User talk:Twitter imabptweets

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Twitter imabptweets, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to RabbitMQ seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 16:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Event-driven architecture, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. One more link to asyncapi and we will have to block you. Drmies (talk) 16:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Twitter imabptweets (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey Drmies please first get this, Drmies and MrOllie: Fmvilas and Twitter_imabptweets are two different persons, and we have not violated the any policy of Wikipedia. AsyncAPI is an specification, just similar to Cloudevents, and its recommended for you to be inclusive as per policy, and first know about asyncapi or the subject matter, before putting ban on users. Twitter imabptweets (talk) 04:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The fact that this does not offer us a reason you should be unblocked is not the worst thing about this request. It is that you deny something you weren't even accused of as far as I can tell (sockpuppetry). — Daniel Case (talk) 06:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Twitter imabptweets (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Its already known that AsyncAPI is an open source specification for EDA. Can you tell me Daniel Case , how is it a spam? And regarding above account Fmvilas, it is removed why? when it belongs to a different person. Is this how, the Wikipedia Community Works, by deleting accounts and abusing the users. It is advised to do a self-research before removing/ adding any content, specially in the space of technology and software architecture, which keeps on evolving with time. Twitter imabptweets (talk) 10:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you see nothing wrong with your edits, there are no grounds to consider lifting the block. Yamla (talk) 11:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.