Jump to content

User talk:Sathishcm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Sathishcm!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk 20:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdkb Thank you. I registered in 2007 but did not have any time to contribute till now. Retired now, and looking forward to working with you :) Sathishcm (talk) 20:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely; feel free to reach out with any questions! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Sathishcm (talk) 22:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Data

[edit]

ADD Sathishcm (talk) 02:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sathishcm. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 09:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sathishcm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I posted a detailed data set (see above) of User:Wikishovel who has published 25 Biography Pages in violation with fake user profiles, as you can see above. The administrator:girth puppet without reviewing my data, marked me as a sock puppet to someone else. No justification was provided. My crime was that I uncovered a user who has used fake data to create 100s of commercial pages. If this is the way wikipedia works, how is it trust worthy?

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I already reviewed those edits from Wikishovel (well, half a dozen of them) before I realised you were a sock. None of them were in any way concerning - it was obviously just someone doing some gnoming on the NPP feed, fixing refs and adding categories and tags. I have remove those, and your last unblock request which was merely an accusation against another editor. If you post anything like that again I will revoke your ability to edit this page. Girth Summit (blether) 13:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have again misused this talk page to post polemic about another user. I have already reviewed your evidence and find it unconvincing - there's nothing there. I have revoked your ability to edit this page. There is still WP:UTRS. Girth Summit (blether) 14:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #77898

[edit]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:12, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023 Cable Car Accident Battagram district (September 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AmericanAir88 was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at 2023 Battagram cable car incident instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AmericanAir88(talk) 07:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sathishcm&oldid=1176518525"