDB

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]