User talk:Theleekycauldron/Archive/2025/January
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Theleekycauldron. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
PSHAW
Hey leeky, could you edit this line on queuer.js to allow for template editors to move preps to queue? Thanks! – 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 22:07, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, right, thanks Hilst! Just did :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 17:45, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
WP:AE
Hello, thank you for your comment on the AE. By being specific, you showed me that there was a misunderstanding. I posted to clear it up. I couldn't get the ping to work, so I am posting here. Till next year. Tinynanorobots (talk) 15:11, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2025 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2025 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.
For the 2025 WikiCup, we've implemented several changes to the scoring system. The highest-ranking contestants will now receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are now open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants will no longer be eliminated at the end of each round.
The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2025
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RFC, Wikipedia:Notability (species) was adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
- A request for comment is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.
Technical news
- The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.
Arbitration
- Following the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: CaptainEek, Daniel, Elli, KrakatoaKatie, Liz, Primefac, ScottishFinnishRadish, Theleekycauldron, Worm That Turned.
Miscellaneous
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Sign up here to participate!
DYK for Boneghazi
On 8 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Boneghazi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one Tumblr user cursed another for stealing bones for use in curses? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Boneghazi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Boneghazi), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 7,921 views (660.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2025 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
New DYK nomination didn't work
I'm not sure what went wrong with Template:Did you know nominations/Jill Yager. SL93 (talk) 20:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- failed template substitution usually means curly brace imbalance! fixed :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 20:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. SL93 (talk) 21:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
2025 skipped by bot
Not sure if I wasn't supposed to do that, but I noticed a bot ignored 2025 and declared 2026 a year early. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Diner Lobster
On 17 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Diner Lobster, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Saturday Night Live sketch received an award from the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Diner Lobster. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Diner Lobster), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
1=Launchballer 00:02, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
|
|
Hook update | |
| Your hook reached 15,682 views (653.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2025 – nice work! |
GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
LA Wildfire edit-a-thons January 26 and February 2
| Upcoming edit-a-thons focused on the Los Angeles Wildfires | |
|---|---|
 In response to the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires, WikiLA has organized three edit-a-thons to create or improve articles about the historically, culturally, and/or architecturally significant structures that were destroyed or damaged during the fires, and the organizations and entities that stepped up to help. Please join us.
To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.
| |
JSFarman (talk) 19:55, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
2025
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
2025 opened with trumpet fanfares that first sounded OTD in 1725 (as the Main page had). Today I had a composer (trumpeter, conductor) on the main page who worked closely with another who just became GA, - small world! To celebrate: mostly flowers pics from vacation ;) - Thank you for improving article quality in January! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
PSHAW not working for moving prep 2 to queue
It is stuck at "moving to Template:Did you know/Queue/2... clearing Template:Did you know/Preparation area 2... updating prep counter..." SL93 (talk) 20:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- It just worked. SL93 (talk) 20:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- my bad! broke it this morning testing a change :) fixed now theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 20:10, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
PSHAW discussion closing signature
Hey @Theleekycauldron, in my promotion of Template:Did you know nominations/Elisheva Biernoff, the closing comment has a weird no brackets signature, which was also not the one set to my ~~~~ sig. Is this intentional, if can can you chnage it to just subst our ~~~~? Thanks in advance! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:41, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hey, Bunnypranav! I think that's inherent to the way {{DYKsubpage}} is set up, it has nothing to do with PSHAW. iirc, we don't use normal signatures because Echo interprets that as us trying to ping everyone who was involved with the nomination upon closure. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 20:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks for the clarification, and your helpful script :) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 02:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Information
Hello, I have a question that can be answered by a checkuser, I'm asking you because I found your name in the recently active checkusers list but in case you haven't got time I can ask another checksuer. I've read that a user can register and use just 1 account, if a user creates more there's a violation of the rules and the other accounts may be considered sockpuppets and, in case, blocked. So, I've noticed a certain username which is most of the time sleeping and is active solely to make a specific kind of edits in certain periods. I find this a bit strange, I think that it's possible that such a username is a sockpuppet of another account which is normally used unless when the user needs to make that specific kind of edits that he does't want to be related to his main account. My question is the following: should this be the case, is the original user doing something against the rules (so that he might deserve a check to find a relation between 2 or more accounts) or is he acting legally? Let me know your opinion please, thanks for yout time. 151.82.71.178 (talk) 12:12, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- My gut feeling would be that it really depends on what the accounts are doing, but you should probably tell this to someone who has more CU experience than I do. RoySmith, any interest? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 20:12, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- There are some legitimate reasons for creating alternate accounts. As a common example, mamy people create a second account to use on mobile or public access devices. I've got one of those myself (RoySmith-Mobile). As long as these are disclosed, they're fine. See WP:SOCKLEGIT for more examples. And for comparison, WP:ILLEGIT gives some examples of inappropriate reasons to create additional accounts. RoySmith (talk) 22:05, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you both. I don't think that account is used in good faith for causes of force majeure, or it wouldn't be used just to make 1 kind of edits. It's more likely that account is used somehow to mislead, or to circumvent something. His acting could be considered a bit suspicious in my opinion but if I were all wet an eventual check would prove he's doing nothing wrong. 151.82.74.223 (talk) 14:46, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- There are some legitimate reasons for creating alternate accounts. As a common example, mamy people create a second account to use on mobile or public access devices. I've got one of those myself (RoySmith-Mobile). As long as these are disclosed, they're fine. See WP:SOCKLEGIT for more examples. And for comparison, WP:ILLEGIT gives some examples of inappropriate reasons to create additional accounts. RoySmith (talk) 22:05, 25 January 2025 (UTC)