Jump to content

User talk:Trillfendi/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Nomination of Birgit Kos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Birgit Kos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birgit Kos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creepTalk 09:10, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Cora Emmanuel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cora Emmanuel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cora Emmanuel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creepTalk 09:22, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Birgit Kos

So I was just checking to see if you made any more contributions or commented on Birgit Kos when I saw this diff in your history. The Daily Mail is definitely a garbage tabloid, but it looks like it was only being used for the birth date and not any WP:GOSSIP. So you deleted the source and kept the birth date? Is it better for Wikipedia to have a birth date with a questionable source or no source at all? So when you deleted references from Snooki you thought it was best to use no Edit Summary and not leave a message on the talk page? I am flabbergasted. --SVTCobra (talk) 01:50, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

@SVTCobra: The Daily Mail is literally banned on this website.... (On top of the fact that it didn’t give a date of birth it just said she was turning 23). If one tried to place that ref today Wikipedia would not even save the edit. Trillfendi (talk) 02:02, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
OK, but why not remove the birth date or tag it "citation needed"? --SVTCobra (talk) 02:21, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. –Davey2010Talk 14:25, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

@Davey2010: And I was about to take it to the noticeboard before YOU decided to get involved. Trillfendi (talk) 14:26, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
You'd be shooting yourself in the foot would you not ? ..... You went to the tp only an hour 5-10 minutes ago .... Just because you get no replies that doesn't mean you then revert and edit war with everyone. –Davey2010Talk 14:29, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
@Davey2010: What are you even talking about? Trillfendi (talk) 14:30, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
You shooting yourself in the foot by potentially going to 3RRNO and that consensus takes time to build ? ... Thought that was obvious but there we are. –Davey2010Talk 14:35, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cara Delevingne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Wang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

American TV series

Hey, I noticed you moved to 2 sets of articles from (American TV series) to (U.S. TV series). You might not be familiar with a recent RfC which resulted in this change at WP:NCTV. --Gonnym (talk) 22:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Your edit summaries

Blatantly condescending someone's reading skills and implying they're an idiot as you did here is not at all appropriate. Being frustrated with problematic changes isn't an excuse for making such remarks. Please don't use edit summaries like that in the future or patronize others in discussions. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:28, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS: I said what I said. Yet interesting how I'm not the one calling people "sneaky" or "dishonest". Trillfendi (talk) 22:18, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
No, you didn't use such descriptions, but that doesn't change my point on how it's inappropriate to belittle others' intellect/comprehension skills. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Ivanka Trump

Hi Trillfendi ~ nice to meet you ~ I just thought you would like to know there is a survey going on here Ivanka Trump Parents were married ~ - buy the way I like your summaries they make me laugh ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 01:12, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

@Mitchellhobbs: I did it just as you sent this. Trillfendi (talk) 01:17, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

BLP issue

I noticed you added a birth name to a BLP article on Eva Angelina, but the only source you cited was a third-party records site that does not link the birth name to the article subject's name. That's technically WP:OR, but the more important issue is that it goes against our fundamental policy on biographies of living persons, particularly WP:BLPPRIVACY. I've reverted the addition as a BLP violation. If you can show that information is widely published in reliable sources, feel free to add that information back in with those sources cited. Bakazaka (talk) 19:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

@Bakazaka: Anybody who knows of Eva Angelina inevitably knows her name is Nicole Clyne. Also Nicole Tyler as of recently, but I wouldn’t resort to the banned Daily Mail. Whether people like it or not (I certainly don’t) the California Birth Index is legal under California state law because birth certificate records are allowed to be publicly accessed there, to this day. There’s only one Nicole Clyne who was born in California on March 14, 1985, and there’s really no way around the facts. Other articles including Kendall Jenner and Dr. Dre have been known to use it when necessary. Trillfendi (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Then I guess you've spotted one difference between Wikipedia and a tabloid, which is that tabloids out people based on original research, and Wikipedia doesn't, as a matter of policy. Bakazaka (talk) 02:32, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
@Bakazaka: They were the ones showing a photo, which came from her Instagram account, of a certificate from the LA Fire Department that her legal name she these days is Nicole Tyler; for years it's been said she remarried which I presume amounts to the different surname but no one has really shown evidence of it. A quick google of Nicole Clyne will make her Wikipedia article pop up, which is strange given how they usually filter out that in the search box. Other languages of Wikipedia have used her full birth name for years but the closest source is in the vein of IMDb, but it's not IAFD. At any rate, she's long retired. Trillfendi (talk) 21:07, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
My comment is about your editing on Wikipedia. Those people did not edit Wikipedia. You did. Those people did not connect a birth name to a professional name on Wikipedia without reliable sourcing. You did. And your explanations that "anyone knows", the Daily Mail did it, a birth record that does not mention the subject of the article must be the same person, and "she's long retired", are not only unconvincing under policy but truly disappointing coming from someone who is often helpful in fixing the same kinds of problems when other editors make them. Bakazaka (talk) 21:55, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
@Bakazaka: I will never assume stupidity on behalf of a reader. I already said all it takes is googling Nicole Clyne for her Wikipedia page to show up, so it's blatant that thousands of people already know that when they search her name. It only makes sense to verify that. Of course a public record isn't going to predict someone's life path. I for one thought the Mail probably had it all wrong, as they usually do. She's long retired is in regards to the fact that she's held many different jobs over the years (firefighting, waitressing, Crossfit instructing, whatever) and none of them have been for any of the production companies she's expressed disdain for let alone not even using the name "Eva Angelina" in public anymore. But what do I know, I'm not a genius I just edit casually. Trillfendi (talk) 23:33, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
You know ~ Trillfendi ~ I used to watch Anjelica at the cinema and snap my fingers casually at the same time ~ I have to hand it to you ~ it takes a lot of coordination ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 23:59, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Asa Akira

You are an experienced editor who should know better to cite articles that directly supports your additions. Adding additional information not supported in the article is considered original research. Please take a look at the article talk page as several other editors have not been successful in finding an adequate source on her current personal life. Morbidthoughts (talk) 01:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

@Morbidthoughts: When you have a subject who’s career is based on the likes of anal penetration, where do you realistically think you’re gonna find ? This isn’t Ariana Grande. Billboard and E! News and Us Weekly aren’t gonna do stories on her posts. It’s not original research to mention something THEY openly write on their own public accounts no matter if people like the source or not. Here in 2019, famous people, yes including adult film stars, use social media to put information about their personal life into the world. And in rare occasions, on this website, that’s the one necessary to use if there are no better options. We have a president who actually delineates policy via tweet, I mean come on. Trillfendi (talk) 01:45, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Cite to the actual specific podcasts! Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:22, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019 at Women in Red

August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131


Check out what's happening in August at Women in Red...

Virtual events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Rosiestep (talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Andrew Garfield

Please review WP:SUBCAT, especially, "Apart from certain exceptions (i.e. non-diffusing subcategories, see below), an article should be categorised as low down in the category hierarchy as possible, without duplication in parent categories above it. In other words, a page or category should rarely be placed in both a category and a subcategory or parent category (supercategory) of that category (unless the child category is non-diffusing – see below – or eponymous)." If you feel this merits an exception, you are welcome to raise the question at the article's Talk page. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 17:40, 1 August 2019 (UTC) @Doniago: This is absolute stupidity. How is he “American of English descent” but not “English of American descent” when the only separating those two demographics is the SAME PARENT. Trillfendi (talk) 17:46, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

You may want to review your own edit. You were adding Category:English people of American descent when Garfield is currently listed under Category:English people of American-Jewish descent. Because the second category already falls under the first, there is no need to add the first. I'm not sure what you mean by your question, and would encourage you to ask at the article's Talk page if my rationale isn't clear to you. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 20:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
@Doniago: Judaism is an ethno-religion, "American" is a nationality. It's just not even remotely the same thing. Trillfendi (talk) 22:05, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
That may or may not be the case, but as a matter of categorization functionality, as I've said, by being added to the American-Jewish category Garfield does end up under the American category as well. If you feel that that's not how those categories should work in general, you should raise the question at the Talk pages for those categories. If you feel it's an issue specific to Garfield, you're welcome to discuss it at the Talk page for his article, but my opinion is that this is addressed effectively (though perhaps not as effectively as it could/should be) by WP:SUBCAT. Put another way, I understand your concerns, but I'm not sure they should trump the editing guideline. Thank you for your understanding. DonIago (talk) 02:37, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Danny Amendola/Olivia Culpo

Hi Trillfendi, I am sorry to restore the edit andyou know that Wikipedia cannot use gossip news. So could you go to Olivia Culpo's article and remove the long rant from it's gossip source. I know who restore the long rant gossip source it was User:Maxen Embry. So first go Olivia Culpo's article and remove the long rant from the personal life and adding gossip on Wikipedia is not allowed. And then talk to User:Maxen Embry to not allowed to re-add a long rant on social media. If User:Maxen Embry countines to re-add long rant tell User:Maxen Embry to face action for a possible block. This is a urgent message. Thanks for your time. 2001:569:7C07:2600:21EE:D696:C37C:1550 (talk) 03:12, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Information icon Hello, I'm CrispyCream27. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to Talk:IMG Models. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. CrispyCream27 (Talk) 05:48, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

@CrispyCream27: I do not give a single, legally aged fuck what these people think of my editing. And I mean that in the most polite way. Trillfendi (talk) 05:50, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Barbara Palvin

Hello. The only source you provided does not say that she was born in Albertirsa. Otherwise, all except Spanish Wikipedia writes that she was born in Budapest. Provided with resources. In Albertirsa, only her grandmother lives and visits many times, so she was mistaken for being born there. Some sources, which writes born in Budapest:

Stop the editorial war and accept the facts and resources. --InterCity(IC) (talk) 20:36, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

@InterCity(IC): Oh give it up! None of those are reliable sources! You have been on this trip for years, relying on your own original research and single purpose editing. So no, YOU stop the edit warring while I uphold BLP. Trillfendi (talk) 20:43, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
@Trillfendi: I'm not giving up! :) Because the false statement has no place on Wikipedia. --InterCity(IC) (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
@Trillfendi: +1 ref https://www.wmagazine.com/story/this-weeks-model-barbara-p --InterCity(IC) (talk) 08:09, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
@InterCity(IC): When a reliable source says a BLP statement that conflicts with your cognitive dissonance the you put “sources differ”. Period. Trillfendi (talk) 21:43, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Juli Briskman

On 16 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Juli Briskman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Juli Briskman, who received international coverage for flipping off President Donald Trump, went on to enter politics and win an election? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Juli Briskman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Juli Briskman), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 01:08, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Please tell me this was in jest

Because you "predicting" All I Want for Christmas Is You topping the Hot 100 is in no way unique to you, and two days ago shows you would be far from the first person to think it would. I saw people using chart metrics to predict the song going to number one this year in the US last month, and it was already ramping up two weeks ago. Final chart predictions were made as late as last week......you know, just saying. Ss112 21:20, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

@Ss112: I thought you of all people would have known that the song did—in fact—become number one today. There’s an impeachment going on and even CNN reported on this. Trillfendi (talk) 21:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
I of all people did know this. In fact, I edited the article a full 50 minutes before you with a reference [1]. I'm saying you predicting it two days ago doesn't make you special when people were predicting it seriously two weeks ago. Lmao. Ss112 21:32, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
@Ss112: Nobody said this was groundbreaking thought.... Anyone who pays even nominal attention to music saw this coming last year. I just randomly thought “this week will be the week” as I heard the song while grocery shopping. I’m not Natestradamus. Trillfendi (talk) 21:42, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Well, the way you worded it made it sound like you thought it was groundbreaking to think it two days ago... and I wasn't referring to the "psychic" part. I figured that was a joke. Besides, if one were legitimately psychic (if there even is such a thing), I could think of far more productive (and profitable) uses of their time than editing Wikipedia. If there were a legitimate psychic editing Wikipedia articles with their predictions, they'd more than likely be reverted and before long blocked for persistent addition of unsourced content... Ss112 21:46, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
@Ss112: If someone had a psychic ability—which wouldn’t be “psychic”, it would be uncanny—specifically for predicting chart data they’d fix that Billboard problem (it’s unfortunate that they got rid of the joke when they redesigned the site. What’s the fun in that?) Or maybe they’d be working at PwC. No one edits Wikipedia for productivity, rather than abject boredom. Ultimately, it’s really not that deep. I don’t even listen to Mariah Carey. I’m a Madonna kinda girl. Trillfendi (talk) 22:06, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Sanne Vloet

Hello Trillfendi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sanne Vloet, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: previous versions contain claims of significance, such as appearing on magazine covers and in magazines and appearing for multiple notable brands in fashion shows. Thank you. SoWhy 17:28, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Thank you for continuing to make Wikipedia the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season. Lightburst (talk) 23:38, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Alex Binaris for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Binaris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Binaris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 21:08, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020 at Women in Red

January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153


Happy Holidays from all of us at Women in Red, and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020!

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

Good luck

豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはTrillfendiたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 02:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:He Cong

Hello, Trillfendi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "He Cong".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Snowycats (talk) 04:33, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Donald Glover

On 28 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Donald Glover, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Stan Lee supported the viral fan campaign to allow Donald Glover to audition for the role of Peter Parker in The Amazing Spider-Man‬? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Donald Glover. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Donald Glover), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Life Is Good (song)

Hello! Your submission of Life Is Good (song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:08, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Kesewa Aboah

On 23 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kesewa Aboah, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that fashion model Kesewa Aboah is descended from British nobility? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kesewa Aboah. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kesewa Aboah), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Dr. Woo concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dr. Woo, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:McKenna Hellam

Hello, Trillfendi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "McKenna Hellam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 11:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Block-free UBX

Hi. I saw you have the block-free userbox, but if I click on the link there, I see that you've been blocked. Can you please remove the UBX? ミラP 14:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

@Miraclepine: “Stuff” happens. The question is, why do you care? Why do people concern themselves with what goes on at my own page? And what gives you the authority to tell me what to have on my own page? ⌚️ (talk) 16:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
I'm just saying, I'm not sure if the block-free UBX should be wielded by users who have been blocked before, even if it was 72 hours. ミラP 16:22, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
@Miraclepine: I don’t care enough to change it, I don’t see why you would either. There are 6 million+ articles to edit on Wikipedia and you’re here worrying about my userbox. Is this what the 49 people who watch my page (smh) do? ⌚️ (talk) 16:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Timothée Chalamet, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Hi, your deletion of his height detail, which is duly referenced with RS, is unexplained and without valid reason. Please see my edit summary and why I reverted it. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 02:52, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

@Migsmigss: Save your template messages for someone else. With quotes like This sent Mulaney into a tailspin of self-doubt and honestly, same. Finding out that Timothée Chalamet, who appears to be roughly the size of Armie Hammer's pocket square in Call Me By Your Name, is a relatively giant six-foot-tall string bean of a person rocked my world. First of all, I have no idea how to conceive of six feet. Bigger than a bread box? Not the bread I'm eating. Secondly, how tall does that make Armie Hammer?! it’s pointless. ⌚️ (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Have you actually read the entirety of the WMA magazine article? Mulaney himself confirmed from Chalamet that he's (Chalamet) 6'0", and offered an apology for the roast. I don't see any reason why you would revert said edits, and your explanations lack valid reason. If you insist on this, I will be escalating this to the disruptive editing noticeboard. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 03:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
@Migsmigss: I don’t give a fart where you “escalate” this to tbh. I’m not gonna sit by and watch gross misrepresentations placed on his article that was already getting vandalized and disrupted by “fans” every day until I asked for it’s continued protection. Just because it came from a fashion magazine’s website doesn’t mean the information from this JOKE was the truth. How could Mulaney himself confirm information of a person he has never met? The same way that editors went the extra mile to put the accurate portrayal of his name is the same way that all information on the article has to be approached. So HE said in a video “I’m 5’10”... I think”. If he doesn’t even know, how does anyone else? On top of all that, unless he is a male model (he isn’t...) or of extreme height, it doesn’t even go there! Period. ⌚️ (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi. I've actually already resolved this with Brojam who so kindly explained it. And I got it, thanks to him/her. So I didn't really wanna reply here anymore. But just wanna say your language engaging in this discussion is rather unnecessary. Hope you get a little more amiable and respectful when discussing things. That's all. Have a good day. Migsmigss (talk) 15:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
@Migsmigss: *deep sigh* I will never understand why you people come to my page with this foolishness to begin with. If it took Brojam to explain common sense to you—great. ⌚️ (talk) 15:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Because not all editors and contributors learn everything at the same time and have the same overall knowledge of Wiki's guidelines and general best practices. Obviously some have just started editing, some learning as they progress, and some are experts at it. And since you've brought up the idea of common sense—it's also common sense to observe common courtesy and respect, and watch one's language here, or am I mistaken? Thanks.Migsmigss (talk) 15:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
@Migsmigss: Yet I explained multiple times in multiple ways that his height could not be included in the article because that's not a notable trait for him, but you were hell-bent on including it just because a fashion magazine mentioned it. And did I curse at you? No. If I hurt your feelings by being blunt and forthright about it, nothing I can do about that. ⌚️ (talk) 15:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
I did not once read any well meaning explanations, just blabbering. But thanks for the effort. Migsmigss (talk) 16:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
@Migsmigss: It's not my role to coddle the "newbies". Use context clues next time. :) ⌚️ (talk) 16:37, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, would never like to be like you when I grow up here, too, so all's good.Migsmigss (talk) 16:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
@Migsmigss: You either die a hero or live long enough to get annoyed at having random people pestering your talk page on a daily basis about the most unimportant minutiae. If you care about his height so much, there's IMDb. Glad Brojam reverted it too. ⌚️ (talk) 16:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
I'm actually glad he/she did it, too, and explained it to me well, why, afterwards. Without the condescension that characterizes any miserable person. Such a great guy/girl, Brojam.Migsmigss (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
@Migsmigss: What's miserable is you thinking it was even worth inclusion to begin with when it clearly wasn't remotely a notable feature about him, which I said right here. You were going off information from a comedy routine. Wikipedia is not a fan site. I wouldn't have to "condescend" if people knew what they were doing and I certainly wouldn't have had to take it there if you didn't come hastening over here trying to correct me on something you weren't even knowledgeable on. Glad you learned something though. :) ⌚️ (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Oh, you did "condescend?" Oh. Okay. Migsmigss (talk) 17:38, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
@Migsmigss: According to you. ⌚️ (talk) 17:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
:) Migsmigss (talk) 17:57, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

3RR

This is the requisite notice that you are on verge of breaking WP:3RR at Pamela Anderson. Note that a pattern of edit-warring beyond 24 hours is also reportable.--Tenebrae (talk) 23:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

@Tenebrae: I’m aware of that. 23:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
I tend to agree with the interpretation on BLP on this one. Is there possibly another source that can be used? Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
@Hell in a Bucket: I've given at least 4. ⌚️ (talk) 16:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Naomi Chin Wing concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Naomi Chin Wing, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Hiandra Martinez concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hiandra Martinez, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Damaris Goddrie concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Damaris Goddrie, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Stella Duval concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stella Duval, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Jess Cole concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jess Cole, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Dilia Martins concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dilia Martins, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Karly Loyce concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Karly Loyce, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Saffron Vadher concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Saffron Vadher, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Charlotte Free concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Charlotte Free, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Ashley Brokaw concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ashley Brokaw, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020 at Women in Red

March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159


Happy Women's History Month from all of us at Women in Red.

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

DYK for Valeria Shashenok

On 10 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Valeria Shashenok, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a young Ukrainian photographer, Valeria Shashenok, posts satirical TikTok videos about the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Valeria Shashenok. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Valeria Shashenok), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Hook update
Your hook reached 5,300 views (441.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Daniel Jackson (fashion photographer)

Hello, Trillfendi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daniel Jackson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022 at Women in Red

Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May 2022 at Women in Red

Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 10:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your draft article, Draft:Abby Champion

Hello, Trillfendi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abby Champion".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Alisha Kramer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alisha Kramer, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alisha Kramer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

June events from Women in Red

Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Anna October

Wanted to just ping you as to this DYK nomination. Unsure if the Vogue source supports one of the hooks. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:13, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Trillfendi

Thank you for creating Tzurit Or.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start, I marked as reviewed

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Trillfendi

Thank you for creating Nancy Chemtob.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Throast. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Camille Vasquez, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Throast (talk | contribs) 19:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

As far as I'm concerned, the California Birth Index is a neutral, reliable and valuable source for people born in California prior to 1996, as it's legal in California to publish this information. It only provides general information. Trillfendi (talk) 19:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
I implore you to read WP:BLPPRIMARY, which explicitly excludes public documents to be used as verification for personal information, (and WP:BLPUNDEL for content disputes regarding BLPs). Thank you. Throast (talk | contribs) 20:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
So now you're disagreeing with an actual state's bar. Trillfendi (talk) 22:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Huh? Wikipedia has its own set of policies, you know? Throast (talk | contribs) 01:22, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Christopher McQuarrie. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:52, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Anna October

Hello! Your submission of Anna October at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 15:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Please consider this a final call/last ping to respond. It would be shame if this nomination had to be closed. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for reminding me. Trillfendi (talk) 16:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Trillfendi/Archive_3&oldid=1109800727"