User talk:Thousandtalent

Welcome!

Hi Thousandtalent! I noticed your contributions to Fluoride and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! — Rod ^talk 09:09, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fluoride

Fluoride is a very large topic. Many major applications and many fundamental chemical principles. Readers come to this article to find out facts, not speculations or future possibilities. If fluoride-based batteries are a substantial area, you are encouraged to write an article on this topic. Just go to Fluoride battery and paste in your content. --Smokefoot (talk) 14:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the suggestions. Actually, I do not know how to make new article on Wikipedia. I tried several times to make new article, but the articles were deleted. If you could make the new article for Fluoride battery, I will update it. Thousandtalent (talk) 14:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, you wrote "this fluoride battery business is hype and undue, it deludes readers". I do not agree it. Where do you think "hype", "undue" and "it deludes readers". Please explain the points. Thousandtalent (talk) 14:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you wrote "fluoride battery is specialized and hyped, this article is for normal readers seeking facts". I wrote only the facts. They are not hypes. Thousandtalent (talk) 14:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted all sentence about Fluoride battery. I think that's not polite for editors. The sentences are not hype and undue. Before delete the all sentence, you should suggest revised points in the sentences. Thousandtalent (talk) 14:45, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not reply to my comment or make the "Fluoride Battery" article on Wikipedia, I will undo your revision. Please accept the revision. Thousandtalent (talk) 14:57, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For your comments,

Fluoride is a very large topic. Many major applications and many fundamental chemical principles.

-> I agree with that.

Readers come to this article to find out facts, not speculations or future possibilities.

-> I agree with that. However, I wrote only the facts, not speculations or future possibilities. You should not delete the sentences.

If fluoride-based batteries are a substantial area, you are encouraged to write an article on this topic.

-> I agree with making the new article for fluoride-based batteries. I hope your could make it.

Anyway, I thank for your great efforts to improve Wikipedia. Thousandtalent (talk) 15:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

F-ion battery

Please edit F-ion battery.

Other comments:

try to think about how many publications appear every day on the topic of "fluoride". For this reason, fluoride really focuses on big stuff, not research.
please do not refer to people or institutions (e.g. KIT), Just facts.

--Smokefoot (talk) 16:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for creating F-ion battery! I will edit it.

By the way, I have to point out that you wrote about "Li-ion battery" using metal fluoride as active material in the article of F-ion battery. That is "Li-ion battery" and completely different from "fluoride ion battery" or "fluoride shuttle battery". Thousandtalent (talk) 16:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please do not refer to people or institutions (e.g. KIT)

=> I do not agree with that. Please see Lithium-ion battery article. There are a lot of people and organization names. That must be acceptable. Thousandtalent (talk) 16:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will remove those names for the most part. See WP:PEACOCK. But Wiki articles do usually mention Nobel Prize winners and discoverers of major breakthroughs.

do not refer to yourself or your friends. We call that WP:COI. Rather strict rule but most people understand that it would be bad taste to do that!
Focus on WP:SECONDARY, reviews and such.
Wikipedia has little interest in cutting edge results. WP:NOTNEWS.

--Smokefoot (talk) 20:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks and external links

Hello, seeing this I suggest you to have a look at the difference between an internal and an external link. Jaqen (talk) 16:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]