Jump to content

User talk:Spencer/Archive 33

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 30Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33Archive 34Archive 35Archive 40

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

Happy New Year, Spencer!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.


Administrators' newsletter – January 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).

Guideline and policy news

  1. G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
  2. R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
  3. G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.

Technical news

  • Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
  1. At least 8 characters in length
  2. Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
  3. Different from their username
User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
  • Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
  • {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
  • Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

RD: Edwin Erickson

Hi. I was just wondering how recognition worked for RD noms. Is this different from normal itn? Is there any? (I don't do it for recognition, I was just wondering...) --DannyS712 (talk) 23:39, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Permission for Rollback rights

Hi, I'm willing to get rollback rights to prevent unwanted edits. I can re-edit without rollback rights but it takes more time and I have to check properly 2-3 times. With rollback rights, it will become easier for me and thus for Wikipedia.

Shivkarandholiya12 (talk) 17:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Shivkarandholiya12, I notice that you have less than 200 mainspace edits right now, which is a little low than when Rollback is typically granted. Do you have any examples of a time when you reverted vandalism? Thanks, SpencerT•C 19:12, 14 December 2018 (UTC)


Thank you for the reply. I know that I've less than 200 mainspace edits but will surpass the mark in a couple of days. I've removed an entire heading in Veer Teja because it was not properly associated with the main topic. Till now I've mostly tried to make articles even and proper so that they look good as in the case of Dharmendra filmography, Dance Plus and many others. Surely, I don't have as many edits as needed but I regularly use Wikipedia to look for information and believe in its value to the society especially for students. I will keep on contributing to Wikipedia whether or not I get any special privileges or not.

Shivkarandholiya12 (talk) 06:46, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Great! Shivkarandholiya12, I think you have the right attitude. I think for now, it doesn't seem like you have a big need for rollback right now, but in a month, once you're a little more familiar with things, I think you would be ready. Two links that may be useful:
  • Here is now to "revert" an individual edit: WP:UNDO (once you get the hang of this, then rollback will be more helpful).
  • You'll want to provide an edit summary with your edits, so other people can see more easily what you did in each change. See this for more information: Help:Edit summary
Happy editing, and feel free to reach out if you have any questions! My apologies in advance for any slow responses. Best, SpencerT•C 07:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)


Thank you very much. I truly appreciate your helpful behaviour and guidance. Shivkarandholiya12 (talk) 07:09, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
What do you think now? I've around 600 edits and ready to take my journey to next level. Is there anything more that I've to do? Please guide me through. Shivkarandholiya12 (talk) 05:38, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Request granted. I reviewed your contributions and your reverts look good. I would encourage you to use edit summaries on your edits, including reverts. Lastly, test out rollback at WP:SANDBOX so you have an idea of how the tool works. Best, SpencerT•C 12:34, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

Administrators' newsletter – February 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).

Administrator changes

added EnterpriseyJJMC89
readded BorgQueen
removed Harro5Jenks24GraftR. Baley

Interface administrator changes

removedEnterprisey

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is currently open to reevaluate the activity requirements for administrators.
  • Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.

Technical news

  • A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2019 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2019, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2019, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

Administrators' newsletter – March 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
    • paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing.
    • checkuser-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.

Miscellaneous


A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Río de la Mina (Rio Grande, Puerto Rico) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Río de la Mina (Rio Grande, Puerto Rico) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. the eloquent peasant (talk) 11:05, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

My AIV report on Mageswift

I checked a button in error and tried to correct my report but was not quick enough. Apologies for the confusion. S0091 (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

No worries, I took a deeper look through the contribs and edit filter after I made my comment, and realized that regardless of prior block status, a block was needed. Thanks, SpencerT•C 21:59, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:North Korea parliamentary election, 2009

Template:North Korea parliamentary election, 2009 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 12:35, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

Administrators' newsletter – April 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
  • As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:55, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle
Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:44, 4 May 2019 (UTC)