User talk:The Almightey Drill

Please note: To keep this page tidy and reduce risk of lag/crashing I will remove conversations which are dead for over a week. Awards will be put in an appropriate place. For reasons of transparency, all past conversations will still exist in the history, if you really need to look.

Further note for ITN awards: I appreciated these but I do not store these because the awarding is inconsistent. Sometimes I have not been awarded for the nomination, sometimes I have been awarded just for editing. I don't think that nominating something is a meritous act, possibly the only nomination where I was even a major contributor would be the sudden and shocking death of Patrick Ekeng.

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demba Ba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tianjin Teda. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Various (OK, just two)

What a fall from grace! Speaking about his article, why do I see sometimes the quotation marks being altered from their original form in articles? I suppose it's some technicality, no?

Don't they have any limits on stupidity in Cyprus? They should (and ONE MONTH AND A HALF before the market closes still)!!

Keep it up --Be Quiet AL (talk) 16:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fábio Coentrão

Hello, why do you believe that his loan move to Monaco should not be it's own sub-section?

Wshjackson(talk)

Loans

Yes I see that he had earlier loans as well but there is some gray area since those deals included percentage rights such as Rio Ave own like 20 or so % and Benefica etc. There is no need of doing a return heading if he does return and stay at RM as shown with Julian Green's page. While others such as Gerard Deulofeu, Víctor Valdés, Adnan Januzaj, etc. In most cases, loans due get their sub-section.

Wshjackson(talk)

ITN recognition for Kate Granger

On 25 July 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kate Granger, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 00:49, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doubt

Was I unpolite in any of our recent exchanges (direct or - summaries, etc - indirect)? If so, I sincerely apologize --Be Quiet AL (talk) 23:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Be Quiet AL. Not at all. You ask this quite often, which is the sign of a good moral compass. But if ever I feel insulted, I will tell that person. '''tAD''' (talk) 23:56, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That (good moral compass) may be, but also not playing with a full set of marbles :) Okeydokey, I know you will tell it like it is if I ever am a wiki-asshole to someone that does not deserve it (as in this case). Thanks! --Be Quiet AL (talk) 00:20, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, I frankly did not know about Geraldo Alves (and strangely enough, I only saw this today, no notification received that I am aware of), but I'll tell you this: if it was similar to what this manager did whilst at Real Madrid (I followed this so I know what the hey am I saying) it amounts to nothing, giving players five or ten minutes when the score was at 4-0 or higher, for example Dani Carvajal received the grand total of ZERO SECONDS during Mourinho's tenure (compare that to what "hated" (with or without quotation marks!) van Gaal did in the early 90s at Ajax, "only" won one European Cup with a squad of kids against Milan). Leaving a comment on a Portuguese web report titled "Mourinho has promoted 26 canteranos" and noting precisely what I wrote before, I was handed the following response: "You are pathetic!". Of course I am, I dared to attack one of the two demi-gods of Portugal... --Be Quiet AL (talk) 17:48, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Be Quiet AL Given the MO at Chelsea in both of his spells (and unfortunately inbetween as well!) I am fully aware that most of the players in that reference were just filling temporary gaps. Right now, there's Ruben Loftus-Cheek, but to stake a claim into Chelsea's attacking midfield is a monumental task if they can buy any player who is better than you '''tAD''' (talk) 18:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Be Quiet AL, well LvG did build another team with an Oranje spine to it - his turn-of-the-millennium Barcelona '''tAD''' (talk) 19:11, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, nobody's perfect is the lesson here... --Be Quiet AL (talk) 20:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What the fuck (http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Carles_Gil&diff=next&oldid=730692106)?! Hate edit (regarding soccer of course, there are far worse out there) if I ever saw one! --Be Quiet AL (talk) 22:02, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About the reversal

Some of the guys get ticked if you remove a nice article for one that isnt as nice but has the CoD. When we do that, we state that the CoD can be found at such and such link. To check that go to history and look at the remark section. You will find:

16:39, 29 July 2016‎ Sunnydoo (talk | contribs)‎ . . (133,190 bytes) (+6)‎ . . (→‎29: type of cancer for Barrie from http://www.southwales-eveningpost.co.uk/ken-barrie-the-postman-pat-8217-s-voice-has-died-aged-83/story-29565499-detail/story.html) (undo)

Just a heads up as some dont like to be reverted either ;p. Cheers. Sunnydoo (talk) 21:06, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One other thing is that you can put the person in question...in this case Barrie along with Liver Cancer into your news search engine just to check it out. There are a couple more out there now that say the same thing. So if you want to check out for veracity sake, you can do it that way also. Keeps everything on the old up and up.Sunnydoo (talk) 21:11, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2014 ISL Final Update

Hey mate, added the section and some other stuff. Cheers. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 07:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tom Mendelsohn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Mendelsohn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Mendelsohn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Your recent editing history at Tom Mendelsohn shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:58, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2015 UEFA Champions League Final

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2015 UEFA Champions League Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 15:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2015 UEFA Champions League Final

The article 2015 UEFA Champions League Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2015 UEFA Champions League Final for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 18:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mr. Rice's Secret

On 10 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mr. Rice's Secret, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a reviewer from The New York Times called the film Mr. Rice's Secret "bland and ordinary", apart from a scene where children exhume their neighbour's coffin? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mr. Rice's Secret. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mr. Rice's Secret), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 11:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of 2015 UEFA Champions League Final

The article 2015 UEFA Champions League Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2015 UEFA Champions League Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Boca Jóvenes -- Boca Jóvenes (talk) 11:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Almightey Drill (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit that what I did was foolish and childish. However, sock puppetry is worse when it is used for vote-stacking or restoring reverted content, and I did none of that. The sock was not voting the same way as me. I was blocked for having other unrelated accounts on my IP address. However my behaviour before had been inappropriate and I will take more care to stop edit warring and swearingin summaries. I will also accept a ban on creating BLPs tAD (talk) 23:11, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This isn't the first time you've been caught using multiple accounts. Nor is it the first time you've been caught violating WP:BLP. After reviewing your edits, I think Wikipedia is far better off without your contributions here. Yamla (talk) 13:36, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla You haven't reviewed my edits at all. The first SP was collateral, there isn't a casepage. The second, I was not using socks to bolster my opinion, they were not connected. As for the BLP block two years ago, that was an arbitrary decision by one editor who received a lot of flak for it. "Far better off without me",have you even checked my edits? I demand a second opinion '''tAD''' (talk) 14:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome to a second opinion. Please request another unblock, using the unblock template. I did review your edits, by the way, including your deleted edits. --Yamla (talk) 14:50, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla Cool. Did you see how I've got two DYK, two GA and an FL since being blocked? So much for this place being "far better" without me '''tAD''' (talk) 15:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Assassination threats against Donald Trump for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Assassination threats against Donald Trump is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assassination threats against Donald Trump until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 03:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Rubin Kazan.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Rubin Kazan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Waasland-Beveren.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Waasland-Beveren.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Simpsonwave.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Simpsonwave.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The Almightey Drill. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of international goals scored by Robert Lewandowski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international goals scored by Robert Lewandowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international goals scored by Robert Lewandowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 01:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Irish Daily Mail.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Irish Daily Mail.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:26, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bonehill poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bonehill poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cuckservative for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cuckservative is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuckservative (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheDracologist (talk) 22:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Warrington Town FC badge.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Warrington Town FC badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nadia Ali (actress) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nadia Ali (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadia Ali (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Wealdstone Raider.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Wealdstone Raider.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bart's New Friend.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bart's New Friend.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Venezia F.C.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Venezia F.C.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:36, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2014 Australian counter-terrorism raids for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Australian counter-terrorism raids is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Australian counter-terrorism raids until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sport and politics (talk) 11:26, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clown porn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clown porn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clown porn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KMF (talk) 00:48, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2014 Dijon attack

The article 2014 Dijon attack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a news paper. This fails every aspect of WP:EVENTCRIT. No long-term societal impact -- the "reactions" section is synthed to include increased security from other (unrelated) attacks that occurred in the same timeframe -- and after the routine news cycle, no further analysis or indepth coverage followed. This was not a terror attack, although WP:OR tries to infer it, and WP:RECENTISM advices us to consider recent events are reported in the news, a WP:PRIMARY source by the way, differently than our encyclopedic standards. Please enforce our policies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:03, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:National Action UK logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:National Action UK logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2014 Dijon attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Dijon attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Dijon attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:51, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:1 de Dezembro.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1 de Dezembro.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Terek Grozny.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Terek Grozny.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Spartak Moscow logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Spartak Moscow logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tbilisi Zoo logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tbilisi Zoo logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:55, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ed Miliband bacon sandwich photograph for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ed Miliband bacon sandwich photograph is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Miliband bacon sandwich photograph until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jtrainor (talk) 13:55, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Will Cornick.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Will Cornick.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:54, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stewie is Enceinte.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stewie is Enceinte.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:University of Rwanda.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:University of Rwanda.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Krasnodar.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Krasnodar.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yogwi21 (talk) 05:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Lokomotiv Moscow.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Lokomotiv Moscow.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yogwi21 (talk) 06:07, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Rostov logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Rostov logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yogwi21 (talk) 06:11, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Ufa logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Ufa logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yogwi21 (talk) 06:33, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Ural Sverdlovsk Oblast.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Ural Sverdlovsk Oblast.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yogwi21 (talk) 04:37, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Roshonara Choudhry.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Roshonara Choudhry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AC Ajaccio.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AC Ajaccio.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Ascoli Picchio F.C. 1898.png

Thank you for uploading File:Ascoli Picchio F.C. 1898.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sarreguemines FC.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sarreguemines FC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:07, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Britain First New.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Britain First New.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Corpus Christi Catholic College.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Corpus Christi Catholic College.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joshua Ryne Goldberg.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Joshua Ryne Goldberg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:35, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Santos Laguna.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Santos Laguna.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Kuban Krasnodar.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Kuban Krasnodar.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 11:25, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Supertaca logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Supertaca logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Gandía has been nominated for renaming

Category:People from Gandía has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Crowsus (talk) 17:22, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CD Utrera logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CD Utrera logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Josh Alcorn" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Josh Alcorn has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 5 § Josh Alcorn until a consensus is reached. Meters (talk) 03:26, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Atletico Tetuan.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Atletico Tetuan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:07, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Widlin Calixte for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Widlin Calixte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Widlin Calixte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 20:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CD Gerena logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CD Gerena logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Daily Stormer.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Daily Stormer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reichtangle

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Reichtangle, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:52, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UD Espana logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UD Espana logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]